Ron Howard Jokes About Earning His First Acting Emmy Nomination for Playing an ‘A------ Version of Myself' (Exclusive)
Ron Howard exclusively tells PEOPLE how he feels about earning his first acting nomination for the 2025 Emmy Awards
The filmmaker landed a nod in the Outstanding Guest Actor in a Comedy Series category for his role in Apple TV+'s satirical comedy series The Studio
'I'm getting a kick out of it,' he says of the acting nominationRon Howard is 'getting a kick out of' accomplishing a career-first.
The acclaimed director, 71, earned an acting nomination for the 2025 Emmy Awards in the Outstanding Guest Actor in a Comedy Series category for his role in Apple TV+'s satirical comedy series The Studio.
In an exclusive interview with PEOPLE, the three-time Emmy winner revealed his reaction to learning he had landed his first nod for acting.
'I play an a------ version of myself,' Howard says. 'Apparently, it went over. I have many noms and even some wins on the producing and directing side, but first nom as an actor, which is kind of funny.'
'I'm getting a kick out of it,' he adds of his 14th Primetime Emmys nod.
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
Howard has won three of his previous 13 nominations for Jim Henson Idea Man in 2024 (Outstanding Directing for a Documentary/Nonfiction Program), Arrested Development in 2004 (Outstanding Comedy Series) and From The Earth to the Moon in 1998 (Outstanding Miniseries).
In The Studio, Howard is among several A-list stars who play fictionalized versions of themselves. In his Outstanding Guest Actor in a Comedy Series category, Howard's fellow guest actors from The Studio will vie for the Emmy: Dave Franco, Martin Scorsese, Bryan Cranston and Anthony Mackie.
The Studio stars Seth Rogen as Matt Remick, the new head of Continental Studios, an embattled movie studio.
The series' logline reads, 'As movies struggle to stay alive and relevant, Matt and his core team of infighting executives battle their insecurities as they wrangle narcissistic artists and craven corporate overlords in the ever-elusive pursuit of making great films.'
'With their power suits masking their never-ending sense of panic, every party, set visit, casting decision, marketing meeting and award show presents them with an opportunity for glittering success or career-ending catastrophe,' the logline continues.
In episode 3, which came out in April, Howard's character cries when Rogen's studio head character gives him a difficult piece of feedback, resulting in Howard angrily throwing his signature baseball cap at him.
After his Emmy nomination, Howard tells PEOPLE, 'Maybe I should be talking to the acting department at CAA … maybe I should be talking to the acting branch.'
The Studio earned 23 nominations this year. The series is available to stream on Apple TV+.
Read the original article on People
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Parents are embracing a much-needed 'Type C Summer'—here's how
In the chaos of modern parenting, a new kind of balance is emerging. Enter Summer 2025: the reign of the Type C parent—that magical blend of planner and free spirit, rising from the relatable TikToks of moms who've had enough pretending. Welcome to the Type C Summer, where letting go becomes part of the plan. From TikTok to Williamsburg: how Type C parenting hit its stride A viral TikTok by Taylor Vasquez—a mom of two—ruminated on the daily chaos of motherhood: forgetting your debit card, being overstimulated by the word 'mom,' bracing for toddler meltdown after toddler meltdown. Her video sparked thousands of comments: 'This. Is. Me.' The term 'Type C parent' (not scientific, but culturally spot-on) describes someone who strategizes for survival with structure when possible and flexibility when absolutely necessary. Type C parents might color-code calendars but also lose track of shoes. Related: Type C moms are taking over TikTok—and they're finally feeling seen Real confessions meet real pain: Skylight's campaign That chaotic hum of parenting just got louder and more visible thanks to Skylight's 'Parent Confessions' campaign. They collected 1,165 anonymous confessions to illuminate just how stretched-thin families are. According to Skylight's 2024 Mental Load Report: Parents average 30.4 hours per week on mental load—scheduling, logistics, emotional coordination—equivalent to a full-time job worth $60,000/year. Mental load takes up 63% of daily brain space. 79% of parents report anxiety about scheduling. And the confessions? Equal parts hilarious and heartbreakingly human: 'I too am scared of the spider in the bathroom.' —Dad, 32 'I hide the good ice cream in a broccoli bag in the freezer.' —Mom, 34 'I once bought all the things my daughter needed for camp but forgot to register her.' —Mom, 44 'If we don't have cash in the house for the tooth fairy, we use money from their piggy bank.' —Dad, 35 Each confession is anonymous but sourced directly from real parents across the U.S. as part of Skylight's digital confessional wall. Funny, raw, and weirdly comforting—they're a collective sigh of 'same here.' It's official: Summer 2025 is a Type C vibe Skylight's newest data shows that parents are relating to and proudly living the Type C label: 73% of parents say they've embraced Type C tactics this summer. 40% are rewriting household traditions on their own terms. 30% have declared a truce with Pinterest-perfect dinners. 25% are embracing screen time without shame. These aren't parenting failures. These are adaptive strategies—a quiet rebellion against impossible standards and an exhausted shrug toward reality. Why the Type C parent moment matters Type C parenting reflects a shift toward emotional honesty and flexibility. As experts like Dr. Caroline Fenkel explain, this attuned approach supports resilience, security, and authenticity in kids. It also speaks to a broader reality: the 'default parent'—often the mom—continues to carry a heavy mental load, one that can mirror a second unpaid job. For many, embracing the Type C mindset feels more like a reclaiming of balance and agency. TL;DR: You're not a mess—you're a Type C parent. Whether you're laughing through the chaos or just trying to survive until bedtime, you're part of a rising tribe redefining what 'good parenting' looks like. So eat the secret chocolate. Watch Cars for the third time while texting your mom group. If you're showing up with love—even in sweatpants and cereal-stained dignity—you're doing enough. And this summer? That's more than enough. Related: POV: You grow up with a Type B mom—and realize love doesn't need to look perfect Solve the daily Crossword
Geek Tyrant
22 minutes ago
- Geek Tyrant
Vanessa Kirby Reveals Intense Deleted Scene Between Sue Storm and Mole Man from THE FANTASTIC FOUR
Vanessa Kirby is opening up about a deleted moment from The Fantastic Four: First Steps that would've added a fun, edgier layer to her character, Sue Storm. In an interview with Variety, the actress shared details about a scene with Paul Walter Hauser's Mole Man that never made it into the final cut, one that highlighted the raw power and dangerous potential of the MCU's Invisible Woman. Kirby explained: 'There was a line within a scene that isn't in it anymore with Mole Man – who I absolutely love. I'm so excited that we might get to do more with him if we get to do any more of this, because Paul [Walter Hauser] is amazing. 'But in it, she said something like, 'I could give you an aneurysm if I wanted to in two seconds.'' It's a direct nod to classic Sue Storm from the comics, where she often walks a thin line between restraint and lethal precision. Kirby elaborated further on that balance. 'In the comics, Sue uses that threat quite a lot: 'I could put a force field in your brain and give you an aneurysm. I could put an air bubble inside of you and kill you in an instant. 'These powers are also really lethal and really dangerous. But these four have chosen to unite the global community and be a force for good.' 'She's made this decision, but at her fingertips, she could be lethal. It felt so real to me that somebody that's trying to be a force for good also has the capacity, like we all do, for the light and the dark.' In a separate interview, Kirby also shed more light on another missing scene that took place in Subterranea, Mole Man's underground domain. The scene would have appeared early in the movie and offered a unique window into Sue's work life. 'I had a scene with Mole Man going down into [Subterranea] at the very beginning of the movie. Sue goes and kinda kicks back and has a drink with him. Well, she can't because she's pregnant, but he pours her water, and she wishes it was whiskey. I just loved it.' 'It was so fun to shoot. We went into the mines, all the way up to the North of England to shoot it and it just represented Sue's working life and the fact she interacts with all these she's emotionally in tune with them.' While it's not uncommon for Marvel Studios to leave major scenes and even entire subplots on the cutting room floor, it's a shame we didn't get to see this dynamic exchange play out. It sounds like it would have added a darker, more emotionally complex side to Sue Storm while expanding Mole Man's presence in the MCU. Hopefully, we'll see those deleted scenes released on the Blu-ray special features!
CNET
22 minutes ago
- CNET
Confused by Classic Novels? This AI Tool Helps You Understand Older Books While You Read Them
I'm someone who relishes the feel of real books, the touch of the pages on my fingertips as I flip through them, so e-readers have never been my thing. But I recently came across Rebind, an artificial intelligence app that uses AI and prerecorded commentary from experts to guide you while you read classic novels. Rebind lets you pick a book from its library and then discuss that book with an AI-powered chatbot and watch video content from the company's "Rebinders." I wanted to see if it would add to the experience of reading old books whose context is a little further away from what we experience in 2025. What is Rebind? The platform launched last year, as the entrepreneurial and creative collaboration of John Kaag and John Dubuque. With it you can access stand-alone titles for $30 or sign up for an annual subscription ($120 a year). Rebinders are a handpicked collection of writers, philosophers and commentators who guide your reading process through hours of prerecorded video commentary, woven into each chapter. Books available on Rebind Some of the books to choose from on Rebind are: Dubliners by James Joyce Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald Thus Spoke Zarathustra by Friedrich Nietzsche Walden by Henry David Thoreau Meditations by Marcus Aurelius Metamorphosis and Two Other Stories by Franz Kafka Selections from Buddhism The Age of Innocence by Edith Wharton Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare Coming soon to its library are the Bible, Voltaire's Candide, Charles Dickens' A Tale of Two Cities, EM Forster's A Room With a View, James Joyce's Ulysses and more. I decided on Conrad's Heart of Darkness, which I'd be able to explore in discussion with Rebinder and Pulitzer Prize finalist Chloé Cooper Jones. This was a reread for me, chosen for its timely and familiar themes — plus Jones' gender and cultural identity. In total, I spent three days immersing myself in three sectioned chapters, 11 discussions and seven videos on the Rebind platform. Rebind/Screenshot by CNET How Rebind AI works Once I accessed Heart of Darkness, I was prompted with a video on the righthand side of my computer screen where Jones introduced herself and detailed her connection and reaction to the book. Below it, the first chapter was laid out in front of me. When highlighting a section, I could add reactions, start an AI-powered chat about the section or annotate, highlight and copy the text. There's also an option to change text size, theme colors, font and page customization. (To ease eye strain, I decided on a black theme and Arial font.) Each title has a table of contents where you can navigate to different videos and discussions within each chapter. I was immediately drawn to the first discussion, titled "Darkness Vs Light." Good news for my self-esteem: The AI-powered discussion chatbot responded with commentary pulled from hours of Jones' prerecorded content, and was fond of my take on this first discussion point. If no one else is validating your intellect, maybe Rebind is a place to spend a few days. Talking classic literature via AI chatbot. Rebind/Screenshot by CNET It was a bit like a next-generation picture book. I found myself seeking out Jones' face for her video commentary — and a way to break up the monotony of words that streamed down my computer screen. I hold a theory that all books should read like a book of essays, where each chapter is connected to another, though not chronological — nor imperative to read in a linear format. Without the physical element of turning pages, I found my eyes glazing over as I read (and eventually skimmed) the pages that followed — particularly when I reread portions my brain deemed familiar. So, similarly to how I interact with physical reads, I skipped around through chapters. On Rebind, though, I had the option to weave in and out of videos, discussions and suggested questions that popped up in each chapter. This, inevitably, is where I felt the most stimulated. The process nurtured a nice balance between my curiosity about and my comprehension of the book. While I believe Rebind's mission was to delve into the rich psychological takes within each classic's chapters, its structure helped me focus on certain aspects of the title instead of forcing myself to sift through the entirety of the read. Did Rebind potentially solve the challenge of reading for those who are easily distracted, though creative and curious? Seventeen-year-old high school AP English me would have voted for Rebind's approach, rather than the chunks of reading assigned each night. Chloé Cooper Jones offers thoughts about Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness. Rebind/Screenshot by CNET Can AI help you read classic novels? For those who may be seeking interaction without needing to find an in-person community, or who may want a new topic to present to a community that already exists, I can see Rebind as a way to navigate your own thoughts and questions, without being subjected to overwhelming or exhausting personalities. (Though that may be a good mental exercise.) I'd sort of expected to be dissatisfied, somehow, with Rebind, but it offers an opportunity to learn something about yourself — which mirrors Rebind's mission to think deeply and explore reads beyond the words on the page. I was pleasantly surprised by Rebind's interactive nature, even though it uses aspects of the reading experience I normally steer clear of: e-readers and book clubs. What I realized is that Rebind declutters the experiences or tools needed to find a classic read, have a discussion about it, find new connections and meaning to its themes and motifs, and not have to go outside. While I think $120 for annual access is pricey, I can side with a $30 standalone title, knowing that I'm paying for access to experts and artificial intelligence integration within the platform. Personal preference aside, I stand with a platform using AI to keep books accessible — even if that means navigating them on a digital screen, in discussion and with algorithms toiling in the background.
