In AZ speech , Trump ‘border czar' tells immigrants they ‘should be looking over your shoulder'
Democratic legislators walk out of a speech by Tom Homan, President Donald Trump's "border czar," in the Arizona House of Representatives on April 8, 2025. The Democrats held papers with the names of people that critics of the Trump administration say were wrongfully detained. Photo by Gloria Rebecca Gomez | Arizona Mirror
Tom Homan, the chief border security adviser for President Donald Trump, stumped for the administration's mass deportation campaign at the Arizona Legislature on Tuesday.
He waved away criticisms about civil rights violations and said that the plan will keep resulting in the arrests and expulsions of undocumented people without criminal records.
'If you're in this country illegally, you should be looking over your shoulder. It's not OK to enter this country illegally — it's a crime,' he said to enthusiastic applause from Republican lawmakers and law enforcement officials in attendance at a rare joint legislative session.
It is not a crime to enter the United States without authorization, though it is a civil violation of federal law.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Homan's visit comes as the White House faces increased scrutiny of its hostile immigration policies and accusations of flouting due process. Multiple international university students have been targeted and arrested over their political activism, culminating in the revocation of hundreds of student visas, including 50 at Arizona State University. And across the country, migrants with no criminal offenses, and many with pending asylum cases, have found themselves in the crosshairs of ICE.
Most recently, the administration flew 238 Venezuelan migrants to a high-security prison labor camp in El Salvador known for torture, without giving them the opportunity to contest allegations that they have ties to a violent gang in court. Several of those allegations were based solely on the fact that they have tattoos, and ICE officials have since admitted that a Salvadoran man on one of those flights was deported despite an existing legal order prohibiting doing just that because of an 'administrative error.'
The Trump administration is currently facing a lawsuit over those deportation flights and its use of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to remove migrants without due process. On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an order allowing the administration to continue using the act to justify removing Venezuelans 14 years and older suspected of being gang members, but also mandated that they be given 'reasonable notice' to challenge deportation orders in court.
In Tuesday's address, Homan defended those deportation flights, but didn't acknowledge the fact that the allegations against those deported remain unproven.
'We're not going to apologize for removing people through the Alien Enemies Act. They came here to unsettle this country, to cause harm…We will not apologize for sending two planeloads of terrorists out of this country,' he said, referring to the Trump administration's action to designate the Tren de Aragua gang, which the deported migrants have been accused of being members of, as a terrorist group.
Homan traveled to Arizona with U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to attend the Border Security Expo, an annual event featuring military-grade surveillance technology for sale.
ICE director envisions Amazon-like mass deportation system: 'Prime, but with human beings'
Noem kicked off her visit to the Grand Canyon State by joining local ICE officials in arresting undocumented people who are allegedly members of violent gangs, in a showy promo that has become a staple of her tenure.
Republican legislative leadership, meanwhile, invited Homan to speak at a joint legislative session to highlight the majority party's willingness to support the administration's agenda.
Senate President Warren Petersen, who is running for Arizona attorney general in 2026, touted border hawk legislation he's championed as proof of his border security bona fides. The Republican from Gilbert was a driving force behind the Secure Border Act, which made it a state crime for migrants to cross the border anywhere but at an official port of entry.
An overwhelming 63% of Arizona voters cast their ballots in favor of the ballot measure last year.
This legislative session, Petersen has sponsored the Arizona ICE Act, which would prohibit the state, cities, towns, law enforcement agencies and even schools from passing policies that restrict cooperation with federal immigration officials.
Petersen said the two policies are linked. Last year's measure, he said, allowed law enforcement officials to 'engage in the immigration process,' while this year's bill would prevent policies that inhibit the ability of Homan and the Trump administration from 'remov(ing) the most dangerous criminal illegal aliens from the streets.'
'We just want to let you know that Arizona will do everything we can to support you in your efforts,' Petersen told Homan during his introduction.
In his speech, Homan denounced so-called 'sanctuary cities' that limit their involvement with ICE officials and refuse to comply with immigration detainers. Also called ICE holds, detainers are written requests that law enforcement agencies hold a person in their custody for 48 hours after they would have been released, even if they haven't been charged with any crime, to give immigration officials time to determine their legal status.
Petersen's Arizona ICE Act would mandate compliance with ICE detainers and give the Arizona attorney general the power to take noncompliant law enforcement agencies to court. Homan advocated for increasing ICE's access to jails, and singled out former Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio — who was in the crowd — as an example to follow.
'We had no problem when that guy was in office,' he said, pointing to Arpaio and joking: 'Matter of fact, he'd call us up if someone was in jail we might've missed.'
Arpaio's time as the head of the largest county's sheriff's office was marred by rampant racial profiling. Nearly eight years after he was ousted, taxpayers are still footing a $314 million settlement for a lawsuit stemming from the former sheriff's policies.
Homan also previewed the return of notorious anti-immigrant policies that became widely-rebuked hallmarks of Trump's first foray into immigration enforcement: family detentions and zero-tolerance policy.
To defend the former, Homan reiterated the false claim that 300,000 migrant children are missing, and accused Biden administration officials of handing them over to unvetted sponsors that led to the children being trafficked.
While an August 2024 report from the Department of Homeland Security's Office of the Inspector General found that Immigration and Customs Enforcement failed to consistently 'monitor the location and status of unaccompanied migrant children,' once they were placed with sponsors, who are often relatives already living in the country, immigrant advocates have said the number refers to a gap in a paper trail and not a case of missing children.
The report noted that more than 291,000 had not received a notice to appear in court and another 32,000 received a notice but failed to appear at their court hearings. Additionally, the figures in the report span Biden's presidency and the last 15 months of Trump's first administration.
To address that mischaracterized issue, Homan called for the return of family detention, a widely criticized policy from Trump's first term that involves jailing immigrant parents with their children and infants. He claimed it would help make sure children aren't entrusted to the wrong people.
'We can do DNA tests and make sure that child is with a parent and not a trafficker. We're trying to protect children. We're doing the right thing,' he said, to a standing ovation from GOP lawmakers and law enforcement officials.
While both former President Barack Obama and Trump previously detained parents with their children, Biden strongly criticized his predecessor's use of the policy and ended it in 2021. Last month, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, under Trump's direction, took the first steps to restart the program by publishing a request for proposal asking private prison companies to bid for contracts for detention facilities specifically intended to hold families. A Texas family detention center with a 2,400 capacity has already reopened its doors in anticipation.
Homan also praised Trump's 'Zero-Tolerance' policy, saying it helped 'tank' border crossings. The policy drew backlash from immigrant rights groups who called it inhumane and it led to the separation of more than 5,000 children from their families. To justify it, Homan pointed out that U.S. citizens are separated from their children by local law enforcement officers when they commit crimes.
'Zero tolerance worked — the numbers went down. It's sad and unfortunate that families get separated,' he said. 'Law enforcement does it thousands of times across the country but there's a good meaning behind it.'
Despite efforts to reunify children taken away from their parents beginning as soon as June 2018, just two months after the program was implemented when a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to reunite the families, more than a thousand are still separated. A December 2024 report from a coalition of human rights groups, including the Human RIghts Watch, estimated that as many as 1,360 children have yet to be reunited with their families.
And many might never be reunited: some parents were murdered after being deported, others are impossible to find and some children died before they could be returned to their families.
Just minutes after Homan was welcomed into the Arizona House of Representatives and began his speech, the handful of Democratic lawmakers in attendance filed out of the chamber, holding up papers with the names of people printed on them that critics of the Trump administration say were wrongfully detained.
Among them were Mahmoud Khalid, who helped organize pro-Palestianian protests at Colombia University and remains in ICE custody; Ranjani Srinivasan, another Columbia University student who also participated in the protests and chose to self-deport when her student visa was revoked; and Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, the Salvadoran migrant who was sent to the Salvadoran prison last month because of an 'administrative error.'
In the plaza between the legislative buildings, members of immigrant and voting rights groups Living United for Change in Arizona and Our Voice, Our Vote Arizona rallied against Homan's presence. The public was barred from the legislative gallery.
As Homan and Republican lawmakers exited the chamber and headed inside the nearby Capitol museum, protestors circled the building's entrance and chanted, 'No hate no fear, immigrants are welcome here!' and 'Shame!'
Sen. Analise Ortiz, who has vocally criticized anti-immigrant legislation at both the state and federal levels, told the Arizona Mirror that she and other Democrats were 'really pissed off' that Republicans invited Homan to speak. The Phoenix Democrat said her constituents, and those of her colleagues, are calling on elected officials push back on the harmful policies that Homan has advanced.
'Our communities are demanding that we fight against the Trump administration, which is just flat out denying court orders and defying the law to roll out their mass deportations,' she said, referring to the likelihood that the White House ignored a district judge's order to stop the deportation flights to El Salvador. 'It's terrifying what's happening in this country.'
And while Republicans have held up the overwhelming support for the Secure the Border Act and Trump's recapture of the state in last year's election as proof that Arizonans want more aggressive border policies, Ortiz said she doesn't believe they want their 'coworkers or child's teacher' to be deported without due process.
'I do believe that the vast majority of Arizonans want order on the border, but what Trump is promising is the exact opposite of order. It's chaos,' Ortiz said.
Democratic Minority Leader Priya Sundareshan echoed that her party is firmly opposed to the violation of people's constitutional rights, and said that Homan's invitation amounts to a celebration of the Trump administration's actions.
'What happens when you violate the law and violate due process is that we are disappearing people, and to have the federal government doing that in our names is unacceptable,' the Tucson Democrat said.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
19 minutes ago
- CNN
See moment Trump criticized Musk in Oval Office
See moment Trump criticized Musk in Oval Office President Trump said he was 'very disappointed' with Elon Musk, as the tech billionaire and former adviser continues to blast Trump's massive tax and spending cuts package. The bill is estimated to add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade. Musk responded on X in real-time saying that he never saw the bill before it passed and said the elimination of America's electric vehicle tax incentives has nothing to do with his opposition to Trump's bill. 01:15 - Source: CNN Vertical Politics of the Day 16 videos See moment Trump criticized Musk in Oval Office President Trump said he was 'very disappointed' with Elon Musk, as the tech billionaire and former adviser continues to blast Trump's massive tax and spending cuts package. The bill is estimated to add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade. Musk responded on X in real-time saying that he never saw the bill before it passed and said the elimination of America's electric vehicle tax incentives has nothing to do with his opposition to Trump's bill. 01:15 - Source: CNN Curtis Yarvin is inspiring a new generation of MAGA CNN's Hadas Gold interviews anti-democracy author Curtis Yarvin about his argument for an all-powerful executive in the White House. 02:24 - Source: CNN DNC Trolls Trump with Taco Truck The Democratic National Committee parked a taco truck outside the RNC headquarters in Washington DC Tuesday, as a way to troll the president over an acronym created by a Financial Times commentator about the president's frequent walk backs and pauses to his tariff's. 00:52 - Source: CNN Musk calls Trump's bill 'disgusting abomination' Elon Musk lashed out at President Donald Trump's agenda bill — which the president is pressuring GOP senators to support — calling it a 'disgusting abomination.' CNN's Kaitlan Collins reports. 00:59 - Source: CNN ICE chief defends agents wearing masks during immigration raids Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons is defending federal immigration agents for wearing masks during raids across the US, citing safety concerns. The tactic has sparked backlash and raised questions about transparency and accountability. 00:58 - Source: CNN Dana Bash presses Trump's budget chief about cancer cuts CNN's Dana Bash presses Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought on the Trump administration's proposal to cut non-defense spending by more than 22% — including deep reductions to education, food assistance, and billions in cancer research funding. As Vought defends the cuts and criticizes the NIH, Bash challenges him on the real-world impact to life-saving medical research. 01:35 - Source: CNN Trump reacts to video of Macron's apparent shove from wife President Trump was asked by reporters about the viral video appearing to show French President Emmanuel Macron being pushed by his wife Brigitte as they disembarked from a plane in Vietnam. Macron, at the time, quickly dismissed the video. 00:34 - Source: CNN Trans high school athlete wins events amid controversy A transgender athlete, whose participation sparked a national controversy and a temporary rule change, took first place in two of her three events in the California High School Track and Field Championship. 01:09 - Source: CNN South Carolina voter says 'no' to moving center South Carolina has often bucked the electoral trend – voting for candidates who lost in Iowa or New Hampshire and thus helping pick which candidate will move on to the general election. CNN's Jeff Simon spoke to multiple voters at a Democrat dinner in Columbia, South Carolina about the party's leadership and future. 01:25 - Source: CNN Hegseth warns 'threat China poses is real' US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, speaking to Asia's premier defense forum in Singapore, delivered a dire warning to the world: China's designs on Taiwan pose a threat to global peace and stability that requires 'our allies and partners do their part on defense.' While Hegseth made clear that Washington does not seek conflict with China, he stressed the Trump administration would not let aggression from Beijing stand. 00:50 - Source: CNN GOP senator pressed on Medicaid in heated town hall GOP Sen. Joni Ernst faced concerns from town hall attendees over potential cuts to Medicaid and SNAP programs as a result of President Donald Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill, saying at one point, 'Well, we all are going to die,' and insisting that those who are eligible for Medicaid will continue to receive payments. 01:12 - Source: CNN Fareed Zakaria breaks down Trump's tariff battle CNN's Fareed Zakaria breaks down what's going on with President Donald Trump's battle with the Supreme Court over tariffs. 00:58 - Source: CNN President Trump's timeline for things seems to almost always be 'in two weeks' President Donald Trump told reporters it will take about 'two weeks' to determine whether Russian President Vladimir Putin is serious about ending the war in Ukraine. That two week timeline, CNN's Abby Phillip says, is a familiar one. 01:48 - Source: CNN President Trump is on a pardoning spree President Donald Trump used his pardon power to grant clemency to a wave of individuals who had been convicted of crimes that range from public corruption, guns and even maritime-related offenses, according to multiple officials. CNN's Kaitlan Collins reports. 00:53 - Source: CNN Trump responds to Wall Street term 'TACO': Trump Always Chickens Out President Donald Trump was asked about "TACO," an acronym that means "Trump Always Chickens Out," which is used by Wall Street workers for his on-and-off approach to tariffs. Calling it "the nastiest question," Trump defended his tariff policy by calling it "negotiation." 01:13 - Source: CNN Harvard students and faculty speak out against Trump Harvard students and faculty spoke to CNN ahead of commencement as Donald Trump said the university should cap foreign enrollment. The Trump administration has recently sought to cancel $100 million in contracts with the school. 02:03 - Source: CNN


Vox
20 minutes ago
- Vox
The Supreme Court's blessedly narrow decision about religion in the workplace, explained
is a senior correspondent at Vox, where he focuses on the Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the decline of liberal democracy in the United States. He received a JD from Duke University and is the author of two books on the Supreme Court. In 2018, shortly before Justice Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation shifted the Supreme Court drastically to the right, Democratic Justice Elena Kagan laid out her strategy to keep her Court from becoming too ideological or too partisan. The secret, she said, is to take 'big questions and make them small.' Since then, Kagan and her Democratic colleagues have had mixed success persuading their colleagues to decide cases narrowly when they could hand right-wing litigants a sweeping victory. The Court has largely transformed its approach to religion, for example, though it does occasionally hand down religion cases that end less with a bang than with a whimper. SCOTUS, Explained Get the latest developments on the US Supreme Court from senior correspondent Ian Millhiser. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission will likely be remembered as such a whimper. The opinion is unanimous, and it is authored by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, one of Kagan's few fellow Democratic justices. The case could have ended in a sweeping decision that severely undermined the rights of many workers. Instead, Sotomayor's opinion focuses on a very narrow distinction between how Wisconsin law treats some religious groups as compared to others. Catholic Charities involved a Wisconsin law that exempts some nonprofits from paying unemployment taxes. This exemption applies only to employers that operate 'primarily for religious purposes.' Wisconsin's state supreme court determined that a 'religious purpose' includes activities like holding worship services or providing religious education, but it does not include secular services like feeding the poor, even if those secular activities are motivated by religion. Related The Supreme Court is leading a Christian conservative revolution The upshot is that Catholic Charities — an organization that is run by the Catholic Church but focuses primarily on secular charitable work — was not exempt from paying unemployment taxes. Sotomayor's decision reverses the state supreme court, so Catholic Charities will now receive an exemption. The Court largely avoids a fight over when businesses with a religious identity can ignore the law In a previous era, the Court was very cautious about permitting religious organizations to claim exemptions, in part because doing so would give some businesses 'an advantage over their competitors.' Such exemptions could also potentially permit employers with a religious identity to exploit their workers. In Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secretary of Labor (1985), for example, the Court considered a religious cult that operated a wide range of commercial businesses. These businesses paid no cash salaries or wages, although they did claim to give workers food, clothing, and shelter. The cult sought an exemption from minimum wage laws and similar workplace protections, but the Court disagreed. A too-broad decision in Catholic Charities could have potentially undermined decisions like Alamo Foundation, by giving some employers a broad right to ignore laws protecting their workers. But Sotomayor's opinion reads like it was crafted to hand Catholic Charities the narrowest possible victory. Under the state supreme court's decision in Catholic Charities, Sotomayor writes, a church-run nonprofit that does entirely secular charity work may not receive an exemption from paying unemployment taxes. But a virtually identical nonprofit that does the exact same work but also engages in 'proselytization' or limits its services to members of the same faith would receive an exemption. This distinction, Sotomayor says, violates the Supreme Court's long-standing rule that the government 'may not 'officially prefe[r]' one religious denomination over another.' The state may potentially require all charities to pay unemployment taxes. But it cannot treat religious charities that seek to convert people, or that limit their services to members of one faith, differently from religious charities that do not do this. In Sotomayor's words, an organization's 'eligibility for the exemption ultimately turns on inherently religious choices (namely, whether to proselytize or serve only co-religionists).' The crux of Sotomayor's opinion is that the decision whether to try to convert people, or whether to serve non-Catholics, is an inherently 'theological' choice. And states cannot treat different religious organizations differently because of their theological choices. Unfortunately, Sotomayor's opinion, which is a brief 15 pages, does not really define the term 'theological.' So it is likely that future courts will have to wrestle with whether other laws that treat some organizations differently do so because of theological differences or for some other reason. It's not hard to imagine a cult like the one in Alamo Foundation claiming that it has a theological objection to paying the minimum wage. But the Catholic Charities opinion also does not explicitly undermine decisions like Alamo Foundation. Nor does it embrace a more sweeping approach proposed by dissenting justices in the Wisconsin Supreme Court, who argued that nonprofits whose 'motivations are religious' may claim an exemption — regardless of what that nonprofit actually does.


Newsweek
22 minutes ago
- Newsweek
AOC Scrambles New York City Mayoral Race With Endorsement
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez made her endorsement in New York City's mayoral race as more progressive Democrats in the city work to consolidate support against front-running former Governor Andrew Cuomo. Why It Matters Ocasio-Cortez remains popular with younger, more progressive voters in New York City, so her support could convince some of those voters to head to the polls for the June 24 primary. Whoever prevails in the primary would become the favorite to win in November, as the city remains a Democratic stronghold. What To Know The progressive congresswoman announced in The New York Times that she is ranking Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani, who has polled second behind Cuomo and emerged as a favorite among many left-leaning voters, first in the Democratic primary. New York City uses ranked choice voting in their local elections. She said she will be ranking New York City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams second, New York City Comptroller Brad Lander third, former Comptroller Scott Stringer fourth and state Senator Zellnor Myrie fifth in her endorsement, the Times reported. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York speaks during a rally in Denver on March 21, 2025. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York speaks during a rally in Denver on March 21, 2025. JASON CONNOLLY/AFP via Getty Images "Assemblymember Mamdani has demonstrated a real ability on the ground to put together a coalition of working-class New Yorkers that is strongest to lead the pack," Ocasio-Cortez told the newspaper. "In the final stretch of the race, we need to get very real about that." Newsweek reached out to the Mamdani and Cuomo campaigns, as well as Ocasio-Cortez's office, for comment via email. Cuomo has established a polling lead over other candidates and is viewed as the leader with less than a month until the primary, as progressives seek to rally behind other candidates to prevent him from becoming the party's nominee because of his more moderate policy positions. A recent Emerson College poll found Cuomo and Mamdani as the top two Democratic candidates. On the first round of voting, 35 percent of respondents said they'd vote for Cuomo, while 23 percent would back Mamdani. By the final round, however, Cuomo had support from 54 percent of respondents, while Mamdani had 46 percent. The poll surveyed 1,000 registered voters from May 23-26 with a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. Cuomo resigned as governor in 2021 after a report from Attorney General Letitia James' office alleged that he sexually harassed multiple female employees and created a toxic working environment, allegations Cuomo has denied. In May, he accused the Trump administration of "election interference" after The New York Times reported it launched a criminal investigation into whether Cuomo lied to Congress about his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. Mamdani has engaged more progressive voters with a more left-leaning platform, emphasizing issues like a rent freeze to deal with rising rent and housing in the city and the establishment of a network of city-owned grocery stores intended to combat rising grocery costs for New Yorkers. Ocasio-Cortez's endorsement comes just one day after the Democratic candidates faced off in their first debate, during which each sought to portray themselves as the strongest to lead the city of more than 8 million people. "I am Donald Trump's worst nightmare, as a progressive Muslim immigrant who actually fights for the things that I believe in and the difference between myself and Andrew Cuomo," Mamdani said during the debate. What People Are Saying New York City mayoral candidate and Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani, in a post on X, formerly Twitter: "Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is a once-in-a-generation leader who has led the fight for working people in Congress. In 2018, she shocked the world and transformed our politics. On June 24, with @AOC's support and this movement behind us, we will do the same." Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez told The New York Times: "Even if the entire left coalesced around any one candidate, an ideological coalition is still insufficient for us to win. We have to have a true working-class coalition." What Happens Next The New York City mayoral primary is set for Tuesday June 24. The winner will face off against a Republican, as well as Mayor Eric Adams, who is seeking reelection as an independent, in November.