logo
What the firing and death of a transport minister reveals about Putin's Russia

What the firing and death of a transport minister reveals about Putin's Russia

CNN3 days ago
As scattered details of the apparent suicide of Russia's former transport minister Roman Starovoit trickled in via state media on Monday, one stood out. Near his body, the Kommersant newspaper reported, investigators found a Glock pistol that Starovoit had been given as an award.
In October 2023, in his previous job as governor of Russia's Kursk region, Starovoit was pictured in a local news article being presented with a velvet-boxed firearm from the region's interior ministry for his role in maintaining security there.
Fast forward 21 months and his death came amid reports he may have been doing the exact opposite. Two sources told Reuters he was suspected of being involved in a scheme to embezzle millions of dollars earmarked for border defenses. Defenses that would undoubtedly have come in useful when Ukrainian troops launched a surprise invasion there last August.
There's no way of knowing if it was the same pistol, and it's not clear yet if the corruption case had anything to do with his firing (no official reason was given) or his death. But the image it creates of a state-sponsored self-destruction, of a once rising star in Vladimir Putin's political elite dead near his Tesla, with the spoils of his former loyalty, is especially poignant in today's Russia.
More than three years into Putin's unprovoked war on Ukraine, the Kremlin's political vice is tightening again. Fealty to the regime is no guarantee of safety, and there are fewer places to hide from increasingly brutal consequences.
For Russians with long memories, old fears are rising.
'There's a smell of Stalinism from this story,' wrote exiled Russian dissident Ilya Yashin on X.
And that stench is permeating beyond the halls of the transport ministry.
With Putin now settled into the second year of his fifth presidential term, the Kremlin has in recent weeks been moving to shut down any remaining threats.
In mid-June Russia's supreme court banned the opposition 'Civic Initiative' party, which had unsuccessfully attempted to field the only anti-war candidate – Boris Nadezhdin – in the 2024 presidential race. The court accused it of failing to take part in elections for seven years.
'It's a tragic farce situation,' party leader Andrey Nechaev told supporters on Telegram last month. 'First they ban us from participating in elections for fabricated reasons, then they accuse us of not participating in them,' he said.
Independent election monitoring, already on its last legs in Russia, may now also be a thing of the past. On Tuesday, Golos, Russia's only remaining independent election watchdog, announced it was closing down.
The decision, it said, came after its co-chair Grigory Melkonyants was sentenced to five years in prison in late May, after a court found him guilty of running activities for European election monitoring network ENEMO, deemed by Russia to be an 'undesirable organization.'
Golos denies the charge, but said the verdict put all its participants at risk of criminal prosecution.
The Golos case, opposition politician Vladimir Kara-Murza argues in a Washington Post op-ed, smacks of another Putin trademark: holding long-term grievances and meting out delayed retribution.
Kara-Murza believes that Golos' original sin was not in 2024, but in documenting widespread parliamentary election violations in 2011, the year Putin announced he would return to the presidency after a brief hiatus as prime minister. The protests that followed were the biggest since the fall of the Soviet Union.
'It was a real scare for Putin, his moment of greatest weakness,' writes Kara-Murza. 'And he never forgave those who, as he put it, attempted a 'color revolution' in Russia. This is the real reason for Grigory Melkonyants's prison sentence.'
And it's not just politics where the pressure is rising.
On Saturday, Konstantin Strukov, the head of Yuzhuralzoloto, one of Russia's largest gold mining companies, was arrested while trying to leave the country on his private jet, according to Kommersant.
A few days earlier, Russia's prosecutor general had launched a legal bid to nationalize the company, alleging Strukov had used a regional government position to acquire control of the company, among other violations.
If the post-Soviet years saw a wholesale redistribution of property away from the Russian state through rapid privatization, the Ukraine war years are characterized by the reverse.
Alexandra Prokopenko, a fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center, calls it 'the biggest redistribution of wealth in Russia in three decades.' And the purpose, she says, is 'to increase loyalty to Putin.'
And there's no attempt to mask the scent of Soviet-style control here. In March, Russia's prosecutor general reported to Putin that companies worth 2.4 trillion rubles (over $30bn) had been transferred to the state, part of an effort 'to not allow the use of private enterprises against state interests.'
Roman Starovoit's death had echoes and notable differences to that of Gorbachev's interior minister-turned-coup plotter Boris Pugo, who killed himself in August 1991 when his rebellion collapsed and he faced arrest. In the chaos of the early 90s, details leaked out freely about his death, his wife's attempted suicide and even the notes they left.
The almost airtight information zone of Putin's presidency makes it much harder to discern what exactly happened to mister Starovoit, and why.
But for Russians, it's a graphic reminder that wealth and power carry increasing risks, as the Kremlin closes ranks for what it sees as a long-term confrontation with the West.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

In his words: Trump's rhetoric about Zelenskyy and Putin has evolved
In his words: Trump's rhetoric about Zelenskyy and Putin has evolved

San Francisco Chronicle​

time38 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

In his words: Trump's rhetoric about Zelenskyy and Putin has evolved

U.S. President Donald Trump repeatedly said during his campaign that, if elected to a second term, he would be able to end the war between Russia and Ukraine 'in 24 hours.' But since his Jan. 20 inauguration, the road to a peace deal has been fraught with changing dynamics between the U.S. leader, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump's rhetoric toward both Zelenskyy and Putin has evolved during his second term in the White House. Trump initially was conciliatory toward Putin, for whom Trump has long shown admiration. But in recent days the Republican leader has expressed increasing exasperation with Putin, criticizing the Russian leader for his unbudging stance on U.S-led peace efforts and for prolonging the war. Until recently, Trump had repeatedly said Russia seemed more willing than Ukraine to get a deal done. Trump appears to have softened toward Zelenskyy after a February blowout in the Oval Office. And, in a reversal, has promised to send badly needed Patriot air defense missiles to Ukraine amid Russia's stepped up aerial attacks. Russia's bigger army is pressing hard on parts of the 620-mile (1,000-kilometer) front line, where thousands of soldiers on both sides have died since the Kremlin ordered the full-scale invasion in February 2022. June brought the highest monthly civilian casualties of the past three years, with 232 people killed and 1,343 wounded in Ukraine, the U.N. human rights mission in Ukraine said Thursday. Jan. 31 'We want to end that war. That war would have not started if I was president.' Trump says his new administration has already had 'very serious' discussions with Russia and that he and Putin could soon take 'significant' action toward ending the conflict. Feb. 19 'A Dictator without Elections, Zelenskyy better move fast or he is not going to have a Country left." Trump's harsh words for Zelenskyy on his Truth Social platform drew criticism from Democrats and even some Republicans in the United States, where defending Ukraine from Russian aggression has traditionally had bipartisan support. Zelenskyy said Trump was falling into a Russian disinformation trap — and he was quickly admonished by Vice President JD Vance about the perils of publicly criticizing the new president. Feb. 28 'You're gambling with World War III. And what you're doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country that's backed you far more than a lot of people said they should have.' Trump and Vance berated Zelenskyy over the war in Ukraine, accusing him of not showing gratitude after he challenged Vance on the question of diplomacy with Putin. The argument in the Oval Office was broadcast globally. It led to the rest of Zelenskyy's White House visit being canceled and called into question the U.S. support of Ukraine in its defense against Russia's 2022 invasion. A few days after the blowup, Trump temporarily paused military aid to Ukraine to pressure Zelenskyy to seek peace. March 30 'I don't think he's going to go back on his word. You're talking about Putin. I don't think he's going to go back on his word. I've known him for a long time. We've always gotten along well.' Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, the U.S. president said he trusts the Russian president to hold up his end of a potential peace deal. The comments were among the last positive remarks Trump made about Putin this year. April 24: 'I am not happy with the Russian strikes on KYIV. Not necessary, and very bad timing. Vladimir, STOP! 5000 soldiers a week are dying. Lets get the Peace Deal DONE!' In a Truth Social post, Trump was reacting to Russia attacking Kyiv with an hourslong barrage of missiles and drones. It was the first of his rare criticism of Putin amid increased Russian attacks on Ukraine. April 29 "A lot of his people are dying. They're being killed, and I feel very badly about it.' Trump addressed the toll on Ukrainians during an interview with ABC News after he met with Zelenskyy on the sidelines of Pope Francis' funeral. It was the first time the two leaders had met since the Oval office spat, and signaled a shift in Trump's attitude toward the Ukrainian president. May 25 'I've always had a very good relationship with Vladimir Putin of Russia, but something has happened to him. He has gone absolutely CRAZY!' Trump's Truth Social post made it clear he was losing patience with Putin as Moscow pounded Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities with drones and missiles in stepped-up aerial attacks. June 25 'He was very nice actually. We had a little rough times, sometimes. He was ... Couldn't have been nicer. I think he'd like to see an end to this, I do.' Trump had a closed-door meeting with Zelenskyy during a NATO summit in The Hague. Trump's comments to reporters later also opened the possibility of sending Patriot air-defense missiles to Ukraine. July 8 'We get a lot of bull--—t thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth. He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.' Trump also said he's 'not happy' with his Russian counterpart and that Moscow's war in Ukraine is 'killing a lot of people' on both sides. Trump's comments during a Cabinet meeting came a day after he said the United States would send more weapons to Ukraine. It was a dramatic reversal after earlier announcing a pause in the delivery of previously approved firepower to Kyiv, a decision that was made amid concerns that America's military stockpiles had declined too much. July 13 'I am very disappointed with President Putin, I thought he was somebody that meant what he said. He'll talk so beautifully and then he'll bomb people at night. We don't like that.'

Beijing's Growing Boldness: China's Stance On Ukraine Sparks EU Alarm
Beijing's Growing Boldness: China's Stance On Ukraine Sparks EU Alarm

American Military News

timean hour ago

  • American Military News

Beijing's Growing Boldness: China's Stance On Ukraine Sparks EU Alarm

This article was originally published by Radio Free Asia and is reprinted with permission. Publicly, Beijing has presented itself as a neutral party in the war sparked by Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, claiming it respects the territorial integrity of Ukraine while also highlighting the need to address Russia's security concerns. But behind the scenes, that may be changing. According to EU officials speaking to RFE/RL on condition of anonymity, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas last week that Beijing couldn't accept Russia's defeat in the war as it would free up Washington to focus on China. The remarkable admission, first reported by the South China Morning Post, came during a four-hour long discussion with Kallas in Brussels that covered an array of topics from trade practices such as state subsidies for electric vehicles, Taiwan, the situation in the Middle East and, of course, the war in Ukraine. It was during those talks that Brussels accused China of siding with Moscow and noting that the invasion of a sovereign country was against international law. Beijing allegedly voiced objections to the EU's allegations that Russia is using Chinese products and other components in its war effort before adding its fear of both potential western sanctions against Chinese financial institutions and an eventual Ukrainian victory in the conflict. Signs of Brussels' displeasure with China over the war have been piling up. In May, a classified EU report said China, including Hong Kong, is responsible for 'approximately' 80 percent of the circumventions of sanctions against Russia. The 27-member bloc has also begun targeting Chinese companies it believes are responsible for the 'undermining of Ukrainian territorial integrity and sovereignty.' In its latest sanctions package, the bloc is looking to slap asset freezes and visa bans on one Chinese businessman for repeatedly transferring goods made in the EU to Russia while those goods were subject to EU export restrictions. Two Chinese companies are also targeted for selling all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), infrared detectors, and other optical components to the Russian armed forces for use in Ukraine. Another sign of the growing concern in Brussels came from NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, who recently said China and Russia present growing threats to the transatlantic alliance. Rutte told reporters during a trip to Berlin that he believes Russia and China would coordinate attacks on Taiwan and Europe to keep the West bogged down in various parts of the world at the same time. 'Xi Jinping, the president of China, before he would attack Taiwan, he will first make a call into Moscow to ask [Russian President Vladimir] Putin to keep us busy in this part of Europe,' Rutte said. China and Russia struck a so-called 'no limits strategic partnership' shortly before the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. The partnership does not include a formal military alliance or a specific commitment to mutual defense, but it does involve extensive military cooperation and strategic alignment that enhances both countries' security interests. Still, Beijing publicly has been keen to distance itself from Russia's actions. Speaking after Wang's European trip, a Foreign Ministry spokesperson reiterated that 'China's position on the Ukraine crisis is objective and consistent, that is, negotiation, ceasefire and peace. A prolonged Ukraine crisis serves no one's interests.' Analysts, though, are focused on other recently spoken words by officials from Beijing. Speaking to Current Time, Russian political scientist Natalia Shevshkova noted comments from Wang after his recent European tour were a sign that Beijing has 'grown bolder' in its rhetoric to where 'it's no longer Eastern diplomacy, but rather outright, almost rude behavior.' 'China understands that if Putin is now allowed to recognize — if he's allowed to keep Crimea, if the Western community is ready to negotiate and leave some territories with Putin, then China's hands are untied too,' Shevshkova said.

The spectacle presidency: How Trump governs through distraction
The spectacle presidency: How Trump governs through distraction

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

The spectacle presidency: How Trump governs through distraction

'President Donald Trump says there's a TikTok buyer that he'll reveal in 'about two weeks,'' read a June 29 CNN headline. The phrase 'about two weeks' has become a hallmark of Trump's communication style — an ever-moving deadline that signals action is imminent but never quite arrives. Roughly two weeks before that TikTok claim, Trump had told reporters it would be 'about two weeks' before he decided how to respond to Iran. In that case, he acted within three days. And nearly two months earlier, asked how he would respond to Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump again answered, 'I'll let you know in about two weeks.' As New York Times reporter Shawn McCreesh noted before the U.S. bombing of Iran, Trump's 'two weeks' refrain has applied to everything from tax plans and healthcare to conspiracy theories and infrastructure. NPR noted that this is not a new strategy, as Trump often espoused on the two-week refrain in his first term. But this isn't just some verbal tick — it's a calculated tactic. Two weeks is a time frame that feels just around the corner but is distant enough to delay scrutiny. It generates anticipation, keeps the press guessing and monopolizes public attention. In essence, it's distraction disguised as transparency. In Trump's second term, this politics of distraction has proved remarkably effective. Despite growing evidence of policy failures and corruption, Trump has maintained his popularity by dominating headlines and reshaping narratives faster than facts can catch up. Scholar Tim Wu has explained how capitalism has increasingly come to depend on attention, monetized through advertising, misinformation and influencer content. Attention is a commodity, and Trump has mastered how to corner the market. As Mickey Huff and I argued in 'United States of Distraction,' Trump's rise is rooted in a media ecosystem shaped by the attention economy, where spectacle — not truth — wins the day. Too much of the legacy media is now fully embedded in the attention economy, following the president's every spectacle — not because it's newsworthy, but because it's engaging. And that engagement drives traffic, ratings and revenue. This creates a symbiotic loop: Trump thrives on spectacle, and the media reward it. Meanwhile, real issues — for example, Trump's misuse of government contracts in his first term or his current promotion of dubious cryptocurrency schemes — receive minimal sustained coverage. Trump is exploiting the attention economy with a politics of distraction, enriching himself while convincing supporters he's delivering on the policies they care about. Trump has long viewed governance through the lens of television, where drama and visuals take precedence over substance. During a heated exchange with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Trump even admitted he kept the press in the room because it made for 'great television.' His strategy follows a predictable cycle: achieve a goal, often under false pretenses, and then, just as the public begins to scrutinize it, pivot to a new, emotionally charged issue. Take April 2, dubbed 'Liberation Day' by the Trump administration. That day, Trump announced tariffs, based on formulas that may have been generated by artificial intelligence. Markets quickly tanked. For the first time in years, Trump's poll numbers on the economy dipped. In response, his team released conflicting information about a '90-day pause' on the tariffs — a claim that was later denied — further muddying the waters. As confusion mounted, Trump shifted attention to immigration and protests — two topics his administration has reliably weaponized. He deployed the National Guard to cities like Los Angeles, falsely citing 'paid protesters' opposing mass deportations. Though local officials, including the governor, mayor and police chief, insisted the protests were peaceful and did not require military intervention, Trump proceeded anyway. The resulting spectacle backfired when images of a Marine detaining a U.S. citizen — an unprecedented move — unsettled many Republican lawmakers and military veterans, who saw it as a disturbing display of authoritarianism. So, Trump pivoted again — this time, to Iran. Following an Israeli bombing of Iranian targets, Trump authorized U.S. airstrikes; the decision redirected the news cycle. Unlike in the past, though, Trump did not wait for public opinion to shift based on false claims; he bombed first. Some supporters, like podcaster Dave Smith, turned against Trump, calling for his impeachment in the wake of the bombing. Similarly, Tucker Carlson publicly rebuked the move and embarrassed Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) in an interview that revealed the Texas Republican's ignorance about the country he supported bombing. Meanwhile, the administration claimed it had 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear program — another distortion quickly challenged by press leaks. As doubts swirled about the efficacy of the strikes, Trump pivoted once more, this time to a domestic priority: his 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' This sweeping economic bill, which includes unpopular cuts to Medicaid, has become the centerpiece of his rhetoric in recent weeks. The president went all-in on signing it by 'July 4' — another arbitrary deadline designed to generate suspense. Meanwhile, in an effort to maintain support for the bill, Trump falsely claimed that it did not cut entitlements or dramatically increase the deficit, even as independent analyses show otherwise. What will Trump use to distract the public next? And perhaps more critically, will the media keep chasing the spectacle? Nolan Higdon is a political analyst, author and host of 'The Disinfo Detox Podcast.' A lecturer at Merrill College and the University of California, Santa Cruz, Higdon is a founding member of the Critical Media Literacy Conference of the Americas and is a Project Censored national judge. His latest book is 'Surveillance Education: Navigating the conspicuous absence of privacy in schools .'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store