Floral tricolour highlights ‘Made in India' message
This year's stunning arrangement, conceptualised by nursery owners Palla Satyanarayana Murthy, Venkatesh, and Vinay, delivered a powerful message about boosting the value of the Indian rupee. Using thousands of border variety plants, they spelled out 'Made in India' and 'Independence'.
The centrepiece of the display was a beautifully crafted Indian Tricolour.
It also featured a creative representation of an Indian citizen holding the flag in one hand and seemingly repairing the Indian rupee with the other. Satyanarayana Murthy said that this visual was intended to encourage citizens to prioritise the purchase of indigenous goods to strengthen the country's economy and currency, a crucial step in the face of global economic decisions. The nursery's display is being praised for its creativity and patriotic spirit.
A unique and creative floral arrangement to mark Independence Day
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
6 minutes ago
- Time of India
It's only a matter of time before Trump blinks on tariff: Chris Wood
Christopher Wood suggests buying Indian equities despite US tariffs. He believes Trump will eventually reverse the tariffs. Wood highlights India's geopolitical importance and notes the unusual nature of the tariffs. He mentions India's underperformance in equities and links the second tariff tranche to India's Russian oil purchases. Wood also observes the US Federal Reserve's potential rate cut in September. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Mumbai: Jefferies' global head of equity strategy, Christopher Wood, said the Trump administration's imposing a 50% tariff on Indian imports is not a reason to sell Indian equities. Instead, it's a reason to buy them since "it is only a matter of time before Trump backs off the stance, which is not in America's interest.""It is worth noting that the track record makes it clear that it pays to stand up to the Donald," said Wood in his latest 'Greed & Fear' said the Trump administration's decision to impose an additional 25% tariff, taking the total levy to 50%, on Indian goods is "somewhat unusual" given India's relatively small trade surplus with the US and its "very important geopolitical relationship" with second tranche of 25% tariffs appeared linked to New Delhi's purchase of Russian oil."China has been buying much more oil from Russia but has not been sanctioned in the same way," he said. "The singling out of India in this fashion is not what most people would have predicted."According to Wood, Donald Trump has succeeded in bringing China, Russia, India, and Brazil together like never before."Indeed, BRICS as a grouping has been regalvanised."Wood said India's equities had recorded the biggest underperformance relative to other markets in 15 years in the 12 months to July. He attributed the weakness to "very high valuations" and "a heavy schedule of equity issuance."According to him, it is too late to cut India with valuations now back near the 10-year average 63% Price to Earnings (PE) ratio premium over emerging market said the slightly better-than-anticipated July inflation data has marginally lifted expectations of the US Federal Reserve easing. The base case remains for a rate cut by the American central bank in September and for the US dollar to remain in a downtrend."Still, for a data-dependent Fed not willing to project forward, which is more or less where the Powell-led Fed has been of late, there is still an argument to stay on hold since the reality is that reported inflation is still well above the 2% YoY target," he said the prime driver of the Trump administration's criticism of Jerome Powell is not concerns about the state of the economy, but rather to get the cost of debt servicing down.
India.com
6 minutes ago
- India.com
Bad news for Swiggy customers, company takes BIG decision, increases platform fees by Rs…, will it affect 2 million orders?
Swiggy Platform Fees Hike On Independence Day, food delivery giant Swiggy increased its platform fee from Rs 12 to Rs 14 per order. The new rates already took effect on August 15, 2025. The company, which delivers over 2 million orders daily, says the hike is aimed at strengthening its financial position as order volumes rise during the festive season. Swiggy Increases Platform Fees Swiggy first introduced a platform fee in April 2023 at just Rs 2 per order. Since then, it has gradually increased, reaching Rs 14 now. Despite the repeated hikes, order volumes have not been affected. While a Rs 2 increase may seem small to customers, for a company like Swiggy it translates into huge gains. At current order levels, the new fee could generate an additional Rs 2.8 crore per day, Rs 84 crore per quarter, and Rs 336 crore annually. Swiggy Financial Performance According to Moneycontrol , the hike comes during the festive season when food ordering spikes. However, it is unclear whether Swiggy will roll back the fee to Rs 12 after the season ends. In the past, the company has kept higher rates even after special occasions. Last time during the New Year period, the fee was raised and never reduced after observing no drop in order volumes. In terms of financials, Swiggy reported a loss of Rs 1197 crore in the April–June 2025 quarter, a 96% jump compared to a loss of Rs 611 crore in the same period last year. Revenue, however, grew 54% to Rs 4,961 crore from Rs 3,222 crore a year earlier. Its food delivery business expanded by 19%, while its quick commerce arm, Instamart, grew by around 108%. The company's total order value rose 45% to Rs 14,797 crore, but expenses also climbed sharply from Rs 3,908 crore to Rs 6,244 crore. This latest fee hike means customers will now pay Rs 2 more per order. Swiggy says the change will help improve its services, but for customers.
The Hindu
6 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Balancing code and commerce in U.K. trade compact
India's digital trade compact with the United Kingdom breaks new ground. Chapter 12 of the India-U.K. Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) sets out a bargain that trades some oversight tools for access, credibility and scale. The trade-off has sparked a policy debate. Supporters call it a strategic step into the global digital economy. Critics call it a retreat from digital sovereignty. Such agreements rarely produce winner-take-all outcomes. They usually end in negotiated compromises. On balance, the gains look real, but they signal a need for guard rails that keep pace with evolving risks. The digital wins The digital wins are clear. The agreement recognises electronic signatures and contracts and commits both sides to work towards mutual recognition. That trims paperwork for software-as-a-service firms and also lowers barriers for small and medium enterprises. Paperless trade and electronic invoicing make cross-border documentation and payments easier. And policy continuity on zero customs duties for electronic transmissions protects a software export pipeline that the Commerce Ministry estimates at $30 billion a year. Cooperation on data innovation can help too. The text encourages pilot projects that use regulatory sandboxes where required. That gives payments and other data-driven firms a way to test and scale tools under supervision, which builds credibility abroad. Beyond the digital chapter, the broader India-U.K. deal is expected to improve day-to-day commerce. Industry expects that as the agreement is implemented, close to 99% of Indian merchandise exports could enter the U.K. duty-free, with textile tariffs falling sharply, including from 12% to zero on key lines, increasing growth prospects in textile export hubs such as Tiruppur (Tamil Nadu) and Ludhiana (Punjab). Analysts also point to more doors opening in British public procurement for Indian IT suppliers. Employers say social-security waivers for short assignments could cut payroll costs by roughly one-fifth. These moves promise a wider and more predictable trade corridor. The digital costs Nevertheless, the possible digital costs deserve attention. Critics have contended that India has stepped back from source-code checks as a default regulatory tool, as there is a ban on code-inspection under the agreement. Regulators can demand access on a case-by-case basis, tied to an investigation or a court process. Government procurement is excluded from the scope of digital trade. Hence any access to source code in products procured by government is not restricted. While the agreement aims to enhance business trust, it does not sacrifice essential interests. A general security exception exists. It preserves national supervision of power grids, or payment systems and other critical infrastructure, even if privately owned. The restriction is only of good governance, ensuring that action is not taken in a manner which would constitute a disguised restriction on trade. Should additional reassurance be required, a practical step could be to accredit trusted labs for reviewing sensitive code, under tight safeguards. On government data, the posture is voluntary. There is no legally binding commitment. India decides what to publish and in what form. When it does open a dataset, it should be machine-readable and easy to reuse. This is not a blank cheque for anyone to demand access. India could also seek clear audit trails for cross-border data intermediaries so that accountability follows the data. There is no 'automatic MFN (most favoured nation)' for cross-border data flows. Instead, the agreement creates a forward review mechanism. If one side later signs a trade pact with tougher data rules, the two sides consult on whether to extend equivalent terms. There is a promise to talk; not an autopilot extension. A formal review is stipulated within five years. As multiple versions of ChatGPT in under three years show that AI is developing rapidly, future pacts should have a review every three years to align rules with risks. Aligning with modern trade norms marks a departure from past Indian practice, but this makes sense for a country that is seeking a larger role in the global digital economy. It reflects India's shift from trade scepticism to strategic engagement. Domestic foundations usually anchor external commitments. The Digital Personal Data Protection Act of 2023 still needs notification of final rules. For future trade texts to build on that framework, the rules need to institutionalise open consultations before deals are closed so that inputs are sought and concerns surface early and can be addressed in time. Steps to take Digital treaties decide what governments can regulate, what companies can expect, and what citizens can protect. Chapter 12 of the India-U.K. agreement is a milestone in terms of a first step. In future, India should integrate market-openness with regulatory oversight. It could accredit trusted labs to review sensitive code under strict safeguards and also mandate audit trails for cross-border data flows. It could also institutionalise broad-based pre-negotiation consultations and schedule regular three-year reviews of digital treaties. Together, these steps show that sovereignty and global engagement need not pull in opposite directions but, instead, can power the modern Indian economy. Syed Akbaruddin is a former Indian Permanent Representative to the United Nations and, currently, Dean, Kautilya School of Public Policy, Hyderabad. Shivangi Pandey is Executive Assistant to the Dean, Kautilya School of Public Policy, Hyderabad
