Decatur votes against allowing a new type of gambling device
WCIA talked to someone who helps treat problem gamblers to see what these machines are… Anita Pindiur from the group Way Back Inn.
'They're video gaming terminals that don't have a payout potential, though they are mainly used as entertainment,' Pindiur said.
PREVIOUSLY: Decatur looking to end sweepstake kiosks, regulate massage parlors
They're also known as sweepstakes kiosks. But — a Decatur city official said they're not always free.
'They say that they're a free play, so you don't actually have to put any money in. But we've found through investigation that you do end up having to put money in to end up getting any sort of prize,' Decatur Communications Coordinator Ryan Huffer said.
Huffer said the ban received community support
'The community has been pretty vocal about not wanting more video gaming in the city,' Huffer added.
And Pinduir said they can be a gateway to worse outcomes for people who play.
Decatur Public Library introduces Illinois Underground Railroad exhibit
'Often depending on how they are, they're kind of their first beginning. So, we know as persons who are at high risk might engage in them and then kind of feel very motivated to start on gambling for more money,' Pinduir said.
City officials said the council had a reason for doing this now.
'Some businesses have been approached here about having them located in the City of Decatur, so we wanted to get ahead of that,' Huffer said.
And it's part of a bigger push from the community against gambling as a whole. The city did a survey asking people their thoughts on the amount of gambling in Decatur.
'Surveys are what they are. But we did get a pretty overwhelming response from the community that there [is] too much gambling,' Huffer said.
Macon Co. Sheriff's Office warns of call scams
So, he said the council will remain strong on this issue.
'We're just trying to get ahead of it at all times. And again, we've heard from the community that they don't want more video gaming. And the council is also behind that, that reducing the number of video gaming machines is a goal of ours,' Huffer said.
If you or anyone you know is struggling with a gambling addiction Anita Pindiur said there are many resources out there to help. One of those is 1-800-GAMBLER — a phone line where you can get help 24/7.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
City council wants public hearing to consider impeachment of Mayor Weddle
What began as an effort to formally charge London Mayor Randall Weddle with misconduct devolved into a heated and inconclusive City Council meeting — with the legality of the vote and whether the resolution will move forward remaining unclear. The resolution, presented during the council's Monday meeting, alleged multiple violations by Weddle. The discussed resolution proposed holding a public hearing on August 20 to consider removing the mayor from office for misconduct and willful neglect. Council Member Anthony Ortega moved to amend the regular meeting's agenda to include the proposal, which was read aloud by Acting City Clerk Ashley Taylor and ultimately approved. The charges against Weddle include the following allegations: — Hired and paid individuals for city positions not formally established or approved by the City Council, violating KRS 83A.0703 — Removed and appointed members of the London Housing Authority in violation of KRS 80.090 and KRS 80.030 — Directed Housing Authority staff to ignore laws and regulations, misused police resources and made inappropriate remarks during city business — Created a personal police protection detail using city resources — Falsely asserted city jurisdiction over FEMA contractors working outside city limits — Failed to meet city residency requirements — Used a personal media outlet to target a city employee — Refused to hold regular council meetings without the consent of a majority of council members — Altered and rejected city contracts without notifying the legislative body — Improperly released a recorded call between a crime victim and a city police officer. Council Member Stacy Benge moved to table the resolution, but it failed to receive a second. Council Member Kelly Greene then moved to vote, seconded by Justin Young. The motion passed with all voting in favor except Benge. However, the legality of the vote immediately came into question. Mayor Weddle argued that approval of the full council was required, not just a majority. City Council Attorney Conrad Cessna disagreed, stating that the higher threshold applied only at the hearing stage. City Attorney Larry Bryson maintained that a majority of the full council was required to adopt the resolution. As tensions escalated, TJ Roberts introduced himself as outside legal counsel retained by the council, but was met with loud boos from the crowd. The mayor, pointing out that no public motion had been made to hire Roberts, told him to sit down. Roberts obliged. Mayor Weddle then accused the council of skipping due process. 'Let's get this on the record — every accusation that you guys have made, you have a due diligence, according to KRS, to start an investigation exploratory subcommittee. How come that has not been done on any of this?' he asked. 'You have not done it — and you know why you've not done it.' Council Member Judd Weaver then moved to hire attorney Chris Wiest. That motion passed. 'Another attorney for the city folk to have to pay, but you [couldn't] care less about the roads,' Weddle commented. Later, Weaver made a motion for a point of clarification on whether the resolution had passed. Bryson recommended waiting for legal review before proceeding, and Roberts' second attempt to speak was again drowned out by booing from the crowd. Carmine G. Iaccarino, attorney for Mayor Weddle, then addressed the council, stating, 'I think that Mr. Bryson's recommendation is very well advised. In order to ensure due process, and that the Kentucky Revised Statutes are in fact followed, in such an important situation as the removal and nullification of the vote of the people of London.' Weaver asked Iaccarino whether the resolution required six votes. Iaccarino deferred, replying, 'My recommendation is to follow Mr. Bryson's recommendation.' Weaver then asked for the determination of the chair, Mayor Weddle, to which the mayor replied, 'I think we're taking the recommendation of the city attorney.' Weaver moved to appeal the decision, which was seconded by Greene, but no vote or discussion followed. Weddle would go on to adjourn the meeting himself, stating, 'The chair has the ability to adjourn a meeting. We're getting nowhere. The chair is adjourning the meeting. The meeting is adjourned.' With that, the mayor and council members dispersed, and the status of the resolution remained unresolved as of press time Tuesday. Should the public hearing move forward, discussion indicated that it would be a special meeting set for August 20 at 9 a.m. That meeting was confirmed Tuesday by Roberts and Cessna, though Cessna acknowledged there had been no further discussion of a legal review. Attempts to contact Bryson for confirmation were unsuccessful as of press time. In preliminary research, The Sentinel-Echo found no specific reference to scheduling a hearing but did find the following clause as part of KRS 83A.040 in regard to removal of city officials: 'Except in cities of the first class, any elected officer, in case of misconduct, incapacity, or willful neglect in the performance of the duties of his or her office, may be removed from office by a unanimous vote of the members of the legislative body exclusive of any member to be removed, who shall not vote in the deliberation of his or her removal. No elected officer shall be removed without having been given the right to a full public hearing. The officer, if removed, shall have the right to appeal to the Circuit Court of the county and the appeal shall be on the record. No officer so removed shall be eligible to fill the office vacated before the expiration of the term to which originally elected.' Solve the daily Crossword
CBS News
a day ago
- CBS News
Grand Prairie council censures Mike Del Bosque following assault allegation
After hearing from 60-year-old Austin real estate broker David Collantes, Grand Prairie council members voted Tuesday night to censure councilman Mike Del Bosque. "I think it was the right vote," David Collantes said. "Someone with that kind of temper should not be running for public office." Last April, Collantes reported he was attacked by Del Bosque while he was looking at a property the councilman owns. He says the building was being turned over to another owner after a default judgment, but Del Bosque didn't want him showing the property. "I just was fighting for my life, literally," he said. Surveillance video obtained exclusively by CBS News Texas shows the councilman taking Collantes to the ground, smashing his cell phone, and trying to grab his wallet. The encounter led to his arrest for misdemeanor assault and criminal mischief. After Tuesday's vote, he had this to say: "I'm man enough to do what needs to be done and I took accountability, and I did apologize, but again, we're not going to get in the depth of this because this case is still in litigation," Del Bosque said. "He's doing it to save his own skin," Collantes said. "If he really was truly remorseful, he would've contacted me four months ago. I expected a little bit more, maybe some of the City Council members saying this behavior should not have been tolerated." Del Bosque's attorney has said this video doesn't tell the full story. "David Collantes entered our client's private property," Phillip Linder said. "The back door was in a private office. The female staff felt threatened and when asked to leave he used expletives." But Collantes says that's not true and believes this video speaks for itself. "I never entered his business in the back door," he said. "I plan to continue to follow this and I'm not going to give it up. I will continue to press forward and make sure that justice is served." The Dallas County District Attorney's office says the case will be prosecuted like any other.
Los Angeles Times
a day ago
- Los Angeles Times
L.A. agrees to pay $500,000 to reporters arrested at 2021 Echo Park protest
The city of Los Angeles has tentatively agreed to pay $500,000 to two Knock LA journalists who claim their constitutional rights were violated when police arrested them while covering a protest four years ago in Echo Park. Without admitting wrongdoing, the city agreed Monday to settle a lawsuit brought by the reporters, averting a federal civil trial just before jury selection was set to begin. The payout, which still needs approval from the City Council, would cover damages and attorney fees. Kate McFarlane, an attorney who argued the lawsuit on the pair's behalf, said the outcome felt somewhat hollow. The Los Angeles Police Department's treatment of journalists covering recent protests against the Trump administration shows that the department's culture has not changed despite the litigation, she said. 'We've been seeing journalists in the last few weeks being attacked by LAPD, either by less-lethal weapons or other weapons that LAPD uses to suppress their First Amendment rights to report,' McFarlane said. An LAPD spokesperson declined to comment. The Los Angeles City Attorney's office did not respond to questions. Another recent lawsuit filed by several news media advocacy groups after dozens were injured by police actions during protests in June led to a court order that bars officers from targeting reporters with hard foam projectiles and other crowd-control munitions. The Knock LA case stems from the evening of March 25, 2021. Jonathan Peltz and Kathleen Gallagher, both working for the online news nonprofit organization, were reporting on the removal of a homeless encampment from the banks of Echo Park Lake. Despite 'clearly identifying' themselves as reporters and being among other journalists 'engaged in similar conduct,' Peltz or Gallagher said in their lawsuit that they were arrested and booked after the LAPD declared an unlawful assembly. Under state law, journalists are generally allowed to cover police activity even after members of the public have been ordered to disperse. Among those detained were Times reporter James Queally, Spectrum News reporter Kate Cagle and L.A. Taco reporter Lexis-Olivier Ray. Unlike the two Knock LA journalists, they were were all released at the scene. Police, however, bound Peltz and Gallagher by the wrists with plastic zip ties. They also searched the pair and their phones, and confiscated their other belongings before placing them on buses with dozens of other arrested protesters. Both remained in custody for more than four hours. Peltz, the lawsuit claims, was later taken to the hospital, where medical staff said swelling in his arms and hands was the result of a pinched nerve from being held in the zip ties for so long. None of the more than 180 people arrested that night were charged. Attorneys for the two journalists argued that their arrests fit a pattern of LAPD officers 'obstructing, targeting, and retaliating against' journalists reporting on their actions — particularly those from smaller, nontraditional media outlets —dating to the 2000 Democratic National Convention. In a text thread disclosed during the litigation, then-LAPD Chief Michel Moore messaged some of his senior staff members on the night of the Echo Park protest, asking about Queally's detainment. Moore said he had been texted by another Times reporter asking for an explanation. The thread included former assistant Chiefs Daniel Randolph and Beatrice Girmala as well as deputy Chief Donald Graham, the incident commander that night. Moore wrote: 'Queally posted that he is being arrested. I've asked [the public information officer] to support and assist in any way possible. If Queally is in custody it will garner significant attention due to his status with the LAT.' Graham responded that he would send a spokesperson to the scene to 'to identify Queally.' Moore responded that he '[w]ould recommend you hold transports until figured out.' The LAPD later released an after-action report that acknowledged some missteps in dealing with members of the news media, but also defended the police response that night, arguing that officers felt threatened and arrests became necessary. The department said it stepped up its outreach to local media organizations and provided additional training for new sergeants and detectives for identifying journalists at mass demonstrations. McFarlane, the attorney for the Knock LA reporters, said their case was less about who the LAPD sees as a member of the media and more as a reflection of the department's ongoing efforts to thwart scrutiny. 'The broader theme is that it's clear that the LAPD is trying to hide their actions, especially when we know their actions are unlawful,' she said.
