Physicist Dr. Hadiyah-Nicole Green Uses Nonprofit to Raise Funds for Cancer-Killing Technology
In 2003, Dr. Hadiyah-Nicole Green graduated with a B.S. in Physics from Alabama A&M University with a plan to revolutionize the way consumers receive cable TV and internet. She had diligently prepared herself for her future career in fiber optics and optical communication, and she was excited to finally be on her way. The day after graduation, Dr. Green's aunt, who had raised her along with her two older brothers, disclosed that she had cancer.
'She told us she had 'woman's cancer,' which usually means cervical or ovarian cancer, and was only given three months to live,' Dr. Green recalled. 'She also said she'd rather die than experience the side effects of chemo or radiation treatments.' As Dr. Green nursed her aunt through the ravages of the disease, she remembers thinking, 'We have satellites in outer space that can tell whether a dime on the ground is face up or face down, but we can't treat a tumor just at the site of the tumor? That doesn't make sense.'
Three months after her aunt died, Dr. Green's uncle, her late aunt's husband, was diagnosed with esophageal cancer and given up to six months to live. Dr. Green was the primary caregiver for her uncle while he received the conventional treatments of radiation and chemo. Although with treatment, Dr. Green's help, and God's grace, her uncle lived 10 years past his original prognosis, Dr. Green saw his body bear the brunt of the treatment's brutal side effects.
'I watched him wither down to nothing after losing 150 pounds,' Dr. Green said. 'He lost all of his hair on his head, his eyebrows, and his eyelashes, and his skin looked like it had been barbequed.' Seeing her aunt and uncle suffer at the hands of cancer and cancer treatments inspired Dr. Green to dedicate her life to developing innovative and more humane ways to attack and destroy cancer. In 2005, she enrolled in the physics Ph.D. program at the University of Alabama in Birmingham (UAB) to develop this inspired cancer treatment using lasers and nanotechnology.
A cure without sufferingCancer has impacted most of us. While cancer that is detected early has a high cure rate, nearly 10 million people still die from cancer each year worldwide. Even with the best care, any of us – our family, friends, or colleagues – can be subjected to ineffective treatments, harsh side effects, lengthy treatment durations, prohibitive costs, and limited accessibility. Now, there's a better way!
Dr. Green developed a novel cancer-killing technology, Laser-Activated NanoTherapy (LANT), that is of high clinical relevance in the field of oncology. LANT directly addresses the urgent yet unmet global need for more effective treatment options for millions of people with difficult-to-treat cancers. LANT is designed as a minimally invasive, curative treatment for solid tumors that induces site-specific (not cell type-specific) cellular death and tumor regression precisely at the site of laser activation. The peer-reviewed, preclinical in vivo LANT data showed complete tumor regression with clear tumor margins and healed skin in just 15 days after a single, 10-minute treatment without surgery, chemotherapy, radiation or observed side effects. Because its mechanism of action is based on physics instead of biology, LANT is a platform therapy designed to have clinical indications for a variety of difficult-to-treat solid tumors, such as brain, pancreatic, breast, prostate, and head and neck cancers.
Dr. Green founded the Ora Lee Smith Cancer Research Foundation, a cancer nonprofit, to keep the technology she developed affordable for all. The Ora Lee Smith Cancer Research Foundation is on a mission to change the way cancer is treated and reduce cancer patient suffering by providing a treatment that is accessible, affordable and effective. Limited by funding, not technological advancements, the Ora Lee Foundation is ready to move LANT beyond the laboratory and into humans with tax-deductible donations. When you support the Ora Lee Smith Cancer Research Foundation, your donations will help ensure Dr. Green's research comes to life by helping to fund human clinical trials, taking this tech from the lab to the living.
The future of cancer researchDr. Green acknowledges that none of us are islands; we all stand on the shoulders of those who came before us. As such, she pays it forward by creating opportunities in her research laboratory and nonprofit for women and students in STEM to grow their research and personal skills. She also advises her mentees and trainees on educational, career, and life strategies.
'My advice to young women interested in pursuing research careers would be to excel in your coursework and obtain summer and work-study research experiences to help confirm or narrow your scientific interests,' Dr. Green said. 'Put your best into everything that you do, so that when opportunities come, you will be prepared. Everyone has a divine purpose for being on the planet. Channel your joy or pain and the things that make you happy or angry, into your purpose or to help you identify your purpose.'
Dr. Green says, 'I turned my pain into passion and used the loss of my loved ones to cancer to develop new ways to fight cancer. I also channeled the skills I built as the president of different organizations in college into my position as the founder of my nonprofit.' If you haven't found your purpose, Dr. Green recommends supporting something or someone you believe in, and by dedicating time and effort to something bigger than yourself, you will gain experience and skills that may be the investment needed to achieve your own success.
Explore Your Future in Healthcare – Learn More Now
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
10 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Ship's bell ‘will ring again' 100 years after Alaska shipwreck, officials say
A crew of researchers has recovered the bronze bell from a ship that sank near a remote Alaska island more than 100 years ago, officials said. The bell from the Star of Bengal, a 264-foot ship that sank in the early 1900s, is bound for the Wrangell Museum in Alaska, according to a news release included in William Urschel's May 26 Alaska Endeavour Captain's Log newsletter. Urschel is captain of the Endeavour, a research vessel used in the trip that led to the bell's recovery. During the trip, the researchers mapped the shipwreck near Coronation Island in Southeast Alaska, finding and documenting 'the hull frames and plates, four anchors, the windlass, other ship's machinery' and the bell, officials said. The bell will make a stop at Texas A&M University for conservation work before it goes to the museum in Wrangell, according to officials. The Star of Bengal was constructed in 1874 in the same Irish shipyard where the Titanic was built, officials said. The Alaska Packers Association bought the ship in 1906 to transport cannery workers, products and supplies between Wrangell and San Francisco, California, according to officials. It sank in 1908 after leaving Wrangell, officials said. More than 100 people died, largely cannery workers, many of whom were immigrants from China, according to officials. The ship was being pulled through a strait by two tugboats, but 'a combination of high winds, no communication, and mechanical failures forced the tugboats to sever the tow lines,' officials said. The ship dropped its anchor, and 'the anchor dragged and the ship was broken on the rocks' of the island, officials said. The shipwreck is the second-deadliest maritime disaster in Alaska, according to officials. Urschel wrote in his newsletter about the bell's meaning. 'There is something special about a ship's bell. It gives life to a ship. One of our party said, 'Science is important, but 100 years from now folks will connect to the Star and the cannery workers who died on it through this bell,'' he wrote. He added that, 'The men going down that night heard that bell. That bell will ring again.'
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
A tribute to Charles A. Wright, a trailblazer in Black STEM education
The Florida A&M University family lost yet another titan May 26 when Charles A. Wright, Ph.D., an engineering professor and department chair, died at the age of 82. For those unaware, Wright grew up on a farm in rural Glenwood, Georgia, during a critical time in American history when Jim Crow segregation laws were the norm across the South, a reality that created separate and unequal educational experiences for Black children who maintained an interest in higher education. The racial strictures of that era did not deter Wright from excelling academically in high school and later at Savannah State University, a storied HBCU where he graduated with a degree in civil engineering technology in 1967. As Wright would often remind his students and mentees, Black college students during his youth were often discouraged from pursuing studies in higher level mathematics and science, but his natural curiosity to understand nature and how things worked inspired him to earn a master's degree in civil and public works engineering from the then recently integrated University of Florida in 1972, and a doctoral degree in civil engineering transportation from Vanderbilt University in 1991. Wright keenly understood the need to pass his vast reservoir of knowledge about science and mathematics to succeeding generations, a passion that propelled many of his pupils to pursue advance degrees in science, technology, and mathematics long before the STEM acronym became a buzzword in academia in the 1980's. In furtherance of his passion, in 1979, Wright was named the senior lecturer at Egerton Agricultural College in Njoro, Kenya, and he spent the next several years teaching future civil engineers on its campus. Upon returning to the United States in 1982, Wright was hired by then Florida A&M University President Walter Smith to teach civil engineering, a position that saw him eventually rise to the rank of professor emeritus upon his retirement from teaching in civil engineering at the FAMU-FSU College of Engineering. While providing his students rigorous instruction, Wright found time to author or co-author over 50 peer-reviewed journal articles and books about civil engineering, technology, and safety assessments. In 2011, cognizant that per the National Science Foundation, Black people represented only 7% of the STEM workforce nationwide, Wright was hired to serve as the inaugural executive director for the James E. Clyburn University Transportation Center (JECUTC) at South Carolina State University, another storied public HBCU located in Orangeburg. Under his leadership, the transportation center became a key hub for studying and advancing transportation needs ranging from regional transit to transcontinental travel. While Wright's professional accomplishments will be remembered for ages to come, he leaves to mourn his passing his wife of 58 years, Barbara Wright, three children, five grandchildren, numerous godchildren, and thousands of former students across the globe who owe a debt of gratitude for his wise tutelage. In fact, his professional zeal was only matched by his civic engagements through his beloved Omega Psi Phi Fraternity, Inc., the Tallahassee Chapter of 100 Black Men of America, Inc., and historic Bethel Missionary Baptist Church, where he served as a Sunday School teacher and deacon until his untimely illness and passing from Earthly labor to Heavenly reward. And as one of his many godsons, I can personally attest that his loss is one that cannot be easily assuaged, but we all can rest assured that the City of Tallahassee - and the world - are all for the better because he lived and pursued the FAMU motto, "Excellence with Caring," in words and deeds. Chuck Hobbs is a past winner of the Florida Bar Media Award, a two-time Pulitzer Prize nominee, and historian residing in Tallahassee. Reach him via chuckhobbs@ (Viewing for Charles A. Wright will be noon to 5 p.m. June 6 at Strong & Jones Chapel followed by a wake service at 5 p.m. His funeral service is 11 a.m. June 7th at Bethel Missionary Baptist Church.) JOIN THE CONVERSATION Send letters to the editor (up to 200 words) or Your Turn columns (about 500 words) to letters@ Please include your address for verification purposes only, and if you send a Your Turn, also include a photo and 1-2 line bio of yourself. You can also submit anonymous Zing!s at Submissions are published on a space-available basis. All submissions may be edited for content, clarity and length, and may also be published by any part of the USA TODAY NETWORK. This article originally appeared on Tallahassee Democrat: Charles Wright was an early advocate of Black STEM education | Opinion
Scientific American
5 days ago
- Scientific American
Inside the Collapse of the America's Overdose Prevention Program
At an addiction conference in Nashville, Tenn., in late April, U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., spoke about his own experience with drug use. 'Addiction is a source of misery. It's also a symptom of misery,' he said. Kennedy's very personal speech, however, ignored recent federal budget cuts and staffing reductions that could undo national drug programs' recent progress in reversing overdoses and treating substance use. Several experts in the crowd, including Caleb Banta-Green, a research professor at the University of Washington, who studies addiction, furiously spoke up during Kennedy's speech. Banta-Green interrupted, shouting 'Believe science!' before being removed from the venue. (The Department of Health and Human Services did not respond to a request for comment for this article.) 'I had to stand up and say something,' says Banta-Green, who has spent his career working with people who use drugs and was a senior science adviser at the Office of National Drug Control Policy during the Obama administration. 'The general public needs to understand what is being dismantled and the very real impact it's going to have on them and their loved ones.' On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. The Trump administration has defunded public health programs and made plans to consolidate or eliminate the systems that track their outcomes, making it difficult to monitor the deadly consequences of substance use, Banta-Green says. For instance, staff cuts to the Overdose Data to Action program and the Opioid Overdose Prevention and Surveillance program will hamper former tracking efforts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and at local and state health departments' prevention programs. A recently fired policy analyst at the overdose prevention division at the CDC's National Center for Injury Prevention and Control— who wishes to remain anonymous, citing fear of retaliation—tells Scientific American that she used to provide policy support to teams at health departments in 49 states and shared public overdose data and information to Congress. She is a veteran who should have had protected employment status, but she lost her job during federal cuts in February. 'No one else is doing surveillance and data collection and prevention like the CDC was,' she says. 'There's so much that's been cut.' (When approached for an interview by Scientific American, a CDC spokesperson said, 'Honestly, the new administration has changed how things normally work' and did not make anyone available for questions.) What Gets Measured Gets Managed Provisional data suggest that deaths from drug use declined by almost 25 percent in 2024, though overdoses remain the leading cause of death for Americans aged 18 to 44. Cuts to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health will make it difficult to measure similar statistics in the future. Because substance use is highly stigmatized, Banta-Green says it's important to have diverse, localized and timely data from multiple agencies to accurately capture the need for services—and the ways they're actually used. 'You can't design public health or policy responses if you don't know the scale of the need,' he says. Overdose trends vary by region—for example, usage of the synthetic opioid fentanyl appeared earlier on the East Coast than the West—so national averages can obscure critical local patterns. These regional differences can offer important insights into which interventions might be working, Banta-Green says. For instance, important medications such as naloxone rapidly reverse opioid overdoses in emergency situations. But getting people onto long-term medications, including methadone and buprenorphine, which reduce cravings and withdrawal symptoms, can more effectively prevent mortality in both the short and long term. Declining deaths may also mask tragic underlying dynamics. Successful interventions may not be the only cause of a drop in overdoses; it could also be that the people who are most vulnerable to overdose have recently perished and that there are simply fewer remaining at risk. 'It's like a forest fire burning itself out,' Banta-Green says. This underscores the need for the large-scale data collection threatened by the proposed budget and staff cuts at the CDC and National Institutes of Health, says Regina LaBelle, an addiction policy expert at Georgetown University. 'What [the administration is] doing is shortsighted' and doesn't appear to be based 'on the effectiveness or the outcomes of the programs that [it's] cutting,' she says. For example, despite promising to expand naloxone access, the Trump administration's latest budget proposal cuts funding for a critical program that distributes the lifesaving medication to first aid responders. 'A Chance at Redemption' When LaBelle was acting director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy during the Biden administration, she led efforts to expand evidence-based programs that provided clean syringes and tested users' drugs for harmful substances. These strategies are often referred to as 'harm reduction,' which LaBelle describes as 'a way you can meet people where they are and give them the services they need to keep them from dying.' José Martínez, a substance use counselor based in Buffalo, N.Y., says harm-reduction practices helped save his life. When Martínez got his first job as a peer advocate for people using drugs, he was still in a chaotic part of his own addiction and had been sleeping on the street and the subway—and regularly getting into fights—for a decade. The day after he was hired to help provide counseling on hepatitis C, he got into a New York City shelter. As his bruises healed, he learned life skills he was never taught at home. 'For a lot of people, drug use is a coping tool,' he says. 'The drug is rarely the problem. Drug use is really a symptom.' Working with others who understood that many people need help minimizing risks gave Martínez a chance to make progress toward recovery in a way that he says abstinence-only treatment programs couldn't. 'I don't agree that somebody should be sober in order for them to do things different,' he says. Over the past six years working for the National Harm Reduction Coalition, Martínez started a national support network for other peer program workers and community members—people who share their experiences and are a trusted source of education and support for others using drugs. 'There's never no time limit,' he says. 'Everybody works on their own pace.' Though Martínez's program doesn't take federal funding, the Trump administration is cutting similar kinds of peer programs. Martínez says doing this peer work gives many users a sense of purpose and stability—and helps them avoid previous behaviors. The proposed 2026 federal budget will slash the CDC's opioid surveillance programs by $30 million. It also creates a new subdivision called the Administration for a Healthy America that will consolidate the agency's prevention work, along with existing programs at the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Agency (SAMHSA), which often coordinates grants for treatment programs. The programs formerly conducted through SAMHSA are also facing cuts of more than $1 billion. Advocates fear this will include a shift toward funding abstinence-only priorities, which, Martínez says, 'will definitely mean that we're going to have more overdoses.' (Some research suggests abstinence-based treatment actually puts people at a higher risk of fatal overdose than those who receive no treatment at all.) 'The general public needs to understand what is being dismantled and the very real impact it's going to have on them and their loved ones.' —Caleb Banta-Green, addiction research professor These cuts could disproportionately affect communities already facing higher overdose rates: Martínez, who is Puerto Rican, notes that U.S. Black, Latino and Indigenous communities have experienced drug overdose death increases in recent years. In many states, overdose deaths in Black and brown communities remain high while white overdose death rates are declining. Looming cuts to Medicaid programs, LaBelle warns, are likely to worsen inequalities in health care access, which tends to make communities of color more vulnerable. In Kentucky, where Governor Andy Beshear recently celebrated a 30 percent decline in overdose deaths, Shreeta Waldon, executive director of the Kentucky Harm Reduction Coalition, says the reality is more nuanced. While national overdose deaths declined in white populations from 2021 to 2023, for example, they continued to rise among people of color. Black and Latino communities often face barriers when accessing health services, many of which have been shaped by predominantly white institutions. Waldon says it's essential for people from diverse backgrounds to participate in policy decisions and necessary to ensure that opioid abatement funds —legal funds used toward treatment and prevention—are distributed fairly. Without adequate federal funding, Waldon predicts treatment programs in Kentucky will become backlogged—potentially pushing more people into crisis situations that lead to emergency services or incarceration rather than to recovery. These financial and political pressures are not only making it harder to find support for people in crisis; they also reduce opportunities to discuss community needs. Waldon says she knows some social workers who now avoid terms such as 'Black woman' or 'marginalized' in grants and public talks out of fear of losing funding. But people currently needing treatment for substance-use disorder are not necessarily aware of the federal funding news—or 'what's about to hit them when they try to go get treatment and they're hit with barriers,' Waldon says. 'That's way more important to me than trying to tailor the way I talk.' Funding and staffing cuts don't just limit resources for the people most in need. They limit the ability to understand where someone is coming from, which undermines efforts to provide meaningful care, Martínez says. Harm reduction is more than the services and physical tools given to community members, he says. It's about the approach. 'When you look at a whole person, you plant the seed of health and dignity,' he says. 'If everybody deserves a chance at redemption, then we've got to rethink how we're approaching things.'
