Are we at risk of an Iranian sleeper cell attack in the US?
Recent apprehensions at the border, including Iranian migrants with suspected terror ties, have heightened these concerns. Though U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies are actively working to intercept threats before they materialize, shifting resources to border security might inadvertently expose other vulnerabilities. Caitlin stresses that despite these dangers, Iran's regime remains cautious, fully aware that direct attacks against America or its citizens would provoke devastating retaliation. The situation demands continued vigilance, proactive measures, and public awareness to ensure national security and prevent complacency.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
‘Fare adjustment'? Sorry, Janno Lieber: New Yorkers know a fare hike when they see one
Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post 'Fare adjustment': That's what MTA boss Janno Lieber laughably calls the next subway-fare hike. Give us a break: A hike is a hike. And every New Yorker knows it. Lieber is resorting to Team Hochul's Orwellian-naming schtick for papering over bad news and rotten policy. Advertisement As in the faux-wonk term 'congestion pricing' for a $9-per-trip tax that's still headed back to the originally-planned $15 — which will doubtless rise on in what Lieber can call 'a congestion pricing adjustment.' More mush: Don't forget that Gov. Kathy Hochul bragged about 'saving' New Yorkers money by starting with only $9 when she socked them with that tax, not the full $15?) Advertisement OK: The subway hike is just a dime, to $3 (for now). But it comes atop countless other taxes that hit New York residents with the nation's heaviest state- and local-tax burden. 'While a small increase may seem like nothing to you at all, it makes a big difference,' one resident, Hannah Reed, told MTA board members. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Advertisement Yet the brass won't admit the truth: 'I would not call this a hike,' board member Neal Zuckerman huffed. It's 'a very gradual raise, and I think very respectful of the inflation and affordability issues.' What arrogance. As one straphanger, Emmanuel Vasquez, fumed, 'There's always flooding, there's always a brake emergency, there's always a power outage' on the subway, but officials never stop zapping riders with hikes. And that's despite the billions the agency collects not just from fares but city, state and federal tax revenue, corporations, individual taxes and, yes, 'congestion pricing.' Advertisement And while it diverts money to politically-driven projects like Second Avenue Subway expansion: On Monday, the board OK'd a $1.9 billion contract for just a part of project; the final tab will run at least $7 billion for just three new stations. Lieber & Co. know darn well their repeated dips into New Yorkers' pockets sting; they just don't care to admit it. Why else hide behind weasel words?
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tehran accuses Israel of assasination attempt on Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian
A senior Iranian political official told state media that an IDF strike on an Iranian national security council meeting was an attempt on Pezeshkian's life. Israel tried to assassinate Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian during the 12-day war in June, according to Mohsen Haji-Mirzaei, Pezeshkian's chief of staff. Israel launched a wave of strikes against Iranian leaders and nuclear infrastructure during the war. An Israeli attack on June 16 had targeted a Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) meeting in Tehran and was 'a calculated plan to kill Pezeshkian,' Haji-Mirzaei told Iranian state television on Friday. Pezeshkian was lightly wounded in his leg after six missiles or bombs slammed into the compound hosting the council, he said. Israel deliberately targeted the entrances and ventilation systems of the building to block escape routes and suffocate those inside, according to Fars News Agency, which has close ties to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Among the senior officials present at the meeting were Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni and Gen. Abdolrahim Mousavi, head of the armed forces. Momeni had struggled to breathe after inhaling dust, and Mousavi came out with his uniform torn and his body covered in ash and rubble, Haji-Mirzaei said. Pezeshkian managed to walk out on his own, take a shower, and later meet with Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, before visiting a doctor the following day, he said. 'Israel wanted him dead, but fate did not allow it,' he added. Was Pezeshkian the target? The targeting of Iran's top decision-making body was particularly striking given the role the SNSC has played since its creation in the early years of the Islamic Republic. Established to oversee national defense and foreign policy, it is chaired by the president but operates under the supervision of the supreme leader. During the Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s, the council helped coordinate military strategy. An Israeli strike on the SNSC represents not just a military escalation but an unprecedented attempt to decapitate Iran's leadership in one blow, an approach rarely seen even in Israel's long history of targeted assassinations against Iranian commanders, nuclear scientists, and proxies abroad, according to some analysts. For Tehran, Pezeshkian's survival became a symbol of resilience. Yet it also highlighted the vulnerability of Iran's leadership structure to external attack. For Israel, the campaign achieved significant tactical gains, but it also risked drawing the US deeper into a regional confrontation. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Iran FM, IRGC chief warn that hostilities could resume
Araghchi hinted that financial compensation may be necessary for Tehran to reenter negotiations with the US, mirroring sentiments previously expressed to the Financial Times. In separate statements, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and the commander-in-chief of Iran's military, Amir Hatami, said that Iran could still strike Israel. Hatami told state media that threats from Israel still persist. "A 1% threat must be perceived as a 100% threat. We should not underestimate the enemy and consider its threats as over," Hatami said, according to the official IRNA news agency, adding that the Islamic Republic's missile and drone power "remains standing and ready for operations." Araghchi claimed earlier that there was no established ceasefire between Tehran and Jerusalem in an interview with the Iranian Student News Agency. 'The aggression has stopped, and in turn our right to defend has stopped,' Araghchi said. ' That's it. There is no ceasefire agreement; there is nothing else. They stopped the aggression without any conditions, and we stopped the defense. When there is no aggression, naturally, there is no reason to defend ourselves. So since they asked for the attacks to stop without any conditions, we accepted. 'Everything can resume. They can resume, we can resume. There is no official ceasefire, and everything is possible, and it is not just Iran that should be worried and concerned.' In the same interview, the regime official asserted that it was necessary for the regime to continue enriching uranium and that Iranian healthcare was dependent on an enrichment of at least 20%. Iran's nuclear talks While Iran has held discussions with a number of European officials since talks with the US failed, Araghchi said, 'Why should we continue negotiations with them? So there is only one reason to negotiate with the Europeans, and that is the trigger mechanism. Because they cannot lift or terminate the sanctions, they cannot stop the aggression. They cannot do anything. The only leverage they think they have is the possibility of activating the trigger mechanism, and if they do that, everything is over and they will no longer play any role in the future of the Iranian nuclear negotiations.' He alleged that there was strong pressure in Tehran to walk away from any negotiations, claiming that the recent 12-day war signalled the Trump administration was disinterested in reaching any real agreement. Araghchi hinted that financial compensation may be necessary for Tehran to reenter negotiations with the US, mirroring sentiments previously expressed to the Financial Times. 'Financial compensation for what has been imposed on us, and of course, as you know, a significant number of our people have been martyred in these attacks. So we cannot simply return to negotiations and pretend that everything is normal. The situation is no longer the same,' he said. 'They have attacked us. Our facilities have been severely damaged. So we cannot enter negotiations and pretend that nothing has happened. This is obvious. So this time the negotiations will be much more difficult, and they must understand that by attacking our nuclear facilities, they have not made the path of negotiations easier, but rather more complicated and difficult.' While acknowledging that Operation Rising Lion had damaged much of Tehran's nuclear capabilities, Araghchi claimed that Iran was capable of restoring the facilities. 'Although many advanced centrifuges have been lost in Fordow and Natanz, we can still enrich, we still have the capacity to enrich uranium after the attacks,' he said. '...We have the theoretical and practical knowledge of it…We had everything before the attacks. The buildings are rebuilt and the machines are replaced because the technology is there; we have many scientists and technicians who were working in our facilities, and, as I said, we have the ability to do this. But when and how we resume enrichment depends on the circumstances.' Solve the daily Crossword
