SNP slam Anas Sarwar as FOI reveals ‘silence' over welfare cuts
On March 26, the Chancellor delivered her Spring Statement and announced a £5 billion package of welfare cuts, with a huge number of people now set to be denied the Personal Independence Payment (PIP).
Charities and health experts have since warned the cuts could risk lives, as the UK Government's own analysis indicates that an extra 250,000 people could be living in relative poverty by 2029-30 as a result – including 50,000 children.
But an FOI submitted by the SNP, which asked for any correspondence to Reeves from Sarwar and his frontbench spokesperson Paul O'Kane between March 1 and April 15 this year, received this response: 'We can confirm that the HM Treasury does not hold information within the scope of your request.'
READ MORE: 'That shouldn't be happening': Inside a chaotic Hamilton by-election hustings
Scores of Labour politicians have made clear their opposition to the plans over the past few months, including Manchester mayor Andy Burnham who has said "it feels like the wrong choice".
Scottish Labour leader Sarwar, meanwhile, has defended the cuts publicly, saying the impact assessment only considered the benefits changes, not a "package of measures" announced by the UK Government which could help tackle poverty.
SNP MSP Collette Stevenson said the FOI revealed that Sarwar 'will always stand up for the Prime Minister rather than stand up for vulnerable households in Scotland'.
She added: 'From adopting harmful Tory policies to copying Tory austerity, the priorities and values of this Labour Party are completely out of sync with those of the people of Scotland.
'However, it seems that Scottish Labour are on the same page as their Westminster bosses; content to stay silent while hundreds of thousands of families have critical support taken away by Rachel Reeves (above).
'Yet again, Anas Sarwar has shown he will always stand up for the Prime Minister rather than stand up for vulnerable households in Scotland.
'The SNP is taking action to ensure that Scotland remains the only party in the UK where rates of child poverty are falling, including providing support through the Scottish Child Payment and working towards abolishing Labour's two-child cap.
'But Labour's choices at Westminster are holding back Scotland's progress, and senior figures in Scottish Labour have nothing to say about it.
'While Anas Sarwar looks for his missing backbone, the SNP is putting Scotland first - and standing up to the cruel policies of the UK Labour Government."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Just work in a cupboard, says SNP minister in row over soaring business rates
Businesses can avoid paying high rates by setting up in cupboards, the Deputy First Minister has said. Kate Forbes said the most profitable firms are 'smaller ones' which can operate from a 'cupboard, where there are no rates'. Her suggestion came during a Scottish parliament debate on whether the 'current rates regime' prevents companies from 'scaling up'. Ms Forbes admitted the rates system is 'based on an older version of the economy' which did not apply in 'our new, tech-driven environment'. Last night Scottish Tory economy spokesman Murdo Fraser said: 'Kate Forbes' view of how businesses work is so detached from reality that she might as well have claimed Narnia is at the back of the cupboard. 'She must know it's nonsense to suggest that manufacturing, hospitality, retail or a host of other businesses could operate in this way. 'And it's downright insulting to downplay the cost of rates, when the SNP withheld relief available elsewhere in the UK, putting Scottish firms at a huge disadvantage.' At Holyrood, Scottish Tory MSP Liam Kerr asked Ms Forbes: 'Does the Government think that the way in which the current rates regime is structured militates against small businesses scaling up?' She replied that it did not because of the small business bonus scheme which she said 'remains the most generous across the United Kingdom'. Ms Forbes, who is also Economy Secretary, said the 'rates system often does not take into account the fact that some of the most profitable businesses are the smaller ones'. She said: 'A start-up can be launched from a cupboard, where there are no rates, while a large and perhaps less profitable business has to pay them.' Speaking in the Holyrood debating chamber on Wednesday, Ms Forbes said the rates system is 'based on an older version of the economy, in which the size of properties was linked to profitability, and that is just not the case in our new, tech-driven environment'. Commenting last night, Glasgow-based businessman Donald MacLeod said: 'This is very disappointing – the SNP appears to have given up on business. 'Businesses in the hospitality sector are falling by the wayside and finding it really tough – and there's no support there. 'For some, a cupboard might be ok – if you were a one-person business – but clearly it doesn't work for nightclubs, bars and restaurants. 'We need to be incentivising and supporting businesses – not telling them to set up a in a cupboard. 'This is mind-boggling stupidity from Kate Forbes - it is utterly absurd. 'Businesses are on their knees - and we have a government which is economically illiterate.' It came as Ms Forbes criticised about the impact of the SNP's policies after questioning why there is an 'obsession' with income tax rates in Scotland. Following a keynote speech at economic think tank Adam Smith House, she said: 'In Scotland there seems to be an obsession with income tax as though it's the only tax businesses and individuals have to grapple with.' Scotland is the only part of Britain not cutting business rates for shops this year. The Welsh Government announced it will provide 40 per cent relief for all firms in the retail, hospitality and leisure industries. It came after Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced a 40 per cent relief package for the same sectors in England as part of her Budget. But the SNP government Budget unveiled in December means retailers in Scotland businesses are receiving less support than those in other parts of Britain this year. Businesses are also struggling with the UK Government's hike in National Insurance employers' contributions, which began in April. It emerged in January that companies based in Scotland will pay £55million more tax than those in England because SNP ministers have not delivered on a promise to give them a level playing field. SNP ministers confirmed that firms based in larger premises in Scotland will pay £54.7million more in business rates than those in England in the year beginning in April. Shops will pay £9.1million more than those south of the Border, while offices will pay an additional £6.4million and hotels face an extra £2.5million bill. In its 2021 manifesto, the SNP promised to ensure that 'the largest businesses pay the same combined poundage in Scotland as in England'.
The Courier
39 minutes ago
- The Courier
Angus killer Tasmin Glass parole deferral slammed as 'appalling'
The deferral of Angus killer Tasmin Glass' parole bid has been slammed as 'appalling'. Liam Kerr, justice spokesperson for the Conservatives, criticised the treatment of her victim's family, the Donaldsons, during the process. Glass' latest parole bid was deferred on Wednesday after the board failed to reach a decision following her recall to prison. It will now be around six to eight weeks before the case is considered again by the board at an oral hearing. Mr Kerr told The Courier: 'It is appalling that this family have once again been left in limbo. 'After first having to suffer through Tasmin Glass being released only halfway through her sentence, this decision will only add to their trauma. 'It looks as though the needs of a cold-blooded killer are being put above those of the victims' family which is all too often the case in the SNP's soft-touch justice system. 'Steven Donaldson's family deserve to be treated much better than this and for parole decisions to stop being kicked into the long grass.' The North East MSP's words reflect the feelings of Steven's dad Bill when he learned the case had been pushed on. He called the situation 'a nonsense'. 'This means this is, yet again, going to drag on for us,' Bill told The Courier. 'We now have to go through the entire procedure yet again. 'We can take comfort from the fact she currently remains in prison but how much longer do we have to deal with this. 'Yet again Glass seems to be dictating terms.' Glass was convicted of culpable homicide in 2019 for her 'pivotal role' in the murder of Steven and sentenced to 10-years in prison. Last July, halfway through her term, the killer was granted her freedom. The Donaldson family were left in limbo twice during that time thanks to deferrals by the board. Nine months after being paroled, Glass was back in jail after breaking the conditions of her release. Through our A Voice for Victims campaign, The Courier has been working with families like the Donaldsons to bring reforms to the Scottish parole system. We want more transparency, better communication for victims and a rethink on automatic parole consideration for violent offenders halfway through their sentence. The Scottish Government has been contacted for comment.
Rhyl Journal
44 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Peers debate change to 105-year-old law so children can work on steam trains
Labour's Lord Faulkner of Worcester proposed an amendment to the Employment of Women, Young Persons, and Children Act 1920, which barred children from work in any 'any industrial undertaking', including in mines, construction or transport. If agreed, his change would have exempted voluntary work on heritage railways and tramways from the ban. Government whip Lord Katz cautioned there 'may be unintended consequences' by amending the 'old legislation', but Lord Faulkner indicated he could push for a vote on his proposal before the Employment Rights Bill becomes law. Supporting the proposals, independent crossbench peer the Earl of Clancarty said: 'Steam railways are an important part of this country's heritage, and as every year passes that importance surely grows. 'We are getting closer to a time when there will be no-one with a personal memory of such trains in their working life, so as well as being an enjoyable activity for interested, enthusiastic children and young people, this is also an educational opportunity for the next generation.' Lord Faulkner said the ban was from a 'very different era' and told the Lords it 'languished unknown on the statute book for many years'. He said: 'Heritage railways managers, not surprisingly, do not wish to break the law, even if it is moribund and other safeguards exist.' Training on heritage railways 'has led to many seeking careers on the national rail network and in some cases have provided training and apprenticeships appropriate to their future career choices', Lord Faulkner added. He warned that even where regulators have said they would not prosecute a child who volunteers on a heritage railway, a legal challenge 'could be brought by a local authority or by a relative of a young people, regardless of the assurances given'. Historic England chairman and Conservative peer Lord Mendoza said: 'One of the most difficult things in the heritage sector is to encourage young people to come into it, to learn the skills, to learn the trades that we need in order to keep our heritage environment going for as long as we can.' In his response, Lord Katz said 'regulators should and do take a proportionate approach to enforcement action'. He offered a meeting with peers who wanted to change the law, adding: 'The 1920 Act is old legislation and amendment of it should only be considered after a thorough review upon other areas of law, as there may be unintended consequences.' Withdrawing his amendment to the Employment Rights Bill, Lord Faulkner said he would 'take up the minister's kind offer' but added that without solution, he believed 'the House as a whole would like the opportunity to express its view on the report' as the draft new law progresses.
