logo
'Trump's attack on birthright citizenship serves to expand his authority by jeopardizing the status of all Americans'

'Trump's attack on birthright citizenship serves to expand his authority by jeopardizing the status of all Americans'

LeMonde27-06-2025
"Birthright. That's a big one," President Donald Trump mused out loud as he signed an executive order purporting to end birthright citizenship in America. On that, at least, all Americans can agree.
Although attacks on birthright citizenship are as old as the nation, President Trump's reasons for doing so break new ground. In the past, the primary goal was to exclude and deport disfavored immigrants. Today, the Trump administration is weaponizing citizenship not only to deport the unwanted, but also to control all those who remain.
In 2025, the United States is one of only 33 countries that automatically grant citizenship to nearly every child born within its borders, almost all in the Western Hemisphere. European countries either never adopted birthright citizenship or abandoned it in recent decades. The Trump administration wants to add the US to that long list.
But birthright citizenship is essential to American identity. In many ways, the story of birthright citizenship is the story of America.
A fraught issue
At its founding, the US was conflicted over citizenship – a fraught issue in a nation composed of indigenous tribes, European immigrants and their descendants, and the 20% of the population who were enslaved. In its infamous 1857 decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford, the Supreme Court heldthat no Black person, slave or free, could ever be a citizen of the US. That decision helped to precipitate the Civil War. Slavery was abolished by that war's end, but the question of who qualified as an American remained.
In 1868, the US repudiated Dred Scott and the caste system it created by ratifying the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution. The first sentence of that amendment declares: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside."
The Fourteenth Amendment granted birthright citizenship to all, including the newly freed slaves and the children of immigrants. The only exceptions were a few discrete groups not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the US due to their unique legal status, such as the children of diplomats and those born members of Native American tribes. Senator Jacob Howard, who proposed this language, claimed it "settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Swiss gold industry warns against Swatch boss's US gold tax proposal
Swiss gold industry warns against Swatch boss's US gold tax proposal

Fashion Network

time2 hours ago

  • Fashion Network

Swiss gold industry warns against Swatch boss's US gold tax proposal

Swatch CEO Nick Hayek told Swiss newspaper Blick that Trump's announcement indicated that tariffs on gold would be painful for the US president. "Now is the time to go on the offensive. Switzerland should order a 39% export tax on gold bars for the US," Hayek told the paper. "That's where we have to get at him. That's his Achilles' heel." The Swiss Association of Manufacturers and Traders in Precious Metals (ASFCMP) said that while ideas to better balance bilateral trade were welcome, careful consideration needed to be given to Switzerland's longer-term interests. "An export tax on Swiss gold destined for the US would not only harm Switzerland economically, but also damage the reputation of a country that has consistently promoted and defended free trade," ASFCMP President Christoph Wild said. The Swiss Economy Ministry declined to comment on the proposal, but said the support of business representatives was in general welcome and helped underscore the close economic ties between the US and Switzerland. Trump justified his 39% tariff by pointing to Switzerland's sizeable trade surplus with the US. Part of that is due to gold exports. Hayek said that even if a gold levy failed to move Trump, it would cut the US trade deficit with Switzerland. "If Trump doesn't give in to our pressure, we'll at least improve the trade balance with the US if the Americans no longer import gold bars via Switzerland," he told Blick. Switzerland is continuing to hold talks with US officials aimed at lowering the US tariffs.

Swiss gold industry warns against Swatch boss's US gold tax proposal
Swiss gold industry warns against Swatch boss's US gold tax proposal

Fashion Network

time2 hours ago

  • Fashion Network

Swiss gold industry warns against Swatch boss's US gold tax proposal

Switzerland's gold industry on Thursday voiced scepticism about a proposal by the boss of watchmaker Swatch to introduce a levy on gold exports to the US in retaliation for US tariffs on Switzerland. US President Donald Trump last week imposed tariffs of 39% on imported Swiss goods, causing shock and dismay in the Alpine republic, a major refining and transit hub for gold. The US Customs and Border Protection afterwards said Washington might put tariffs on the most widely-traded gold bullion bars in the US. However, Trump said on Monday that gold would not face tariffs. Swatch CEO Nick Hayek told Swiss newspaper Blick that Trump's announcement indicated that tariffs on gold would be painful for the US president. "Now is the time to go on the offensive. Switzerland should order a 39% export tax on gold bars for the US," Hayek told the paper. "That's where we have to get at him. That's his Achilles' heel." The Swiss Association of Manufacturers and Traders in Precious Metals (ASFCMP) said that while ideas to better balance bilateral trade were welcome, careful consideration needed to be given to Switzerland's longer-term interests. "An export tax on Swiss gold destined for the US would not only harm Switzerland economically, but also damage the reputation of a country that has consistently promoted and defended free trade," ASFCMP President Christoph Wild said. The Swiss Economy Ministry declined to comment on the proposal, but said the support of business representatives was in general welcome and helped underscore the close economic ties between the US and Switzerland. Trump justified his 39% tariff by pointing to Switzerland's sizeable trade surplus with the US. Part of that is due to gold exports. Hayek said that even if a gold levy failed to move Trump, it would cut the US trade deficit with Switzerland. "If Trump doesn't give in to our pressure, we'll at least improve the trade balance with the US if the Americans no longer import gold bars via Switzerland," he told Blick. Switzerland is continuing to hold talks with US officials aimed at lowering the US tariffs.

EU, US closer to clinching trade deal text as Washington shares update
EU, US closer to clinching trade deal text as Washington shares update

Euronews

time3 hours ago

  • Euronews

EU, US closer to clinching trade deal text as Washington shares update

The United States has reverted to the European Commission over the heavily-anticipated joint statement that underpins the trade agreement reached between Ursula von der Leyen and Donald Trump in late July, the EU's executive confirmed on Thursday. "I'm now happy to confirm that we have received a text from the US with their suggestions for, let's say, getting closer to that finalisation of the document," spokesperson Olof Gill told reporters. "So we're going to look at that now." The US and the EU reached a political agreement ending the trade dispute between the two blocs more than two weeks ago, when US President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen met in Scotland. The parties agreed that the US will set 15 % tariffs on EU goods, with the bloc also committing to purchasing US energy products worth €750 billion and to investing a further €600 billion Stateside before the end of Trump's term. But the two sides have since been making contradictory claims about the content and scope of the deal. The joint US-EU statement will not be legally-binding but it is highly important because it will set technical details and include the list of goods that will be exempt from tariffs. Gill would not be drawn to comment on when the text might be finalised, saying that "the speed with which that happens depends on both sides giving it full engagement and full focus and from our side we can certainly say that we will be doing so". Further technical and political engagement between the two sides should now take place, with the EU set to "make our own suggestions back", Gill said. "We ping pong it forward and back until we get to a final text, and I hope we can get there soon." Some European manufacturers have bemoaned the delays in the implementation of the deal, chief among them the automotive industry for which the tariff rate has not been reduced to 15% yet and remains at 27.5%. The EU Commission spokesman reiterated on Thursday that he is not concerned that the US president has not yet signed the executive order on car imports, arguing: "The US has made political commitments to us in this respect, and we look forward to them being implemented."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store