Luxury goods group Richemont sees strong first quarter sales growth across key markets
Image: Supplied
Compagnie Financière Richemont SA increased sales 6% to €5.4 billion in the quarter to June 30, 2025, the Switzerland and JSE-listed luxury goods group that trades under brands such as Cartier, Paige and Van Cleef & Arpels said Wednesday.
The increase in the group first quarter sales was in spite of a volatile macroeconomic and geopolitical environment in many markets. The growth was led by double-digit increases in Europe, the Americas and Middle East & Africa, more than offsetting Japan's sales decline against high prior-year comparatives.
Sales in the Asia Pacific region remained stable. In Europe, sales grew by 11%, driven by robust demand from local clients and overall positive tourist spend, supported by successful jewellery events. Almost all main markets in the region saw an increase in sales this quarter, with notable performances in Italy and Germany, the group said in a statement.
In the Americas, sales growth remained strong at 17%, driven by local demand across all business areas and markets. Sales in the Middle East & Africa region rose by 17%, led by the United Arab Emirates market as well as higher tourist spend.
In Japan, sales declined by 15% against a demanding 59% comparative in the prior-year period, with a strengthening Yen strongly reducing tourist spend, most notably from Chinese clientele, whilst local demand remained positive.
Asia Pacific sales were stable overall versus the prior-year period, as a 7% decline in China, Hong Kong and Macau combined, was compensated by robust growth in almost all other Asian markets. Of note, sales in Australia and South Korea were up double digits.
The four Jewellery Maisons - Buccellati, Cartier, Van Cleef & Arpels and Vhernier, recorded an 11% rise in sales, marking a third consecutive quarter of double-digit growth, supported by both jewellery and watch product lines.
Specialist Watchmakers sales were 7% lower than the prior-year period, largely reflecting declines in sales in China, Hong Kong and Macau combined as well as in Japan, partly offset by double-digit growth in the Americas.
The 'Other' business area, which includes Fashion & Accessories Maisons, fell 1% compared to the prior-year period. Highlights included continued solid momentum at Peter Millar and Alaïa, an encouraging performance at Chloé and robust growth at Watchfinder & Co.
There was consistent growth across all distribution channels, led by Jewellery Maisons. The group cash position remained robust at €7.4 billion, after cash of €4276m was transferred to luxury fashion e-commerce company YNAP, upon closing of the sales transaction with LuxExperience.
Richemont's sale of YNAP to luxury e-commerce platform Mytheresa, now called LuxExperience, involved transferring YNAP debt-free, with a €555m cash balance, in exchange for 33% of LuxExperience, which was finalised in April 2025.
Richemont's share price gained 1% on the JSE Wednesday morning to R3325.58 per share, 18.3% higher than the R2811.00 it traded at a year previously.
Visit:www.businessreport.co.za
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
a day ago
- The Star
BRICS+ Series: The link Between the G20, BRICS & The Global South
Cole Jackson and Dr Iqbal Survé | Published 2 days ago The G20 (Group of 20) was established in 1999 in the wake of the 1997–1998 Asian financial crisis as an informal platform bringing together Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors from the world's leading developed and emerging economies to address global economic and financial stability. While its early discussions centred primarily on broad macroeconomic concerns, the G20 has since broadened its scope to cover a wider range of global priorities, including trade, climate action, sustainable development, health, agriculture, energy, environmental protection, and anti-corruption efforts. BRICS was established in a similar fashion, as quoted by Cole Jackson: ' The BRICS grouping has, to a large extent, grown naturally considering the global climate during its formation and in today's context. BRICS was formed in 2009. Its formation follows the 2007/08 financial crisis, caused by a period of dramatic economic downturn in the United States (US)--due to the housing market collapse and a subprime mortgage crisis–leading to a global recession. Many countries, the world over, bore the brunt of this recession, especially those countries in the Global South already battling economic difficulties.' The G20 comprises BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Saudi Arabia) and other countries in the Global South (Argentina & Mexico). These presidencies and officials often overlap between countries in the Global South, G20, BRICS (and its associated institutions like the New Development Bank (NDB)). This in essence, means more than a quarter of members are BRICS or Global South affiliated. However, due to the United States (US) & Canada, for example, being part of the G7 they need to collaborate and deliberate with many of these countries having BRICS/Global South agendas to fulfill. Reforming Global Governance G20: Includes both developed and emerging economies and increasingly acknowledges the need for reform in global financial institutions (like the IMF and World Bank). BRICS: Actively pushes for a multipolar world and reform of institutions to reflect the voices of emerging powers and developing nations. Global South: Wants a fairer system where their voices are heard and interests are not sidelined by traditional Western powers. Promoting Inclusive and Sustainable Development G20: Advocates for sustainable development, climate finance, and reducing inequality, especially through multilateral cooperation. BRICS: Prioritises development-led growth, infrastructure financing (e.g., through the New Development Bank), and South-South cooperation. Global South: Seeks development financing and capacity building on their terms, focusing on health, education, and infrastructure. G20: While not centered on the Global South, it increasingly includes dialogues on cooperation between developing countries. BRICS: Champions South-South cooperation as a means to share resources, technology, and strategies among developing nations. Global South: Sees South-South partnerships as more equitable alternatives to Western aid or conditional loans. Multipolarity and Economic Sovereignty G20: Includes rising powers like India, China, Brazil, and South Africa, reflecting a shift away from unipolar dominance. BRICS: Promotes a multipolar world order with diversified centers of power. Global South: Seeks to reduce dependency on the West and build regional blocs and alternative financial institutions. Climate Justice and Energy Transitions G20: Has focused on climate change mitigation and adaptation, though progress varies. BRICS: Supports climate action but emphasizes common but differentiated responsibilities. Global South: Advocates for climate finance, technology transfer, and the right to develop. The growing alignment between the G20, BRICS, and the Global South reflects a strategic shift towards a more inclusive and multipolar global order. With overlapping memberships and shared priorities—ranging from global governance reform and sustainable development to climate justice and economic sovereignty—these groupings increasingly influence one another. BRICS and the Global South have injected fresh urgency and purpose into G20 deliberations, pushing for a system that better represents emerging economies and developing nations. As this alignment deepens, it strengthens efforts to reshape international institutions, promote equitable growth, and ensure that the voices of the Global South are not only heard but also acted upon. Written By: Dr Iqbal Survé Past chairman of the BRICS Business Council and co-chairman of the BRICS Media Forum and the BRNN *Cole Jackson Lead Associate at BRICS+ Consulting Group Chinese & South American Specialist * MORE ARTICLES ON OUR WEBSITE ** Follow @brics_daily on X/Twitter & @brics_daily on Instagram for daily BRICS+ updates
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Aveng flags operating loss in the second half of the year
JSE-listed Aveng will report an operating loss before capital items in the second half of the year in line with that reported in the first half, the company said in a trading statement on Friday. JSE-listed Aveng will report an operating loss before capital items in the second half of the year in line with that reported in the first half, the company said in a trading statement on Friday. It said the operating loss before capital items for the year was negatively impacted by the J108 project in Southeast Asia and the Kidston Pumped Hydro project in Queensland. In addition, a warranty provision has been raised in Southeast Asia due to recently identified defects on a project currently in its defect liability period. The remainder of the project portfolio continues to operate in line with improving expectations. Following the completion of projects in the year and the award of the new Gamsberg project, the Mining segment conducted an optimisation exercise on its fleet. This involved redeploying existing equipment, entering into a rebuild programme and disposing of redundant or end of life fleet. An impairment charge of A$11.9 million (R136m) has been recognised in respect of assets identified for disposal. New Zealand operations have consistently reported profit. In prior periods, taxable profit was offset by previously reported tax losses in New Zealand. These tax losses were fully utilised and the group will report a tax charge in the current year. This results in an overall tax charge of A$15.1m for the Group. The group now expects a basic (loss) of earnings per share of between 69.0 to 72.5 Australian cents for the year ended June 30, 2025 an increase of more than 100% from 20 Australian cents reported in June 30, 2024. It also expects a headline (loss) of earnings per share of between 63.3 and 67.2 Australian cents more than 100% from 29.6 Australian cents in the prior reporting period. BUSINESS REPORT
TimesLIVE
a day ago
- TimesLIVE
Trump-Putin summit ends with no ceasefire in Ukraine war
A highly anticipated summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin yielded no agreement to resolve or pause Moscow's war in Ukraine, though both leaders described the talks as productive before heading home. During a brief appearance before the media after Friday's nearly three-hour meeting in Alaska, the two leaders said they had made progress on unspecified issues. But they offered no details and took no questions, with the normally loquacious Trump ignoring shouted questions from reporters. 'We've made some headway,' Trump said, standing in front of a backdrop that read, 'Pursuing Peace'. 'There's no deal until there's a deal,' he added. The talks did not initially appear to have produced meaningful steps towards a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine, the deadliest conflict in Europe in 80 years, a goal Trump had set ahead of the summit. But simply sitting down face-to-face with the US president represented a victory for Putin, who had been ostracised by Western leaders since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. After the summit, Trump told Fox News' Sean Hannity that he would hold off on imposing tariffs on China for buying Russian oil after making progress with Putin. He did not mention India, another major buyer of Russian crude, which has been slapped with a total 50% tariff on US imports that includes a 25% penalty for the imports from Russia. 'Because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that now,' Trump said of Chinese tariffs. 'I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something, but we don't have to think about that right now.'
