Indian official blames ‘political constraints' for loss of jets during clash with Pakistan
Indian 'political constraints' are to be blamed for the loss of fighter jets during the air force's operation in Pakistan, an Indian military attache to Indonesia has said, in remarks that have triggered a political row in the country.
In a seminar at an Indonesian university analysing the India -Pakistan conflict, Captain Shiv Kumar said the Indian government did not permit strikes on Pakistani military bases at the start of the hostilities between the two countries, claiming this allowed Islamabad to shoot down an unspecified number of fighter jets.
'I may not agree with him that India lost so many aircraft. But I do agree that we did lose some aircraft and that happened only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack the military establishments and their air defences,' Captain Kumar of the Indian Navy said at the Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma on 10 June.
New Delhi and Islamabad stepped back from the brink of all-out war on 7 May following their worst military escalation in decades, during which both sides fired drone and missile strikes in a four-day showdown while border forces fired artillery at the border, killing dozens of people.
The conflict followed a militant attack in Indian-administered Kashmir on 22 April that led to the deaths of 26 civilians, the worst attack on civilians in decades in the region. India called it an act of terrorism and blamed Pakistan-based militants for the attack, while Pakistan denied any involvement.
Captain Kumar's comments follow weeks in which the Indian government formally refused to admit any of its jets had been shot down. India's chief of defence staff Anil Chauhan eventually admitted India suffered some losses but declined to give figures or details on how the planes came down.
He blamed the loss of jets on tactical mistakes, which he claimed were then rectified during subsequent days.
'What is important is that... not the jet being downed, but why they were being downed,' he told Bloomberg TV on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore in May.
Captain Kumar's latest comments represent the clearest explanation yet from the Indian side about why it lost fighter jets during the conflict, amid scrutiny of prime minister Narendra Modi's government from opposition parties at home.
The opposition Congress party doubled down on its criticism of the government, using the Indonesian official's comment to argue that the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had "misled" the country.
'There are several unanswered questions related to the untimely ceasefire – especially when India actually had an upper hand in the escalation,' it said.
It prompted the Indian embassy in Indonesia to issue a clarification on Captain Kumar's remarks, saying his statements were misrepresented.
'His remarks have been quoted out of context and the media reports are a mis-representation of the intention and thrust of the presentation made by the speaker,' it said on X.
'The presentation conveyed that the Indian Armed Forces serve under civilian political leadership unlike some other countries in our neighbourhood.'
During the speech at the university, Captain Kumar said India reassessed its policy after suffering initial losses and went about targeting Pakistan's air defences, allowing New Delhi to hit several military targets.
He said it was the Indian strikes on airbases that led to Pakistan calling for a ceasefire.
The intense fighting came to a halt after the two governments announced a ceasefire following talks between their national security advisers. US president Donald Trump claimed credit for brokering the truce but Indian officials quietly rowed back against the idea that his intervention was pivotal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Albo, tell Donald Trump to 'bugger off': Brutal advice for PM as he drops clue about when he will meet US President
Karl Stefanovic has told Anthony Albanese he should tell Donald Trump to 'bugger off' as he faces mounting pressure to lock in a meeting with the US President. The Prime Minister is the only leader from the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue - made up of Australia, the US, India and Japan - who is yet to meet Trump in person since his re-election. Albanese appeared on various breakfast television programs on Tuesday morning to endorse a string of changes that came into force on July 1, but was instead grilled on when a meeting with Trump would be set up. 'Look, every Quad leader has met him. It's all got a little bit embarrassing hasn't it? Pretty simple question. When are you going to meet the Donald?' Stefanovic said. The PM said they would meet in the 'coming months' but refused to lock in a date. 'I can't comprehend how the President, given how close allies we have been with the US for so long, couldn't give a rat's about meeting with you,' Stefanovic continued. 'I think it's so disrespectful. And why don't you just tell him to bugger off?' Mr Albanese said he was having audio issues and missed the question which was repeated by co-host Sarah Abo. 'He (Trump) seems to be snubbing you,' she said. The PM rejected the assumption and said he and Trump had had 'really constructive discussions'. It comes amid speculation Albanese will finally meet Trump at a Quad meeting in India later this year. 'I'd be prepared, of course, to meet with President Trump when a suitable time can be organised,' the PM told the ABC on Monday. 'We also have the Quad meeting coming up that we are finalising as well. 'So these things are being organised, and I look forward to having a meeting and continuing the constructive dialogue that I've had with President Trump up to now.' The September meeting now offers the best chance for their long overdue meeting. That month, Albanese will also travel to New York for the UN leader's week, and may also be able to meet Trump there, or make a trip to Washington. Sticking points in the US-Australia relationship which are crying out to be addressed include the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal, which is currently under review by the Trump administration, and punishing tariffs imposed by the US on Aussie imports, including a 50 per cent levy on steel and aluminium. The prime minister has been accused of dragging his feet in meeting with the leader of Australia's most important security ally. Since Trump was inaugurated in January, the pair have spoken on the phone three times. He missed an opportunity to meet the US president at the G7 Summit in Canada earlier this month when Trump left the Summit early to deal with the Israel-Iran conflict. He also did not attend last week's NATO Summit, where political observers had hoped he would have a second chance to meet with Trump. Even US lawmakers are now urging Albanese to come to the White House and develop a personal rapport with Trump in order to save the wavering AUKUS pact. The meeting, when it does happen, will not necessarily be an amicable one. Trump is expected to leverage tariffs and his commitment to AUKUS in order to pressure Albanese to increase defence spending, which at 2.2 per cent of GDP is well short of the 3 per cent that the US has previously demanded of Australia. There is added pressure on Australia to boost defence, now that NATO members have agreed to lift their defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP over 10 years - with the White House later indicating it expects its allies in the Asia-Pacific to follow suit. Trump also reportedly does not like Australia's ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, and may view Rudd's ongoing tenure as a barrier to improved relations. Rudd enjoys cross-party support in Australia, but his position has been under threat since past comments he made about Trump came to light. In November, shortly after Trump's election win, Daily Mail Australia revealed how Rudd never envisioned his comeback, calling his first term a period of 'episodic craziness'.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
My young comrade died in my arms. It would be immoral if those soldiers who survived were now betrayed - former Special Forces soldier in Northern Ireland speaks out amid Mail campaign
Britain's Government is on the brink of a decision that defies explanation. It is choosing to side with former terrorists against veterans of the Armed Forces. Our politicians risk betraying every soldier who served to keep the peace in Northern Ireland during the decades of the Troubles, when both Republican and Loyalist extremists were intent on mayhem and murder. And, for me, this is deeply personal. One of my men died in my arms, a youth of 20, killed while doing his job. For his killers, and people like them, to be allowed to continue their campaign of hatred through the courts is utterly immoral. With exceptional bravery, professionalism and dedication, men and women from Special Forces, as well as the regular Army, risked their lives every hour to try to bring an end to this senseless violence. And now they are being punished for it. While the terrorists have long been granted immunity under the terms of the Good Friday Agreement, many soldiers could face prosecution for doing the job they were sent to Ulster to do. Some of them never came back. The rest live in dread of receiving a summons, and the threat of jail, for doing their duty. The Northern Ireland secretary, Hilary Benn, and the Attorney General, Lord Hermer, are in the process of tearing up the Legacy Act, the law enacted by the Conservatives to protect veterans from being dragged to court decades later. If that protection is abolished, every major anti-terrorist operation against the IRA would likely be rebranded as a war crime. It is beyond iniquitous – this is outright political insanity, or worse. Labour's ministers, and, most of all, Sir Keir Starmer, desperately need to rediscover their moral compass. If the Prime Minister had witnessed what I saw 42 years ago, he would never have lost his ability to distinguish between right and wrong. The difference would be burned into his memory. I was a 21-year-old Second Lieutenant leading a patrol on the streets of West Belfast. This was a day after the 1983 General Election at which Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams was elected as an MP for the first time. That morning, Adams was holding a press conference. Though counting had not yet finished, and he had no intention of taking up his seat in Westminster, his election win was a foregone conclusion. The Northern Ireland secretary, Hilary Benn, and the Attorney General, Lord Hermer, are in the process of tearing up the Legacy Act, the law enacted by the Conservatives to protect veterans from being dragged to court decades later, writes the former SAS soldier My men and I were patrolling part of a nationalist estate a short distance from the publicity event. We were in four units of four, known as 'bricks'. I was in the forward position with three soldiers, accompanied by two Royal Ulster Constabulary officers. One of the men in my brick was Private Geoffrey Curtis, a fresh-faced 20-year-old lad with a heart of gold. As we reached a junction, a girl of about five came running out, stared at us, and scooted off. We carried on – but, two or three seconds later a massive blast rocked the street. I turned to see Private Curtis mortally wounded. The other two soldiers in my brick suffered superficial injuries. Later, we learned that a 15lb bomb concealed in a lamppost beside a wall had been detonated by a 'command wire' – a thin cable with a battery to trigger the explosion. Private Curtis took the full force of the blast. This type of bomb is a cold-blooded ambush device, set off by a watcher concealed nearby. A terrorist murderer had been lying in wait for our patrol. He pressed the button to detonate the bomb, and watched Geoff Curtis die before fleeing like the coward he was. No one has ever been charged with this atrocity. I believe my life was saved by that little girl. Private Curtis was not the target. It was me, and the two policemen. But the IRA killers did not dare risk harming the child, because earlier in the year one had died in a bombing by another terrorist group, the INLA, and local families had reacted with fury. The bomb was meant to send a bloody message to Margaret Thatcher's Conservative government, which had just been re-elected. Despite Sinn Fein's success at the polls, the IRA had no intention of achieving its aims by democratic means. The terrorists intended to step up their campaign of slaughter. It's inconceivable to me that Gerry Adams did not know about this bombing in advance. It cannot, however, be proven and never will be. Yet the Labour Government is now considering the prosecution of veterans who served in Northern Ireland. Some of them are my former colleagues in Special Forces. After six years as an infantry officer, I applied for duties with 14 Intelligence Company, which is now renamed the Special Reconnaissance Regiment. In the 1980s, 14Int was made up of servicemen and women from the Army, Royal Navy and Royal Air Force, and its selection procedure was exceptionally tough. Of the 260 volunteers who applied in my intake, only 11 finished it. Our role was to blend into the streets and countryside and carry out surveillance on terrorists, building a picture of the operations they were planning. The death of Private Curtis was a major motivating factor for me, because I knew the IRA would never come to the negotiating table as long as they believed they could succeed through violence. Soldiers, whether they are officers or not, think about the wider implications of the job they are expected to do. My experiences showed me it had to be ballots, not bullets, that secured peace. Special Forces, along with MI5 and the RUC Special Branch, led the campaign that forced the terrorists to lay down their weapons. It took courageous, principled men and women to effect this. All aspects of what was accomplished were considered and measured. We were not above the law. But, importantly, we were directed by senior generals and civil servants – and it was the instructions of politicians and Prime Minister Mrs Thatcher that ultimately dictated our strategy and action. Mrs Thatcher took a keen interest and visited us on operations on several occasions. The generals, politicians and civil servants do not face the possibility of prosecution. It is the retired soldiers, who were young then and doing their job for the right reasons, who do. Today's Labour Government has, it seems, sympathy with Adams and the former terrorists – so much so that, while 100 Special Forces soldiers have been required to give evidence, very few terrorist volunteers and none of their leaders have been asked to explain their actions. The simple truth is that we all sleep tight in our beds because of the bravery of our Armed Forces. Everyone who accepts that fact should support the petition to Parliament to stop any proposed legal changes that would enable prosecution of the brave men and women who did their duty.
BBC News
6 hours ago
- BBC News
Kumbh Mela: BBC investigation reveals hidden deaths at India festival crush
Warning: The story contains distressing details A BBC Hindi investigation reveals that Indian officials quietly paid compensation to the families of more people than they admit died in a deadly crowd crush at the Kumbh Mela, a Hindu festival which is the world's largest religious official death toll is 37, but the BBC found 26 additional cases where families received partial compensation in cash, and 18 more deaths where no payment was 25 March, a team of plain-clothed police officers from India's northern Uttar Pradesh (UP) state arrived in neighbouring Bihar with bundles of team visited Gopalganj city, where they met the family of 62-year-old Tara Devi. They handed over 500,000 rupees ($5,758; £4,291) in cash to her son, Dhananjay Gond, and asked him to record a statement on the video, Dhananjay introduces himself, saying: "My mother Tara Devi and I went to the Kumbh Mela for a holy dip. My mother died. Officers from UP came and gave us 500,000 rupees. We have received it."Dhananjay says his mother was killed in the crowd crush in the city of Prayagraj in UP on 29 UP government has not yet released an official list of the crush victims. Tara Devi's son says police told him the money he got was the first instalment of the 2.5m rupees officially promised to victims' families. Dhananjay says he hasn't received the remaining 2m rupees. The UP government says it has paid 2.5m rupees each to the families of 35 victims (of the 37 deaths, one victim remains unidentified, and another does not have a legal heir). A three-member judicial commission set up to investigate the incident and submit a report within a month has had its tenure BBC, however, found one more family which was given a cheque of 2.5m rupees. For the other 35 victims, the compensation was transferred to relatives' bank from this, the BBC found 26 cases - including that of Tara Devi - where police paid 500,000 rupees in cash at people's many instances, officials had families sign documents blaming health issues for the deaths, despite them insisting that their relatives died in the crush. (The UP government typically does not compensate for natural deaths during the Kumbh, held every 12 years.)The BBC also confirmed 18 deaths where no compensation was given (excluding the case mentioned above where there was no legal heir).It also found evidence of four separate crush incidents in Prayagraj on 29 January, despite Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath's claim that only one occurred at what is called the Sangam nose - the point of confluence of three sacred rivers, Ganga, Yamuna and the mythical the weeks after the Kumbh crush, the BBC met over 100 families across 11 states in India, who claimed their relatives died in the tragedy. It verified 82 deaths in total with concrete evidence, excluding cases lacking reports from scene of India's Kumbh Mela crushFamilies mourn loved ones who died in Kumbh Mela crush Some families hold post-mortems, morgue slips, death certificates, or photos and videos as proof. The BBC cross-checked local newspaper reports and spoke to district reporters to trace where bodies were received, mapped these locations, and then visited the victims' BBC interviewed families and eyewitnesses to reconstruct timelines for each case - when the victims left for the holy dip, the time of the crush, nearby landmarks, the distance from the bathing site and the immediate these detailed accounts, clear patterns emerged, leading to the identification of four crush locations: Sangam Nose, Jhusi side of Samudrakup Chauraha, Airavat Marg, and Mukti Marg Chauraha near Kalpavriksha of the full 2.5m-rupee compensation cases list the death location as "Ward No. 7, Fort Cantt, Prayagraj", about 1.5km (0.9 miles) from Sangam contrast, the cases that received 500,000 rupees mostly mention "Sector-20 or Sector-21, Kumbh Mela area, Jhusi". Some of these families claim their relatives also died near Sangam Nose, but that their certificates wrongly cite Jhusi - possibly to downplay the scale of the tragedy for the 18 families which did not receive any compensation, there does not seem to be a common thread binding instance, at one crush location, the BBC identified five bodies through photos and the numbers issued during post-death formalities. Of these, the families of three victims received 500,000 rupees in cash, while the other two received nothing. Some other families have photographs from the day of the crush which show bodies of their relatives, but these deaths have not been acknowledged by the BBC repeatedly tried to contact UP government officials, emailing the information department and district magistrate. Despite promises by the district magistrate's office, no call was arranged. Attempts to reach the UP police chief went unanswered, while Prayagraj's police commissioner at the time of the incident, Tarun Gaba, and Mela officer Vijay Kiran Anand refused to answer BBC has also found evidence of deaths in crushes that took place at locations other than the Sangam Nose, which the government has acknowledged through giving some compensation. In UP's Jaunpur, Dharmbir Rajbhar received 500,000 rupees each for the deaths of his wife and daughter-in-law in the Airavat Marg crush.A video shot by the BBC on 29 January shows the family sitting with both bodies at the site. Back home, Rajbhar displayed the cash bundles and said, "The government promised 2.5m rupees, but the police gave only 500,000 rupees each and left."The UP police also travelled hundreds of kilometres to Paschim Bardhaman in West Bengal, where they handed over 500,000 rupees to the family of Vinod all families accepted the amount, though. In Bihar, the relatives of Sunaina Devi rejected it. They told the BBC that they refused to "sign false documents".Watch: Belongings strewn aside after India crushThirty killed in crowd crush at India's Kumbh Mela festivalThe BBC also identified at least five families who lost their relatives near Kalpavriksha Gate, about 3-4km from Sangam Devi, the wife of Panne Lal Sahni, says that her husband died around 8am on 29 January. "People were stepping over his body. I sat in the sun with his corpse until 4pm. No-one even gave us water," she says. The family received 500,000 rupees in of all five people who died near the Kalpavriksha Gate, had similar stories to narrate - they sat with the bodies from morning till time, 18 more families came forward claiming their relatives died in the crush but they haven't received compensation the 18 is Meena Pandey from Sultanpur, UP, who travelled to the Kumbh with her husband, and neighbour Archana Singh. Archana recalls sitting with Meena's body at the crush site until 3pm - seven hours after the claims of 2,750 AI-enabled CCTVs, 50,000 security personnel, drones and ambulances, no help arrived, relatives afternoon the body had begun to decay, says Archana."We had no choice but to carry it home in our vehicle." Like Meena Pandey's family, relatives of Shyamlal Gond from UP's Deoria are still waiting for son, Bhagirathi Gond, works as a daily wage labourer in Bengaluru. After the crush, he travelled to Prayagraj looking for his father, and reached the hospital on 3 to a slip from the hospital, Shyamlal Gond was brought in dead at 10.02 local time on 29 January."My father was listed as unidentified. To maintain records, they [hospital staff] had kept a file. They took a photo of the body in the condition it was found and pasted it into a register."He adds, "It was difficult to identify him through the photo. After the fall, his head was bent down, chest pushed upward, and his face had slightly turned."Bhagirathi says the hospital staff would not give him a death certificate or any other papers."They told me to take the body, but I said I would only do so if some official procedure was followed," he took four months before he got the death certificate. But he is still waiting for compensation for his loss."The government has still not acknowledged that my father died in the crush."Follow BBC News India on Instagram, YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.
