Shell profits fall as trading hit by volatile markets
Nevertheless, profits in the second quarter of the year were ahead of analyst expectations.
Shell added that income attributable to shareholders was 23% lower, due to the effect of 'lower trading and optimisation margin' and decreasing energy prices.
The firm said it was also impacted by a charge of 509 million dollars (£383 million) related to the UK energy profits levy.
Wael Sawan, chief executive of Shell, said: 'Shell generated robust cash flows reflecting strong operational performance in a less favourable macro environment.
'We continued to deliver on our strategy by enhancing our deep-water portfolio in Nigeria and Brazil, and achieved a key milestone by shipping the first cargo from LNG (liquified natural gas) Canada.
'Our continued focus on performance, discipline and simplification helped deliver 3.9 billion dollars (£2.9 billion) of structural cost reductions since 2022, with the majority delivered through non-portfolio actions.
'This focus enables us to commence another 3.5 billion dollars (£2.6 billion) of buybacks for the next three months, the 15th consecutive quarter of at least 3 billion dollars in buybacks.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Trump envoy Witkoff in Russia this week for stab at Ukraine ceasefire after Kremlin warns US to be ‘careful' over nuclear subs move
Steve Witkoff, the New York real estate developer turned roving peace envoy for President Donald Trump, is heading to Russia this week for yet another round of talks with officials in Moscow with an eye towards pushing Russian President Vladimir Putin to end his years-long war against Ukraine. Trump told reporters on Sunday that Witkoff, who has also been tasked with serving as a mediator in the Israel-Hamas conflict, would be traveling to Russia on either Tuesday or Wednesday for meetings ahead of Friday's deadline for Moscow to call off the war or face more U.S. sanctions. Asked what Putin could do to avoid harsh penalties, including secondary tariffs on goods from countries that purchase Russian oil, he told reporters: 'Get a deal where people stop getting killed.' But the president also expressed skepticism that new sanctions could hurt Russia's economy, citing Moscow's demonstrated ability to evade them. 'Well there will be sanctions but they seem to be pretty good at avoiding sanctions. You know, they're wily characters and they're pretty good at avoiding sanctions. So we'll see what happens,' he said. Trump's Ukraine envoy, retired Army general Keith Kellogg, is understood to be planning travel to Kyiv at the same time Witkoff is in Moscow. Witkoff has visited the Russian capital multiple times since being handed the Russia portfolio, and he has attracted attention in foreign policy circles for his nonchalant and conciliatory attitude towards Putin and his government. He has openly spoken of his admiration for the Russian leader and once presented him with a painting of Trump as a gift. Witkoff has also violated normal diplomatic protocols by arriving without an American translator, instead relying on a Russian one during meetings without any other American witnesses. Kremlin press secretary Dimitri Peskov told reporters on Monday that the Russian government is 'always happy to see Mr. Witkoff in Moscow' and called the talks with the real estate developer 'important, substantive and very useful.' He also suggested that Witkoff could end up meeting with Putin during his time in the Russian capital. The Trump White House envoy's visit comes just days after Trump said he was redeploying a pair of American 'nuclear submarines ' in response to belligerent statements made on X by former Russian president Dimitri Medvedev earlier last week. Writing on Truth Social on Friday, Trump said he was ordering the American warships to 'the appropriate regions' due to what he called 'the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia ' and noted Medvedev's status as a deputy chair of the Russian national security council. Trump said the move was a precautionary measure 'just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that.' 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances,' he added. The online feud between Trump and Medvedev comes as months of talks in Turkey between Ukraine and Russia have failed to achieve anything beyond arrangements for exchanges of prisoners of war and the bodies of each side's respective war dead. Russia has continued to target Ukraine with nightly attacks by drones and other aerial weapons, with a civilian death toll that has incensed Trump and led him to send more U.S. made weapons to Ukraine after months of indulging the more isolationist-minded members of his government. During an appearance last week alongside British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer on the steps of his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland, Trump complained that Putin had too often talked a good game about wanting to reach a ceasefire in the conflict only to resume bombing civilian targets in short order. 'We thought we had that settled numerous times. And then President Putin goes out and starts launching rockets into some city like Kyiv, and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever. You have bodies lying all over the street. And I say that's not the way to do it,' Trump said.
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Why were US job numbers which riled Trump revised down by so much?
President Donald Trump has fired the head of the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (LBS) after the department revised down recent job numbers by more than 250, says the figures were "rigged" to make his administration "look bad".Although the latest revisions were bigger than usual, it is normal for the initial monthly number to be changed and it has happened routinely under both Democratic and Republican presidents. How are the job figures collected? The BLS head - known as the commissioner - plays no role in collecting the data or putting the numbers together, only stepping in to review the final press release before its published, according to former commissioners."My reaction was, 'That couldn't happen,'" says Katharine Abraham, who served as BLS commissioner from 1993 to 2001, about Trump's claims that the numbers had been rigged."The commissioner doesn't have control over what the numbers are," she jobs report from the BLS is based on two surveys – one that collects data from about 60,000 households and another from 121,000 public and private sector employers. The estimates of job gains come from the survey of employers, often referred to as the establishment survey. It tends to be considered more reliable than the household survey because of its large sample size, covering about a third of all non-farm payroll jobs.A majority of the responses come from large firms, typically enrolled in a programme that automatically submits their employment information. BLS staff also administer web surveys and telephone interviews."The initial estimates of payroll employment are a preliminary look at what occurred in each month," the BLS told BBC Verify."It is the quick but lower-resolution snapshot of what went on in the job market for a particular month. Because the revised estimates are based on more complete data, they create a higher resolution picture - and occasionally the revised data produce a different picture," it bureau updates the figures in the two months following the initial monthly estimate, as more responses come in. It also recalculates the numbers annually to incorporate data from unemployment insurance tax records."There are all of these career people who also have the data and if the commissioner were to try to change the numbers they would all know and it would get out," Prof Abraham says. How unusual are the latest revisions? For May and June this year the initial figures have been revised down by 125,000 and 133,000 258,000 combined reduction total for the two month period represents the biggest change since records began, aside from the months in 2020 following the outbreak of the Covid there are adjustments every month and large changes are not this case, many analysts were already expecting revisions to the June figures, which had showed an unusual rise in school employment during a month when most schools were about to close for the responses also disproportionately reflect smaller firms, which are more vulnerable to changes in the economy such as tariffs, analysts May figure was adjusted down largely in response to the June revision and is consistent with other data showing a slowdown. In records going back to 1979, the average monthly change to the jobs figures (either up or down) is 57,000, according to the revisions tend to get bigger during times of economic from the most recent numbers and the 2020 Covid period there have been eight other occasions since 2000 when the BLS revised down monthly job numbers by more than 100,000 - with most of these coming around the 2008 financial instance, there was a 143,000 reduction to the January 2009 figure when President Barack Obama was in BLS also said job gains in 2009 were 902,000 lower than it first estimated - the largest full-year revision on jobs created in 2024 under President Joe Biden were revised down by 598,000, though that was a smaller change than the more than 800,000 initially estimated - an update which also caused political Abraham said updates are part of the process and she was not surprised to see such large revisions for May and June, given increased difficulty of collecting responses and lack of investment in new methods - and the wider slowdown in the economy, driven in part by new tariffs."It's always difficult when you're at a point where things may be changing and then you add to that the fact that staffing has been constrained and the agencies haven't had the resources to invest in following up with respondents the way they might have in the past," she said. Have there been problems with the data in the past? Response rates have dropped significantly over the last decade, accelerating after the pandemic, raising concerns about the reliability of the example, the response rate for the establishment survey was less than 43% in March, compared with more than 60% a decade countries, including Canada, Sweden and the UK, have been wrestling with similar falls. In the UK, response rates to the Labor Force survey have fallen to roughly 20%.In the US, it has sparked some efforts to explore new methods of data collection, including web-based the significance of the problem remains a matter of debate.A review by researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco in March of this year, found that revisions in recent years were mostly in line with pre-pandemic patterns, which it said should be reassuring to those worried about reliability. What do you want BBC Verify to investigate?
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
US defence firms scrambling for rare earth minerals after China blocks exports
The US is scrambling to get hold of the rare earth metals needed to make weapons after China slashed its supply to American defence firms. Prices of some rare earths have increased more than 60-fold after Beijing restricted the export of the materials for defence purposes earlier this year, amid a trade war with the US. Beijing controls around 90 per cent of the world's rare metal supply and dominates the production of many other critical minerals, giving the country a 'stranglehold' on the US defence industrial base, experts said. A senior defence industry source told The Telegraph the 'light is turning from yellow to red' when it comes to American companies' ability to source the materials, that are needed for everything from fighter jets and drones, to missile-targeting and defensive satellites. The strain on rare earths has exposed how reliant the US is on Chinese exports for its defence supply chain, giving Beijing leverage at a time of fraught trade discussions between the two rival powers. A spokesman for the China select committee labelled the situation a 'wake-up call' that 'underscores just how dangerous our current dependencies are'. 'The United States cannot afford to have defence supply chains at the mercy of the Chinese Communist Party,' they said. 'Congress and the administration must now urgently work together to identify and mitigate these vulnerabilities before they cost American lives.' 'No quick and easy fix' Michal Sobolick, a senior fellow specialising in United States–China relations at Hudson Institute, said: 'We've traded with this authoritarian, Marxist regime and they now have a stranglehold on our ability to make fighter jets. 'That's dangerous and there is no quick and easy fix for this.' In addition to restrictions on rare earths, since December China has banned exports to the US of germanium, gallium and antimony, which are critical minerals used in the making of bullets and night vision goggles. Some companies have warned of imminent cuts to production unless fresh supplies of minerals arrive soon. On Wednesday, the chief executive of US-based Leonardo DRS said the firm has been forced to tap into its 'safety stock' of germanium. 'In order to sustain timely product deliveries, material flow must improve in the second half [of 2025],' Bill Lynn said on a conference call, according to The Wall Street Journal (WSJ). The mineral is used in infrared sensors that guide missiles and other equipment. Two-month delivery delays Drone manufacturers are said to be among the most exposed defence firms as they are often small businesses that do not have the kind of stockpiles of rare earths that larger companies do. 'I can tell you…we talk about this daily and our companies talk about it daily,' Dak Hardwick, the vice-president of international affairs at the Aerospace Industries Association trade group, told the WSJ. Since China introduced export licences for rare earths in April, defence firms have been required to fill out extensive paperwork, including providing sensitive information such as product images, to ensure the material is not used for military purposes, Western buyers told the WSJ. This has led to delivery delays of up to two months, with one drone manufacturing company reporting that its Chinese magnet supplier had demanded drawings of products, a list of buyers and assurances they would not be used for military applications. 'Of course we are not going to provide the Chinese government with that information,' Chris Thompson, the vice-president of global sales for ePropelled, told the Journal. The company builds motors for drones used in the Ukraine conflict. DoD boosting production of minerals Metal importers told the WSJ that Beijing's demands to know what rare earths are being used means that licences are not being approved for traders to stockpile supplies. The department of defence has moved 'at warp speed' in recent months to boost production of critical minerals, according to Dr Gracelin Baskaran, the director of the critical minerals security programme at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies This included a $400m investment earlier this month in MP Materials, which operates the largest rare earth mine in the Americas. As part of the deal, the company plans to scale its annual magnet manufacturing capacity from 1,000 metric tons in 2025 to 10,000 metric tons over the next decade. Last year, the Pentagon also set up the Critical Minerals Forum, which helps metal miners secure funding for rare earth extraction and enables larger defence firms to purchase the materials directly rather than relying on smaller subsidiaries. 'The modern age is powered by rare earth elements, and if we don't move aggressively to solve this problem, we are always going to be playing catchup,' an industry source said. Mr Sobolick warned that the US has 'sleepwalked into this situation' and that China's dominance of the rare metals supply chain will give them the upper hand in trade negotiations over the next few years.
