logo
Extreme step: Noted lawyer-activist who fought against shooting stray dogs in Goa weighs in on Supreme Court order

Extreme step: Noted lawyer-activist who fought against shooting stray dogs in Goa weighs in on Supreme Court order

Noted animal rights activist and environmental lawyer Norma Alvares said the Supreme Court's directions to authorities in Delhi to pick up stray dogs and move them to shelters, and further to ensure that no dogs are taken out from shelters, 'directly contradict the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, which mandate that after sterilisation, the stray dogs should be returned to the places they were picked up from'.
Alvares, founder of the People For Animals–Goa (PFA Goa) NGO and founding trustee of the Federation of Indian Animal Protection Organisations (FIAPO), also argued that the ABC Rules are required to be implemented.
'I do not know what the situation in Delhi was to warrant such drastic action without first considering the validity of the ABC Rules. These rules have been in force for several years. I, however, agree that children, and people in general, should feel safe on the roads and out in public. Young children should learn how to avoid conflict with strays in public places,' she said.
Alvares has been advocating for animal rights for decades and was instrumental in obtaining judicial orders that led to a ban on bullfighting in Goa and in stopping the practice of shooting stray dogs in the coastal state.
PFA Goa had filed a petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa in 1996, contending that bullfights (dhirios) were occurring illegally in Goa in contravention to the provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, following which bullfights were banned in the state by the High Court. The PFA Goa also opposed the 'barbaric' practice of shooting stray dogs in Goa, which was disallowed by the High Court in 1999.
Alvares, who was awarded Padma Shri for social work in 2002, said, 'There could be a need for a kind of government shelter for housing what we would term 'difficult' dogs…who bite constantly or attack people. But, it is an extreme step to say that every single dog should be taken off the streets from any particular place. Most strays are pretty harmless on the streets, especially once they are sterilised. The crucial thing is that the sterilisation programme is not effective enough because not enough money is being allocated…to rapidly do a large number of sterilisations and bring the situation under control.'
'There has to be a committee to look at these issues. Sometimes, there are very old dogs who cannot manage on the streets, and they should be moved to shelters where they can be taken care of. But, these often are only temporary measures to break the sort of (pattern of) aggressiveness that some dogs display,' Alvares said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Online gaming will be regulated based on panel report: Home Minister
Online gaming will be regulated based on panel report: Home Minister

The Hindu

time36 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Online gaming will be regulated based on panel report: Home Minister

The government will take action on regulating online gaming based on the recommendations of a committee headed by IPS officer Pranab Mohanty. The committee, which was set up in April 2025, is expected to submit its report in September, Home Minister G. Parameshwara informed the Legislative Assembly on Tuesday. In a reply to S. Suresh Kumar (BJP) during question hour, Dr. Parameshwara said he held a meeting with online gaming companies and sought their cooperation for regulating the sector, as youth have been getting addicted to online games. Legal battles In 2021, the previous BJP government amended the Karnataka Police Act to prohibit online games. This was struck down by the High Court in 2022. The government has challenged this before the Supreme Court. The Home Minister said comprehensive amendments were challenged by the All India Gaming Federation. Online betting cases registered in Karnataka Year No. of cases 1 2023 84 2 2024 104 3 2025 (till July 31) 159 Dr. Parameshwara said a total of 347 cases have been registered for online betting in the State since 2023. A total of 84 cases have been registered in 2023, 104 in 2024, and 159 as of July 31, 2025. Mr. Kumar said the government has not been doing enough in the Supreme Court since the matter has been pending before the court for three years. Noting that online gaming companies were aggressively enticing people, the BJP member said sportspersons like Harbhajan Singh have endorsed games. Senior member C.N. Ashwath Narayan (BJP) criticised the government for allowing betting on online games. Big business IT/BT Minister Priyank Kharge said that even fantasy sports were put under the 'skill game' category by the court. He stressed that both the Union and State governments must come together to frame a law. Mr. Kharge said the online gaming business will go from $4.5 billion to $9 billion in three years. There are 519 million gamers in India. Of them, 140 million are paid gamers.

SC on stray dogs: What the order says, how big is the menace, and other points, explained
SC on stray dogs: What the order says, how big is the menace, and other points, explained

Mint

time36 minutes ago

  • Mint

SC on stray dogs: What the order says, how big is the menace, and other points, explained

The Supreme Court on August 11 directed municipal authorities to pick up and house all stray dogs in Delhi and parts of the National Capital Region (NCR) in dedicated shelters within eight weeks. The directions were given in a case the top court took up suo motu on July 28 after what it said was a 'very disturbing and alarming' newspaper report about the death of a six-year-old girl due to rabies. 'Infants and young children, at any cost, should not fall prey to rabies…The action should inspire confidence that they [children] can move freely without fear of being bitten by stray dogs,' Justice JB Pardiwala said. For good measure, he warned that 'If any individual or organisation comes in the way of picking up stray dogs or rounding them up, we will proceed to take action'. While the apex court directives have kicked up a huge row, there is clearly the need for a middle ground. India has one of the highest numbers of stray dogs in the world, but equally, stray dog control has become a lightning rod civic issue in Delhi and other Indian cities. While some residents see the dogs as a menace, others consider them to be family. Many dogs are fed daily by community feeders who provide food, water and veterinary care. Here, we do a deep dive into a subject where animal activists and the victims of dog bites are nearly evenly matched. The ruling, one of the strongest in the nation's long-running struggle with its street dog population, directs civic authorities to capture all strays, sterilise and vaccinate them and relocate them to newly built shelters. The court gave authorities eight weeks to create the facilities and install CCTV monitoring to ensure no animals are released back onto the streets. India does have the highest number of rabies cases globally. It is estimated that India accounts for approximately 36% of global rabies deaths. Dog bites are the primary cause of rabies transmission in India, accounting for about 96% of cases, according to the National Centre for Disease Control. Between January and June this year, Delhi reported 35,198 animal bite incidents and 49 rabies cases, municipal data revealed. The last dog census, in 2012, put Delhi's stray population at 60,000 and the figure now is estimated to be closer to 1 million. Dog packs roam out in the open in colonies and on streets, and attacks on children and elderly people often make news headlines. The number of strays may vary. Constructing dog shelters in the NCR will involve significant costs, including land acquisition, construction, staffing, and ongoing operational expenses. While a precise cost estimate is difficult without specific details, the scale of the problem (millions of stray dogs) and the requirements for adequate facilities (sterilisation, vaccination, housing, etc.) suggest a multi-million-dollar investment is likely needed. The Delhi government and local municipal bodies would need to allocate significant funds for shelter construction and operation. In addition, animal welfare organisations often rely on private donations, fundraising events, and corporate sponsorships to support their work. Collaboration between government bodies and private organisations can help pool resources and expertise. The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972 at various places protect stray dogs against any kind of cruelty. The Supreme Court of India in 2009 gave a similar stay order against removal, culling or dislocation of a dog anywhere in India. Thus far, stray dogs were protected under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act of 1960, especially under Section 38 of the Act. Also, as per the Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules, 2001, dogs cannot be relocated or removed from their territory. Dog lovers protest near Hanuman Mandir at Connaught Place, in New Delhi, on Tuesday, August 12. The Supreme Court has directed that all stray dogs in Delhi and NCR be rounded up within eight weeks and housed in shelters set up by civic authorities. (Photo by Sanjeev Verma/ Hindustan Times) The Supreme Court, until the August 11 judgement, observed last month, while taking up the case suo moto, that law warrants the protection of street dogs, but the authorities will have to bear in mind the concern of common man, such that their movement on streets are not hampered by dog attacks. Local bodies are responsible for taking care of stray dogs, including providing shelters. The Animal Birth Control Rules, 2023, require local bodies to manage stray dog populations through sterilisation and anti-rabies vaccination programmes. There is a common misconception in India that feeding strays is illegal. Instead, the Constitution of India supports the right of citizens to show compassion towards all living creatures, including strays and to feed them, under Article 51A(g). What is the reaction of animal rights groups? Animal protection groups have called the order 'impractical and inhumane'. Bharati Ramachandran, the chief executive of the Federation of Indian Animal Protection Organisations urged large-scale sterilisation, vaccination, and public awareness campaigns. Mini Aravindan, a senior official at Peta India, said: 'It's infeasible to build and staff enough shelters for hundreds of thousands of dogs', adding that the cost would be huge.

No purpose in continuing criminal case against kin after divorce: SC
No purpose in continuing criminal case against kin after divorce: SC

Business Standard

time36 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

No purpose in continuing criminal case against kin after divorce: SC

The Supreme Court on Tuesday said continuation of criminal proceedings against family members after divorce between the couple served no legitimate purpose. A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and K V Viswanathan passed the direction while quashing an FIR against a father-in-law booked under provisions of Dowry Act and IPC provisions, including Sections 498A (cruelty by husband or his relatives). The top court said the power under Article 142 (to do complete justice) must be invoked to advance the cause of complete justice in matters of such nature. "Once the marital relationship has ended in divorce and the parties have moved on with their lives, the continuation of criminal proceedings against family members, especially in the absence of specific and proximate allegations, serves no legitimate purpose," the bench said. The order continued, "It only prolongs bitterness and burdens the criminal justice system with disputes that are no longer live. The law must be applied in a manner that balances the need to address genuine grievances with the equally important duty to prevent its misuse." The apex court said the power to quash such proceedings was essential to uphold fairness and bring about a "quietus to personal disputes that have run their course". Referring to its judgements, the bench said the family members of the husband ought not to be unnecessarily roped into criminal proceedings stemming from matrimonial discord. "The court observed that it has become a recurring tendency to implicate every member of the husband's family, irrespective of their role or actual involvement, merely because a dispute has arisen between the spouses," it said. The bench observed the verdicts further held it to be abuse of law if the complaint was bereft of specific particulars, especially where the relatives sought to be prosecuted resided separately or had no connection with the matrimonial home. The order came on an appeal filed by man challenging an order of Madhya Pradesh High Court which refused to quash the FIR lodged by the man's daughter-in-law. The top court said the estranged couple was separated by a decree of divorce in 2021, which attained finality and not challenged by either side. Both parties were stated to be leading independent lives.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store