
Documents suggest B.C.'s hydrogen plans under threat as uncertainty halts 'large-scale' projects
Documents released through a freedom of information request reveal that B.C.'s former energy minister was told last September that at least seven "large-scale hydrogen projects" were being cancelled or paused because of issues including electricity supply, high cost and transportation.
The end of one of those plans — Fortescue's Project Coyote — has since been made public, but the documents list six more projects that have been quietly put on ice, including a Prince George clean hydrogen project publicly launched by Premier David Eby last January.
All told, the documents outline serious threats to B.C.'s dreams of becoming a leading hydrogen producer — including lack of domestic demand, an "unprecedented" need for electricity and uncertainty around moving volatile chemicals by rail through First Nations land.
"Over the past six months, at least seven large-scale hydrogen production projects have paused development or been cancelled due to a range of issues," then energy minister Josie Osborne was told in a briefing note in September 2024.
"The government of B.C. will need stronger policy action to support hydrogen production and use to successfully establish a hydrogen economy in B.C."
'Creating jobs and delivering cleaner air'
The briefing note was part of a package released earlier this month in response to a freedom of information (FOI) request from a business.
Hydrogen's potential as an environmentally-friendly alternative to fossil fuels has generated global excitement.
It can be produced from domestic resources including natural gas, biomass, and wind or solar power. And when used as fuel to power anything from cars to ships to buildings, hydrogen produces zero to negligible amounts of greenhouse gases — although it has been critiqued for the large amount of energy it takes to create.
The B.C. government has embraced the role of hydrogen in hopes of achieving net-zero emissions by 2050, developing a strategy"to accelerate the production and use of renewable and low-carbon hydrogen and be a world leader in the growing hydrogen economy."
In pursuit of that goal, Eby travelled to Prince George last January to announce a project led by Chilliwack-based Teralta Hydrogen Solutions to power a Canfor mill with hydrogen produced as a byproduct from a nearby Chemtrade sodium chlorate production facility.
"Our work is creating jobs and delivering cleaner air across the province. B.C.'s hydrogen strategy has paved the way for this project to move forward," Eby said in a news release issued at the time.
"Teralta and their partners, Chemtrade and Canfor Pulp, are leaders in fighting climate change through creative solutions that lower carbon emissions, create good-paying jobs for people, and build healthier communities."
But according to the FOI documents, that project has since been paused.
"Chemtrade ceased sodium chlorate production due to local mill closures, which means no byproduct hydrogen is being produced on site," the documents say.
A Teralta spokesperson told CBC News that while the project itself was successful, the closure of the Canfor mill and Chemtrade's decision to stop producing sodium chlorate in Prince George meant it was no longer viable, so the project has been put on hold indefinitely.
'Not cost competitive with its alternatives'
The briefing note to Osborne lists five other major project that have been paused:
MIXT Energy (McLeod Lake Indian Band) and Mitsubishi's $5-billion green hydrogen and ammonia production project for export on Kerry Lake reserve near Prince George.
Shell Canada's Aurora Hydrogen green hydrogen production project for domestic use near Port Moody.
TC Energy's green liquid hydrogen export project for northwest B.C.
Kanata Clean's blue hydrogen production project for export in northwest B.C.
NorthRiver Midstream's blue hydrogen production project for domestic use in Taylor.
The documents cite specific concerns for each project, including "electricity availability," "lack of domestic demand" and "transportation of ammonia."
A separate briefing note sent to Eby last March sounds an alarm about the demand for electricity from "numerous proposed industrial projects at various stages of advancement that are requesting over 150 megawatts" — including a series of hydrogen projects.
"The growth in new industrial customer interconnection requests, both in number and magnitude, requires a broader consideration of how B.C.'s clean electricity resources are managed," the premier was told.
"New policy approaches are needed to balance industrial competitiveness with electrification in other sectors of the economy, all while keeping rates affordable."
The briefing note to Osborne says while a requirement for large load customers to contribute costs for incremental generation and transmission infrastructure "is considered necessary to protect ratepayers from cost increases, it renders many large-scale hydrogen projects uneconomical."
Osborne was also told that B.C. "has not developed a stable domestic market for green hydrogen, primarily due to the high cost of adoption of both hydrogen fuel and hydrogen technologies."
The document lists examples of "funding programs and incentives" for would-be producers, but concludes that "even when currently available incentives are stacked, green hydrogen production is not cost competitive with its alternatives, both in domestic and international markets."
'Significant risk to human health and the environment'
The challenge of transporting hydrogen is a constant theme in the documents included in the FOI release.
One of the most efficient ways of moving hydrogen is by chemically combining it with nitrogen to make ammonia, which can be shipped by rail or boat and then "cracked" back into its separate components at a final destination.
"The use of ammonia as a hydrogen energy carrier is considered more energy efficient and uses globally established infrastructure," Eby was told in an information document written last July.
"However, when not handled properly, or spilled, ammonia can pose significant risk to human health and the environment due to its flammability, acute toxicity and negative impacts to aquatic ecosystems."
The same document says the governments of B.C. and Alberta have been in trilateral discussions with Ottawa — which has jurisdiction over interprovincial rail lines — over issues like safety, liability and engagement with Indigenous communities.
"Transporting ammonia by rail across B.C., will require consultation with communities and 26 First Nations along the proposed corridor," Eby was told.
"However, rail operations in Canada have a complex and challenging past. Often expansion of the railway network across the country meant land dispossession and undue hardship for First Nations communities along its corridors."
'What's necessary is an energy corridor'
CBC reached out to representatives of the projects listed as "paused" in the briefing note.
In a statement, TC Energy confirmed the end of its plans.
"In 2023/2024, we conducted a pre-feasibility study on liquid hydrogen production," the company told CBC.
"The assessment revealed that production costs exceeded market price targets, leading to the decision to not move forward with the opportunity."
In an email exchange, Kanata Clean confirmed that its project is paused — as opposed to cancelled — citing both the lack of natural gas capacity in Prince Rupert and the transportation of ammonia as issues.
"Ultimately what's necessary is an energy corridor through the province that ends at Prince Rupert, which would include an LNG pipeline and a hydrogen/ammonia pipeline," spokesperson Mark Marissen said in an email.
"To make hydrogen projects like this one a reality in B.C., this energy corridor needs to be included in the list of the province's top priorities for expediting, given that this would help us to diversify our markets from the American market in a big way."
Kanata Clean CEO Robert Delamar suggested that challenges facing hydrogen projects should be a federal election issue.
"We'd like to see an Indigenous Energy Corridor running from Northwest BC to Eastern (and Northern) Canada, with pipelines a core feature of the corridor," Delamar wrote in an email.
"Just saying in a federal election that Canada should diversify its trade, obfuscates the reality that this is a multi-generational, multi-party policy failure. We need real, concrete solutions, quickly."
Former Liberal environment minister Barry Penner reviewed the FOI documents; he says they show the NDP government's enthusiasm for hydrogen projects is at odds with reality.
"If you just take a look at this briefing note, it reveals that the plan is not working out as expected so far," said Penner, who now leads the Energy Futures Initiative, an organization calling for energy policy considerations to include reliability and affordability.
"I didn't see any indication of any projects there that are really moving ahead. At best, some have been paused, others have been cancelled outright. It's quite a list, so yes, it's disappointing, but it is not surprising."
In a statement to CBC, a spokesperson for the province noted that hydrogen "is a new industry, and many proponents and governments globally are still figuring out how to best develop the sector."
"Despite the actions that have been taken by the Province, some proponents have had to make difficult commercial decisions, based on a number of internal and external factors," the statement said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Canada Standard
an hour ago
- Canada Standard
A First Nations Power Authority Could Transform Electricity Generation for IndigenousNations
First Nations across British Columbia have developed renewable electricity projects for decades. Yet they've experienced significant barriers to implementing, owning and managing their own electricity supply. That's because there have been few procurement policies in place that require their involvement. While municipalities are allowed to own and operate electricity utilities in B.C., First Nations are not [ pdf ], writes at team of experts and advocates at The Conversation. The Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA) in B.C. requires that First Nations are provided with opportunities for economic development without discrimination. Many First Nations in B.C. view the development of renewable electricity projects on their lands-like hydro power, solar panels, wind turbines and transmission lines-as a way to achieve social, environmental and economic goals that are important to their community. These goals may include powering buildings in the community, creating economic development and local jobs, earning revenue, improving access to affordable and reliable electricity or using less diesel. Related: First Nations Power Authorities Could Show Path to Energy Justice The study shares the story of a coalition of First Nations and organizations that advocated for changes to electricity regulations and laws to give Indigenous communities more control to develop renewable electricity projects. Interviews with knowledge holders from 14 First Nations offer insight into motivations behind their calls for regulatory changes. The coalition includes the Clean Energy Association of B.C., New Relationship Trust, Pembina Institute, First Nations Power Authority, Nuu-Chah-Nulth Tribal Council, and the First Nations Clean Energy Working Group. View our latest digests Almost all electricity customers in B.C. are served by BC Hydro, the electric utility owned by the provincial government. The coalition argues that applying DRIPA to the electricity sector should allow First Nations to form a First Nations power authority. Such an organization would provide them with control over the development of electricity infrastructure that aligns with their values and would also help B.C. meet its greenhouse gas reduction targets. In the Re-Imagining Social Energy Transitions CoLaboratory (ReSET CoLab) at the University of Victoria, the team analyzed regulatory documents from the B.C. Utilities Commission, and advocacy documents and presentations for discussion developed by the coalition. Six proposed First Nations power authority (Indigenous Utility) models were identified: A capacity building point-of-contact model streamlines the development of renewable electricity projects to sell power to the provincial utility. For example, the First Nations Power Authority in Saskatchewan was formed for this purpose by SaskPower. This would be the most conformative model. It would provide vital networks and connections to First Nations while allowing BC Hydro and the British Columbia Utilities Commission to maintain full control over the electricity sector. In the second model, called a "put" contract, a B.C. First Nations Power Authority represents First Nations wishing to develop renewable electricity projects. Whenever the province needs to build new electricity generation projects to meet growing electricity demand, a portion of the new generation is developed by the First Nations authority. In the third model, First Nations build and operate electricity transmission and distribution lines to allow remote industrial facilities and communities to connect to the electricity grid. This is called "Industrial Interconnection." For example, the Wataynikaneyap Power Transmission line in Ontario is a 1,800-kilometre line that provides an electricity grid connection for 17 previously remote nations. Twenty-four First Nations own 51 per cent of the line, while private investors own 49 per cent. In the fourth model, the B.C. First Nation Power Authority acts as the designated body for various opportunities in the electricity sector, such as the development of electricity transmission, distribution, generation or customer services. This model is referred to as "local or regional 'ticket' opportunities." Fifth, the First Nation Power Authority develops renewable electricity projects and distributes electricity from these projects to customers as a retailer, or under an agreement through the BC Hydro electricity grid. For example, Nova Scotia Power's Green Choice program procures renewable electricity from independent power producers to supply to electricity customers. Sixth, new utility is formed in B.C., owned by First Nations, that owns and operates electricity generation, transmission and distribution services and offers standard customer services in a specific region of B.C. (called a "Regional Vertically-Integrated Power Authority"). Most of these models would require changes to regulations. The sixth and most transformative model would provide First Nations with full decision-making control over electricity generation, transmission and distribution. It would also give them the ability to sell to customers and require extensive changes in electricity regulation. First Nations knowledge-holders told us that a lack of reliable power, high electricity rates, lack of control over projects on their traditional lands and the need for resilience in the face of climate events were motivations for taking electricity planning into their own hands. They also expressed that varied factors motivate community interest in renewable energy: improving the quality of life for community members; financial independence; mitigating climate change; protecting the environment; reducing diesel use and providing stable and safe power for current and future generations. First Nations are already seeking to capitalize on the benefits of renewable energy by developing their own projects within the current regulatory system. Most of those we spoke to see a First Nations power authority in B.C. as a means to provide opportunities for economic development without discrimination - and to achieve self-determination, self-reliance and reconciliation by addressing the root causes of some of the colonial injustices they face by obtaining control over the electricity sector on their lands. This article , first published at The Conversation on June 4, was co-authored by David Benton, an adopted member and Clean Energy Project Lead of Gitga'at First Nation and Kayla Klym, a BSc student in Geography at the University of Victoria. Source: The Energy Mix


Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
What to know about inspections of Iran's nuclear program by the IAEA ahead of a key board vote
VIENNA (AP) — Iran's nuclear program remains a top focus for inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency, particularly as any possible deal between Tehran and the United States over the program would likely rely on the agency long known as the United Nations' nuclear watchdog. This week, Western nations will push for a measure at the IAEA's Board of Governors censuring Iran over its noncompliance with inspectors, pushing the matter before the U.N. Security Council. Barring any deal with Washington, Iran then could face what's known as 'snapback' — the reimposition of all U.N. sanctions on it originally lifted by Tehran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, if one of its Western parties declares the Islamic Republic is out of compliance with it. All this sets the stage for a renewed confrontation with Iran as the Mideast remains inflamed by Israel's war on Hamas in the Gaza Strip. And the IAEA's work in any case will make the Vienna-based agency a key player. Here's more to know about the IAEA, its inspections of Iran and the deals — and dangers — at play. Atoms for peace The IAEA was created in 1957. The idea for it grew out of a 1953 speech given by U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower at the U.N., in which he urged the creation of an agency to monitor the world's nuclear stockpiles to ensure that 'the miraculous inventiveness of man shall not be dedicated to his death, but consecrated to his life.' Broadly speaking, the agency verifies the reported stockpiles of member nations. Those nations are divided into three categories. The vast majority are nations with so-called 'comprehensive safeguards agreements' with the IAEA, states without nuclear weapons that allow IAE monitoring over all nuclear material and activities. Then there's the 'voluntary offer agreements' with the world's original nuclear weapons states — China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the U.S. — typically for civilian sites. Finally, the IAEA has 'item-specific agreements' with India, Israel and Pakistan — nuclear-armed countries that haven't signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. That treaty has countries agree not to build or obtain nuclear weapons. North Korea, which is also nuclear armed, said it has withdrawn from the treaty, though that's disputed by some experts. The collapse of Iran's 2015 nuclear deal Iran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, negotiated under then-President Barack Obama, allowed Iran to enrich uranium to 3.67% — enough to fuel a nuclear power plant but far below the threshold of 90% needed for weapons-grade uranium. It also drastically reduced Iran's stockpile of uranium, limited its use of centrifuges and relied on the IAEA to oversee Tehran's compliance through additional oversight. But President Donald Trump in his first term in 2018 unilaterally withdrew America from the accord, insisting it wasn't tough enough and didn't address Iran's missile program or its support for militant groups in the wider Mideast. That set in motion years of tensions, including attacks at sea and on land. Iran now enriches up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels. It also has enough of a stockpile to build multiple nuclear bombs, should it choose to do so. Iran has long insisted its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but the IAEA, Western intelligence agencies and others say Tehran had an organized weapons program up until 2003. IAEA inspections and Iran Under the 2015 deal, Iran agreed to allow the IAEA even greater access to its nuclear program. That included permanently installing cameras and sensors at nuclear sites. Those cameras, inside of metal housings sprayed with a special blue paint that shows any attempt to tamper with it, took still images of sensitive sites. Other devices, known as online enrichment monitors, measured the uranium enrichment level at Iran's Natanz nuclear facility. The IAEA also regularly sent inspectors into Iranian sites to conduct surveys, sometimes collecting environmental samples with cotton clothes and swabs that would be tested at IAEA labs back in Austria. Others monitor Iranian sites via satellite images. In the years since Trump's 2018 decision, Iran has limited IAEA inspections and stopped the agency from accessing camera footage. It's also removed cameras. At one point, Iran accused an IAEA inspector of testing positive for explosive nitrates, something the agency disputed. The IAEA has engaged in years of negotiations with Iran to restore full access for its inspectors. While Tehran hasn't granted that, it also hasn't entirely thrown inspectors out. Analysts view this as part of Iran's wider strategy to use its nuclear program as a bargaining chip with the West. What happens next Iran and the U.S. have gone through five rounds of negotiations over a possible deal, with talks mediated by the sultanate of Oman. Iran appears poised to reject an American proposal over a deal this week, potentially as soon as Tuesday. Without a deal with the U.S., Iran's long-ailing economy could enter a freefall that could worsen the simmering unrest at home. Israel or the U.S. might carry out long-threatened airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities. Experts fear Tehran in response could decide to fully end its cooperation with the IAEA, abandon the the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and rush toward a bomb. If a deal is reached — or at least a tentative understanding between the two sides — that likely will take the pressure off for an immediate military strike by the U.S. Gulf Arab states, which opposed Obama's negotiations with Iran in 2015, now welcome the talks under Trump. Any agreement would require the IAEA's inspectors to verify Iran's compliance. But Israel, which has struck at Iranian-backed militants across the region, remains a wildcard on what it could do. Last year, it carried out its first military airstrikes on Iran — and has warned it is willing to take action alone to target Tehran's program, like it has in the past in Iraq in 1981 or Syria in 2007. ___ Associated Press writer Stephanie Liechtenstein contributed to this report. ___ The Associated Press receives support for nuclear security coverage from the Carnegie Corporation of New York and Outrider Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content. ___ Additional AP coverage of the nuclear landscape:


Toronto Star
2 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Developers unveil plans for aviation-themed playground on former Downsview Airport lands
A Toronto-based developer unveiled plans to convert a 100-foot decommissioned airplane into a playground on former Downsview Airport lands on Monday. The deconstructed plane, or 'playscape,' is part of a larger project including a public plaza at YZD, the community planned for the redevelopment of North York's former 370-acre airport.