logo
Some lawmakers go outside district boundaries with capital outlay funding

Some lawmakers go outside district boundaries with capital outlay funding

Yahoo04-05-2025
May 4—SANTA FE — It's a long haul from Albuquerque to Angel Fire, but that didn't stop several metro-area lawmakers from allocating some of their capital outlay dollars this year for construction of a new veterans' wellness center in the high mountain village.
In all, more than 25 Republican legislators chipped in a combined total of $1.2 million for the facility during the 60-day legislative session, even though most of them live far from Angel Fire.
"I thought it was worthwhile," said Sen. Jay Block, R-Rio Rancho, a first-term senator and U.S. Air Force veteran who said other veterans in his district could benefit from the new facility.
Meanwhile, five lawmakers — a mix of Democrats and Republicans — allocated a total of $355,000 for the Fort Sill Apache Tribe to build a new fire station in Luna County between Deming and Las Cruces.
One of those lawmakers, Sen. Bill Soules, D-Las Cruces, said he's made it a point to support tribal projects in southern New Mexico, even if they're not located within the boundaries of his Senate District 37 seat.
"I've always provided some funding for whatever project they've got going on," Soules told the Journal, referring to the Fort Sill Apache, who won a 2011 court order to establish a reservation in New Mexico.
"They're the ones who were in this area historically," he added.
While New Mexico lawmakers generally tend to bring home the "pork," or capital outlay dollars, for road construction, water projects, sports fields and other projects in their districts, it's not uncommon for them to also fund outside projects.
Some funded projects are located far from legislators' districts, such as the $500,000 allocation for a new high school football field in Texico made this year by Sen. Joshua Sanchez, R-Bosque.
There are no rules that funded projects must be located within a legislator's district boundaries, and until recently, it was difficult to tell how most lawmakers divvied up their available capital outlay funds.
While attempts to overhaul the state's capital outlay system have been unsuccessful at the Roundhouse, lawmakers agreed in 2021 to disclose how each legislator divvies up their funding.
But that disclosure — in the form of a published list — is not made by the Legislative Council Service, the Legislature's administrative arm, until 30 days after the session's end.
How the capital outlay system works
Under the state's system for funding public works projects, each lawmaker gets a certain amount of funding during every regular legislative session to distribute for projects. The governor also receives a share.
This year's bill, House Bill 450, provided each House member with $2.5 million in available funding. Senators got a slightly larger share of nearly $4.2 million each.
In all, the bill appropriates about $1.2 billion for roughly 1,400 projects around New Mexico, though Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham vetoed a number of smaller projects from it last month.
Money appropriated under the capital outlay bill generally has to be spent within three years, though lawmakers can extend that deadline by reauthorizing approved projects.
'Everybody asks for money'
A review of this year's capital outlay allocations shows top-ranking senators from both political parties gave money to projects outside their districts.
Senate Minority Leader William Sharer, R-Farmington, allocated $50,000 for the veterans' wellness center project in Angel Fire and another $50,000 to bolster efforts to build a New Mexico Sports and Cultural Museum in Albuquerque.
For her part, Senate President Pro Tem Mimi Stewart, D-Albuquerque, gave money to several projects outside her district, including $100,000 for a student-led green initiative at New Mexico Highlands University in Las Vegas and $200,000 for improvements to the Navajo Preparatory School in Farmington.
She said those funding decisions stemmed from meetings at the state Capitol and friendships she made with students at the schools.
"I try to limit the funding that goes outside my district — I think we all do," Stewart said in an interview, while emphasizing the vast majority of the 31 projects she funded are located within her district.
But Stewart also said this isn't the first year she's supported projects outside her district, saying she's also done so in past years.
Lawmakers say the volume of requests they get for proposed infrastructure projects around the state is higher than ever, even as the state's cash-flush budget situation has allowed for more money to be spent on capital outlay projects in recent years.
"Everybody asks for money," said Stewart. "It's unbelievable."
As for the project in Angel Fire, the National Veterans Wellness and Healing Center plans to use the $1.2 million it secured to build eight cabins for veterans who travel to northern New Mexico to take part in weeklong retreats, said Markus Podell, the group's president and post-traumatic stress disorder program director.
Podell said he went "office to office" during the legislative session asking lawmakers to support the project, which he said will allow the group to avoid having to rent out an entire condominium complex to house retreat participants.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republican bid to help Trump move past Epstein falls flat
Republican bid to help Trump move past Epstein falls flat

Boston Globe

time13 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Republican bid to help Trump move past Epstein falls flat

On Monday, Representative James Comer, Republican from Kentucky, the chair of the House Oversight Committee, said the Justice Department would begin sharing its Epstein records with his panel by Friday. He also suggested the release of the documents would take some time, all but ensuring that questions about the Epstein affair will drag on for weeks. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up At the same time, Democrats, in some cases with the help of Republicans, have laid a series of procedural traps that will make it all but impossible for the GOP to avoid confronting the issue again when Congress reconvenes in September. 'We're going to keep the pressure up — 100 percent,' Senator Ruben Gallego, Democrat from Arizona, said at an event in Iowa this month. 'As often as we can, until we know exactly what happened, why it happened.' Advertisement Even with Congress in recess, the Epstein case continues to generate attention in Washington. On Monday, William Barr, who was President Trump's attorney general when Epstein died, testified in a closed-door deposition for the Oversight Committee. Lawmakers of both parties concede the Trump administration could quiet the furor over the Epstein files on Capitol Hill and nationwide by simply releasing them to the public. Comer's statement on Monday was the only public indication to date that it might do so. All the while, several efforts connected to Epstein, a disgraced financier who was found dead in his prison cell in 2019, have been percolating and threaten to disrupt a busy month in which Congress also faces a Sept. 30 deadline to fund the government and avert a shutdown. Chief among them may be a maneuver led by Representive Thomas Massie, Republican fron Kentucky, who is a frequent Trump critic, to try to force a floor vote on the release of the files. Such a vote would thrust Republicans into a politically thorny position between Trump and constituents who are unhappy with the administration's handling of the case. Before leaving Washington, Massie and Representative Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, filed what is known as a discharge petition, which allows any member of the House to force legislation to the floor if a majority of members — 218 — sign on. Because of arcane procedural rules, the pair cannot start collecting signatures until they return in September, but they appear to have more than enough support to succeed. The timing all but guaranteed that the issue would hang over lawmakers throughout the August recess and that Republican leaders would be forced to address it when they returned. While they could try to table the effort, several rank-and-file Republicans earlier this year blocked a similar attempt to circumvent a measure that had majority support. Advertisement So far, 43 other lawmakers, 11 of them Republicans, have signed on to Massie and Khanna's initiative. Last week, the pair announced plans for a news conference with victims of Epstein and his longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell, to be held outside the Capitol on lawmakers' second day back from their break. Democrats on the powerful House Rules Committee, a panel controlled by the speaker that determines which legislation reaches the floor, also plan to continue pressuring Republicans over the issue. Republican leaders never found a solution to the committee's impasse, which led them to send the House home a day ahead of schedule. But they seemed to take solace in the Trump administration's request that federal judges release transcripts of grand jury testimony in three cases related to Epstein and Maxwell. Both House Speaker Mike Johnson and Representative Steve Scalise, the number two Republican, suggested such a move might help alleviate concerns, adding that the House could not address the Epstein files while the courts were weighing in. 'That process is underway right now,' Johnson said last month. 'Now, we've got to zealously guard that and protect it and make sure it's happening. And if it doesn't, then we'll take appropriate action when everybody returns here.' Yet so far, federal judges in two of those three cases have denied the government's requests. A judge overseeing Maxwell's case said that the Justice Department's suggestion that grand jury testimony 'would bring to light meaningful new information' was 'demonstrably false.' A third judge, who oversaw Epstein's 2019 case, is still considering whether to unseal grand jury materials connected to that prosecution. Advertisement And Republicans and Democrats alike have argued that the grand jury testimony falls far short of the promise that Attorney General Pam Bondi and other top officials had made. Instead, they have turned to legal maneuvers meant to force the Justice Department to provide the Epstein files to Congress. This month, the Oversight Committee issued a subpoena to Bondi asking the Justice Department to give the committee its files related to Epstein and Maxwell by Tuesday. Comer, a staunch Trump ally, was forced to send the subpoena after a small group of Republicans joined Democrats in voting to approve it at a subcommittee meeting last month. On Monday, he told reporters he was confident that 'we're going to get the documents,' citing 'productive' conversations with the Justice Department. Senate Democrats have already started to pressure Republicans over the matter using a little-known and infrequently tested maneuver to try to force Bondi to turn over the Epstein files. Under a provision of federal law, government agencies are required to hand over relevant information if any five members of the Senate's chief oversight committee requests it. Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat from New York, the minority leader, and seven other Democrats had asked the Justice Department to give them Epstein-related materials by Aug. 15. They also asked that a briefing be held for the committee's staff before the end of the month. So far, the committee has not received any material, and the briefing has not been scheduled, according to two people familiar with the matter who said they were not authorized to discuss it publicly. Advertisement Schumer has said Democrats are prepared to seek legal recourse if the Trump administration does not meet the letter's deadlines. On Friday, he began publicly pressuring Senator John Thune, Republican from South Dakota, the majority leader, to appoint a lawyer who would defend the Senate's legal authority for congressional oversight. 'If he chooses complicity — we'll take them to court ourselves,' Schumer wrote in a social media post. This article originally appeared in .

Mississippi to Send National Guard Troops to DC to Back Trump's Crackdown on Crime
Mississippi to Send National Guard Troops to DC to Back Trump's Crackdown on Crime

Epoch Times

time14 minutes ago

  • Epoch Times

Mississippi to Send National Guard Troops to DC to Back Trump's Crackdown on Crime

Mississippi will send several hundred National Guard troops to Washington to assist President Donald Trump's effort to crack down on crime in the nation's capital, joining several other Republican-led states that have pledged military resources. In a statement posted on social media on Aug. 18, Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves announced that he's approved the deployment of some 200 National Guard soldiers 'to support President Trump's effort to return law and order to our nation's capital.'

Scholten drops out of Iowa Senate race, endorses fellow state rep
Scholten drops out of Iowa Senate race, endorses fellow state rep

The Hill

time34 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Scholten drops out of Iowa Senate race, endorses fellow state rep

Iowa State Rep. J.D. Scholten (D) announced Monday he is suspending his campaign for U.S. Senate and endorsing fellow State Rep. Josh Turek (D) in his bid to unseat incumbent Sen. Joni Ernst (R). 'Today I am suspending my campaign. I know this may come as a surprise but I made this decision because I think it's in the best interest of Iowans and myself,' Scholten said in a statement. 'From the very beginning, I thought a prairie populist athlete from Western Iowa would be the best candidate to win in the General election,' he continued. 'I still do, but instead of me, I have complete confidence that Josh Turek can take this on. That's why I am suspending my campaign and endorsing him.' Turek, a two-time Paralympics gold medalist for Team USA, announced last week he's entering the crowded Democratic primary to unseat Ernst in the 2026 midterm race. Scholten, who launched his Senate bid in early June, said his decision to end his campaign was 'founded on friendship,' pointing to their shared values and extensive history working together in the state Legislature. 'Ultimately, I decided he could carry the issues I deeply care about — universal health care, breaking up monopolies that are hurting farmers and consumers, getting special interests out of politics. As his friend, I'm proud to support him,' he added. Scholten made clear that he decided independently to drop out of the race and did not feel pressure to do so. 'I want to stress this is a decision of my own accord. I'm ending my campaign because I believe it's the right thing. I want Joni Ernst to be held accountable for her failed leadership. I want Democrats to win and I know we will if we elect Josh Turek,' he said. Ernst, who is seeking a third term next year, won reelection against a Democratic challenger by roughly 7 points in 2020. Republicans have long held on to Iowa's Senate seats, and President Trump won the state by 13 points in November. Scholten will join Turek for a campaign event Monday evening to formally announce the endorsement, Turek's campaign said. 'I am honored to have the support of J.D.,' Turek said in a statement. 'Over the last several years, J.D. and I have fought alongside one another in the state legislature to lower costs for Iowa's families, to make health care more affordable and accessible, to make housing more affordable, and to make life a little bit easier and a little bit better for Iowa's families.' 'We have an incredible opportunity to beat Joni Ernst in 2026, and I'm proud to join forces with J.D.,' he continued.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store