logo
Rachel Reeves urged to raise income tax for first time in 50 years

Rachel Reeves urged to raise income tax for first time in 50 years

Telegraph14-04-2025

Rachel Reeves should consider raising the basic rate of income tax for the first time in 50 years, the director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has said.
Paul Johnson suggested the Chancellor follow in the footsteps of Denis Healey, the former Labour chancellor, and take 'drastic action' by increasing the basic rate of income tax, which is currently 20pc, in her autumn Budget.
However, experts warn it would leave workers hundreds of pounds worse off a year.
Writing in The Times on Monday, Mr Johnson said: 'If Reeves does find herself in need of more money come the autumn, perhaps she should take a leaf from the book of her distinguished predecessor both as Labour chancellor and as an MP for the city of Leeds: break the 50-year taboo, be honest and transparent in her choice of tax policy, and raise the basic rate of income tax.'
Tuesday marks exactly 50 years since Mr Healey raised the basic rate from 33pc to 35pc when faced with surging inflation and high unemployment.
In the years since, politicians have moved 'heaven and earth' to avoid raising it, Mr Johnson said.
Income tax is the simplest way for the Treasury to bring in large amounts of revenue. A one percentage point increase in the basic rate would raise £8bn, while a two percentage point increase would generate over £16bn, according to calculations by accountancy firm Blick Rothenberg.
However, the move is deeply politically unpopular because it would leave millions of workers worse off. A worker on £30,000 would see their annual pay fall by £175 if the rate increased to 21pc and £349 if it rose to 22pc. Meanwhile, a worker earning £50,000 would be worse off by £375 or £749 respectively.
As a result, successive Chancellors have only ever reduced the rate since Mr Healey's 1975 Budget. It is currently charged at 20pc on income earned between £12,571 and £50,270.
Experts now predict that Ms Reeves will be forced to either increase taxes or cut spending in the autumn Budget to avoid breaking her self-imposed fiscal rules.
Britain's tax burden is already soaring to a post-war high, with the income tax bill expected to leap from £260bn in 2024-25 to £310bn in 2027-28.
Despite this, some experts think further tax rises are now 'inevitable'.
Nimesh Shah, of Blick Rothenberg, said: 'Given the current state of the country's finances, and global events likely to have fully wiped out the Chancellor's fiscal headroom, it appears inevitable that income tax has to increase at the next autumn Budget.'
However, he said this was more likely to come in the form of a reversal in the Conservative government's National Insurance cuts.
'For me, a more likely 'win' for the Chancellor would be to reverse the Conservative government's National Insurance cut – citing that this measure was always unsustainable for the country's finances.'
Alternatively, the Chancellor could extend the freeze on income tax thresholds.
Rather than increasing the rates, the previous Conservative government chose to freeze income tax thresholds for years – generating billions in extra revenue by stealth as rising wages pushed workers into higher tax bands.
Laura Suter, of stockbroker AJ Bell, said: 'While Labour made an election promise not to raise taxes on working people, they have already done so by the back door by continuing with the income tax band freeze that started under the Tories.'
She added: 'The Chancellor could extend the freeze further into the future if she wanted to continue this boost to taxes – and that's likely to be a more palatable option as it doesn't strictly raise income tax rates and so doesn't break the manifesto promise.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lanarkshire MSP calls on Holyrood to make sure OAPs aren't left behind on winter fuel payments
Lanarkshire MSP calls on Holyrood to make sure OAPs aren't left behind on winter fuel payments

Daily Record

time32 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Lanarkshire MSP calls on Holyrood to make sure OAPs aren't left behind on winter fuel payments

More than 75 per cent of pensioners in England and Wales will be entitled to the new annual payment of up to £300 after the Labour government abandoned one of its first, and most controversial, policies. A Lanarkshire MSP has called on the Scottish Government to ensure local pensioners aren't left behind following the UK Government's u-turn on winter fuel payments. More than 75 per cent of pensioners in England and Wales will be entitled to the new annual payment of up to £300 after the Labour government abandoned one of its first, and most controversial, policies. ‌ Scotland has already created a devolved benefit of £100 for all pensioner households, potentially leaving hundreds of thousands of Scots worse off than their counterparts south of the border. ‌ Central Scotland list Labour MSP Monica Lennon said 'This is welcome news that will bring even more money to people in Lanarkshire – on top of the record funding settlement Labour delivered for Scotland in the budget. 'While the last Tory government left our public finances in chaos, Labour has made good progress cleaning up the mess it inherited. 'The Winer Fuel Payment is a devolved payment in Scotland and Scottish Labour has been clear that we want to see it reinstated for the majority of pensioners here – but despite their loud spin, the SNP voted against our attempts to do so. 'That's why we are urging the SNP not go ahead with plans that would unfairly hit poorer pensioners. 'The SNP must re-examine their own proposals in light of this game-changing announcement, ensure payments reach those most in need, and give a cast-iron guarantee that no struggling Scottish pensioners will be left out of pocket under their plans.' ‌ Last July, Chancellor Reeves drew widespread criticism over cuts to the winter fuel payment - a lump sum of £200 a year for households with a pensioner under 80, or £300 for households with a pensioner over 80 - in a bid to save an estimated £1.4 billion. In response, the Scottish Government introduced a new scheme offering those in receipt of qualifying benefits like Pension Credit £200 or £300 depending on their age, and £100 for all other pensioner households. ‌ However, while the benefit for pensioners above the income threshold will be clawed back through tax, richer pensioners in Scotland will be able to keep the payment. Following the latest announcement from Westminster, Scottish pensioners who do not get pension credit but whose income is below that £35,000 threshold are expected to receive £100 less than if they lived in England or Wales. Shirley-Anne Somerville said Scotland introduced a winter heating payment for all pensioners because of the UK government's 'betrayal of millions of pensioners'. ‌ She said the Scottish Government welcomed the U-turn, but 'there is still no detail about how the Chancellor intends to go about that'. The social justice secretary said: 'We have once again not been consulted on the policy and its implications in Scotland and will scrutinise the proposals carefully when they are announced. 'I would therefore urge the UK Government to ensure the Scottish government is fully appraised of the proposed changes as soon as possible.'

Rachel Reeves spending review live - when it starts and what to expect
Rachel Reeves spending review live - when it starts and what to expect

Daily Mirror

time37 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Rachel Reeves spending review live - when it starts and what to expect

Rachel Reeves will deliver her long-anticipated spending review on Wednesday after weeks of behind-the-scenes wrangling. The Chancellor is set to announce billions of pounds will be spent on the NHS, schools and tech - but other areas are expected to face painful cuts. Ms Reeves will unveil her plans at around 12.30pm following Prime Minister's Questions. Among the headline announcements will be a 2.8% hike to the Department of Health's annual budget and an £86billion package of funding into research areas. Unlike Budgets, Spending Reviews have no legal basis. Instead, they set out what the Government intends to do with its spending plans over the following years. There will be no tax changes in the Spending Review as these require new legislation. When the Chancellor presents the Budget, all the measures on taxation are contained in an annual Finance Bill. Parliament debates the Budget and scrutinises the Finance Bill. This does not happen with a Spending Review. It means some announcements - including the winter fuel payment U-turn - might be mentioned at the Spending Review. But details on exactly where the money will come from to pay for the policy are not expected until the Autumn Budget later this year. One of the biggest winners of Wednesday's Spending Review is expected to be the science and technology sector, which will get an £86billion package of funding into research areas, including into new drug treatments and longer-lasting batteries. The health service is also expected to be a big winner, with a 2.8% hike to the Department of Health's annual budget - amounting to around £30billion in additional funding by 2028/29. The Mirror understands schools will also get a major boost to per pupil funding, with £4.5billion extra for the core schools budget. This includes a major expansion of free school meals to 500,000 more pupils. The Ministry of Justice, which was one of the first departments to settle its budget, will see a £4.7billion funding injection to build three new prisons amid an ongoing overcrowding crisis in jails. The Ministry of Defence also already had a clearer idea of its funding settlement, with the PM having earlier this year announced plans to increase defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2027, with an aim to get it to 3% by 2034. Some £15.6billion will also be handed to mayors for major transport projects across the country. This will go towards plans to improve trams, trains and buses in the North and the Midlands. Click here to read the full run-down

UK Government ‘betraying Wales' over rail funding, Plaid leader says
UK Government ‘betraying Wales' over rail funding, Plaid leader says

Rhyl Journal

time38 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

UK Government ‘betraying Wales' over rail funding, Plaid leader says

Rhun ap Iorwerth, leader of Plaid, criticised the UK Labour Government for reclassifying the £6.6 billion Oxford to Cambridge line to an England and Wales project. The designation means Wales will not receive the additional rail funding it would get if branded an England-only project. Mr ap Iorwerth called on Eluned Morgan, the Welsh Labour First Minister, to condemn the reclassification. Baroness Morgan agreed Wales was not getting its fair share but said she was expecting to see positive changes in the UK Government's spending review on Wednesday. Mr ap Iorwerth's comments come following reports that revealed the project had originally been listed as England-only from 2020 to 2024. The Treasury told the BBC the classification was a 'publishing error' and insisted it was always considered an England and Wales development. Speaking First Minister's Questions in the Senedd on Tuesday, Mr ap Iorwerth said: 'We were getting our share until Labour actively moved the goalposts. 'Labour went out of its way to make sure Wales wouldn't get the money when the big spending really began.' He added: 'She should be joining me in condemning the UK Labour Government for betraying Wales. Will she?' Mr ap Iorwerth argued the reclassification was a 'new HS2 scandal' – a rail project that has been controversial in Wales. Despite none of the track being laid in the country, it was also designated an England and Wales project by the last UK Conservative government. Plaid has said this designation cost Wales £3.9 billion in funding. Responding to Mr Iorwerth, Baroness Morgan said: 'I've learned to expect nothing but constant negativity from the Plaid Cymru leader. 'I've been clear and I've been consistent when it comes to rail funding that we have not been getting our fair share of funding, in a position that the Tories left us with for over a decade. 'The difference between the Tories and the UK Labour Government is that they've recognised that injustice. 'I don't know what's going to be in the spending review, but the one thing I do know is that if Labour gave Wales a total land of milk and honey, Plaid Cymru would still find fault.' Baroness Morgan added they were 'expecting something positive from the spending review', but the Welsh government would have to keep on making the case for a fair share of funding. In January, the UK government admitted Welsh railways had been underfunded, with spending at 'low levels' in recent years. However, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander did not announce any additional funding at the time.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store