Sean Lennon says his parents John and Yoko were ‘the first power couple'
John and Yoko are the subject of a new documentary from Kevin Macdonald that explores their relationship and work around the time that John was organising his only full post-Beatles concert at Madison Square Garden in 1972.
The film, which was made with the cooperation of Sean, Yoko and the Lennon estate, includes extensive archive footage along with audio recordings of interviews and private phone calls.
'Anyone who pays attention to John and Yoko in the latter part of The Beatles, and then together through the Seventies, can see that my dad had this feeling that John and Yoko had sort of fused into one person,' Sean told The Telegraph in an interview this week.
'He had all these terms [such as] 'JOKO'! He said that they were one, and there should be one word: JohnandYoko.'
'I think a modern psychologist might say that [my dad] was a bit co-dependent,' he continued. But the reality is, he didn't want to individuate any more.
'They were the first power couple, like Brangelina or whatever. He wanted them to be an institution beyond just marriage and family. He wanted them to be an artistic union, a political union, a romantic union.'
The documentary also delves into the racism and hatred Yoko received from Beatles fans and members of the public who blamed her for breaking up The Beatles.
In 2021, Yoko appeared to agree with fans who suggested that Peter Jackson's three-part documentary, Get Back, had helped to dispel this notion, as archival footage showed her sitting quietly reading the newspaper or knitting while the band are at work.
'The thing with Yoko, though, that they have to say, is that she doesn't impose herself,' Jackson pointed out in an interview with 60 Minutes. 'She's writing letters, she's reading letters, she's doing sewing, she's doing painting, sometimes some artwork off to the side.'
In an interview with BBC Radio 6 Music last year about the Grammy-nominated expanded box set edition of John's 1973 album, Mind Games, Sean discussed the influence his mother had on his father's work.
At the time he was writing his fourth solo album, Mind Games, John was in the middle of his famous 18-month separation from Ono, a period referred to as the 'Lost Weekend'.
'A lot of people said like, 'Yoko wasn't around for this record, why are they featuring her in the booklet' or something,' Sean began. 'And I think there's a lot of history, there's a lot of assumptions made about that time period because they were sort of on their way towards that famous separation that people call the Lost Weekend.
'But the truth is, even when they were apart they were always talking, so I don't think they ever really broke up, all his stuff was still in the apartment with my mum. It's not like they had a real separation. And on top of it, all my dad was thinking about was her.'
He pointed to the album artwork for Mind Games: 'It's a collage of my mum literally the size of a mountain, and he's this little tiny thing sort of fading into the background.
'And I think it's clear what his view of my mum was in his life. She was monumental, obviously. And the whole album is about her.'
One to One: John & Yoko shows in IMAX exclusive previews on 9 and 10 April – and is in cinemas nationwide from 11 April.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
4 hours ago
- Time Magazine
The Science of Why Humans are Obsessed with Stadium Concerts
August 15, 2025 marks the 60th anniversary of a pivotal moment in live music history: The Beatles' infamous performance at Shea Stadium. What began as an unprecedented attempt to accommodate the Fab Four's overwhelming popularity has evolved into a touchstone of pop culture—the modern stadium tour. Today's stadium concerts are more than just supersized live shows; they have become cultural phenomena and socio-economic markers. Perhaps most intriguingly—at least to me—they are also neuroscientific experiments in mass synchronization. In 1965, pop music's demographic was dominated by teenagers with disposable income and a desire to break the self-imposed boundaries of their post-Depression-era parents. The Beatles' audience at Shea was overwhelmingly young, predominantly female, and distinctly American. In the decades since, stadium audiences have expanded in every conceivable way. Through the '80s and '90s artists like U2, Madonna, and Michael Jackson drew increasingly global, multi-generational crowds. Today, truly global music acts like BLACKPINK and Bad Bunny play to stadium audiences worldwide, reflecting the increasing multicultural appeal of contemporary music. And touring artists like Bruce Springsteen, Paul McCartney, Cyndi Lauper, and The Rolling Stones now draw in new followers aside lifelong fans, with three generations of family members often attending together. Fandom itself has transformed. Where fans once relied on the vagaries of radio play and magazine spreads to engage with their favorite artists, today's fans form tightknit communities on social media platforms like TikTok and Discord. Through these digital spaces, enthusiasts exchange theories, share memes, decode Easter eggs, and coordinate elaborate travel plans and ticket-buying strategies months in advance. The shift from passive consumption to active participation has transformed how fans engage with pop music, turning concerts into global events that have expanded well beyond geography and generations. Yet this evolution has created new challenges, chief among them, the skyrocketing cost of being part of the experience. We've gone from $5.10 to see the Beatles at Shea Stadium to Eras Tour tickets with face values ranging from $49 to $449 reselling for up to $20,000 on StubHub and SeatGeek. When my mother wanted to surprise me with tickets to Bryan Adams' Waking Up The Neighbours Tour in 1992, she lined up at the physical box office hours before opening with other eager fans. She forked over $42.50 for two, side-view seats in the lower bowl. Compare that to last year when I battled bots and refreshed my browser every few milliseconds in the hope of scoring four tickets to Olivia Rodrigo's GUTS World Tour before they soared to mortgage-level proportions. By some miracle, I was able to take my three teenage daughters to their first arena show for a relatively low $600. They're now saving their babysitting money and diligently tracking price trends for Benson Boone's American Heart Tour while I'm (half) considering dipping into their college fund to see Bryan Adams again this fall. At what point does the price of admission outweigh the joy of participation? When it came to the Eras Tour, like many other disappointed Swifties, we had to settle for movie screenings and grainy live feeds. Swift didn't stop in our hometown of Montreal. We considered travelling to Toronto, Boston, New York, or Philadelphia. When calculating the costs—tickets, travel, accommodations, meals—our cheapest option turned out to be Lisbon, Portugal. That three-day excursion would have set us back about $6,000 CAD. While that was substantially less than the resale tickets in any nearby city, the financial cost and complicated logistics of participation were too great. Economists often argue that high ticket prices are simply a reflection of market forces—artists, and resellers, can charge more because demand far outstrips supply. Sociologists counter that this trend deepens cultural divides, turning concerts into exclusive experiences for the financially privileged. Despite the costs, stadiums continue to sell out at record speed, raising the question: what is it about live music that makes us willing to pay such a premium? Is it the music itself, the sense of community, or something even more basic? For 30 years, our lab has been exploring why music moves us—literally and figuratively. Many of our studies focus on memory for music, demonstrating that people have a remarkable ability to recall melodies, pitch, tempo, and loudness with surprising accuracy, even without formal music training, suggesting that musical memory operates differently from other forms of memory. We conducted some of the first neuroimaging studies to map the brain's response to music—showing how it lights up the brain, engaging areas responsible for hearing, memory, movement, and emotion all at once. This is why a song can transport you back to a specific moment in time, evoking vivid memories and emotions. Our studies show that when people listen to music they love, it activates brain regions associated with pleasure and reward, helping to explain why a favorite song can feel as satisfying as a good meal or a warm hug. Music's ability to give you chills and make you feel euphoric is tied to the release of natural opioids in the brain, the same chemicals that help relieve pain. Years ago, our lab showed in brain scans that listening to the same piece of music caused people's brain waves to synchronize. Recent studies conducted in real-time, in concert halls, demonstrate that people enjoy music more when the performance is live and experienced as part of a group. Live music triggers stronger emotional responses than recorded music due to the dynamic relationship between the audience and the performers. The visual cues, collective energy, and real-time responsiveness of live music engage more sensory and emotional systems than listening alone, deepening our visceral connection to the experience. Attending a concert is associated with increases in oxytocin, a bonding hormone, enhancing our sense of social connection. When we move together to music—clapping, swaying, or singing in sync—we engage neural circuits involved in motor coordination, empathy, and social prediction, reinforcing our sense of being part of a group. We're literally on the same brainwave! What ties all this together is the simple but profound idea that music is more than just entertainment. From the joy of discovering a new banger to the comfort of an old, familiar tune, music may well be a biological necessity, a fundamental part of being human, wired into our brains and bodies in ways that shape how we think, feel, and connect with one another. Our innate desire for connection might also, in part, explain why a friendship bracelet exchange (inspired by Swift's You're On Your Own Kid) is trending at modern stadium shows: the simple act of swapping beaded bracelets cultivates a microcosm of human connection within a macro-scale experience. It's a ritual that transforms a crowd of thousands into an intimate community, where strangers become momentary friends, bound by shared enthusiasm and a tangible token of group membership. It's a small, tactile gesture that taps into our deep-seated need to bond, to feel seen, and to belong. In a world where digital interactions often replace physical ones, these trinkets are a reminder of the power of touch, of giving, and of creating memories that extend beyond the concert itself. Music has always been a social glue, a way for humans to synchronize their emotions and movements, whether around a Neanderthal campfire or in a packed stadium. And in an era of increasing isolation, these moments of connection feel more vital than ever. Making friendship bracelets to share with your fellow Swifties may be part of the solution. But today's stadium shows aren't just about emotional connection or even entirely about the music—it's also a masterclass in sensory stimulation. The Beatles may have pioneered the stadium format, but their setup was quaint by today's standards. Early stadium shows featured little more than musicians standing in front of a static backdrop, struggling to project their sound through subpar sound systems designed for sports announcers, not music. By the 1980s, technological advancements had changed the game. Pink Floyd's The Wall Tour in 1980 set a new standard for large-scale stage production, with elaborate sets, visual projections, and theatrical storytelling. U2's Zoo TV Tour in 1992 introduced multimedia screens that transformed the stage into a digital playground. More recently, Taylor Swift's Eras Tour involved 70,000 wristbands pulsing in unison, and stage sets transforming from slithering snakes to whimsical fairy-tale forests to cinematic cityscapes. And Beyoncé's 2023 Renaissance Tour incorporated cutting-edge robotics and high-fashion couture, proving that stadium concerts can be as much about visual effects as they are about the music. While many fans view these advances as improvements, others argue that the intimacy and simplicity of early stadium shows have faded, and been replaced by a commercialized, high-stakes industry. The Outlaws Roadshow stadium tour in 2012 left me feeling as though I had overpaid for a lights and lasers show that happened to include the Counting Crows phoning it in somewhere in the background. In the pursuit of grandeur, has some of the raw, unfiltered magic of live music been diluted? And what does all this mean for the future of live music? If the past 60 years of stadium shows (and tens of thousands of years of human music-making) have taught us anything, it's that music, at its core, is about shared experience. We crave the pulse of the bass beneath our feet, the collective chant of a catchy chorus or killer bridge, the unspoken understanding between strangers who, for just one night, are part of something bigger than themselves. As technology continues to evolve and fan communities grow more interconnected, one thing is certain: the stadium concert will remain a space where we come together, not just to listen, but to belong.
San Francisco Chronicle
5 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Cyndi Lauper to celebrate musical legacy with Bay Area crowd
Decades into her career, Cyndi Lauper still just wants to have fun. The pop singer got her start in the late '70s and rose to mainstream fame with her debut album, 'She's So Unusual,' in 1983. The record included her smash hit 'Girls Just Wanna Have Fun' and skyrocketed to the top of the charts in more than 25 countries. After years of entertaining, the Grammy winner opted to wind things down with her 'Girls Just Wanna Have Fun' farewell tour, which kicked off in October 2024 and stopped at Chase Center last November. The San Francisco show saw her 'bop,' shimmy and rock out to her hits, from 'True Colors' to 'Time After Time.' Despite its title, Lauper has clarified that the tour is not a retirement sendoff. The 72-year-old said she'll be open to occasional performances, and wanted to make sure she made one more push for an arena tour while she was still strong enough to give it her all. The trek, her first world tour since 2016, is scheduled to stop in the Bay Area once again at Mountain View's Shoreline Amphitheatre.
New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
NYC supermarket mogul Catsimatidis makes debut in Timothée Chalamet flick: ‘I never knew who he was!'
City billionaire John Catsimatidis is making his big-screen debut in heartthrob Timothée Chalamet's newest film, 'Marty Supreme' — and, in true form, is making cash off griping about the high cost of things. 'I actually got paid! I'm a member of SAG. And so I got a new career at my age,' the 76-year-old supermarket mogul told The Post on Friday. 3 New York City supermarket mogul John Catsimatidis is making his film debut in the upcoming Timothée Chalamet movie 'Marty Supreme.' x/RealChalamet Advertisement 'Josh Safdie — who is the big producer on it — he was looking for Upper West Side people and approached me, and I said, 'Yeah! Sounds like fun!' ' the mogul said. Catsimatidis — who is also famous these days for his WABC radio show, where he regularly complains about rising costs in the city — revealed he will star in 'two or three scenes' of the new film about the life of a fictional table-tennis star, Mary Mauser. The film is based on the actual life of legend Marty Reisman, who ran a ping pong parlor in an Upper West Side building owned by Catsimatidis. Advertisement The onetime mayoral candidate also makes a cameo in the final seconds of the film's trailer, which was released Wednesday, in a scene in which Chalamet tries to convince two men with New York accents to purchase a custom orange ping pong ball with his name branded on the surface. 3 'I got a new career at my age,' Catsimatidis crowed to The Post. Stefan Jeremiah for New York Post 3 Chalamet stars as Marty Mauser, a fictionalized version of table tennis legend Marty Reisman. x/RealChalamet 'A custom ball like that, it's going to cost a lot of money,' Catsimatidis tells the actor. Advertisement When it came to working with the Academy Award-nominated Chalamet, Catsimatidis admitted he had no idea who the heartthrob was. 'I never knew who he was! I was complaining to the director that he was getting a bigger role than me!' he quipped to The Post. It wasn't clear whether Chalamet, a fellow New Yorker and public-school graduate, knew who Catsimatidis was before filming. Advertisement Catsimatidis said his ping pong-peddling scene took as many as seven hours to shoot. 'I would say I'm used to days of work for five days,' Catsimatidis told The Post. '[Filming] was like 14-hour days. By the time I got [done], it was like midnight.'
