The Universe's Largest Map Has Arrived, And You Can Stargaze Like Never Before
It's called the COSMOS-Web field, and if that sounds familiar, it's probably because an incredible image of it dropped just a month ago. That, however, was just a little taste of what has now come to pass.
The full, interactive map and all the data have just dropped, a map that vastly outstrips the famous Hubble Ultra Deep Field's 10,000 galaxies. The new map contains nearly 800,000 galaxies – hopefully heralding in a new era of discovery in the deepest recesses of the Universe.
"Our goal was to construct this deep field of space on a physical scale that far exceeded anything that had been done before," says physicist Caitlin Casey of the University of California Santa Barbara, who co-leads the COSMOS collaboration with Jeyhan Kartaltepe of the Rochester Institute of Technology.
"If you had a printout of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field on a standard piece of paper, our image would be slightly larger than a 13-foot by 13-foot-wide mural, at the same depth. So it's really strikingly large."
JWST is our best hope for understanding the Cosmic Dawn, the first billion or so years after the Big Bang, which took place around 13.8 billion years ago. This epoch of the Universe is extremely difficult to observe: it's very far away, and very faint. Because the Universe is expanding, the light that travels to us from greater distances is stretched into redder wavelengths.
With its powerful resolution and infrared capabilities, JWST was designed for just these observations: finding the faint light from the dawn of time which informs us on the processes that gave rise to the Universe we see around us today.
The COSMOS-Web image covers a patch of sky a little bigger than the area of 7.5 full Moons, and peers back as far as 13.5 billion years, right into the time when the opaque primordial fog that suffused the early Universe was beginning to clear.
There, the researchers are looking not just for early galaxies, they're looking for an entire cosmic ecosystem – an interactive gravitational dance of objects bound by the cosmic web of dark matter that spans the entire Universe.
JWST data collected to date indicates that even with Hubble data, we've barely scratched the surface of what lurks within the Cosmic Dawn.
"The Big Bang happens and things take time to gravitationally collapse and form, and for stars to turn on. There's a timescale associated with that," Casey says.
"And the big surprise is that with JWST, we see roughly ten times more galaxies than expected at these incredible distances. We're also seeing supermassive black holes that are not even visible with Hubble."
This profusion of well-formed galaxies hasn't just surprised astronomers – it's given them a whopping great puzzle to solve. According to our current understanding of galaxy evolution, not enough time had elapsed since the Big Bang for them to have formed.
Even one is a bit of a head-scratcher – but the numbers in which JWST is finding them just boggle the mind. With access to datasets free and available to everyone who wants to take a crack, however, we may get a few answers.
"A big part of this project is the democratization of science and making tools and data from the best telescopes accessible to the broader community," Casey says.
"The best science is really done when everyone thinks about the same data set differently. It's not just for one group of people to figure out the mysteries."
Papers on the data have been submitted to the Astrophysical Journal and Astronomy & Astrophysics. Meanwhile, you can head over to the COSMOS-Web interactive website and muck about zooming through the Universe nearly all the way back to the beginning of time.
Giant Jets Bigger Than The Milky Way Seen Shooting From Black Hole
Humanity Has Just Glimpsed Part of The Sun We've Never Seen Before
'City-Killer' Asteroid Even More Likely to Hit The Moon in 2032
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
TRAPPIST-1d isn't the Earth-like planet scientists had hoped it to be, according to JWST data
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. There's bad news for our hopes of habitable planets existing around TRAPPIST-1, with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) finding no evidence for an Earth-like atmosphere on a third world orbiting the red dwarf. However, that still leaves four other planets in orbit around TRAPPIST-1 that could be habitable, with at least two or three of them in what is regarded as the "habitable zone" where temperatures would be suitable for liquid water to exist —- assuming an Earth-like atmosphere that can retain heat. Previously, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) had failed to find evidence for an atmosphere around the two innermost planets in the TRAPPIST-1 system, world TRAPPIST-1b and TRAPPIST-1c. Now, we can add the next planet out, TRAPPIST-1d, to the list. "Ultimately, we want to know if something like the environment we enjoy on Earth can exist elsewhere, and under what conditions," Caroline Piaulet-Ghorayeb of the University of Chicago and the Trottier Institute for Research on Exoplanets (IREx) at Université de Montréal, said in a statement. "At this point, we can rule out TRAPPIST-1d from a list of potential Earth twins or cousins." All seven planets of the TRAPPIST-1 system are seen transiting, or passing in front of, their star. Although not even the JWST can see the silhouette of the transiting planet, it can detect where the star's light has been absorbed by molecules in the planet's atmosphere during the transit. This is called transmission spectroscopy. Yet, despite using the JWST's sensitive Near-Infrared Spectrometer, or NIRSpec, astronomers led by Piaulet-Ghorayeb found no evidence for water, methane or carbon dioxide, all of which are common in Earth's atmosphere and which act as natural greenhouse gases to retain heat and keep a planet warm enough for liquid water. "There are a few potential reasons why we don't detect an atmosphere around TRAPPIST-1d," said Piaulet-Ghorayeb. "It could have an extremely thin atmosphere that is difficult to detect, somewhat like Mars. Alternatively, it could have very thick, high-altitude clouds that are blocking our detection of specific atmospheric signatures — something more like Venus. Or, it could be barren rock, with no atmosphere at all." The problem that the TRAPPIST-1 planets collectively face is their star. Red dwarfs, small and cool, seem at first glance to be unthreatening, but in reality they are tumultuous with frequent violent outbursts of radiation. These repeated flares can strip an atmosphere from a world a piece at a time. It is quite possible that this is the fate that has befallen TRAPPIST-1b, c and d. In particular, planet d seems like a real blow to our hopes of finding a world with an Earth-like atmosphere around TRAPPIST-1 because it resides on the inner edge of the system's habitable zone. That said, so does Venus in our solar system, and a Venus-like planet is still on the table. And there are four other planets still to go. "All hope is not lost for atmospheres around the TRAPPIST-1 planets," said Piaulet-Ghorayeb. "While we didn't find a big, bold atmospheric signature for planet d, there is still potential for the outer planets to be holding onto a lot of water and other atmospheric components." Planets e and f are definitely in the star's nominal habitable zone, g is at the outer edge like Mars is in our solar system, while planet h is beyond the habitable zone and will be almost certainly too cold to support an Earth-like atmosphere. However, probing whether any of these outer planets has an atmosphere is more difficult. Their greater distance from their star means any spectral signature is weaker, perhaps too weak even for the JWST to detect. RELATED STORIES — TRAPPIST-1: A guide to the system with 7 Earth-size exoplanets — Why the 7 worlds of TRAPPIST-1 waltz in peculiar patterns — TRAPPIST-1 Worlds Are Rocky and Rich in Water, New Research Uncovers But even if all the worlds around TRAPPIST-1, which is 40 light-years away, prove to be a bust, there are many more fish in the sea. Red dwarf stars are by far the most common type of star, making up about three-quarters of all stars in the Milky Way galaxy, and there are numerous other interesting planets around other red dwarfs, such as Teegarden's Star b, LHS 1140b and even Proxima Centauri b, even though the latter does not transit. And the search continues for rocky planets in the habitable zone of more sun-like stars — a search that the European Space Agency's PLATO mission, currently set to launch in December 2026, will accelerate. The latest news regarding the search for an atmosphere around TRAPPIST-1d was published on Aug. 13 in The Astrophysical Journal. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
How a mysterious particle could explain the universe's missing antimatter
Everything we see around us, from the ground beneath our feet to the most remote galaxies, is made of matter. For scientists, that has long posed a problem: According to physicists' best current theories, matter and its counterpart, antimatter, ought to have been created in equal amounts at the time of the Big Bang. But antimatter is vanishingly rare in the universe. So what happened? Physicists don't know the answer to that question yet, but many think the solution must involve some subtle difference in the way that matter and antimatter behave. And right now, the most promising path into that unexplored territory centers on new experiments involving the mysterious subatomic particle known as the neutrino. 'It's not to say that neutrinos are definitely the explanation of the matter-antimatter asymmetry, but a very large class of models that can explain this asymmetry are connected to neutrinos,' says Jessica Turner, a theoretical physicist at Durham University in the United Kingdom. Let's back up for a moment: When physicists talk about matter, that's just the ordinary stuff that the universe is made of — mainly protons and neutrons (which make up the nuclei of atoms), along with lighter particles like electrons. Although the term 'antimatter' has a sci-fi ring to it, antimatter is not all that different from ordinary matter. Typically, the only difference is electric charge: For example, the positron — the first antimatter particle to be discovered — matches an electron in its mass but carries a positive rather than a negative charge. (Things are a bit more complicated with electrically neutral particles. For example, a photon is considered to be its own antiparticle, but an antineutron is distinct from a neutron in that it's made up of antiquarks rather than ordinary quarks.) Various antimatter particles can exist in nature; they occur in cosmic rays and in thunderclouds, and are produced by certain kinds of radioactive decay. (Because people — and bananas — contain a small amount of radioactive potassium, they emit minuscule amounts of antimatter in the form of positrons.) Small amounts of antimatter have also been created by scientists in particle accelerators and other experiments, at great effort and expense — putting a damper on science fiction dreams of rockets propelled by antimatter or planet-destroying weapons energized by it. When matter and antimatter meet, they annihilate, releasing energy in the form of radiation. Such encounters are governed by Einstein's famous equation, E=mc2 — energy equals mass times the square of the speed of light — which says you can convert a little bit of matter into a lot of energy, or vice versa. (The positrons emitted by bananas and bodies have so little mass that we don't notice the teeny amounts of energy released when they annihilate.) Because matter and antimatter annihilate so readily, it's hard to make a chunk of antimatter much bigger than an atom, though in theory you could have everything from antimatter molecules to antimatter planets and stars. But there's a puzzle: If matter and antimatter were created in equal amounts at the time of the Big Bang, as theory suggests, shouldn't they have annihilated, leaving a universe made up of pure energy? Why is there any matter left? Physicists' best guess is that some process in the early universe favored the production of matter compared to the production of antimatter — but exactly what that process was is a mystery, and the question of why we live in a matter-dominated universe is one of the most vexing problems in all of physics. Crucially, physicists haven't been able to think of any such process that would mesh with today's leading theory of matter and energy, known as the Standard Model of particle physics. That leaves theorists seeking new ideas, some as-yet-unknown physics that goes beyond the Standard Model. This is where neutrinos come in. A neutral answer Neutrinos are tiny particles without any electric charge. (The name translates as 'little neutral one.') According to the Standard Model, they ought to be massless, like photons, but experiments beginning in the 1990s showed that they do in fact have a tiny mass. (They're at least a million times lighter than electrons, the extreme lightweights among normal matter.) Since physicists already know that neutrinos violate the Standard Model by having mass, their hope is that learning more about these diminutive particles might yield insights into whatever lies beyond. Neutrinos have been slow to yield their secrets, however, because they barely interact with other particles. About 60 billion neutrinos from the Sun pass through every square centimeter of your skin each second. If those neutrinos interacted with the atoms in our bodies, they would probably destroy us. Instead, they pass right through. 'You most likely will not interact with a single neutrino in your lifetime,' says Pedro Machado, a physicist at Fermilab near Chicago. 'It's just so unlikely.' Experiments, however, have shown that neutrinos 'oscillate' as they travel, switching among three different identities — physicists call them 'flavors': electron neutrino, muon neutrino and tau neutrino. Oscillation measurements have also revealed that different-flavored neutrinos have slightly different masses. Neutrino oscillation is weird, but it may be weird in a useful way, because it might allow physicists to probe certain fundamental symmetries in nature — and these in turn may illuminate the most troubling of asymmetries, namely the universe's matter-antimatter imbalance. For neutrino researchers, a key symmetry is called charge-parity or CP symmetry. It's actually a combination of two distinct symmetries: Changing a particle's charge flips matter into antimatter (or vice versa), while changing a particle's parity flips a particle into its mirror image (like turning a right-handed glove into a left-handed glove). So the CP-opposite version of a particle of ordinary matter is a mirror image of the corresponding antiparticle. But does this opposite particle behave exactly the same as the original one? If not, physicists say that CP symmetry is violated — a fancy way of saying that matter and antimatter behave slightly differently from one another. So any examples of CP symmetry violation in nature could help to explain the matter-antimatter imbalance. In fact, CP violation has already been observed in some mesons, a type of subatomic particle typically made up of one quark and one antiquark, a surprising result first found in the 1960s. But it's an extremely small effect, and it falls far short of being able to account for the universe's matter-antimatter asymmetry. In July 2025, scientists working at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN near Geneva reported clear evidence for a similar violation by one type of particle from a different family of subatomic particles known as baryons — but this newly observed CP violation is similarly believed to be much too small to account for the matter-antimatter imbalance. Experiments on the horizon So what about neutrinos? Do they violate CP symmetry — and if so, do they do it in a big enough way to explain why we live in a matter-dominated universe? This is precisely the question being addressed by a new generation of particle physics experiments. Most ambitious among them is the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE), which is now under construction in the United States; data collection could begin as early as 2029. DUNE will employ the world's most intense neutrino beam, which will fire both neutrinos and antineutrinos from Fermilab to the Sanford Underground Research Facility, located 800 miles away in South Dakota. (There's no tunnel; the neutrinos and antineutrinos simply zip through the earth, for the most part hardly noticing that it's there.) Detectors at each end of the beam will reveal how the particles oscillate as they traverse the distance between the two labs — and whether the behavior of the neutrinos differs from that of the antineutrinos. DUNE won't pin down the precise amount of neutrinos' CP symmetry violation (if there is any), but it will set an upper limit on it. The larger the possible effect, the greater the discrepancy in the behavior of neutrinos versus antineutrinos, and the greater the likelihood that neutrinos could be responsible for the matter-antimatter asymmetry in the early universe. For Shirley Li, a physicist at the University of California, Irvine, the issue of neutrino CP violation is an urgent question, one that could point the way to a major rethink of particle physics. 'If I could have one question answered by the end of my lifetime, I would want to know what that's about,' she says. Aside from being a major discovery in its own right, CP symmetry violation in neutrinos could challenge the Standard Model by pointing the way to other novel physics. For example, theorists say it would mean there could be two kinds of neutrinos — left-handed ones (the normal lightweight ones observed to date) and much heavier right-handed neutrinos, which are so far just a theoretical possibility. (The particles' 'handedness' refers to their quantum properties.) These right-handed neutrinos could be as much as 1015 times heavier than protons, and they'd be unstable, decaying almost instantly after coming into existence. Although they're not found in today's universe, physicists suspect that right-handed neutrinos may have existed in the moments after the Big Bang — possibly decaying via a process that mimicked CP violation and favored the creation of matter over antimatter. It's even possible that neutrinos can act as their own antiparticles — that is, that neutrinos could turn into antineutrinos and vice versa. This scenario, which the discovery of right-handed neutrinos would support, would make neutrinos fundamentally different from more familiar particles like quarks and electrons. If antineutrinos can turn into neutrinos, that could help explain where the antimatter went during the universe's earliest moments. One way to test this idea is to look for an unusual type of radioactive decay — theorized but thus far never observed — known as 'neutrinoless double-beta decay.' In regular double-beta decay, two neutrons in a nucleus simultaneously decay into protons, releasing two electrons and two antineutrinos in the process. But if neutrinos can act as their own antiparticles, then the two neutrinos could annihilate each other, leaving only the two electrons and a burst of energy. Stay in the KnowSign up for the Knowable Magazine newsletter today A number of experiments are underway or planned to look for this decay process, including the KamLAND-Zen experiment, at the Kamioka neutrino detection facility in Japan; the nEXO experiment at the SNOLAB facility in Ontario, Canada; the NEXT experiment at the Canfranc Underground Laboratory in Spain; and the LEGEND experiment at the Gran Sasso laboratory in Italy. KamLAND-Zen, NEXT and LEGEND are already up and running. While these experiments differ in the details, they all employ the same general strategy: They use a giant vat of dense, radioactive material with arrays of detectors that look for the emission of unusually energetic electrons. (The electrons' expected neutrino companions would be missing, with the energy they would have had instead carried by the electrons.) While the neutrino remains one of the most mysterious of the known particles, it is slowly but steadily giving up its secrets. As it does so, it may crack the puzzle of our matter-dominated universe — a universe that happens to allow inquisitive creatures like us to flourish. The neutrinos that zip silently through your body every second are gradually revealing the universe in a new light. 'I think we're entering a very exciting era,' says Turner. This article originally appeared in Knowable Magazine, an independent journalistic endeavor from Annual Reviews. Sign up for the newsletter. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
A Dark Mirror Universe May Be Hiding Right Next Door, Scientists Say
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: We have not been able to detect dark matter yet, even though there are many aspects of the universe that suggest the existence of invisible matter. In one new theory, it is possible that dark matter exists in a mirror universe where there are only dark versions of forces that hold the universe together. Another new theory suggests that dark matter may have been created at the edge of the universe right after the Big Bang, then radiated into space as the universe expanded. Hypothetically, dark matter is supposed to exist, even though it has managed to elude every single detection attempt so far. It neither absorbs nor reflects light. Still, something has to be generating enough gravity to hold together immense galaxies that rotate so fast, they would otherwise end up annihilating themselves. We keep searching for it—but we might be searching in the wrong universe. There might be more exotic explanations for invisible matter that is supposedly right in front of us. Physicist Stefano Profumo of the University of California, Santa Cruz, suggests it could have come from one of two origins. It might be lurking in a dark mirror universe contained within the visible universe. The merging of dark matter black holes in that realm may cause gravitational waves which can be detected. If this is starting to sound like one of the multiple mirrorverses in Stephen King's The Dark Tower, think of it as a shadow version of the same rogue chasing the same man in black through space and time. 'The nature of dark matter remains one of the most pressing mysteries in modern cosmology and particle physics,' Profumo said in a study recently published in Physical Review D. 'While numerous candidates have been proposed, from weakly interacting massive particles to axions, the search for the fundamental nature of the dark matter and of the 'dark sector' it resides in continues.' Alternately, dark matter particles might have formed at the edge of the observable universe, or the cosmic horizon, as it expanded at breakneck speed right after the Big Bang. Profumo thinks these particles might still be radiated into space similarly to how Hawking radiation describes particles evaporating from right outside the event horizon of a black hole. The cosmic horizon is something like the universe's equivalent to a black hole's event horizon. Though Profumo admits both of his theories are highly speculative, they are not impossible. He was inspired by quantum chromodynamics (QCD), which explains how the strong force of gravity binds together the quarks and gluons which make up protons and neutrons. The dark mirror universe he envisions has its own versions of particles and forces that operate just like those in the universe we exist in. Dark quarks (which create protons) and gluons (which glue quarks together into protons) should be able to bind and create baryons such as protons and neutrons, which are the dark reflection of the baryons we can detect. Black holes (or at least objects that behave much like them) could have formed from dark baryons in the nascent universe. While there have been theories about primordial black holes forming as dark matter, researchers have seen them as the product of density fluctuations rather than emerging from a mirror universe. If clouds of dark baryons became dense and massive enough, they would have collapsed into themselves and formed nano-black hole. Enough of these black holes can contain all the dark matter in existence. With such a behemoth amount of gravity, they would also have a profound effect on the shape of the universe. Another possibility that Profumo explores is dark matter particles radiating from the cosmic horizon. The universe is already thought to have fast-forwarded through a period of inflation after its birth, and he argues that in the beginning, because it expanded faster than the speed of light, dark matter particles were released from its edges. While inflation has slowed down dramatically since then, the universe and the very fabric of spacetime are still expanding, which can be seen by the increasing distance between objects that are not gravitationally bound. That means dark matter should keep radiating for as long as expansion continues. 'The underlying mechanism leading to the production of the cosmological dark matter (DM) is at present an open question and a matter of ongoing, intense scrutiny,' Profumo said in a second study also published in Physical Review D. If a mirror universe controlled by the dark side of physics really does exist, is there a portal into it? Maybe the answer to that question will see the light someday. You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life? Solve the daily Crossword
