
Three bills for rural communities pass the legislature, signed by governor
Apr. 23—OLYMPIA — Gov. Bob Ferguson signed 35 bills into law Monday, including three pieces of legislation sponsored by Rep. Tom Dent, R-Moses Lake. Dent's bills include topics such as large animal veterinarian care, the pesticide task force and allowing small regional airports to use real estate excise tax funds.
"I feel good about what I've been able to accomplish," Dent said. "I've been able to do some things that are in my area of expertise, in my wheelhouse, so to speak, and move those bills through the legislature."
Dent said, despite three bills being signed into law, there are still a handful he is fighting for during the final week of the 2025 legislative session.
One bill Dent mentioned is House Bill 1912, which would add an exemption from taxes under the Climate Commitment Act for fuels used for agricultural purposes. The bill has passed both chambers and is waiting for consideration from the House Speaker, Senate President and Governor as of Tuesday.
The other is House Bill 1539, which would address wildfire protection and mitigation. The bill passed the legislature and was delivered to the governor on Tuesday for consideration.
"There's been some wins here this year, there have also been some bills that are not so much, but that part is pretty normal," Dent said. "For every session, you hopefully always have a few wins and there's always some things you didn't (get passed). I will just come back again next year. That's what you do. Overall, it's probably been as positive as any session since I've been here. But we have a new administration, which gave us new people at the agencies. It's just been different and when I say different, it's been different in a good way."
Veterinarians
House Bill 1705 aims to address the shortage of large animal veterinarians in the state. The bill establishes a work group tasked with examining and providing recommendations on strategies to recruit, train, and retain large animal veterinarians. The work group will include representatives from various sectors, including agriculture, veterinary medicine, health and historically marginalized communities, Dent said.
The bill passed both chambers of the legislature unanimously.
"Veterinarians quite often are kind of a chain or a fence, a barrier, so to speak, between diseases that affect the animal world and the diseases that could affect the human world," Dent said. "We need them there to kind of act as another line of defense against some of the bad things that can happen. The bird flu is one of them. That can affect humans. We want to make sure, if we can, to have that line of defense in place."
The Washington State University College of Veterinary Medicine has trained nearly 7,000 veterinarians since its founding in 1899, according to the bill summary. The WSU Veterinary Teaching Hospital facility is the largest veterinary referral center in the Pacific Northwest, testing thousands of animal patients every year. Large animal services specialize in horses, foals, dairy and beef cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, camels, llamas and alpacas.
However, the field is seeing a decline in professionals specializing in large animal care, attributed to factors such as inadequate financial incentives, high student debt and the physical demands of the profession, according to the bill summary. The data collected shows that over the past 20 years, only three to four percent of veterinarians enter food-related care.
"A lot of the newer, younger vets tend to gravitate into working on dogs and cats, because, No. 1, it pays a lot better and No. 2, it's a lot easier," Dent said. "So, we are trying to come up with a plan to how do we increase that pipeline for large animal veterinarians to be able to come in, to get them interested, get them into school and get them out there helping our farmers and ranchers."
The work group's findings, due in preliminary and final reports by December 2025 and June 2026, respectively, will be part of addressing the veterinarian shortfall.
"I expected some pushback on this bill, and there was none," Dent said. "People just like the idea. They were all supportive. I worked on this for over a year, and while I wasn't necessarily totally in love with the bill, I finally decided, well, I'll drop it, at least and we'll start the conversation. I just couldn't believe how it took off like wildfire, and everybody got behind it."
Sen. Judy Warnick, R-Moses Lake, said she was in favor of the bill because she has large animals and has said she has had challenges with finding care for them.
"I am very much in support of a large animal veterinarian study to see how we can increase the availability of large animal veterinarians," Warnick said. "My own family has horses and cows and it's sometimes very difficult in case of emergencies to find a veterinarian and even if it's not an emergency, finding someone who is willing to work on large animals is still challenging."
The bill's fiscal statement estimates around $253,500 to be spent for the implementation of the legislation between 2025 to 2027. Around $28,000 will go to the Department of Agriculture, $203,500 to WSU and $22,000 to the Department of Health.
The legislation is scheduled to take effect 90 days post-session adjournment, contingent upon budget approval.
Pesticide Application Safety Committee
House Bill 1294 proposes the extension of the Pesticide Application Safety Committee until July 1, 2035. Originally established to enhance communication and collaboration among stakeholders in pesticide application, the committee comprises legislators, agency heads from relevant departments and representatives from agricultural institutions. It monitors data collection processes relating to pesticide safety and recommends policy options aimed at improving pesticide application protocols.
"We did that so we could kind of keep track of what's going on," Dent said. "So instead of being heavy-handed, we can work with industry to find better techniques, to make sure the industry has the latest techniques, the best management practices, and whatever resources they may have, so they can operate in a safe and efficient manner. That went pretty well, and the committee has been a good committee with good people who are really engaged in doing the right thing and protecting our use of pesticides, and also the people that are around them. But it expires in 2025. The agencies, along with the industry, wanted to re-up this thing."
The bill also seeks to remove restrictions on the advisory group's ability to conduct in-person meetings, thus facilitating better interaction among its diverse members — including farmworkers, growers, health center representatives, aerial applicators and toxicologists.
The initial expiration date for the committee and advisory group was set for July 1, 2025.
"t's going to go out now to 2035, so we have a 10-year extension, which is a good thing," Dent said. "We need to keep our tools available to our agriculture producers, that they use to produce the food that we use, that we buy, that we like to eat, and also keep working with our farmworkers. We promote safety. It's about efficient and prudent and responsible use of pesticides. I'm excited that we got that one across the line. It's just going to be good, it's good for our industry, it's good for the farmworkers and it's good for the public. I don't see a downside to this bill."
This measure garnered bipartisan support, passing the House with a vote of 97-0 and the Senate with a vote of 49-0.
Warnick said she was in support of the renewal of the committee because she has been serving on it and she said they are making good progress.
"It's something that we need to continue," Warnick said. "The work that has been started by the various stakeholders is important for the safety and future of agriculture in Washington."
Although the bill contains an emergency clause for an effective date of July 1, 2025, it will be null and void unless adequately funded in the budget.
The bill has a proposed expense of around $618,400 in 2025 to 2027. In 2027-29, the expenses are around $674,400 and in 2029-2031, the cost is about $673,000. The funds go to the Department of Health, University of Washington, Washington State University and the Department of Agriculture.
Airports
House Bill 1650 proposes an amendment to allow local real estate excise tax revenues to be utilized for airport capital projects, specifically benefiting small airports. The core objective of HB 1650 is to include small airports in the definition of "capital projects" eligible for funding through local REET, according to Dent.
Traditionally, REET funds have been limited to public works projects such as roads, parks, and government facilities, leaving funding for airports limited and often unviable, according to the bill report. Nonetheless, the bill recognizes that small airports, as defined by their inclusion in the Washington aviation system plan and the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems, are critical to local economies and public safety, Dent said.
"If the governing authority of a community that had an airport wanted to spend some money on an airport, then they could make a choice to do this," Dent said. "We're not telling them they have to do that. It's just another option for them."
The economic significance of regional airports is highlighted in public testimony, citing the Tacoma Narrows Airport's contribution of approximately $160 million annually to Washington's economy.
Additionally, these airports serve multiple functions, including facilitating business travel, educational programs for aviation students, and emergency services. Currently, small airports face logistical challenges, particularly concerning deferred maintenance, inadequate staffing and difficulties in securing matching funds for federal grants, which complicates their operational capacities, according to the bill report.
There is no anticipated expenditure on the bill. Furthermore, the bill does not impose additional taxes but rather grants local governments the flexibility to allocate existing revenues from REET for airport projects if they opt to do so.
"It's a pretty simple bill, but there were some counties that wanted it, and we worked hard to move that bill," Dent said. "It was because sometimes it's difficult for people to truly understand that it's that simple. All we did was add an option to where you could spend the money, but it will help, because we don't have enough funding for our airports."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
America Has Theories on Whether Trump-Elon Musk Feud Is All Fake
After President Donald Trump's beef with Tesla CEO Elon Musk practically broke the internet, Americans are wondering if all the drama was meant to deflect from one crucial piece of legislation: Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Act. Others, however, don't think the president is smart enough to pull it off. Let's get into it. After passing in the House by the skin of it's teeth, the GOP spending bill is headed to the Senate, drawing mixed reviews from Democrats and Republicans alike. With major cuts to Medicaid– which Trump promised he wouldn't do– questionable AI regulations, permanent taxes cut to the wealthy, adding trillions to the national debt and much more, Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Act is anything but beautiful, and more folks should be paying attention. But alas, they're not… And after last week's blow up between him and Musk, many online have theories that the Trump and Musk battle got people watching the wrong fight. 'This Trump-Musk fight seems like a distraction,' @d_originalone noted on June 5. Another user pointed out the suspicious timing of the feud coinciding with the bill. 'Elon Musk sitting on Epstein information and only releasing it because him and trump aren't friends makes him just as disgusting as Trump,' @namenonew started. 'It's all a distraction & greed tactic folks.' Even CNN host Audie Cornish noted 'there's a billion-dollar bill at stake—but all eyes are on the fight between two billionaires.' She continued, 'Medicaid, SNAP, and foreign policy are all in the balance, yet headlines focus on Musk and Trump.' 'Who gives a rat's ass bout a fake feud between 2 Nazis,' @kenyadad12 boldly tweeted before adding the real concern should be 'this bill GOP pushing through that will allow trump to ignore contempt orders from the courts.' Although many are convinced Trump's alleged scheme is to divert Americans from the dangers of the tax bill with the drama of the century, there's no way to exactly know if that's the president's real plan. But, you can't put anything past the man, who is known for his antics and divisive nature. On TikTok, @omekongo listed Trump's travel ban to 12 different countries, a recent abortion directive endangering pregnant people nation-wide and most importantly, that 'big, ugly tax bill' as reasons for Trump's alleged smoke and mirrors trick on America. Other folks online don't want to give Trump and Musk any credit for allegedly scheming to deter from the real issues plaguing the country. 'There's no master plan, no distraction; they're just impulsive fascist idiots,' @LivForJReeves10 said on X. @trustno1evah on TikTok said no matter how hard Trump might try to pull the wool over Americans' eyes, they're not doing a good job at it. 'This Trump and Musk fallout is all a staged LIE,' she said. The bill itself is over 1,000 pages long, tackling any and everything under the sun while still checking off key points in the MAGA rulebook, 'Project 2025.' With legislation this long and tedious, it's not shocking Americans won't be able to digest the full impact the bill will have on their lives. In fact, even House Republicans like Ga. Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene and Neb. Rep. Mike Flood admitted to skimming over key points in the vital tax legislation. If the very people elected to read and review proposed legislation have confessed to being unaware of the very small, fine print, then Americans should probably be paying even closer attention to what's at stake.


New York Post
23 minutes ago
- New York Post
Rep. Elise Stefanik blasts NYS Democrats' ‘radical' agenda in Albany as she eyes run for governor
ALBANY – Potential gubernatorial candidate Rep. Elise Stefanik blasted Democrats during a Capitol visit Monday — as state lawmakers try to ram through free-spending policies at the close of the legislative session. 'Here we are, another year, another failed, radical, reckless agenda and legislative session in New York State,' Stefanik said at a news conference, flanked by state Republican minority leaders Rob Ortt (R-Niagara) and Will Barclay (R-Oswego). 'They have put New York last with this massive, bloated, $254 billion budget. It is anti-worker, anti-family, anti-farm, anti-small business, anti-manufacturer and anti-law enforcement,' Stefanik said. 3 Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) – a potential 2026 gubernatorial contender – rallied with Republicans in Albany Monday. Vaughn Golden/NY Post The high-ranking House Republican from New York ripped into Democrat-pushed initiatives that include loosening requirements on programs to release potentially violent offenders from prison, restricting the deployment of natural gas infrastructure, and a $10 million legal defense fund for Attorney General Letitia James amongst others. Stefanik — an ally of President Trump — is eyeing a run against Gov. Kathy Hochul in 2026 and is already gaining momentum after a fiery speech on Staten Island last week where the North Country lawmaker asked gathered Republicans, 'Are we ready to fire Kathy Hochul next year in the State of New York?' State Democrats staged their own press conference earlier Monday ahead of Stefanik's appearance at the Capitol, criticizing federal Republican lawmakers and Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill spending plan. 'This budget bill is actually ugly and devastating and it's painful,' Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie (D-Bronx) said, citing an estimate that it could lead to $800 billion in cuts to Medicaid over two years. The Democrats – holding signs with estimates of the Washington GOP's budget bill's impacts to hospital and Medicaid funding in localities across the state – framed the federal proposal as a direct attack on blue states like New York. 'This so-called big beautiful bill they're pushing isn't just bad policy, it's a direct attack on middle class families,' Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins (D-Westchester) said. 3 Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie (D-Bronx) and Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins (D-Westchester) called for a repeal of the SALT cap, but also pushed back against proposed cuts to Medicaid programs. Vaughn Golden/NY Post Heastie and Stewart-Cousins, however, wanted Republicans to go further to completely eliminate a cap on how much state and local taxes middle and upper-income New Yorkers can write off on their federal returns. The cap would be lifted in the Republicans' bill from $10,000 to $30,000. 'Anything less than a full repeal is not a win for New York,' Heastie said. But Stefanik credited New York Republicans in the federal government for the increase. 'I'm sure you also didn't hear from them any proposal on how they're going to cut taxes for New Yorkers, and they just want to blame it on SALT,' Stefanik said. 3 Gov. Kathy Hochul is already facing a primary challenge ahead of her 2026 reelection bid. Stephen Yang Ortt labeled his colleagues across the aisle as 'hypocrites.' 'Don't let the hypocrites get away with it. I'm not gonna, Barclay's not gonna, and bet your ass Congresswoman Stefanik's not gonna,' Ortt said. A spokesperson for Hochul declined to comment and referred The Post to a statement released by the state Democratic Party. 'While Stefanik lies to her constituents' faces about her and Trump's plan to gut Medicaid, New Yorkers see right through it – and they know Governor Hochul's budget puts money back in their pockets, cuts taxes for the middle class, and makes our streets and subways safer,' Addison Dick, a spokesperson for the Democrats, said.


New York Post
40 minutes ago
- New York Post
Controversial tax credit to save Downtown Manhattan on verge of getting renewed: sources
The push by real estate dealmakers for Albany to renew a controversial tax-credit critical to saving Downtown Manhattan turned into a real 'cliffhanger' – but appears poised for approval, The Post has learned. The citywide Relocation Employment Assistance Program and a similar one specifically for Lower Manhattan, known as LM-REAP, provide tax credits of up to $3,000 per employee to companies that relocate from out of the city or from parts of Manhattan to designated areas in the outer boroughs or to Downtown Manhattan. Tens of thousands of jobs and the future of scores of Lower Manhattan office buildings would be at risk if the little-known REAP programs were not renewed when they expire on June 30, according to landlords and business advocates. 3 Tens of thousands of jobs and the future of scores of Lower Manhattan office buildings would be at risk if the little-known REAP programs were not renewed when they expire on June 30, according to landlords and business advocates. Christopher Sadowski The measures were left out of the state's budget plan announced in April and appeared doomed as lawmakers in the state Senate and Assembly were set to escape for their summer break. But there was movement on an extension over the weekend, a knowledgeable Albany source told The Post on Monday. 'It finally got key approvals in the Assembly, and it's looking good tomorrow in the Senate, which was where the hangup was,' the source said. Michael Gianaris, the State Senate Deputy Majority Leader from Queens, among others, had argued that REAP cost the city too much in foregone taxes — up to $33 million by 2033, according to the Department of Finance — to justify the economic benefits the additional jobs would bring. 3 Michael Gianaris, the State Senate Deputy Majority Leader from Queens, had argued that REAP cost the city too much in foregone taxes to justify the economic benefits the additional jobs would bring. Hans Pennink But renewing the program 'is critical to COVID recovery, preserving affordable office space and promoting job growth in small and medium-size businesses,' argued a rep for the Alliance for Downtown. Supporters say LM-REAP costs the city a negligible $5 million a year — a pittance weighed against the tax benefits it helps generate in property and incomes taxes, although those figures are harder to quantify. REAP began in 1987 to stem an exodus of tenants to New Jersey. The Lower Manhattan plan, launched in 2003, is credited with supporting 16,000 city jobs and helping to lease hundreds of thousands of square feet of office space in a market that's had more downs than ups since 9/11. One source predicted a fresh wave of flight to New Jersey if REAP is allowed to die. 'They're actively recruiting New York businesses with programs offering up to $8,000 per job and $250,000 relocation grants. It's clear that if New York steps back, New Jersey will step in,' the source said. The REAP renewals, as well as creation of a new program called the Relocation Assistance Credit for Employees (RACE), are backed by Gov. Kathy Hochul. But fearing that the measures would be allowed to die, local congressional representatives threw their voices into the fray. 3 The REAP renewals are backed by Gov. Kathy Hochul. Lev Radin/Shutterstock Gregory Meeks, Grace Meng, Ritchie Torres, Thomas Suozzi and Adriano Espaillat wrote to State Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stweart-Cousins and Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie that with 'record high office vacancies downtown, 'Now is not the time to end LM-REAP.' The REAP programs have also brought jobs to Dumbo, MetroTech and the Navy Yard in Brooklyn and to Long Island City in Queens. But the heat's mostly on Lower Manhattan, where more than 20% of nearly 90 million square feet of offices in the nation's second-largest commercial district stand vacant — and it might get worse. 'I believe the numbers being cited for current and future vacancies are too low, especially on Water Street,' said one Downtown executive who asked for anonymity told The Post. 'The REAP program is essential to keeping downtown competitive.'