logo
Planning reforms break Labour's promise to protect nature, green groups say

Planning reforms break Labour's promise to protect nature, green groups say

Independent22-05-2025

The Government's planning reforms break its manifesto promises to protect and restore the nation's natural environment, green groups have claimed.
The Planning and Infrastructure Bill going through Parliament overrides existing habitat and nature protections, which the Government considers to be a barrier to housebuilding and economic growth.
The draft legislation, if passed, would instead allow developers to make general environmental improvements and pay into a nature restoration fund that improves habitats on other sites.
But the Office for Environmental Protection watchdog recently warned that the Bill represents a 'regression' in environmental law and would remove safeguards for nature.
The Government's own assessment of the Bill also found little evidence green protections are a blocker to development.
The Wildlife Trusts and the RSPB are now warning that irreplaceable habitats such as chalk streams and ancient woodland, species such as hazel dormice and otters, and areas such as the New Forest and Peak District Moors will no longer be as strongly protected from development.
The groups said they have been calling for a series of amendments to tone down what they see as the most damaging aspects of the Bill but that the Government has failed to listen to their concerns or consider their 'constructive solutions'.
Now they want to see ministers remove part of the nature recovery section entirely, which they say replaces environmental protections with a weaker substitute.
The Planning and Infrastructure Bill was introduced in March and comes as Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Chancellor Rachel Reeves argue that current nature rules have gone too far, often citing the £100 million HS2 bat tunnel.
Craig Bennett, chief executive of The Wildlife Trusts, said: 'Before the general election, Labour promised to restore nature.
'Under a year later, the Chancellor is leading an ideological charge against the natural world despite it being the very foundation of the economy, society and people's health.
'Promises have been broken, and millions of people have been betrayed.'
Mr Bennett said the Bill in its current form 'fundamentally undermines' the Government's commitment to protect nature, describing proposals on nature recovery as a 'Trojan horse' and a 'misnomer'.
He also said the organisation is 'appalled' that the suggestions it has put forward to ministers have 'all been spurned'.
The organisations also published research on Thursday arguing that nature does not block economic growth.
It found that bats and great crested newts – protected species often cited in arguments for removing planning barriers – are a factor in just 3% of planning appeal decisions.
Alongside the paper, a Savanta survey commissioned by the Wildlife Trusts suggests less than a third (32%) of the British public feel the Government has kept its promises to improve access to nature, promote biodiversity and protect wildlife.
The poll also found just 26% of the 2,035 respondents believe the Government is taking the nature crisis seriously enough while just 25% said they would back building developments in their area even if they harmed the local environment.
Beccy Speight, RSPB chief executive, said the organisation engaged 'in good faith' with the Government for months but that the current draft legislation will 'rip the heart out of environmental protections and risks sending nature further into freefall'.
'The fate of our most important places for nature and the laws that protect them are all in the firing line,' she said.
'That cannot be allowed to stand.
'The evidence clearly shows nature isn't a blocker to growth.
'The Government has identified the wrong obstacle to the problem it's trying to overcome, and that has led it to the wrong solutions.'
A Government spokesperson said: 'We completely reject these claims. The government has inherited a failing system that has delayed new homes and infrastructure while doing nothing for nature's recovery, and we are determined to fix this through our Plan for Change.
'That's why our Planning and Infrastructure Bill will deliver a win-win for the economy and nature by unblocking building and economic growth, and delivering meaningful environmental improvements.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Majority on Dumfries and Galloway Council back special meeting
Majority on Dumfries and Galloway Council back special meeting

BBC News

time27 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Majority on Dumfries and Galloway Council back special meeting

A majority of councillors in Dumfries and Galloway have backed a move for a no confidence motion in the Conservative-led administration.A total of 22 members of the 43-strong local authority signed the call, which has triggered a special meeting for 16 move came after a number of Conservatives left their political group to form a new Labour and Democratic Alliance councillors have backed the move which could see current leader Gail Macgregor and depute leader Malcolm Johnstone replaced. The Conservatives formed an administration in 2023 after the collapse of a previous had 16 members but that fell to just nine when seven councillors quit the group - four to form a group called Novantae and three to create the Dumfries and Galloway Independent a result a request was lodged to convene a special meeting of the local authority to consider a no confidence vote in the standing orders, the move must be backed by at least a quarter of councillors. However, papers published on the council website show that support has significantly exceeded that 11 SNP members, eight Labour councillors and three from the Democratic Alliance signed the they were to agree to work together in future they could form an outright majority on the full council will meet to decide the way ahead on Monday.

Awkward moment new Reform UK chair David Bull is shown his tweet calling Nigel Farage an idiot
Awkward moment new Reform UK chair David Bull is shown his tweet calling Nigel Farage an idiot

The Independent

time28 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Awkward moment new Reform UK chair David Bull is shown his tweet calling Nigel Farage an idiot

New Reform UK chairman David Bull was shown a previous tweet he posted calling Nigel Farage an 'idiot' during a live breakfast TV interview. Dr Bull appeared on Good Morning Britain on Wednesday morning (11 June), where host Susanna Reid showed him a tweet he made from 2014, calling Mr Farage an 'idiot', stating comments made by him were 'dangerous'. The tweet was over comments Mr Farage made about migrants with HIV. Dr Bull replaces Zia Yusuf, who resigned as Reform's chairman last week.

Rachel Reeves says she ‘chooses investment' ahead of unveiling Labour's spending review
Rachel Reeves says she ‘chooses investment' ahead of unveiling Labour's spending review

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Rachel Reeves says she ‘chooses investment' ahead of unveiling Labour's spending review

Update: Date: 2025-06-11T08:19:01.000Z Title: Rachel Reeves Content: Good morning. The government plans to be spending almost £1.4tr in 2026-27, rising to almost £1.5tr in 2028-29. Those annual limits are already agreed. Today, when , the chancellor, stands up at 12.30pm to present the spending review, she will explain how she has decided to divvy up that money between government departments over the next three years. This is not a budget, and she will not be announcing changes to tax policy. But it will feel like a budget because, like a budget, it will involve decisions that affect the public services people rely upon. And it is bound to intensify speculation about whether taxes will have to go up in the next budget, in the autumn. Public spending is hideously complicated, and Reeves needs a clear, simple narrative that will land with the public at large. We know what it is because the Treasury sent out a press release last night with words from her speech today where Reeves will sum up what she is trying to achieve. She will say: This government is renewing Britain. But I know too many people in too many parts of the country are yet to feel it. This government's task – my task – and the purpose of this Spending Review – is to change that. To ensure that renewal is felt in people's everyday lives, their jobs, their communities. So that people can see a doctor when when they need one. Know that they are secure at work. And feel safe on their local high street … I have made my choices. In place of chaos, I choose stability. In place of decline, I choose investment. In place of retreat, I choose national renewal. These are my choices. These are this government's choices. These are the British people's choices. The government differentiates between current, day-to-day spending ('resource' spending, in Treasury jargon) and capital spending. In so far as Reeves has 'good news' to announce, much of it is in the capital spending area, because she changed her fiscal rules last year to allow more borrowing for infrastructure projects. That is why she is saying 'In place of decline, I choose investment', not 'I choose spending'. Some government departments will face real-terms spending cuts. But there is an obvious political problem with this, well summarised by John McDonnell, shadow chancellor when Jeremy Corbyn was Labour leader, in this comment to the Financial Times. Capital spend takes years to produce political results, while cuts in revenue spending on services like council services are felt adversely quickly. It is easy to promise national renewal, but it is a lot harder to make people believe it is happening. Today's decisions will have a big effect on what voters do end up concluding about this, but it will take a while to know for sure what that effect will be. Here is Aamna Modhin's assessment of what to expect in the spending review in her First Edition briefing. And here is our overnight preview story, by Kiran Stacey, focusing on the proposal to spend £39bn on affordable housing. Here is the agenda for the day. 9am: Keir Starmer chairs cabinet, where , the chancellor, will be briefing colleagues on what is in the spending review. Noon: Starmer faces Kemi Badenoch at PMQs. 12.30pm: Reeves makes a statement to MPs about the spring statement. 4pm: The Institute for Government thinktank holds a briefing on the spring statement. 4.15pm: The National Police Chiefs' Council gives its response to the spending review. If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm at the moment), or message me on social media. I can't read all the messages BTL, but if you put 'Andrew' in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word. If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @ The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary. I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can't promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store