
Insurance Australia Group reports higher annual cash profit on premium growth, raises dividend
The company reported cash earnings of A$1.17 billion ($763.54 million) for the year ended June 30, up from A$905 million last year and slightly above Visible Alpha's consensus estimate of A$1.15 billion.
Net earned premium gained 8% to A$9.98 billion, driving insurance profit to A$1.74 billion. The company now expects to log a reported insurance profit of A$1.45 billion to A$1.65 billion for fiscal 2026.
Favorable weather conditions kept natural disaster costs well below budget, while continued premium growth and improved operations across Australian market boosted earnings.
Natural peril costs for the year came in at A$1.09 billion, about A$200 million below provision for the year. The company will be allocating A$1.32 billion towards its provision for natural perils during fiscal 2026.
IAG declared a final dividend of 19 Australian cents a share, bringing the full-year payout to 31 cents, up 15% from last year.
Henry Jennings, a senior market analyst at Marcustoday, backed the better-than-expected dividend and said it was good to see natural peril costs below allowance.
IAG said its recently announced alliances with the Royal Automobile Clubs of Queensland (RACQ) and Western Australia were expected to add about A$3 billion in gross written premium and lift insurance profit by at least A$300 million.
The insurer, in mid-May, said it would invest A$1.35 billion to buy the underwriting business and brand of the Royal Automobile Club (RAC) of Western Australia, following a similar deal with the club in Queensland.
"Some of the benefits of the RACQ and RAC alliances have yet to come through. That will push GWP (gross written premiums) to around 10%," Jennings added.
($1 = 1.5323 Australian dollars)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Russian aluminium giant Rusal swings to first-half loss as expenses surge
Aug 15 (Reuters) - Rusal ( opens new tab, reported a first-half net loss on Friday, as rising costs, higher interest expenses and foreign exchange fluctuations weighed on the Russian aluminium producer's earnings. The Hong Kong-listed company, the world's largest aluminium maker outside China, swung to a net loss of $87 million for the six-month period ended June 30, from a profit of $565 million last year. Rusal has faced sustained pressure for more than three years from the fallout of Western sanctions on Russia over the war in Ukraine. While not directly sanctioned, the company has seen some Western buyers avoid new contracts for Russian metal. Finance expenses surged by $408 million, reflecting higher interest on bank and company loans, bonds and other charges, while a foreign exchange loss added $181 million to the bottom-line hit. Cost of sales jumped about 40% to $6.11 billion, driven by increased volumes of primary aluminium sales and higher alumina and raw material prices, as well as elevated electricity and transport costs. Still, Rusal's revenue rose 32% to $7.52 billion due to higher sales of primary aluminium and alloys.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Fixing Australia's broken environmental laws must be the first step in improving productivity
We must reform Australia's broken national environment laws, as they have failed to protect the environment. Projects critical to our future prosperity are bogged down in slow, opaque, duplicative and contested environmental planning and approvals processes based on poor information, and mired in administrative complexity. Matters of national environmental significance (MNES), such as world and national heritage areas and the Great Barrier Reef, must be protected and restored. Protecting the environment while facilitating faster project decision-making demands several important changes to the existing commonwealth legal framework. First, we need regional plans, developed cooperatively with state and local governments. Second, we need stronger resourcing of the newly established Environment Information Australia to identify MNES and monitor the goal to stop and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030. Third, we need national environmental standards to provide a basis for the commonwealth to accredit state decision-making processes, permitting the streamlining of project approvals. And fourth, we need an expert, independent and trusted decision-maker in the form of a national Environment Protection Agency. There is no chance of Australia meeting stated targets for net zero, renewable energy, critical minerals development, housing and transport infrastructure without robust national laws that set clear environmental standards for major projects, along with a strong national regulator respected by all parties and significant improvements in commonwealth and state and territory environmental protection systems. Reformed laws will be critical to enhancing economic resilience and lifting flagging productivity growth, which underpins intergenerational equity and opportunity. Commercial and political vested interests are always tempted to exploit the moments of uncertainty generated by proposed reform. This has been a feature of all previous attempts to achieve reform. For some, the stakes at play in environmental law reform are high. After all, we have whole industries with business models built on the destruction of the natural world. It can be done. But it will take a lot of work over many years to put in place new architecture to protect the environment while also facilitating efficient and transparent project approvals. Reforms of the sort outlined here were recommended by Graeme Samuel's review, published five years ago. The recommendations have enjoyed bipartisan political support. They have also had the support of major business and environmental groups. But when it comes to the details of the legislation, stakeholders have invariably found themselves in deadlock. Generally, developers have favoured the fast-tracking of reforms that reduce complexity and facilitate the accreditation of state approvals systems. Environmental interests have favoured stronger protections. The deadlock must be broken. Reforms will be delivered if there is genuine cooperation and a shared purpose among the commonwealth, states and territories, businesses and environmental groups – to prioritise the interests of future generations. Ken Henry is an economist, policy adviser, former Treasury secretary and chair of the Australian Climate and Biodiversity Foundation


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Brutal cash blow for more than 10million Australians: Commonwealth Bank boss unleashes at share price bloodbath
The Commonwealth Bank 's chief executive Matt Comyn has defended its share price plunge - despite a record profit. Shares in Australia's biggest bank plunged by 3.5 per cent on Wednesday morning to $172.59 despite CBA announcing a record, full-year cash profit of $10.3billion for 2024-25. Since then, the share price has continued to bleed, sinking to $167.20 - marking a 5.6 per cent plunge in five days, wiping off more than $15billion from its market capitalisation. While more than 800,000 Australians own Commonwealth Bank shares directly, more than 10million own shares indirectly via their superannuation. 'Of course, we're conscious of share price performance … more than 10 million Australians own the Commonwealth Bank, either directly or indirectly,' he told the ABC.