Cybertrucks vandalized with swastikas in Lynnwood as protest continue against its CEO
'We're stronger than this as a society,' says 'Roro', the owner of one of the vandalized vehicles. 'In 2025 to have swastikas on your car in Lynnwood, Washington, you know, as a gay Jewish person, I was kind of taken aback. But I didn't take it personally, because, obviously, I believe they were just targeting Tesla and Elon and the dealership itself.'
On Wednesday, 'anti-Tesla' protesters gathered outside the Tesla dealership in Seattle with signs and chants criticizing Tesla CEO Elon Musk. Some of the protestors tell KIRO 7 that they plan to gather in peace, and that they don't condone the recent violence against local Tesla drivers.
The vandalism in Lynnwood comes as Tesla vehicles, dealerships and charging stations across the country have become recent targets for criminal activity.
This week, President Trump, called the recent incidents 'attacks' that should be considered domestic terrorism.
'And let me tell you, you do it to Tesla, and you do it to any company, we're gonna catch you and you're gonna, you're gonna go through hell,' said President Trump on the White House lawn, Tuesday.
When asked whether 'Roro' considers the graffiti on his car as domestic terrorism, he responded 'One hundred percent. Absolutely. Yeah, absolutely.'
What do the experts say? KIRO 7 spoke with Brian Levin, who founded the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University, San Bernardino.
'Indeed, in the very technical notion of what constitutes terrorism targeting Tesla dealerships or infrastructure to make a social or political statement would be a terrorist act. The problem is, we don't have a domestic terrorism statute here in the United States,' says Levin.
Levin says while some states do have a criminal statute involving 'domestic terrorism', they're rarely used. However, he states that the Tesla vandalism in Lynnwood could be seen as more than vandalism. It could be charged as a hate crime, depending on the prosecutors.
'Washington state has one of the most broadly applicable hate crime laws in the United States,' says Levin. 'The bottom line is, I wouldn't be committing a lot of crimes in Washington state, and certainly nothing like this.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
28 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump, Newsom square off in court over deployment of troops to quell LA riots
Justice Department lawyers were in federal court Monday to defend the Trump administration's deployment of Marines and California National Guard troops during violent anti-ICE demonstrations in Los Angeles in June. The three-day trial kicked off in San Francisco, with attorneys for the state arguing the deployment — which California Gov. Gavin Newsom strenuously objected to — violated a federal law against using military forces for domestic law enforcement. 4 Trump administration and State of California lawyers are facing off in federal court this week over the deployment of National Guard members during June's anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement The protests began June 6 as lawful demonstrations stemming from a series of raids conducted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement that saw more than 100 illegal immigrants rounded up around the city. Hundreds took to the streets, chanting in opposition and waving Mexican flags and anti-ICE signs while clashing with cops and federal immigration officers. 4 The riots began as protests but quickly descended into anarchy. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement But the protests soon escalated into full-blown riots, with cars burned in the streets, public buildings vandalized and local businesses pillaged by looters. As the violence dragged on, President Trump announced he was deploying some 4,000 Coast Guard members and around 700 active-duty Marines to the City of Angels to put an end to the anarchy. Newsom condemned the deployments, saying it amounted to using soldiers as 'props in the federal government's propaganda machine.' The Trump administration fired back, arguing the state's sanctuary city laws preventing local law enforcement from upholding immigration laws made federal intervention necessary. Advertisement Newsom sued the administration, and federal Judge Charles R. Breyer — a former President Clinton appointee who is overseeing the California bench trial — ruled the deployment was illegal. However, hours later an appeals court rejected Breyer's ruling which cleared the way for the mobilization to continue. 4 Trump's lawyers have argued the president was within his rights to order the troop deployments. By July 1, nearly all of the National Guard members and Marines called to Los Angeles had been released, with around 300 still in the city. Advertisement Those remaining on duty are 'supporting the request for assistance' from federal law enforcement agencies, William Harrington, former deputy chief of staff for the Army task force in charge of the Guard troops said in court Monday, according to the New York Times. 4 California Gov. Gavin Newsom's lawyers insist the mobilizations were illegal under the Posse Comitatus Act, a 1878 federal law prohibiting the use of soldiers to engage in civil law enforcement. Jonathan Alcorn/UPI/Shutterstock The trial could set a legal precedent for the extent of a commander-in-chief's authority over the military on US soil. Newsom's lawyers are vehement that sending troops to Los Angeles violated the Posse Comitatus Act, an 1878 federal law prohibiting the president from using armed forces to engage in civil law enforcement. Attorneys for the state also argue that by deploying troops over the objections of the governor and other California officials, Trump violated the 10th Amendment of the Constitution, which delineates the balance of power between the federal government and US states. Also being alleged is that Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth violated the Administrative Procedure Act, arguing they 'lack authority to federalize members of the California National Guard without issuing such orders through Governor Newsom,' the complaint reads. Trump's lawyers have staked their counter-argument on a little-known law — Section 12406(3) of the US Code — which permits the president to federalize the National Guard under certain circumstances. Advertisement Among them, if the US is in danger of being invaded or currently under invasion, if there is an ongoing rebellion or danger of one occurring, or if the president is unable 'with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.' Newsom and California are seeking a formal declaration from the court that Trump and Hegseth's orders were illegal, as well as injunctive relief, which would prohibit future deployments of the California National Guard without the governor's express approval. The bench trial opened on the same day President Trump announced he was placing Washington, DC's police department under federal control and deploying the National Guard to patrol the streets amid a surge of violent crime in the US capital.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Trump says Hamas can't be allowed to stay in Gaza: ‘Remember Oct. 7'
President Trump said Monday that Hamas cannot be allowed to stay in the Gaza Strip due to the horrors of the Oct. 7 terrorist attack — as he weighs the risks of Israel's looming invasion further into the enclave. While Trump stopped short of endorsing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's plan to invade and occupy Gaza City, the president agreed that Hamas needed to be exiled from Gaza over the threat the terror group presents to the Jewish state. 'I have one thing to say: remember Oct.7, remember Oct. 7,' Trump told Axios, invoking the infamous 2023 terror attack that killed more than 1,200 people in Israel and saw 250 others kidnapped. 3 President Trump said Hamas cannot remain in Gaza as Israel escalates the war with a looming invasion of Gaza City. AP 3 Trump said the world cannot forget the horrors of the Oct.7, 2023, massacre, which saw Hamas kill more than 1,200 people in Israel. AP Trump confirmed that he spoke with Netanyahu on Sunday to discuss the Jewish state's plan to invade Gaza City, with the US president agreeing that military might remains the best way forward to deal with Hamas. Trump acknowledged fears that the operation could put the remaining 50 hostages in danger, but noted that it was always going to be 'very rough to get them' out. Only 20 of the remaining hostages are believed to still be alive, and among the dead are Israeli-Americans Omer Neutra, 22, and Itay Chen, 19. Despite the danger, Trump said he doesn't believe that Hamas would commit to freeing the captives given the last set of tense cease-fire talks referencing the pause in negotiations between the terror group and Israel. '[Hamas] are not going to let the hostages out in the current situation,' Trump said. The president said he would ultimately let Israel proceed as it sees fit and not intervene. Trump's remarks come following global backlash over Netanyahu's plan to evacuate Gaza City and bring it under military occupation to eliminate Hamas' terror cells operating in the city. 3 Israel bombarded Gaza City on Sunday as it prepares to evacuate the city's refugee population to hunt down Hamas' terror cells. AFP via Getty Images The operation fell short of the premier's alleged initial plan to take over the entirety of the Strip, but Israeli military officials still voiced their opposition to the incursion out of fear of the hostages' safety. Netanyahu defended the plan on Sunday as the only viable tactic to free the city from Hamas and apply the pressure needed to force the terror group back onto the negotiating table. The prime minister also reiterated his calls for Hamas to completely demilitarize and give up its control on the Gaza Strip, which the terror group has ruled as the de facto governors for nearly 20 years. Israel has maintained that the war will only end once the goal of eradicating Hamas is complete, with Netanyahu planning to put the Palestinian enclave under the Jewish state's watch until a 'non-Israeli, peaceful civilian administration' can be tapped to take over.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Wins Texas Robotaxi License
Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) climbed after Texas officially listed Tesla Robotaxi LLC as a licensed entity, clearing a key hurdle before a new state law takes effect on September 1 that regulates autonomous rideshare services the same as those with human drivers. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with AMD. The approval was expected, but it still matters because it lowers friction for a broader Texas launch. In Austin, the geofenced area nearly doubled on August 3 to about 80 square miles, roughly in line with Waymo's footprint. Next up, Tesla has pointed to Nevada, Arizona, California and Florida for expansion. Elon Musk has also talked about reaching probably half of the United States population by the end of 2025. For investors, the next proof points are operating metrics, safety data and how quickly the service moves beyond invites and geofences. the Texas license and a clear rulebook reduce regulatory risk and bring Tesla closer to real world robotaxi revenue and modelable usage the September 1 law take effect and the pace of new city launches. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
