13 men arrested for being suspected members of secret societies
On May 23 and 24, almost 90 people and more than 40 public entertainment outlets, nightlife establishments and food and beverage outlets were checked.
The islandwide operation was led by the Secret Societies Branch of the Criminal Investigation Department, said the police in a statement on May 31.
Investigations into all suspects are ongoing.
The police said they will continue to conduct such operations and take firm action against those who associate with secret societies.
They also advised the public to steer clear of secret society activities and make police reports against those who engage in such activities. Anyone found guilty of being a member of an unlawful society may face a jail term of up to three years, a fine of up to $10,000, or both.
More than 1,300 suspected members of unlawful societies were arrested from 2022 to 2024.
According to figures from the Singapore Prison Service, there has been an increase in the number of young people jailed for their involvement in secret society activities under the Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Singapore Law Watch
6 hours ago
- Singapore Law Watch
Investors seek court-ordered judicial management of Tokenize Xchange operator amid police probe
Investors seek court-ordered judicial management of Tokenize Xchange operator amid police probe Source: Straits Times Article Date: 07 Aug 2025 Author: Timothy Goh Hong Qi Yu, a director of AmazingTech, and the founder and chief executive of Tokenize Xchange, was charged in court on July 31 over fraudulent trading under the same Act. Seven cryptocurrency investors have applied to the High Court to place AmazingTech – the operator of embattled cryptocurrency platform Tokenize Xchange – under interim judicial management to protect their investments. If their court application on Aug 5 is successful, the High Court can appoint professional managers to take over the day-to-day running of the company and audit its assets. The Straits Times understands the seven customers have not been able to withdraw their deposits amounting to more than $4 million that are held by Tokenize Xchange. Trading of cryptocurrencies on the platform currently remains suspended. The High Court move by the seven investors comes as AmazingTech and its related entities are under investigation by the police for potential offences of fraudulent trading under the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act. Hong Qi Yu, a director of AmazingTech, and the founder and chief executive of Tokenize Xchange, was charged in court on July 31 over fraudulent trading under the same Act. The seven investors are represented by lawyers Alfred Lim, Jaime Lye and Rasveen Kaur of law firm Meritus. They are asking the High Court to appoint Mr Cameron Lindsay Duncan, Mr David Dong-Won Kim and Mr Joshua Joseph Jeyaraj of corporate advisory and restructuring firm KordaMentha as the judicial managers of AmazingTech. A court hearing has been set for Aug 21. The timeline for a judicial manager to be appointed by the High Court may take up to a few months. Meanwhile, ST understands that another law firm – Dauntless Law Chambers – is assembling more than 100 customers, owed about $40 million by Tokenize Xchange, to file a class action lawsuit against Hong personally for fraud. The Commercial Affairs Department and the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) said in a statement on Aug 1 that MAS had received several customer complaints against AmazingTech in mid-July about delays in withdrawing monies and digital payment tokens. On July 20, Tokenize Xchange said it would shut down the business following MAS' decision not to grant it a licence to offer digital payment token services here. It was previously operating under an exemption. The company told ST then that its customers in Singapore can no longer buy or sell cryptocurrencies on its platform and may only transfer their cryptocurrency holdings to other exchanges, where they can convert them to cash and make withdrawals. ST understands that withdrawals have been inconsistent, with many investors still unable to access their funds. MAS said in its Aug 1 statement that it found indications that the firm may have made false representations about segregating customer assets when applying for a major payment institution licence. It added that AmazingTech and its activities are not supervised or regulated by MAS and has since referred the case to the Commercial Affairs Department for investigation. ST has contacted Hong for comments, while queries for AmazingTech were unanswered. Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Print
Singapore Law Watch
6 hours ago
- Singapore Law Watch
Park Hotel Management director breached fiduciary duty by selling assets to himself under value
Park Hotel Management director breached fiduciary duty by selling assets to himself under value Source: Straits Times Article Date: 07 Aug 2025 Author: Grace Leong The court has ruled that Allen Law transferred the viable assets and businesses of his company, Park Hotel Management, effectively to himself 'at a gross undervalue'. Mr Allen Law, the scion of Hong Kong-based billionaire Law Kar Po, was found to have breached his fiduciary duties and prejudiced the interests of creditors, while navigating his company Park Hotel Management (PHMPL) through financial challenges resulting from the Covid-19 pandemic. According to a 165-page High Court judgment released on Aug 6, Mr Law, the sole director and shareholder of PHMPL, sold assets to himself at 'gross undervalue' and diverted more than $32 million in cash and receivables for his benefit. 'When (Mr Law's) company was in financial peril, he transferred its viable assets and businesses (effectively) to himself at a gross undervalue and manipulated the books of the company to eliminate receivables owed by him and his entities, leaving the creditors with nothing,' High Court Judge Hri Kumar Nair noted. 'Far from demonstrating selflessness, Mr Law showed contempt for his fiduciary obligations... While PHMPL may have failed because of events beyond his control, his response was entirely regrettable. 'He appropriated PHMPL's assets for himself and manipulated PHMPL's books to hide his subterfuge. His conduct, both in relation to the 'restructuring' and his defence of these proceedings, was dishonest and dishonourable. His first and only thought was to benefit himself,' the judge said. Mr Law and three other companies were sued by PHMPL and its liquidators over matters relating to assets sold to entities related to him before the company was placed in liquidation in July 2021 in the wake of the pandemic, which had devastated the hospitality industry globally. The three defendant companies are Park Hotel Group Management (PHG), British Virgin Islands-incorporated Good Movement Holdings and Singapore Institute of Hospitality (SIOH). PHG and SIOH are owned by Good Movement, which in turn is owned by Mr Law, who is married to Ms Tan Shin Hui, granddaughter of former UOB chairman, the late Mr Wee Cho Yaw. She is the executive director of PHG. PHMPL was also the sole shareholder of hotel management company Park Hotel Management (Maldives), restaurant operator Yan and Park Hotel Affiliates (PHA). Due to plummeting occupancy rates and pandemic-related restrictions, Park Hotel CQ, operator of the former Park Hotel Clarke Quay property in Unity Street; and Grand Park OR, operator of the former Grand Park Orchard hotel, were unable to meet their lease obligations. Despite efforts to negotiate with landlords and seek relief under the Covid-19 (Temporary Measures) Act, PHMPL's financial position became increasingly precarious. A sale of PHMPL's assets was done in March 2021. But the liquidators said that PHMPL did not receive any consideration for the substantial assets it disposed of. This included a sum of $2.7 million for assets sold to PHG under an asset share and transfer agreement (ASTA) in March 2021. The assets included 12 hotel management agreements, licence agreements, business names, and PHMPL trademarks. The shareholdings in Park Hotel Maldives were purchased by PHG and Good Movement for US$40,000 (S$51,490), while the shareholding in Yan was purchased by Good Movement for $500,000, and the assets of the Singapore Institute of Hospitality were sold by PHMPL for $200,000. 'The effect of the agreements was that PHMPL's assets... were transferred to the defendant companies for a total sum of $3.4 million and US$40,000,' according to the judgment. 'But Mr Law... arranged it such that PHMPL did not even receive these sums,' Justice Nair said. Furthermore, the judge found that the market value of these assets amounted to $26.4 million and US$2.42 million. 'The transfer of assets and businesses from PHMPL to the defendant companies was only one part of Mr Law's plan. In the period when Park Hotel CQ and Grand Park OR were failing to meet their obligations under their respective leases, Mr Law extracted substantial amounts of cash from all three companies,' according to the ruling. In addition, Mr Law also breached the no-profit rule of the Companies Act when he diverted an opportunity to manage Park Hotel Kyoto to PHG, to the detriment of PHMPL. The second part of the plan, the judge found, 'was to cause PHMPL to declare and backdate substantial dividends in Mr Law's favour and to effect a series of transfers and set-offs in PHMPL's books, most of which were also backdated, to eliminate his and his entities' liabilities to PHMPL.' Mr Law received cash payments from PHMPL and also diverted receivables of $22.3 million due from his related companies to PHMPL. These amounts were set off against dividend declarations of $22 million and $5.9 million, and an accounting entry of $6.75 million in his favour. But the judge found that the dividend declarations were invalid as PHMPL was insolvent at the time they were made. As a result, Mr Law must repay $10.1 million in cash payments and $22.3 million in receivables. 'Given my findings that PHMPL was at the very least financially parlous by 31 December 2020 and Mr Law knew this, the cash payments were not in the interests of PHMPL and amount to breaches of Mr Law's fiduciary duties to PHMPL,' Justice Nair said. A representative from the defendants said: 'This remains a legacy matter arising from the exceptional circumstances of Covid lockdowns in 2020 and their unprecedented impact on the hospitality sector. The judgment is being reviewed and appropriate next steps are being considered.' Allen & Gledhill partners William Ong and Lee Bik Wei are acting for the plaintiffs, while Mr Law and the three defendant companies are represented by TSMP Law's senior counsel Thio Shen Yi. Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Park Hotel Management Pte Ltd (in liquidation) and others v Law Ching Hung and others [2025] SGHC 149 Print
AsiaOne
7 hours ago
- AsiaOne
17-year-old girl breaches home detention, arrested after car crashes into prison van while fleeing, Singapore News
A 17-year-old girl who broke her home detention curfew was arrested alongside a 22-year-old man after they crashed into a Singapore Prison Service (SPS) vehicle while attempting to flee. A video and picture seen by AsiaOne on Aug 1 shows a collision between a yellow car and a grey, unmarked van near a multistorey carpark at Yishun Street 22. The resident who had captured the video told AsiaOne that he heard a loud bang from his window at about 9.30pm on July 31. Upon looking out, he saw "plainclothes officers" dragging a woman — seemingly in handcuffs —to a grey van as she resisted. Several police cars arrived at the scene soon after, and officers were conducting checks, said the resident. Responding to AsiaOne's queries, the Singapore Prison Service (SPS) confirmed that a 17-year-old girl and a 22-year-old man had been arrested in the vicinity of Blk 269A and 269B Yishun Street 22. The teen had been admitted to admitted to the Drug Rehabilitation Centre (DRC) on Oct 16, 2024 for drug consumption and was placed under home detention on June 6 this year. Suitable inmates are placed on community-based programmes (CPB), such as home detention, at the tail-end of their incarceration to help them reintegrate back into society. The girl was electronically tagged and required to observe curfew hours, be gainfully employed or studying and report to SPS regularly for urine testing and counselling, according to the prison service. On July 17, 2025, she breached her curfew and did not return to her residence. When she was recalled to assist in investigations regarding this incident, the teen also failed to report to SPS. As such, her CBP order was cancelled. On July 31 at about 9.30pm, acting on information received, SPS officers spotted the teen and a man exiting a carpark in a yellow vehicle. Their car collided with the prison vehicle carrying the SPS officers in their attempt to leave. SPS arrested the teen at about 9.40pm and called the Singapore Police Force for assistance. Her 22-year-old male companion was arrested by the police for rash conduct with his vehicle and endangering human life, driving without a licence, and other offences. No one was hurt during the incident. SPS stated that investigations are ongoing. [[nid:720909]]
