Super Bowl packs an economic punch, but researchers say it's not the big score the NFL touts
Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Jalen Hurts faces cameras on the field inside the Caesars Superdome during the Super Bowl Opening Night on Feb. 3, 2025, in New Orleans. ()
Independent research has found that the Super Bowl's impact on the economy of host cities is often vastly overstated, but the big game is bringing a boon to certain New Orleans businesses that one might not typically associate with football.
Such is the case for florists Brent Bogan and Herb Oldknow, who run Herbivore Floral Designs and create artistic flower arrangements for weddings and special events. Bogan said he's seen a 100% increase in business due to the Super Bowl with contracts for seven corporate clients this week totaling nearly $100,000.
'We have events going on at Le Pavillon, [The] Misi, Jolie, Capitol on Baronne and a few other dinners and events around the city – all corporate clients who are wining and dining their clients,' Bogan said.
Herbivore typically sees almost no business this time of year, he said, so the Super Bowl brought a welcome change in pace for the business and others who work in event décor.
The Super Bowl is also providing a boost to the rideshare and car service industry. David Rivera, a driver for a luxury transport fleet, has been busy this week shuttling corporate clients to various events.
'It makes one wish New Orleans should host a Super Bowl every year,' Rivera said.
So far not all businesses are seeing a windfall.
Restaurateur Conrad Churra said he's hoping to capitalize on the bustling activity in New Orleans. The two locations of his breakfast/brunch eatery, Wakin' Bakin', have seen mixed returns over the past few days. Sales at his French Quarter location were down Monday, but he said he saw a significant uptick on Tuesday. On the other hand, business has been slow all month at his location in Mid-City.
Cary Rogers, who owns Buffa's Bar & Restaurant on Esplanade Avenue, two blocks from Bourbon Street, said the Super Bowl has so far not brought any noticeable uptick in sales, though he said he's hoping that will change later this week.
Churra and Rogers each said they've seen noticeably fewer customers since the start of 2025 and believe the Bourbon Street terrorist attack on New Year's Day is at least partially to blame.
The Jan. 1 incident, in which an American jihadist drove a truck through a crowd of revelers on Bourbon Street, killing 14 and injuring 57, should be considered when analyzing the Super Bowl's economic impact on New Orleans, according to Alí Bustamante, a University of New Orleans professor and economist at the Roosevelt Institute.
Researchers acknowledge the Super Bowl can have a positive economic impact on a local economy but argue it's typically much lower than the NFL claims. The league commissions economic impact assessments after the event and uses the data to convince state and local governments to subsidize investments such as new stadiums, said Brad Humphreys, an economics professor at West Virginia University.
Studies that factor in the costs of those subsidies have found that cities often see little benefit from hosting a Super Bowl. A North Carolina State University report noted that the 2015 Super Bowl cost the city of Glendale, Arizona, between $579,000 and $1.2 million.
Bustamante said New Orleans didn't have to build a stadium to host the NFL championship. However, the Caesars Superdome did complete a $560 million renovation project last year thanks in large part to government subsidies. About $380 million of that came from a combination of state dollars and the Louisiana Stadium & Exposition District, which is a state agency.
The Sports Management Research Institute, a firm that works with sports leagues that include the NFL, issued a press release last week touting the huge economic impact the game will bring to New Orleans. The firm issues similar statements each year around the Super Bowl, prompting economists and academics to scrutinize the firm's research and argue host cities actually see far fewer benefits.
SMRI boasted of skyrocketing hotel rates in the New Orleans area ahead of the game with an average price of $4,625 per night for four-star accommodations and $847 per night for two-star accommodations. A search on hotel booking websites shows similarly high rates and few vacancies for the upcoming weekend even outside of the city.
'SMRI's research lends credence to the theory that the big game, and the many events leading up to it make a significant economic impact on host cities,' the firm said in its news release. It did not cite any data of the Super Bowl's impact on businesses aside from hotels.
There's little doubt one of the largest single-day sporting events attracts a lot of economic activity, estimated in the billions of dollars each year. The crux of the argument among economists has to do with where most of that money ultimately ends up and who bears the heaviest cost for the least reward.
Humphreys, the economics professor, has conducted his own studies on the Super Bowl and argues the NFL's economic impact claims are greatly overstated.
'Sky-high hotel room rates during the Super Bowl do not generate significant economic impact in the local economy in New Orleans,' Humphreys said. 'Most hotel owners do not live in the area. Hotel employees do not receive higher wages when hotels raise room rates during an event like this. The additional revenues earned by hotels during the Super Bowl represent windfall corporate profits that do not translate to local economic benefits.'
Researchers from North Carolina State University, the University of Delaware and Williams University have come to similar conclusions. Several studies argue a lot of the money from the Super Bowl doesn't stay in the host city, and that the game tends to have a 'crowding out' effect that discourages locals and other tourists from venturing into the city, which can partially offset gains from the football crowds.
Much of the money from past Super Bowls comes from ticket sales, merchandise, brand licensing and network broadcasting deals, all of which goes to the NFL rather than to local businesses of the host cities, according to the North Carolina State study. Research has not landed on a specific annual figure, but past games have made between $300 million and $1.3 billion, according to NCSU.
The studies also point out that Super Bowl host cities are top tourist destinations by their own right, and researchers argue the game merely replaces other events that would have been hosted there.
Other assessments found that Taylor Swift's Eras Tour brought more money to the local economy in Glendale, Arizona, in 2023 than the Super Bowl did when it was hosted there a month earlier, according to a Time magazine article. A later analysis from Statista broke down the numbers, showing how the two events stack up.
Jay Cicero, Greater New Orleans Sports Foundation president and Super Bowl LIX Host Committee member, pointed to a UNO study that found the 2013 Super Bowl had a $480 million economic impact on the city. A projection for this year's game hasn't yet been calculated, but Cicero said local nonprofits are already seeing benefits. For example, more than $3.5 million in grants have been awarded to 65 organizations through an Entergy Corp. community campaign tied to the Super Bowl, he said in an email.
'The sold-out hotel rooms, packed restaurants, and increased foot traffic to our small businesses are tangible visuals that solidify the game's positive economic influence right now,' Cicero said. 'This is our moment to show off what our city does best to national and international audiences, and it is that kind of platform that drives increased tourism long after Feb. 9.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Aaron Rodgers Contract Dubbed 'Major Bargain' for Pittsburgh Steelers
Aaron Rodgers Contract Dubbed 'Major Bargain' for Pittsburgh Steelers originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The Pittsburgh Steelers finally got their guy. After months of speculation and strange conjecture about where Aaron Rodgers would or wouldn't play, he's finally put pen to paper for the black and gold. Advertisement While his skills and mobility may have diminished a bit, the $13.65 million the Steelers are paying him for 2025 still seems like a bargain. Even if he somehow reaches the contract's full potential of $19.5 million seems like a deal for the team. And PFT's Mike Florio agrees. "It's still not known how Rodgers can pump up his pay from $13.65 million to $19.5 million. There's talk that one factor to unlock the maximum package is winning the Super Bowl," Florio wrote. "The full amount, if he earns it, will still be less than what Justin Fields will make this year ($20 million). Which, for a player of Rodgers's capabilities, gives the Steelers a huge advantage. "It also saves millions in cash and cap dollars for other players. Whether it means they'll use the money to pay linebacker T.J. Watt or sign an available skill-position player (like running back J.K. Dobbins) or trade for a receiver (like Allen Lazard) or be ready to make a deal prior to the Week 9 deadline remains to be seen." The key here is that they're getting a top-tier quarterback (we think) for second- or third-tier money. And that's a lot less than what they could've spent elsewhere. Advertisement And it gives the Steelers room to add some pieces around Rodgers if it chooses to do so - and it should. Related: Steelers QB Aaron Rodgers Can Make NFL History with Week 8 Win Related: Three Wideout Possibilities for Steelers' New QB Aaron Rodgers This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 9, 2025, where it first appeared.

Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fresh blow for London as US buyers mount £5bn raid on stock market
Two major British companies are poised to join the exodus from the London stock market after American rivals made multibillion-pound takeover offers for each. On Monday, semiconductor company Alphawave recommended a $2.4bn (£1.8bn) sale to US chip giant Qualcomm while high-tech equipment maker Spectris urged shareholders to back a £4.4bn sale to private equity house Advent International. The deals would mean both companies would cease to be listed in London, dealing a fresh blow to the City just days after Wise, the British financial technology champion, announced it was moving its main listing to New York. Both takeovers will also see the American buyers pay substantially above the share prices that their British targets commanded beforehand, prompting suggestions they may have been undervalued by London investors. Qualcomm's offer is more than 90pc above Alphawave's share price before talks began in April and the Spectris bid is 84pc higher than its stock price on Friday. Charles Hall, head of research at Peel Hunt, said: 'The bids for Spectris and Alphawave show how undervalued UK listed companies are given premiums of 85pc and 96pc respectively.' 'It continues the constant theme of companies leaving the market, with 30 takeovers of scale and just one initial public offering on the London Stock Exchange in 2025.' 'Urgent action is required if we want a healthy UK equity market that supports our listed companies and encourages the next generation of companies to list.' Qualcomm said it was buying Alphawave to aid its expansion into data centres, which are becoming increasingly important in the race to develop artificial intelligence (AI) software. Alphawave is a specialist in technologies that 'drive faster, more reliable data transfer with higher performance and lower power consumption', a joint statement by the companies said. This means its products 'form a part of the core infrastructure enabling next-generation services in a wide array of high growth applications, including data centres, AI, data networking and data storage'. Silicon Valley giants such as OpenAI, Google and Amazon are racing to acquire more data centre capacity to help train their AI programmes. Tony Pialis, the president and chief executive of Alphawave, said: 'Together, we will unlock new opportunities for growth, drive innovation, and create a leading player in AI compute and connectivity solutions. 'For our shareholders, the Alphawave board is pleased that Qualcomm's offer provides an opportunity to realise compelling value for their shares.' Spectris, which is headquartered in London, makes various high tech instruments, including particle measuring systems used in the pharmaceutical industry. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
B.C. premier defends new LNG pipeline with terminus near Prince Rupert
B.C. Premier David Eby is defending the provincial government's approval to continue construction on a new pipeline project that will supply natural gas to a proposed floating liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal north of Prince Rupert, saying his government would not turn away investment in the province. The Prince Rupert Gas Transmission project is a joint venture between the Nisga'a Nation and Texas-based Western LNG to supply natural gas to the proposed Ksi Lisims LNG facility, a project the province says is still undergoing environmental assessment. "The Ksi Lisims project is an Indigenous-owned project led by the Nisga'a Nation. They are a treaty nation that has control over their jurisdiction," Eby said, speaking from Seoul, South Korea, as he nears the end of his 10-day trade mission to Asia. "They have a vision for economic growth in the area, for their people, which includes selling B.C. resources into the Asian market, where I am right now." The Nisga'a Nation and Western LNG say the Ksi Lisims project would be a floating production facility capable of producing 12 million tonnes of LNG per year. The project faces opposition from several environmental groups and the Gitanyow hereditary chiefs, who argue it will have negative environmental consequences, including a risk to important salmon habitat. Tara Marsden, sustainability director for the Gitanyow hereditary chiefs, previously told CBC News there are concerns about Western LNG's financial backing from Blackstone Inc. Blackstone is a major American asset manager whose CEO publicly endorsed U.S. President Donald Trump and contributed to his election campaign — with Marsden saying the investment undermines any notion that the project is needed to push back against Trump's tariff threats. CBC News asked Eby whether the bulk of the profits from the Prince Rupert Gas Transmission project would enrich a U.S. company. "We're not in the business of turning away investment in British Columbia," the premier responded. "Especially investment that assists us in diversifying our customers for our resources and allows us to get a higher price for those resources." The pipeline was first approved in 2014 under the ownership of Calgary-based TC Energy Corp, when it was meant to supply the now-cancelled Pacific NorthWest LNG terminal spearheaded by Malaysian energy giant Petronas. It was purchased by the Nisga'a Nation and Western LNG in 2024 under their revised proposal for the Ksi Lisims facility. Eby says he wants to work with Alberta Eby was also asked Monday about comments from Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, who said she could convince him to drop his opposition to a second crude oil pipeline from Alberta to B.C.'s North Coast. "I'm not the one who stands between Premier Smith and a pipeline to the coast. There's no proponent, there's no money, there's no project right now," Eby said. "In the event that Premier Smith is successful in assembling those things, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it." Prime Minister Mark Carney said last week he supports "nation-building projects," including a possible decarbonized oil pipeline — if he can find consensus among the said companies in South Korea that he's talking to are focused on bringing in hydrogen. He said that would involve Alberta using blue hydrogen, and B.C. exporting green hydrogen, which he said would aid in carbon transition. "I'm happy to talk to Premier Smith about our shared goals of increasing prosperity, about uniting the country," he told reporters. "Focusing on a project that currently does not exist, and focusing on our differences rather than where we can work together, is not the spirit." Eby travelled from Malaysia to Seoul where he met with officials from conglomerates like Hyundai and Samsung as well as the Canadian ambassador to South Korea. His trade mission to Asia, a bid to diversify the province's trading relationships amid the tariff war with the U.S., will wrap up Tuesday.