logo
New Progress Report From World's Biggest Construction Project

New Progress Report From World's Biggest Construction Project

Newsweek7 days ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Further progress has been announced at Saudi Arabia's vast Neom project with the completion of an underground tunnel to connect a ski resort in the desert at the world's largest construction site.
Newsweek has reached out to the company for comment.
Why It Matters
The company's announcement signals continued progress at Saudi Arabia's Neom, despite reports of repeated budget overruns, delays, and a recent full review of project goals ordered by its new leadership.
The outdoor ski resort—set in one of the world's hottest desert countries and due to rely largely on artificial snow—embodies the scale and ambition of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's megaproject, which is designed to help prepare the kingdom for a future beyond oil.
Image combines two satellite photos of Trojena Ski resort in 2022 (left) and in2024 (right).
Image combines two satellite photos of Trojena Ski resort in 2022 (left) and in2024 (right).
Planet Labs PBC
What To Know
Trojena has completed excavation of its B3 Tunnel, with a final blast breaking through the last section of rock to connect the 680-meter (2,200 feet) tunnel linking the Lake Access Road to the Vault, the company announced on LinkedIn.
The Lake Access Road leads to the artificial lake at the center of the luxury tourist resort. Overlooking the site is the Vault, an architectural feature designed as a folded vertical village built into the mountainside.
Perched on Saudi Arabia's Jebel al Lawz at over 8,500 feet, Trojena spans nearly 870 square miles, and features 18 miles of ski slopes, a dozen hotels, retail outlets and restaurants, and a massive man-made lake holding up to 15 billion gallons of water, according to Neom.
Neom has recently appointed a new CEO in a push to fast-track flagship developments. Critics of the megaproject say that its sustainability claims amount to greenwashing—promoting an eco-friendly image while engaging in practices that harm the environment and violate human rights.
What People Are Saying
Tomasso Ciancio, Construction Director at Webuild company, posted on Linkedin: "At Trojena, where every stone moved and every meter advanced reflects months of planning and sacrifice, I'm reminded daily why we push forward. Leadership in a place like this isn't just about progress—it's about resilience, belief, and the will to finish what we started. To everyone in this journey with me: thank you for waking up every day ready to build the impossible."
Human Rights Watch in December 2024 report: "A worker who was employed as a supervisor in a NEOM project said, 'My job is to set targets for workers. Tasks must be completed within a fixed timeline, which puts undue pressure on workers.'"
What Happens Next
Saudi Arabia is racing to complete the ski resort ahead of the Asian Winter Games of 2029 which it is planning to host.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rand Paul Thinks There Are Enough GOP Senators to Block Trump Budget Bill
Rand Paul Thinks There Are Enough GOP Senators to Block Trump Budget Bill

Newsweek

time7 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Rand Paul Thinks There Are Enough GOP Senators to Block Trump Budget Bill

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Senator Rand Paul, a Kentucky Republican, said Sunday that he's confident there are enough members of his party to vote against President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful" spending bill amid concerns that it does not make enough cuts to spending. Newsweek reached out to the White House and Paul's office by email outside of normal business hours on Sunday for comment. Why It Matters Trump made the passage of a new spending bill one of his centerpiece policy goals for his second administration, aiming to wrap everything up into one single bill, the much-touted "big, beautiful bill" that will allow him to pursue his raft of policies. The bill would extend the president's 2017 tax cats, reduce taxes for individuals and corporations, and add new exemptions for tipped workers and overtime pay. Critics also warn that the bill's spending cuts would prove insufficient to pay for the proposed tax cuts and other spending priorities. However, some Republicans have voiced reservations about supporting the bill, with the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimating that it will add $3.8 trillion to the national debt over the next 10 years. The House of Representatives passed the bill by just one vote, 215-214, as two Republicans broke ranks and joined every House Democrat in opposing the bill. What To Know Paul has spoken out against the spending bill and said he will not vote to pass it due to the inclusion of a mechanism that would allow Congress to increase the nation's debt limit by $5 trillion. On Sunday, the senator appeared on CBS News' Face the Nation when host Margaret Brennan asked, "Do you have three other Republicans who will stand with you to block this bill?" Paul responded: "I think there are four of us at this point, and I would be very surprised if the bill at least is not modified in a good direction." He continued: "I want to vote for it. I'm for the tax cuts. I voted for the tax cuts before, I want the tax cuts to be permanent, but at the same time I don't want to raise the debt ceiling $5 trillion, so I've told them if you take the debt ceiling off the bill, in all likelihood I can vote for what the agreement is on the rest of the bill. And it doesn't have to be perfect to my liking, but if I vote for the $5 trillion debt, who's left in Washington that cares about the debt? The GOP will own the debt once they vote for this." The GOP senator said Trump's "big, beautiful bill" increases spending by about $320 billion for the military and for the border. "To put that perspective, that's more than all the [Department of Government Efficiency] DOGE cuts that we found so far, so the increase in spending put into this bill exceeds the DOGE cuts," he said Sunday. Paul then cited what he called inflated spending on the southern border wall, noting that the Trump administration managed to carry out its deportations without needing new spending or equipment and therefore deeming such expenditure in the bill is "asking for too much money." "In the end, the way you add it up to see if it actually is going to save money or add money is how much debt are they going to borrow—$5 trillion over two years is an enormous amount," he said. Brennan: Do you have three other Republicans who will stand with you to block this bill? Paul: I think there are four of us at this point — Acyn (@Acyn) June 1, 2025 What People Are Saying Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Sunday: "The American people, like the Great People of Kentucky, do not support Biden spending levels and $5T in new debt. Therefore, I will not. It's simple." Senator Ron Johnson, a Wisconsin Republican, wrote on X on Sunday: "The House Budget process focused on $1.5 trillion in reduced spending and ignored the looming debt crisis. I am preparing a report: FY2025 Budget Reconciliation, Facts & Figures. I hope to complete it shortly and hold a hearing on it before we take any more Senate votes on the budget." President Donald Trump on Truth Social last week: "THE ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL" has PASSED the House of Representatives! This is arguably the most significant piece of Legislation that will ever be signed in the History of our Country!" He added a message to Senate Republicans: "Now, it's time for our friends in the United States Senate to get to work, and send this Bill to my desk AS SOON AS POSSIBLE! There is no time to waste." House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, in a statement on Thursday: "Today, the House has passed generational, nation-shaping legislation that reduces spending, permanently lowers taxes for families and job creators, secures the border, unleashes American energy dominance, restores peace through strength, and makes government work more efficiently and effectively for all Americans." What Happens Next? Other GOP senators, including Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine and Josh Hawley of Missouri, have also raised concerns about the bill, and have voiced concerns ahead of a vote on the bill, which the Senate has set to happen before the Fourth of July.

Trump's Clash with Harvard Sparks Debate — This Week in Your Words
Trump's Clash with Harvard Sparks Debate — This Week in Your Words

Newsweek

time8 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Trump's Clash with Harvard Sparks Debate — This Week in Your Words

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. We're back with a fresh roundup of your highlighted comments of the week — and this time, one topic has taken center stage. President Donald Trump's ongoing clash with Harvard has ignited passionate discussions across the board. From sharp insights to thoughtful critiques, your comments have brought fresh perspectives that deepen the debate. Whether you agreed, challenged, or expanded the narrative, your voices once again brought this story to life in unexpected ways. Here are some of your highlighted comments from the past week. U.S. President Donald Trump, joined by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, speaks to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. Musk, who served as an adviser to... U.S. President Donald Trump, joined by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, speaks to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. Musk, who served as an adviser to Trump and led the Department of Government Efficiency, announced he would leave the Trump administration to refocus on his businesses. (Photo by) More Getty Images On the Latest on Donald Trump's Clash with Harvard Original Article: Donald Trump Says Harvard is 'Getting Their A** Kicked' Background: Trump and his administration have cracked down on Ivy League institutions, such as Harvard and Columbia University, since taking office in January. Original Comment: "I'm not sure what Trump is trying to prove here. It's silly to think he is just hurting Harvard, he is permanently damaging the International reputation of the US and damaging its reputation for those that want to study in the US. And for what? A couple protests and some DEI policies. Trump decided that's worth tanking 10 Billion dollars in research from arguably the best university in the US. And he's proud of it." - KevinBer702 What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter cuts straight to the heart of the broader consequences behind Trump's actions. Rather than focusing solely on the political optics, they highlight the potential damage to America's global reputation and its standing in higher education. On Plans for Trump's Administration to Revoke Visas for Chinese Students Original Article: Marco Rubio Announces New Plan to Revoke Chinese Student Visas Background: Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced a new plan on Wednesday to "aggressively revoke" student visas issued to international students from China. Original Comment: "Another court challenge that will end up as another loss for Trump. Can't single out students based on their race or national origin for blanket visa revocation, and any decision must be rooted in credible and sufficient evidence of some tangible threat to national security concerning the specific student. Nearly all Chinese students at Harvard are the very cream of the crop, and actually add significant value to US university education. National security threats are managed by our security clearance system and controlling access to secret and top secret information, not by the visa system." - Metteyya What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter challenges the policy with a clear, informed perspective, arguing that targeting students undermines both legal standards and the strength of U.S. academia. On Calls for Universities to Align with the Trump Administration Original Article: Linda McMahon Says Colleges Must Be 'In Sync' with Trump Administration Background: Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in an interview that U.S. colleges and universities should be "in sync" with the Trump administration. Original Comment: "Only in a totalitarian nation-state would any university be REQUIRED to be "in-sync" with the presidential administration. Universities by definition are autonomous regarding academic rigor and freedom; they are apolitical." - countryman_1776 What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter argues for the principle of academic independence, warning against political interference in universities. They highlight concerns that requiring alignment with the administration could undermine the core values of academic freedom and institutional autonomy. Further Reflections on Universities Aligning with the Trump Administration Original Comment: "The American university system has been the envy of the world for decades. That's due in large part to the deeply rooted tradition of academic freedom. The expectation that a university be in sync with the administration is antithetical to the idea of academic freedom." - vasant073 What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: This reader emphasizes the global reputation of the American university system, attributing its success to long-standing traditions of academic freedom. They challenge the notion that universities should conform to political agendas, reinforcing why such expectations conflict with academic ideals. On Asian Colleges Trying to Woo Harvard Students – and The Possible Fallout Original Article: Asian Colleges Aim to Woo Harvard International Students Background: As Harvard University faces looming restrictions on enrolling international students, colleges across Asia are positioning themselves to attract some of the world's brightest minds. Original Comment: "So the US has an advantage in research, medicine and AI but if you are telling potential students to go somewhere else, the money that foreign tuitions that could be used for us citizens scholarships would also disappear. This is unironically the biggest mistake you can make." - What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter points out the potential economic and academic fallout of pushing international students away. They highlight a less discussed consequence: that lost tuition could also impact scholarship support for domestic students. Thank you for sharing your thoughts and keeping the conversation alive. Your insights help us see these stories from new angles and remind us why open dialogue is so important. Keep the comments coming—we look forward to hearing more from you next week.

JPMorgan CEO Says US Economy Threatened by 'Enemy Within'
JPMorgan CEO Says US Economy Threatened by 'Enemy Within'

Newsweek

time15 hours ago

  • Newsweek

JPMorgan CEO Says US Economy Threatened by 'Enemy Within'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The CEO of JPMorgan Chase Jamie Dimon has characterized the real threats to the long-term health of the U.S. economy as internal, rather than those posed by any foreign nation. Speaking at the Reagan National Economic Forum in California on Friday, Dimon said that the "tectonic plates" of geopolitics and the global economy were shifting, and that the biggest issue underlying this was "the enemy within." "I'm not as worried about China. China is a potential adversary—they're doing a lot of things well, they have a lot of problems," he said. "But what I really worry about is us. Can we get our own act together—our own values, our own capability, our own management." Why It Matters Dimon's comments come as the U.S. grapples with the threat of a recession, and a broader deterioration of its economic outlook. In addition to weak consumer confidence and fears over inflation, the trade policies of the U.S. administration have resulted in significant market volatility and raised concerns the economy could be approaching a major downturn. Despite the 90-day tariff pause agreed between the two nations on May 12, negotiations between the two countries have not resulted in substantive progress, with recent accusations of violations further and aggressive posturing from the administration threatening to derail any potential breakthrough. What To Know Dimon defined the "enemy from within" as a broad combination of state-level economic mismanagement, regulatory gridlock, deficiencies in the schooling and health care systems, while mentioning several other difficulties, including the persistent risk of the U.S. economy slipping into a recession. While he agreed with outgoing Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffet's assessment that the U.S. and its economy remain "resilient," Dimon added: "This time is different. This time we have to get our act together and we have to do it very quickly." JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon delivers a speech during the Global Markets Conference, ahead of the Choose France summit, in Paris, on May 15, 2025. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon delivers a speech during the Global Markets Conference, ahead of the Choose France summit, in Paris, on May 15, 2025. Michel Euler/POOL/AFP via Getty Images In addition to geopolitics, and the proxy activity and nuclear proliferation of countries such as North Korea, he said another "tectonic shift" taking place was in the global economy, and America's continued ability to engage and maintain amicable economic relations with its trading partners. He said that the priority over the coming weeks and months—during the pause on reciprocal tariffs and the temporary reduction in China's rates—should be to reach in-principle agreements with "15 important" partners, without specifying the nations in question. "I would engage with China," he added. "I just got back from China last week. They're not scared, folks. This notion they're gonna come bow to America — I wouldn't count on that." Despite the truce agreed last month, negotiations between the world's two largest economies are "a bit stalled," according to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. In addition, President Trump on Friday accused Beijing of "totally" violating the terms of the 90-day pause, signaling a potential reescalation of the trade conflict. What People Are Saying JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon on Friday said: "Right now we're not a team anymore, and we don't collaborate, we don't talk that much to each other. Deal with our policy—and this is the enemy within—we've got to fix our permitting, our regulations, our immigration, our taxation." "But the most important is maintain those military alliances. Spend whatever you've got to spend to have the strongest military in the world," he added. "And I'm hoping the goal of the Trump administration is this: Keep the Western military alliances together." President Trump, via Truth Social on Friday, said: "Because of this deal, everything quickly stabilized and China got back to business as usual. Everybody was happy! That is the good news!!! The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US. So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!" What Happens Next? Trump's 90-day suspension of reciprocal tariffs is set to expire on July 8, while the China tariff pause will end in August—though both remain subject to a potential cancellation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store