444th Brigade and Military Intelligence head Mahmoud Hamza's narrative of the SDF / RADA Tripoli clash
Writing on his personal Facebook page yesterday, and not on his official 444th Combat Brigade page, Major General Mahmoud Hamza, Commander of the 444th Combat Brigade and Director of the Military Intelligence Department, narrated his version of yesterday's events regarding the clash with the Special Deterrence Force (SDF) / RADA in Tripoli.
''For years, we have always been keen on the security and protection of citizens, preventing bloodshed and stopping the armed conflict. We were not advocates of war, and keen on the sanctity of the blood of innocent people and the protection of lives, property and honours.
Our intervention in the past years to stop armed conflicts is evidence of the sincerity of our intentions''.
SDF / RADA reneg on agreement to handover locations
''What happened yesterday (the attack by SDF / RADA and its allied militias on his own forces) is treachery, betrayal and violation of the covenant and the charter, where the 'Deterrence and Judicial Forces' yesterday, after we were in an agreement and covenant with them, attacked all the (444th) brigade's positions in the capital Tripoli treacherously and without warning.
We could only stand firm and valiantly in defence of their treachery, for which they were known before, and they learned a lesson in all the places where they were treacherous. They 'eat with the wolf and cry with the shepherd.'
Refrained from attacking even though they could
''At the same time, we sought with every effort, and we stopped fighting to protect the people, and although all the lines were open to us to advance in all axes, but we stopped fighting. This shows our keenness to prevent blood and not to fight''.
Comment
Ultimately, this is one side of the story. Hamza's story. On the opposite side, the SDF / RADA have conveyed the narrative that Hamza's 444, the 111 Brigade and their other allies at the time, attacked them.
Hamza is saying his forces went to fill a vacuum left by the disintegrating Stability Support Agency (SAA) and its ally, the Judiciary Force, following Abdelghani Ghnewa Al-Kikly's contested death the day before. Hamza recounts that his forces were entering these vacated locations with the agreement of the SDF / RADA forces. But according to him, they reneged on the agreement and attacked Hamza's forces.
Nevertheless, as Hamza suggested, his track record is not that of a hot head. He has sought to portray and mould the 444th as a neutral and regular state institution: a regular army. His forces in guarding major crosspoints, roundabouts and traffic lights Salahaldeen and Ain Zara are impeccably presented and are respected by civilians in their treatment. They are restrained in being overly aggressive and in using force. They are mindful that they are accountable and represent the state. Militas are not. On the contrary, militias act with impunity at the cost of the Libyan people and the Libyan state.
Hamza knows too well, that unlike the warlord militia leaders, he is a military civil servant. He is dispensable at the stroke of the pen of his boss – current prime minister Aldabaiba.
However, Aldabaiba's enemies have sought to take advantage of the fog of war and create a tribal/regional narrative that Aldabaiba only stands for his hometown of Misrata – rather than the militia versus regular police and army narrative.
The Libyan state will never stand on its feet if the state does not have a monopoly on the legitimate, accountable use of force. There can be no monopoly if the state is full of multiple, corrupt, self-aggrandising militias.
.
Images of Abdelghani Ghnewa's funeral in Kikla appear as his SSA militia mourn him
Gunfire at demonstrations calling for Aldabaiba's downfall, nervous ceasefire holding as calm returns to Tripoli
The time of parallel security services is over, there is no place in Libya except for regular institutions of the army and police: Aldabaiba
Tripoli PM Aldabaiba appoints Mustafa Al-Wahishi as the new head of the Internal Security Agency
Tripoli PM Aldabaiba decrees reorganisation of some security units following Ghnewa Kikly's reported killing
Ceasefire announced after heavy overnight fighting in Tripoli
Calm returns after overnight Tripoli clashes as major militia leader reportedly killed
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
a day ago
- Metro
Why I'm scared by a report about Britain's 'minority white' future
A new study has predicted that 'white British' people are set to become a minority in Britain in the next 40 years. Cue the hysteria. I'm not surprised, it feels like this was exactly the intention behind this report. Conducted by Matt Goodwin of Buckingham University, who is also a regular voice on the right-wing TV channel GB News channel, the research claims that the proportion of white Brits will decline from 73% (where it currently stands) to 57% by 2050. It is then thought that white British people will become a minority by 2063 and that by the end of the century they will only constitute a third of the overall population. Referencing his study's findings, Goodwin said that those in favour of 'maintaining the way of life of the traditional majority population' will need their concerns 'recognised, respected and addressed.' Let's be real about what we're looking at here. This is not an impartial, apolitical study of demographic change. Goodwin's definition is so absurdly broad that figures such as King Charles and Winston Churchill wouldn't be considered 'White British' in this instance. Firstly, Goodwin makes frankly insulting and arbitrary decisions about what exactly is considered 'White British'. He defines this as those without at least one immigrant parent – creating a strange conclusion in which some people seem defined only by their 'foreign' side, creating a two-tiered system in which only those untainted by immigrant blood are considered genuinely 'White British' or native. By his definition, as a Muslim with one English parent and one Libyan, I'm not as British as a white non-Muslim, despite being born and raised here. This only reinforces what I have known my entire life – or at least, since I started looking visibly foreign by first wearing the hijab at 15: That I am always defined by my foreignness and never my Englishness. Goodwin's definition is so absurdly broad that figures such as King Charles and Winston Churchill wouldn't be considered 'White British' in this instance. But it is not white people with an American mother or a Greek father who are accused of diluting the native British population when it comes to studies like these. It's people like me whose brown, Muslim lineage renders me a foreigner, despite me being ethnically just as English as I am Libyan. Why else would Goodwin focus on his headline-grabbing statistic that 1 in 5 Britons will apparently be Muslim by the end of the century. In fact, Goodwin's main report on 'religious projections' doesn't even mention any other faiths, simply categorising the UK population along the lines of Muslim or non-Muslim. This sounds chillingly like 'us versus them', 'good guy versus bad guy' or 'native versus foreigner' – all of which fuel hysteria about a Muslim takeover and label Islam and Britishness as mutual exclusives. In fact, just this week we have seen Reform – a party that many predict could soon find its way in Number 10 – raising the issue of a Burka ban. For many, being British is about more than a passport. It looks, sounds and acts a certain way – and that is not Muslim. Studies like the one released this week embolden those holding Islamophobic views, giving them a statistical basis for their bigotry. Research conducted by someone with such incendiary views should be taken with far more suspicion than we have seen with these findings – but I suppose that doesn't matter when there are some catchy fear-mongering soundbites on offer. While the survey has predictably been used as evidence for lowering immigration levels, beneath the odd (frankly racist) categorisation of British identity, it also paints a picture of the birth rates of different communities in the UK and how that will impact future demographics. Given that Britain's birth rate is at an all-time low, we have seen pronatalist policies slowly creep into the mainstream as politicians panic about what the future will look like if nobody can afford to have babies. But what this survey seems to reinforce is that calls to raise the birth rate aren't simply about providing the nation with the next generation of workers and taxpayers. It is, for many, ensuring that the future face of the west remains white and that the so-called native population reproduces quickly enough to balance out other communities like my own, who traditionally tend to have larger families. Last year a peer in the House of Lords made a speech in which he warned about radical Muslims taking over Britain 'through the power of the womb'. More Trending Every year when the name Muhammad inevitably tops the list of most popular baby names, we see another wave of media-manufactured moral panic that Britain overrun by Muslims unless the white British population has more babies. Reports like these don't just legitimise conspiracy theories like this, they help manufacture them, and attempt to make people like me feel more othered, more unsafe. Who knows what this hypothetical Britain will look like in decades time? But if the children and grandchildren of people like me aren't considered part of the future British population, but a hostile outside force, then things are only going to get worse for all of us. Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: Donald Trump and Elon Musk might make peace – but it will never last MORE: What does Eid Mubarak mean and how should you reply to the greeting? MORE: Universal digital 'BritCards' on an app could soon be used to prove who you are
Edinburgh Live
2 days ago
- Edinburgh Live
Trial of man accused of making Lockerbie bomb delayed until 2026 due to 'poor health'
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info The man accused of making the Lockerbie bomb has seen his trial delayed. Abu Agila Mas'ud Kheir Al-Marimi was due to go on trial last month, though it will now begin in April 2026. The case against the pensioner was postponed due to its complex nature, and his poor health, reports the Daily Record. Al-Marimi, known as Masud, has denied priming the explosive device - which brought down Pan Am flight 203 on December 21, 1988, and killed 270 people. A further 11 people in the Dumfries and Galloway town when wreckage of the Boeing 747 fell on their homes. It remains the deadliest terror attack in the history of the United Kingdom. Masud, who is in his early 70s, is described as a joint citizen of Libya and Tunisia. He has been receiving treatment for a non-life threatening medical condition. In a joint status report to the US district court for the District of Columbia last month, both parties referred to the "complex, international nature" of evidence in the case, adding that a pre-trial schedule would be "atypical". Sign up for Edinburgh Live newsletters for more headlines straight to your inbox Lawyers also requested an early deadline for motions to "suppress the defendant's statement," presumed to be an alleged confession Masud made while in jail in Libya in 2012. The claim, which is said to be of "importance to the [US] government's case," alleges that Masud admitted working for the Libyan intelligence service and confessed to building the device which brought down the aircraft. It is also alleged he named two accomplices, Abdelbasset Al Megrahi and Al Amin Khalifah Fhimah. Megrahi was convicted of murdering the 270 victims and died in Tripoli in 2012 after being freed on compassionate grounds by the Scottish government. Join Edinburgh Live's Whatsapp Community here and get the latest news sent straight to your messages. Al Amin Khalifah Fhimah, his co-accused in the trial at the Scottish court sitting in the Netherlands, was found not guilty. Scottish and US prosecutors first named Masud as a suspect in the case in 2015 following the collapse of the Gaddafi regime in Libya. He was charged five years later by then-US attorney general William Barr with the destruction of an aircraft resulting in death. Masud was taken into US custody in 2022 after being removed from his home by an armed militia.
Daily Record
2 days ago
- Daily Record
Lockerbie bombing suspect trial delayed until next year
The case is now scheduled for next April. The trial of the man accused of making the Lockerbie bomb - the worst terrorist attack in UK history - has been delayed. Abu Agila Mas'ud Kheir Al-Marimi was due to go on trial last month. But the case against the pensioner, who is known as Masud, was postponed due to how complex it is, and his poor health. It is now scheduled to go ahead in April next year. The new date for the case, which is to take place before a jury in Washington, was chosen at the request of the defence and prosecution teams lined up to conduct the trial. The BBC reports Masud has denied priming the explosive device which brought down Pan Am flight 103 on 21 December 1988, killing 270 people. The explosion killed 259 passengers and crew and a further 11 people in the Dumfries and Galloway town when wreckage of the Boeing 747 fell on their homes. It remains the deadliest terror attack in the history of the United Kingdom. Masud, who is in his early 70s, is described as a joint citizen of Libya and Tunisia. He has been receiving treatment for a non-life threatening medical condition. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. In a joint status report to the US district court for the District of Columbia last month, both parties referred to the "complex, international nature" of evidence in the case, adding that a pre-trial schedule would be "atypical". Lawyers also requested an early deadline for motions to "suppress the defendant's statement," presumed to be an alleged confession Masud made while in jail in Libya in 2012. The claim, which is said to be of "importance to the [US] government's case," alleges that Masud admitted working for the Libyan intelligence service and confessed to building the device which brought down the aircraft. It is also alleged he named two accomplices, Abdelbasset Al Megrahi and Al Amin Khalifah Fhimah. Megrahi was convicted of murdering the 270 victims and died in Tripoli in 2012 after being freed on compassionate grounds by the Scottish government. Al Amin Khalifah Fhimah, his co-accused in the trial at the Scottish court sitting in the Netherlands, was found not guilty. Scottish and US prosecutors first named Masud as a suspect in the case in 2015 following the collapse of the Gaddafi regime in Libya. He was charged five years later by then-US attorney general William Barr with the destruction of an aircraft resulting in death. Masud was taken into US custody in 2022 after being removed from his home by an armed militia.
