NoMeansNo Presents India's Largest Platform on PoSH Compliance, Workplace Safety, and Inclusion – The 3rd National PoSH Conclave & Excellence Awards 2025
Dr Rashmi Singh, IAS, Dr Pink Anand, Sr Advocate, Supreme Court with Vishal Bhasin, Co-Founder POSH
Presented in association with Nestl India, Steelcase, UCO Bank, Trilegal, Attero, Ferns N Petals (FNP), BIG FM, Yugank Media, and FITS (Federation of Industry, Trade & Service), the event brought together an unprecedented gathering of dignitaries, policymakers, legal experts, corporate leaders, HR heads, IC members, and DEI champions. It reaffirmed its status as India's largest platform for dialogue on workplace safety, inclusion, and Prevention of Sexual Harassment (PoSH) compliance.
Panel discussion with Dr Pawan Duggal, Sr Advicate Supreme Court and RJ Nitin from Big FM with esteemed dignitaries
The event also featured the release of a landmark book authored by Vishal Bhasin, titled Objection Sustained, offering a comprehensive guide to top PoSH judgments and practical advice for IC members and HR leaders.
Esteemed Dignitaries and Guests of Honor
Hon'ble Justice Prathiba M. Singh, High Court of Delhi (Valedictory Keynote)
Ms. Rekha Sharma, Hon'ble Member of Rajya Sabha & Former Chairperson, National Commission for Women
Dr. Rashmi Singh (IAS), Secretary, Department of Women & Child Development, GNCTD
Dr. Pavan Duggal, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India & Cyber Law Expert
Dr. Pinky Anand, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India & Former Additional Solicitor General of India (Guest of Honor)
Mr. Ajay Chaudhry (IPS), Special Commissioner of Police (Traffic), New Delhi
Mr. Amol Srivastava (IAS), District Magistrate, East Delhi & District Officer (PoSH)
Ms. Suhela Khan, Country Programme Manager, UN Women
Agenda Highlights
The conclave, attended by over 200 delegates, featured:
Keynote addresses & special sessions – Setting the tone for inclusive and future- ready PoSH practices.
Book release: Objection Sustained – Unveiling top PoSH judgments and compliance guidance.
Four power-packed panel discussions:
Towards a Gender-Neutral PoSH Framework – Inclusion for all genders.
Leadership Accountability & Building a Safe Workplace Culture – Emphasizing organizational responsibility.
Compliance in Action – Role of Local Committees & District Officers, She-Box, and institutional collaboration.
PoSH in the Age of AI – Addressing digital-age challenges and opportunities.
Celebrating Excellence
The event concluded with the PoSH Excellence Awards 2025, recognizing individuals and organizations making exemplary contributions to safer, more inclusive workplaces.
Speaking on the occasion, Ms. Rekha Sharma, designation, 'I am grateful to attend the POSH Conclave 2025 at The Lalit, New Delhi. This platform reinforces our shared commitment to safe, inclusive workplaces. Strengthening POSH implementation through awareness and accountability remains vital. I stand committed to supporting efforts that ensure dignity and more inclusive workplaces.'
Gaurav Thakur from Steelcase expressed, 'Through our Women of Steel initiative, we're proud to champion strength, resilience, and equity at work – values that align beautifully with the vision of the PoSH Conclave to create safer, more inclusive workplaces.'
Arti Bhardwaj expressed 'At Nestl, we believe that creating safer, more inclusive workplaces begins with dialogue and commitment – and the PoSH Conclave embodies both.'
Vishal Bhasin, Co-Founder of NoMeansNo, remarked, 'Workplace safety and inclusion are not just compliance checkboxes – they are cornerstones of human dignity. This Conclave is not only a dialogue but a call to action for organizations and individuals to move beyond policies and truly embody these values.'
About NoMeansNo
NoMeansNo is a Centre for Skill Development & Training initiative and India's leading advocate for Total PoSH Compliance. It provides training, awareness, and resources to foster workplace safety and inclusion. Over three editions, the National PoSH Conclave & Excellence Awards has become the country's most influential platform in this space.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Auto recap, July 27: VinFast's first showroom in India, Mahindra BE 6's new record, MG Comet price hike & more…
The automotive industry is experiencing rapid changes, which makes it difficult to stay informed about all the latest advancements. At HT Auto, we are dedicated to delivering the most relevant and current information as it becomes available. Below is a concise overview of the key highlights from Sunday, July 27. Here is your quick check on the biggest developments in the world of automobiles. VinFast opens its first showroom in India VinFast Auto India, the Indian subsidiary of the Vietnamese electric vehicle manufacturer VinFast, has announced the inauguration of its first showroom in the country. Located in Surat, Gujarat, the showroom has been launched ahead of the inauguration of the brand's first EV plant in the country. The showroom comes as the first of the 35 dealerships VinFast is planning to set up across 27 cities in India by the end of 2025. The showroom will showcase both the VF6 and VF7 electric SUVs, for which the OEM has already started accepting pre-bookings. Also check these Cars Find more Cars UPCOMING VinFast VF3 210 km 210 km ₹ 9 - 12 Lakhs Alert Me When Launched MG Comet EV 17.3 kWh 17.3 kWh 230 km 230 km ₹ 7.50 Lakhs Compare View Offers UPCOMING Mahindra e20 NXT 15 kWh 15 kWh 140 km 140 km ₹ 6 - 8 Lakhs Alert Me When Launched Tata Punch EV 35 kWh 35 kWh 421 km 421 km ₹ 9.99 Lakhs Compare View Offers UPCOMING VinFast VF7 75.3 kWh 75.3 kWh 450 km 450 km ₹ 60 - 65 Lakhs Alert Me When Launched Mahindra BE 6 79 kWh 79 kWh 682 km 682 km ₹ 18.90 Lakhs Compare View Offers Also Read : VinFast opens its first showroom in India MG Comet EV prices hiked by ₹ 15,000, battery subscription also gets costlier The MG Comet EV has seen yet another price hike for 2025. This is the second price revision from MG this year, following a hike of up to ₹36,000 in May 2025. The latest adjustment raises prices by up to ₹15,000 across most variants. In parallel, the carmaker has also revised the rental charges for its battery subscription model—called Battery-as-a-Service (BaaS)—from ₹2.9 per kilometre to ₹3.1 per kilometre. Also Read : MG Comet EV prices hiked by ₹15,000, battery subscription also gets costlier Mahindra BE 6 does hot laps at London E-Prix, first Indian eSUV to do so In a striking moment for Indian automotive engineering, the Mahindra BE 6, a born-electric SUV from the company's upcoming BE lineup, made its public dynamic debut by doing hot laps at the London Formula E E-Prix this weekend. This marks the first time a made-in-India electric SUV has been showcased in such a global motorsport setting. Also Read : Mahindra BE 6 does hot laps at London E-Prix, first Indian eSUV to do so Delhi govt moves Supreme Court against blanket ban on overage vehicles, hearing on July 28 The Delhi government has moved the Supreme Court, challenging the blanket ban on overage vehicles, which includes restrictions on diesel vehicles older than 10 years and petrol vehicles older than 15 years. A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Bhushan R Gavai is likely to hear the plea on July 28. The Delhi government's plea seeks the recall of the court's order dated October 29, 2018, which upheld the National Green Tribunal's (NGT) initial directive. Also Read : Delhi govt moves Supreme Court against blanket ban on overage vehicles, hearing on July 28 Get insights into Upcoming Cars In India, Electric Vehicles, Upcoming Bikes in India and cutting-edge technology transforming the automotive landscape. First Published Date:
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Officials ignore footpath encroachment in Mysuru despite Supreme Court order
Mysuru: The civic agencies across the state started to reclaim the footpaths from vendors following a recent Supreme Court order, but in Mysuru, the officials remained blind to the problem. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now As a result, pedestrians are forced to walk on the road, causing traffic congestion and threatening their lives. Experts and stakeholders urged the Mysuru City Corporation (MCC) and city police to intervene immediately to help the pedestrians claim the footpath. According to the city residents, with the civic agencies and police failing to act as per the rule book, in many places, vendors have come out with permanent structures on the footpaths. The garages on both sides of the busy Chamaraja Double Road, eateries, and shops are near the city's hospitals, and bus stands are such permanent structures, they said. They allege that even though the footpaths belong to pedestrians, these vendors force them to walk on the road, exposing them to accidents. Advocate PJ Raghavendra said the corporation and city police failed the pedestrians by allowing rampant footpath encroachment. "Unfortunately, even in the heart of the city, footpaths are encroached, and officials are silent," he alleged. "In many places, encroachments are carried out by criminal elements with the patronage of power. Sadly, civic agencies failed to protect the rights of the people," he said. AAP leader and activist Malavika Gubbivani advised the MCC to follow the Chandigarh model, where separate arrangements have been made for the street vendors. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "Due to the current economic crisis, many are opting for roadside businesses. They should be provided with designated spots for the business. At the same time, the footpaths must be saved for the pedestrians," she said. Bhaskara Srinivasa Raje Urs, president of Karnataka State Street Vendors Maha Mandala, said if the Street Vendors Act 2014 is implemented in the true spirit, this problem can be solved. "Both state and central govts framed rules for street vendors. But they are not implemented, which resulted in this chaos," he said.
Time of India
11 hours ago
- Time of India
Gutkha Ban Vs Tasmac Sales: Contradiction in Tamil Nadu's Public Health Policy
Srimathi Venkatachari In Tamil Nadu, public health policy treads a morally ambiguous line between constitutional commitment and commercial convenience. The state, invoking Article 47 of the Constitution—mandating the govt to improve nutrition and public health and prohibit intoxicating substances — has banned gutka and pan masala citing cancer risks. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now At the same time, it operates and profits from the largest govt-run liquor retail monopoly in India: Tasmac. With more than `44,000 crore in annual revenue, the contradiction is not just glaring —it's institutional. This paradox reveals a deeper policy schizophrenia. On the one hand, the govt frames itself as a paternalistic guardian, shielding citizens from harmful substances. On the other, it plays bartender to the masses, peddling alcohol from every street corner, including those adjacent to schools, temples, and homes. The result is a public health framework that outlaws cancer but subsidizes cirrhosis. The 2013 ban on chewable tobacco was enforced under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, a legislative tool designed to protect citizens from hazardous food items. The move received judicial backing. In Godawat Pan Masala Products Co. vs Union of India, the Supreme Court recognised the States' autonomy under the Food Safety law to restrict or ban harmful substances. Madras High Court, in Rathinam Enterprises vs State of Tamil Nadu, (2025) went further, approving the selective ban on processed tobacco while permitting the sale of raw tobacco leaves. Contrast this with the legal regime for alcohol. Here, Tamil Nadu enjoys a golden goose thanks to Entry 8 of the state list in the Constitution. It grants states the sole authority to regulate alcohol production, distribution and sale. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now As a result, the same govt that brands gutka a public enemy becomes a benevolent supplier of alcohol. Public health, in this calculus, bends easily to revenue imperatives. Legally, the state walks a careful line, but the cracks are evident. In state of Tamil Nadu vs K Balu (2017) the Supreme Court upheld state-imposed curbs on liquor sales, especially near national highways, affirming the govt's power to regulate in the public interest. Yet, public interest becomes an elastic term when liquor shops mysteriously reappear just meters from their original locations after 'relocation'. Citizens see through this charade. A Tasmac outlet may comply with zoning laws on paper while operating adjacent to residential zones in practice. Alcoholism, domestic violence and road fatalities climb, but liquor counters stay open, often with police protection. The result is what might be termed 'constitutional tokenism': the use of selective bans to appear health-conscious while running a vast, state-sponsored liquor empire. This satisfies constitutional formalities under the doctrine of 'reasonable classification' but fails the test of equity, ethics and lived experience. The social cost of alcohol consumption in Tamil Nadu is immense. Studies link it to rising domestic violence, workplace absenteeism, school dropouts and road accidents. Women's groups routinely protest Tasmac shops that operate in close proximity to homes, citing increased insecurity and disruption of family life. Many of these protests are met with silence or police force. Meanwhile, the fiscal reliance on liquor revenue makes meaningful reform nearly impossible. In some districts, revenue from Tasmac outstrips allocations for education and public health. The irony is cruel: schools go underfunded while liquor outlets enjoy round-the-clock supply chains. What makes this even more concerning is the regressive nature of this taxation. The poorest — daily-wage workers and labourers — spend disproportionately more on alcohol, while the state grows dependent on their addiction to meet budgetary targets. The paradox sharpens further when one looks at class. Elite society indulges alcohol in private clubs and gated communities, often with imported spirits and minimal state scrutiny. For the working class, Tasmac is the only accessible vendor, public, noisy, often unsafe. The state's liquor policy therefore not only sustains addiction, it stratifies it. The poor buy what the state sells; the rich import what the state ignores. There is no easy solution. Prohibition is neither feasible nor desirable, as Gujarat's failed experiment shows. But surely there is a middle path, one that involves decentralising liquor retail, investing in de-addiction centres, raising awareness about substance abuse, and capping the density of outlets in urban and rural areas. Most importantly, the state must confront its moral conflict: it cannot pose as a public health crusader while acting as the chief purveyor of addiction. Tamil Nadu's policymakers must ask themselves a basic question. Should the health of its people depend on the sale of what ails them? (The writer is an advocate in the Madras high court) Email your feedback with name and address to
