
$5.4m loss reported after site closure
The fertiliser co-operative's result follows a profit after tax of $2.8m a year ago.
Closing the site, off-loading five lime quarries and the sale of assets from its agritech subsidiary C-Dax in a bid to reshape the business resulted in impairments of $9m.
Fertiliser manufacturing officially ended at Ravensbourne earlier this year with the loss of about 30 jobs.
The site will remain a port store and distribution centre with manufacturing operations restricted to Napier and Christchurch.
Before impairments, tax and one-off adjustments, Ravensdown said it delivered an operating profit of $13m.
Plateauing revenue of $764m and volumes up 71,000 tonnes on the previous financial year to 962,000 tonnes resulted in lower margins.
Ravensdown was unable to deliver farmer shareholders a rebate as it worked to keep fertiliser prices down for them.
Chief executive Garry Diack said in a statement the co-op had worked hard again to deliver competitive pricing throughout the year and focus on keeping prices lower while customers emerged from the economic downturn.
"The co-operative has absorbed increasing international fertiliser prices and rising input costs to delay passing them on to customers, even as our own margins have come under pressure. Impairments of $9m from the closure of manufacturing in Dunedin, the divestment of five lime assets, and the sale of C-Dax are an outcome of our strategy to size the business to meet the market."
Chairman Bruce Wills said Ravensdown's underlying performance continued to ensure a stable funding base resulting in an equity ratio lift to 80%, up 1% on the previous financial year.
The co-operative again reported positive inventory and debt management, building on improvements achieved in the previous two years. Inventories at the year-end reduced further by $22m to $128m with debt reduced by 67% to $26m.
However, a third year of difficult trading did not allow payment of a shareholder rebate, he said.
"In this environment it has been prudent to continue our conservative approach to capital expenditure and conserve funds. Although fair pricing was at the expense of a rebate, the business was able to leverage the strength of its balance sheet to ensure we're well positioned for any market upturn."
Mr Diack said improved fertiliser sales could be expected in spring in line with the dairy sector's better fortunes and the beginning of an upturn in the red meat sector.
Ravensdown said its total manufacturing capacity had been adjusted to meet future market volume requirements with the closing of Dunedin manufacturing earlier this year.
Over the past year, capital work had been completed at Ravensdown's two manufacturing sites in Napier and Christchurch, shoring up total manufacturing capability to about 550,000 tonnes a year.
Sales of New Zealand-manufactured product increased 17% (382,000 tonnes) and a further lift is expected during the 2026 financial year.
Mr Diack said the co-op was sourcing and diversifying its supply of raw materials for local manufacturing to suit pastoral farming systems.
"The co-operative's impairments over this past financial year reflect that we are a business adapting to changing market conditions. While the closure of manufacturing in Dunedin has had a significant impact on our financial result this year, ongoing we will realise the benefit of reduced operating and capital maintenance costs."
He said Ravensdown had put together a targeted programme of projects to improve its operational efficiency and support customers to "do more with less" nutrients.
Despite Ravensdown's outlook for increased volumes and profitability as the rural economy returned to a more stable period, it sees the global economy being more volatile.
tim.cronshaw@odt.co.nz

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
5 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Late selling drives NZ sharemarket down
'It's been a good week and the markets seem to be taking the US tariffs in their stride as we head into the reporting season next week,' he said. 'We are confident that we'll see an Official Cash Rate cut from the Reserve Bank [on August 20], which I think will be good for the market and the economy overall. 'We've managed to get through this week without any profit warnings, so that's good,' Lister said. Spark firmed 4c or 1.6% to $2.59 after a difficult period. Lister said the telco appeared to be enjoying the beginnings of a recovery after two years in the investment wilderness. 'It's still got a long way to go, but I think there is a general feeling among the analyst community that there might be a little bit of value there because it's fallen as much as it has,' he said. Also firming were KMD Brands, up 1c at 25c, and Sky TV, up 6c at $3.02. Infratil dropped by 18c or 1.59% to $11.84. The infrastructure investor earlier announced that it and the NZ Superannuation Fund had entered a binding agreement to sell their 100% interest in RetireAustralia to Invesco Real Estate, for A$845m ($925m). As of March 31, the carrying value of Infratil's investment in RetireAustralia was $404m, with the transaction expected to result in an accounting loss on sale of about $80m, the company said. Market heavyweight Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, which has a 16% weighting on the S&P/NZX50 index, fell 31c to $36.69. Retirement village operator Summerset dropped by 25c (2.25%) to $11.08. Transport software specialist Eroad took back some of Thursday's gains, which were on the back of New Zealand's plan to introduce universal road user charges, the stock dropping 6c to $1.95. In the second-tier stocks, major apple exporter T&G Global rallied by 15c (6.7%) to $2.40 after posting a turnaround in its first half to a $1.7m profit from a loss of $18.76m in the previous comparable period. 'As we head into the second half of the year, T&G is in a strong position to build on this momentum,' the company said. 'We're confident in our ability to continue delivering improved financial performance.' T&G's majority owner, Germany's BayWa, has put its stake up for review. BayWa, which has interests ranging from food to construction and energy, first made its play in 2011 for what was then Turners and Growers, with the intention of a complete takeover. T&G's shares have gained 53% in the last 12 months. With a 15% tariff on New Zealand exports to the US now in place, ASB Bank expects beef, dairy and wine exports to be the most heavily affected. 'We think beef is currently under the most risk, but there are opportunities to mitigate the hit,' the bank said. Jamie Gray is an Auckland-based journalist, covering the financial markets and the primary sector. He joined the Herald in 2011.


NZ Herald
16 hours ago
- NZ Herald
US ties with India trampled as Trump hunts goal of ending Russia's war in Ukraine
This week, Trump seemed ready to ditch that relationship. He doubled already hefty tariffs on Indian exports to the US for its steadfast refusal to stop buying oil from Russia, in an effort to pressure Russia to end the war. Trump has accused India of helping Russia finance its war on Ukraine through oil purchases; India has said it needs cheap oil to meet the energy needs of its fast-growing economy. India called the additional tariffs 'unfair, unjustified, and unreasonable', pointing out that it was being punished for doing something — buying Russian oil at a discounted price — that other nations have done, although it didn't mention names. China is the largest buyer of Russian oil, and Turkey has also deepened its energy links with Russia since the start of the war in Ukraine, without incurring similar penalties. Analysts said Trump's pressure tactics could damage the long-standing ties between India and the US. 'We are better off together than apart,' said Atul Keshap, a retired US diplomat and president of the US-India Business Council. 'The partnership forged by our elected leaders over the past 25 years is worth preserving and has achieved considerable mutual prosperity and advanced our shared strategic interests.' It's difficult to quantify what exactly America would lose if its relationship with India cools. India is a valuable strategic partner for the US, acting as a counterweight to China. It is also important to many American companies, including Apple, which has shifted some manufacturing of its products to India from China. Ajay Srivastava, a former trade official at the Global Trade Research Initiative, a New Delhi-based think-tank, said the US action 'will push India to reconsider its strategic alignment, deepening ties with Russia, China, and many other countries'. India and the US, with Japan and Australia, are part of a diplomatic partnership called the Quad, set up largely to counter China's growing influence in the Indo-Pacific region. India is planning to host the Quad Leaders' Summit later this year. Trump was expected to attend, although it's now unclear if he will. For India, the costs of a damaged relationship may prove to be higher. Trump's move puts Prime Minister Narendra Modi in a bind. Russia is the source of 45% of its oil imports. If India stops buying Russian oil, accepting higher prices for consumers and domestic manufacturing, it would be politically damaging for Modi's Government. If it ignores Trump's threat and continues buying Russian oil, the hit to India's economy will be far costlier. The higher tariffs could cut India's more than US$86 billion in exports to the US by half, according to the Global Trade Research Initiative, an Indian research group. The US is India's biggest trading partner, and exports account for nearly 20% of India's economy. India ranks only 10th among American trade partners in goods. India has also come to value American backing for its bid to be recognised as a global superpower. Modi has touted his relationship with Trump, courting the US President during his first term in office and calling him a 'true friend'. But that friendship, as many American allies have learned, may mean little when Trump's own priorities are at stake. US President Donald Trump is open to meeting Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the White House said yesterday. Photo / Olga Maltseva, Brendan Smialowski, Frederick Florin / AFP In recent weeks, Trump announced that he had struck deals with Japan, South Korea and the European Union, but even after months of negotiation, India had not reached an agreement. India was reluctant to make concessions on politically sensitive sectors like dairy and agriculture. India also publicly denied Trump's repeated claims that he helped broker a ceasefire between India and Pakistan after a brief, four-day conflict between the two neighbours in May. India has maintained that the ceasefire was negotiated bilaterally with Pakistan, and Indian leaders bristled at Trump's willingness to insert himself into that bitter rivalry. It is not yet clear whether the punitive tariffs Trump has threatened will ever take effect. In the executive order he issued, Trump said the tariffs would be implemented within a month, but he could modify the order if circumstances changed. The order included a provision that the US would look at other countries' purchases of Russian oil as well. So far, there is no indication that Trump intends to take a similar approach to China. Chinese and US officials are in the middle of sensitive negotiations about potential trade agreements after an initial round of retaliatory tariffs threatened to destabilise the global economy. With his tariff moves against India, Trump is keeping his eye on big strategic goals — a deal with China and keeping the pressure on Moscow before a potential meeting with the leaders of Russia and Ukraine, which he disclosed yesterday. Far from being 'a dead economy', as Trump called it, India is the fastest-growing large economy in the world. But its place on the President's list of priorities may be much less certain. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Anupreeta Das Photograph by: Saumya Khandelwal ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES

1News
17 hours ago
- 1News
'Soul destroying': Fake e-store hijacks Matakana business' brand
A fake online store using the name of a genuine Matakana business has shaken the town's business community, misled customers, and prompted a compliance probe from the Commerce Commission. The scam website, registered in April, has been using the name Matakana Boutique — identical to the legitimate accommodation and catering business run by Amy and Simon Hope in the north Auckland town since 2016. It has aggressively marketed itself on Facebook and Instagram, claiming to be a New Zealand-based clothing retailer. The Commerce Commission said it has received 150 inquiries this year about fake retail websites that appear to be locally run. General manager of competition, fair trading, and credit Vanessa Horne said misleading marketing was a serious concern. "All businesses selling to New Zealand consumers must comply with the Fair Trading Act, regardless of where they are based," Horne said. ADVERTISEMENT "Any claims made, or impressions given, about the origin of a product or a business must not be misleading or deceptive. This includes the use of symbols, such as kiwis, flags or other national emblems." Amy Hope of Matakana Boutique. (Source: Supplied) Amy Hope told 1News it was "soul destroying" to see their brand identity taken from them. What began as one or two calls a week quickly escalated to multiple a day – women chasing up late packages, asking for refunds, and complaining about poor-quality clothing they had received. "We deliberately, strategically, chose Matakana Boutique, knowing that that word offers sort of uniqueness and quality and attention to detail, which is what we're about, so it see someone taking it from us and putting it with products we'd never align with, it's strange," said Hope. "They know what they're doing. They're even using our same font. Seeing and being associated with a website like that — it's awful." She said the fake store was cashing in on both the reputation of Matakana as a destination for high-quality product and the goodwill of New Zealanders wanting to support local businesses. ADVERTISEMENT "These women are parting with their money and having a feel-good moment of supporting New Zealand and small business and buying local, and then realising they're not. For some of these women, it was a big choice for them to buy a top for themselves. They feel misled, exploited, and cheated when the product they received, or haven't received, is really poor quality." TWO Boutique owner-operator Alana Silk. (Source: Supplied) TWO Boutique owner-operator Alana Silk had to explain to 12 people who visited her store last week — who were asking for a specific jumper from the fake e-store — that they had fallen for a scam. "They were all very shocked. Most of them travelled to Matakana especially to try it on. There is no physical address for the 'shop', but the Google algorithm is sending them to me." Matakana Village said in a post to Facebook that a wave of people had recently arrived in the village, looking for items they had seen on the website. "Several shoppers who ordered from the site told us their parcels arrived from China, nothing like the photos, and some said they felt scammed. "This confusion has led to real, locally-owned boutiques like us, White Cottage, and Two Boutique, as well as the genuine having to explain the difference — often to very disappointed visitors." ADVERTISEMENT How to spot a fake e-store The Commerce Commission urged consumers to take extra care when shopping online, especially when dealing with unfamiliar websites. Before making a purchase, the Commission recommended researching the business by checking independent reviews and feedback on external platforms. "Don't rely solely on testimonials displayed on the company's own website," a spokesperson said. "These can be selectively curated or even fabricated." Consumers were also encouraged to look for clear and accessible contact details, such as a local address and phone number. "Legitimate online businesses typically provide transparent information about delivery, returns, and payment security," the Commission said. Red flags included vague or missing contact information, overly positive reviews with no detail, and websites that mimicked the branding of known businesses. "Taking a few minutes to verify a site before you buy can save you from being misled or losing money," the Commission added.