logo
Top 20 most influential players in California tech

Top 20 most influential players in California tech

Politico09-04-2025

SAN FRANCISCO —
The birthplace of Big Tech is at a crossroads.
Never has California seen so many business leaders from its own backyard playing such a crucial role in shaping national — and international — policies, all while competing to see which of their inventions take off. Yet that also creates tension within a state where influential labor leaders, privacy advocates and mental health experts warn of the potential risks of letting innovations advance untethered.
As a first-mover on AI laws and the only state with a dedicated privacy agency, California must decide how to continue to cement its unique position as both a pioneer of the cutting-edge technology that fuels its economy, and the guardrails that keep it in check.
The people on this list could either foster — or foil — those efforts.
It includes rule-makers seeking to define the principles of an ever-changing game; disruptors attempting to upend the status quo; watchdogs sounding the alarm over the social consequences of technology; influencers working overtly or behind-the-scenes to make an impact from the outside; and spenders, whose deep pockets or well-connected organizations move the needle through significant funds.
While not exhaustive, this list aims to paint a picture of the broad range of players who help to define the politics and policy of the tech world in the state where it continues to evolve.
With Silicon Valley's standing in Sacramento in flux
in recent years
, Newsom's importance to the industry has only grown. A former San Francisco mayor with longstanding
personal ties
to prominent CEOs and investors, Newsom is an
innovation enthusiast
with an abiding belief that California's competitive edge — and its tax receipts — depend on a thriving Silicon Valley. These days, if tech wants a
major bill stopped
, Newsom is
often their best bet
: The threat of his veto has shadowed major debates over
artificial intelligence
and
autonomous vehicles
last year.
Newsom's tech-friendliness is all the more important in contrast to the increasingly aggressive stance taken by other California politicos. Legislative Democrats and their allies in organized labor have come to see major tech firms as bad actors who
undermine stable jobs
and
endanger kids online
. Their combative approach has produced a flurry of bills to rein in tech as companies increasingly plunge into ballot fights and
legislative races
.
— Jeremy B. White
The detail-oriented East Bay Democrat and environmental attorney of more than a decade oversees many of the Legislature's most ambitious tech regulations as chair of the Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee. That's given her broad authority, which she's wielded to bolster reproductive health privacy and restrict companies from
using AI to exploit deceased actors' digital likenesses
. She literally defined AI in California — legally speaking, at least, through
a law passed in 2024
.
Still, some of her more ambitious proposals, like her push to prohibit 'algorithmic discrimination,' have failed to make it over the finish line. Bauer-Kahan, undeterred, is putting her influence to the test again this year with
high-profile efforts
to slap tobacco-style health warning labels on social media and identify copyrighted works used to train AI.
— Tyler Katzenberger
San Francisco's state senator has made a name for himself in Sacramento with his willingness to take on major tech issues, from
net neutrality
to AI regulation. Wiener's legislative efforts do not shy away from controversy and
aren't always successful
, like an AI safety bill last year that grabbed national attention — and opposition from Democratic leaders like Nancy Pelosi.
Win or lose, the senator has a way of pushing the conversation forward, including through his influential roles chairing both the Senate Budget and Fiscal Review and Legislative Ethics committees as well as with his measures on housing, public transit and LGBTQ rights. Wiener is
willing to engage critics and supporters alike
, and has picked up where he left off on his AI safety bill, SB 1047, which Newsom vetoed last year. While Wiener has scaled back his ambitious AI bill from last year, the tech industry is still watching closely to see where his latest efforts will go.
— Chase DiFeliciantonio
The Oakland Democrat and former Obama staffer has wide-reaching power to kill or advance bills as the Assembly Appropriations Chair. She's leveraged that authority to shepherd through ambitious measures, like a
landmark newsroom funding deal with Google
, and the nation's first social media law requiring companies to take users' age into account, passed in 2022.
Some of her efforts have attracted the ire of Big Tech, including the social media law, which is
still facing an ongoing legal challenge
in court over First Amendment complaints.
But Wicks hasn't let up. She's now pushing new online safety measures like age verification for app downloads, plus bills on AI watermarking and quantum computing. And never doubt her commitment to the grind: Wicks went viral in 2020 for
showing up to vote with her newborn child
after being denied a proxy.

Tyler Katzenberger
How best to describe California's relationship with clean car entrepreneur turned MAGA paragon Elon Musk? In a word:
it's complicated
.
Tesla's success has both buoyed California's climate agenda and rested on billions of dollars in
state subsidies
. Its Fremont plant has generated manufacturing jobs and spurred clashes over
Covid-19 restrictions
and
labor practices
. His rocket company SpaceX is nurturing California's aerospace industry and fomenting
strife with a coastal regulator
.
After enjoying years of attention from California Democrats —
Newsom in particular
— Musk's conversion to Trump loyalist has made him anathema to liberals as he leads DOGE's cost-slashing crusades while fomenting fights over the state's policies on immigrants,
AI deepfakes
and
transgender people
. Electric cars are indispensable to California's climate goals,but many California politicians wish they could dispense with Musk.
— Jeremy B. White
As president and CEO of the famed startup accelerator Y Combinator, Tan
coined the term
'Little Tech' to describe the scrappier, startup-driven side of the industry that's increasingly asserting itself in policy debates.
In the past year, Tan has gone from a San Francisco Democrat to one of the most recognizable Silicon Valley figures lobbying Washington, particularly on issues of AI and antitrust. Under his watch, Y Combinator has pushed the line that good policy should promote innovation, stand up to Big Tech's deep pockets and avoid kneecapping the startups trying to compete.
His group
waded into
Sacramento's fight last year over AI safety, and Tan
raged against
a proposed California law that would have banned after-work communications. He's equally active in San Francisco — mixing political donations with
pointed X commentary
on the city's future, while encouraging other tech leaders to get more involved, framing civic engagement as just another kind of systems design.
— Christine Mui
From his perch at one of the most influential venture capital firms, Andreessen has poured billions into the AI boom and lobbed takes on everything from climate change to AI risk, often with the air of an above-the-fray oracle who thinks government mostly gets in the way. His widely circulated
techno-optimist manifesto
staked out a political identity that is hyper-bullish on emerging technology, deeply skeptical of regulation and openly dismissive of caution. You can hear less aggressive echoes of that worldview in the way some state officials and Sacramento lawmakers discuss AI, not wanting to stifle California's innovation.
Andreessen was a major contributor to Fairshake PAC's crusade to oust crypto-skeptic candidates in California, including Democratic Rep. Katie Porter — a populist whose viral takedowns of corporate execs clashed with Andreessen's techno-utopian ideology. His firm a16z jumped into the tech world's backlash against SB 1047,
even launching a website
to sound the alarm on its potential to chill investment and smother the open-source startup scene. Andreessen personally
used his mic
at an event to slam the legislation as Orwellian.
He's now among the faces of the
so-called tech right
, a movement of VCs and company leaders openly aligning with Trump policies and rejecting the old liberal consensus that once dominated the Valley.
— Christine Mui
Kemp is the newly minted (and second-ever) leader of America's only dedicated privacy rights enforcement agency since its creation in 2020. His arrival as top privacy cop comes at a critical moment for the CPPA: Republicans in Washington — and
even some traditionally tech-skeptical EU leaders in Brussels
— are on a deregulation kick, right as the agency ramps up investigations of businesses accused of violating California's privacy laws.
The CPPA also has five board members: Drew Liebert, Alastair MacTaggart, Brandie Nonnecke, Jennifer Urban and Jeffrey Worthe. They wield broad regulatory powers on data privacy but must tread carefully to fend off efforts from Congress to pass a federal law that would undermine their authority. That dynamic already
has the board divided
over how to draft potentially sweeping new rules for automated decision-making in the face of strong backlash from Big Tech.
— Tyler Katzenberger
When it comes to AI technology, autonomous vehicles are where the rubber hits the road. And in California and the Bay Area, Teamsters Joint Council 7 President Peter Finn is the one making sure that doesn't mean his union drivers and workers are put out of business.
Finn rose through the ranks as a member and steward in the union's San Francisco outfit, now leading a combined 18 local unions with 100,000 members across Northern California, the Central Valley and Northern Nevada. His group continues to back measures that would place limits on autonomous delivery trucks and aim to keep union drivers in the cab. Though such efforts haven't always been successful, twice being thwarted by Newsom's veto pen, Finn's persistence has shown up in other ways.
A push to protect his members' jobs at San Francisco's airport
resulted in AVs sticking to carrying passengers and not parcels, and could become a blueprint for the technology expanding statewide, and beyond.
— Chase DiFeliciantonio
Steyer (not to be confused with his younger, billionaire brother and once presidential candidate Tom) is the high-energy founder and CEO of Common Sense Media, a youth-focused media and tech nonprofit. His group is often a launchpad for innovative kids' online safety policy ideas, like California's
first-in-the-nation student data privacy law
passed in 2014. Steyer also plays a major role in supporting other ambitious social media and privacy efforts, having sponsored the Golden State's sweeping 2020 Consumer Privacy Rights Act and Wicks' Age-Appropriate Design Code law
.
Steyer boasts a close relationship with Hillary Clinton and an antagonistic one with Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, both of which he's leveraged to spread his argument that Big Tech companies aren't doing enough to fight misinformation and protect young users' mental health on their platforms.
— Tyler Katzenberger
In their own right, Li, Chayes and Cuéllar would each be a force unto themselves in the world of AI policy. When they were
tasked last year by Newsom to produce a roadmap
on how best to regulate the rapidly expanding AI industry, their efforts quickly set the agenda in the technology's home state.
As a co-founder of Stanford's marquee Human-Centered AI lab and a startup founder as CEO of World Labs, Li is a world-renowned expert on not just the inner workings of a complex technology, but its broader societal implications. Often referred to as 'The Godmother of AI,' Li previously served as the chief scientist focused on AI and machine learning at Google Cloud. Her public sector work includes previously advising a governor's commission on the future of work, and the administration of former President Joe Biden.
Chayes is the first dean of the two-year-old UC Berkeley College of Computing, Data Science, and Society, bringing unique industry and academic experience to bear in the policy arena. A longtime researcher at Microsoft, she founded and managed three labs for the computing giant during her more than 20-year career there, focusing on core computing and AI. Chayes was previously a professor of mathematics at UCLA.
Many Californians may recognize Cuéllar as a former justice of the Supreme Court of California and in his current role as president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. He has also served three different White House administrations, previously leading Stanford's Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies. Cuéllar also serves on the boards of Inflection AI and Harvard University.
— Chase DiFeliciantonio
The brother and sister team behind the Claude family of chatbots have been deeply involved in the AI safety agenda since they founded the company in 2021. Both former OpenAI researchers and Bay Area natives, the Amodeis have pushed the technological and policy envelope when it comes to safe, secure and transparent AI systems. They're both regular fixtures at major tech events, from standing onstage with Hillary Clinton at this year's Common Sense summit in San Francisco, to rubbing elbows with foreign leaders at the AI Action Summit in Paris this past February. Their company was also engaged in Wiener's AI safety bill last year, suggesting amendments to strike a balance between industry and safety concerns.
Anthropic was the first to grant the UK's AI Safety Institute early access to one of its models for safety testing, and has committed to safety measures even before the training of new models.
Their different backgrounds in both politics and industry have helped shape their approach to both: Daniela Amodei previously worked for former Rep. Matt Cartwright (D-Pa.) before joining OpenAI and becoming the company's vice president of safety and policy, while Dario Amodei held positions at Baidu and Google before becoming vice president of research at OpenAI.
— Chase DiFeliciantonio
Meta's ace California lobbyist is charged with defending the company from agitated Sacramento lawmakers' barrage of bills aimed at regulating Big Tech firms and social media platforms. But she's more of a ninja than a gunslinger: the well-connected former Democratic operative and state cabinet official leverages her ties to quietly dismantle bills that would tie Meta's platforms, like Facebook and Instagram, in expensive regulatory knots.
Meta has notched plenty of wins with her behind-the-scenes strategy. For example, a 2024 bill from Assemblymember Josh Lowenthal threatening fines of up to $1 million per child for social media platforms that harmed young users
faltered after the Long Beach Democrat was strong-armed into accepting changes
nearly identical to Meta's demands.
She'll likely run the gauntlet again this year against a revived social media harms bill and Bauer-Kahan's proposal to slap 90-second, unskippable warning labels on social media.
— Tyler Katzenberger
Prieto has what every California lobbyist wants: a massive war chest at her command. As Uber's West Coast policy and communications chief, Prieto oversees the company's 'Uber Innovation PAC,'
which had $30 million
to spend on state candidates and ballot measures in the Golden State last year. That money has made Uber (and by extension, Prieto) a massive player in California's political arena with unparalleled reach to fight lawmakers who try to regulate its business model.
So what's Prieto doing with all the money? Uber was a major benefactor for pro-business candidates in last year's legislative campaign, according to state campaign finance records, donating hundreds of thousands of dollars to successful Assembly candidates like Democrat Patrick Ahrens and Republican Steven Choi. The PAC also dropped more than a million dollars countering
labor groups' bid to oust now-former state Sen. Josh Newman
, a moderate Democrat.
And as avid California Playbook readers might have noticed, the company is
running a seven-figure ad campaign
to protest California's mandatory insurance costs for rideshare services — fees it argues benefit predatory injury lawyers while inflating ride prices and eating into drivers' incomes.
— Tyler Katzenberger
The veteran Democratic strategist has spent years helping tech firms navigate the state's bruising policy fights. A former Clinton White House aide and Airbnb's political fixer, Lehane now leads global affairs at OpenAI — where he's applying
his signature blend
of bare-knuckle campaign tactics and insider savvy to steer the company through a rising tide of AI regulation in the states.
In Sacramento, Lehane has emerged as the strategist-in-chief for an industry desperate to shape the rules before they're written. Nowhere is that clearer than in
last summer's fight
over Wiener's landmark AI safety proposal, SB 1047. As lawmakers pushed to impose first-of-their-kind safety mandates on advanced models, Lehane orchestrated a full-court press to
block it
.
At the same time, Lehane has capitalized on a shift in Washington, where the AI conversation has moved from warnings about the technology's risks to bullish talk of dominating the field. OpenAI is now promoting national policy ideas akin to
an industrial strategy
to sustain the growth of American AI — and Lehane has styled himself and his firm as key players in the tech arms race against China.
— Christine Mui
Within the tech industry, the leather-jacketed CEO of chipmaker Nvidia has long been known to draw crowds like no other — but his influence in California's political circles is also growing impossible to ignore. As Nvidia has become the
undisputed kingmaker
in the AI hardware race, Huang has cultivated an image as a visionary technologist whose company holds the keys to the future.
At the federal level, Nvidia's market dominance makes Huang's voice unavoidable in conversations about export controls, national competitiveness and even environmental policy. Behind the scenes, Nvidia has started to
grow its
lobbying footprint
and spend
, while Huang took his first meeting with Trump at the White House in January.
It's in California though where his influence runs deepest, as Sacramento scrambles to respond to both the economic opportunity and geopolitical stakes of AI.
State leaders are eager to cozy up to the industry's rising stars, and Huang is at the top of their list. Nvidia's role as a top employer, source of tax revenue and R&D powerhouse gives it a firm seat at the table. Last year, its blockbuster market performance helped prop up California's budget, earning a shoutout from Newsom in his State of the State address. The two also
inked a first-of-its-kind deal
to ramp up AI education for the state and its community colleges.
— Christine Mui
Benioff's influence is anchored in San Francisco, both literally in terms of its namesake tower and as the CEO of the city's largest private employer. The Bay Area native's roots also run deep, with his grandfather Marvin Lewis serving on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. Benioff himself is godfather to one of Newsom's children, and the CEO has been deeply involved in San Francisco politics and philanthropy. He was the
driving force behind San Francisco's Prop C homelessness tax
on big businesses, including his own, and
has given more than $100 million of his multi-billion-dollar fortune
to Bay Area schools.
But Benioff's reach goes beyond the City by the Bay. Salesforce's technology undergirds much of the modern business software on the market, serving as essentially the default customer relationship management program across industries and forming the substrate layer for countless other companies and websites.
— Chase DiFeliciantonio
Another Bay Area native, Conway — and his investments — are hugely responsible for shaping the Silicon Valley startup ecosystem into what it is today. The noted angel investor's career stretches back decades to his time as co-founder of Altos Computer Systems, which he took public in the 1980s.
Conway went on to sink early cash into the likes of Google, Facebook and PayPal and is currently the founder and managing partner at SV Angel, whose portfolio includes Airbnb, Anthropic, Brex and many other companies.
The investor also has close ties to San Francisco politics, working with former Mayor Ed Lee to orchestrate a tax break for what was then Twitter to put down roots in downtown.
Philanthropically, Conway serves on the board of the Salesforce Foundation and is a donor to UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital and UCSF Medical Center, among other causes. He also founded sf.citi to increase the tech community's civic engagement, and FWD.US which advocates for immigration reform.
— Chase DiFeliciantonio
Hoffman helped launch LinkedIn, but these days he's just as focused on launching Democrats. In a state where tech billionaires are picking sides, he's emerged as the consigliere for the industry-friendly wing of the party. As a partner at VC firm Greylock, Hoffman's portfolio is basically a greatest hits of Silicon Valley influence — featuring Airbnb, Facebook and OpenAI — and so is his donor list.
He's quick to cut the first check for anyone pushing his particular brand of tech optimism and has poured millions into super PACs like Future Forward. Hoffman gravitates toward pro-AI, center-left figures who champion pragmatic regulation, casting himself as a foil to both GOP Big Tech-bashing and progressive techlash. He's called for thoughtful guardrails around issues like misinformation and safety, while warning against overly broad or premature rules that could slow progress.
— Christine Mui
Google shattered records in 2024 by spending more on California lobbying than any other company
that summer
and more than it had for the last
20 years combined
— a sign of where the search giant's real policy fights are heading. It poured over $10 million into a single quarter's campaign to kill Wicks' California Journalism Protection Act, a bill that would've forced it to pay news outlets for using their content. Google ultimately struck a side deal with the state to create a taxpayer-funded journalism sustainability fund, dodging the tens of millions in annual payouts the bill could have required.
That eye-popping figure capped a two-year surge in statehouse influence as Google ramped up efforts to fend off not just the CJPA, but also recruited California's small businesses to oppose
data privacy legislation
. Waymo, the self-driving provider owned by Google parent Alphabet, also went on
a pricey San Francisco lobbying blitz
last year to get its robotaxis into the city's airport, parking itself in a standoff with labor unions.
At the center of these efforts is Kent Walker, Alphabet's top legal mind and global policy chief. Walker, a Stanford Law grad and veteran litigator, started his career in the '90s at San Francisco's Howard Rice (now Arnold & Porter). Google's man in Sacramento is Jon Ross, the first outside lobbyist retained by the company way back in 2006 and a partner leading KP Public Affairs' technology practice.
— Christine Mui

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brevard County election 2025 results for Florida Senate District 19, House District 32
Brevard County election 2025 results for Florida Senate District 19, House District 32

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Brevard County election 2025 results for Florida Senate District 19, House District 32

Who are the winners and losers in the June 10, 2025, Brevard County special election? Voters in Brevard County cast ballots with their picks in the Florida Senate District 19 and Florida House District 32 races. The winners of the April 1 Republican primary election faced Democratic candidates in Tuesday's special general election. The Florida Senate District 19 election will fill the seat left vacant by Randy Fine, who resigned to run for Congress representing the Daytona Beach area. Primary winner Republican Debbie Mayfield faced Democrat Vance Ahrens. Florida's House District 32 seat was vacated by Debbie Mayfield, who is seeking to return to the Florida Senate after being term-limited out and winning this seat in November. The Florida Supreme Court ruled that she was eligible to once again seek her former Senate seat in the special election. Republican Brian Hodgers won the primary and faced Democrat Juan Hinojosa in the special general election. ➤ Dig Deeper: Ultimate voter guide to Brevard County June 10, 2025, special general elections Follow along below for the latest election results, continually updated until all ballots are counted. Polls close at 7 p.m. local time. Any voters waiting in line at 7 p.m. will have the opportunity to cast a ballot. Use the Brevard County voter information look-up to check your voter registration and party status. To find your Brevard County polling place, check the voter precinct look-up or your voter information card. To see a sample ballot for your Brevard County precinct, check the county elections office website. Support local journalism by subscribing to Florida Today. This article originally appeared on Florida Today: Brevard County election results: Florida D19, House D32

House panel demands records of over 200 NGOs that nabbed billions of taxpayer dollars to ‘fuel' border crisis
House panel demands records of over 200 NGOs that nabbed billions of taxpayer dollars to ‘fuel' border crisis

New York Post

time44 minutes ago

  • New York Post

House panel demands records of over 200 NGOs that nabbed billions of taxpayer dollars to ‘fuel' border crisis

WASHINGTON — A House Republican panel is demanding records from more than 200 non-governmental organizations that nabbed billions of dollars in taxpayers' money to settle migrants in the US under ex-President Joe Biden. One of the targeted groups is among those embroiled in the anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles. House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mark Green (R-Tenn.) and Subcommittee Chairman Josh Breechen (R-Okla.) fired off letters to the 215 organizations Tuesday, accusing each of having 'helped fuel the worst border crisis in our nation's history.' 5 House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mark Green (R-Tenn.) fired off letters to 215 non-governmental organizations Tuesday accusing them of having 'helped fuel the worst border crisis in our nation's history.' Bloomberg via Getty Images The powerful Republican chairman and Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee leader said the groups created a 'pull factor' in providing taxpayer-funded transportation, translation, housing and other services to migrants, most of whom were released into the country after crossing the border illegally. 'The Committee remains deeply concerned that NGOs that receive U.S. taxpayer dollars benefitted from the border crisis created by the Biden Administration, and stand ready to do so under future Democrat administrations,' Green and Breechen wrote, citing a 'near-total lack of accountability' for how the money was spent. They also noted that they are investigating how much the funding incentivized 'human trafficking and smuggling' operations as well as whether the 'NGOs are now actively advising illegal aliens on how to avoid and impede law enforcement officials.' 5 The ICE crackdown in Los Angeles rounded up convicted sexual abusers, drug dealers and gang members to put into removal proceedings, federal officials said. REUTERS One of the groups, the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA), took nearly $1 million in DHS grants to 'offer both citizenship instruction and naturalization application services to lawful permanent residents' starting in 2021. Its last tranche of funding was yanked by the Trump administration in March. CHIRLA organized a rally Thursday to denounce the ICE arrests of illegal immigrants in Los Angeles before protests devolved into full-blown riots that destroyed property and led to the assaults of federal law enforcement. 'We have not participated, coordinated, or been part of the protests being registered in Los Angeles other than the press conference and rally,' a CHIRLA rep previously told The Post in a statement. The group did not respond to a Post request for comment Tuesday. The ICE crackdown in the city rounded up convicted sexual abusers, drug dealers and gang members to put into removal proceedings, DHS officials said. 5 'The committee remains deeply concerned that NGOs that receive U.S. taxpayer dollars benefitted from the border crisis created by the Biden Administration,' Green wrote. REUTERS Southwest Key Programs, another group being probed by Green's panel, was the largest housing nonprofit for unaccompanied migrant kids who entered the US and took around $3 billion in taxpayer funding from Biden's Health and Human Services — before Trump officials pulled the plug in March. Between 2021 and 2023, Southwest Key's top five executives saw their salaries inflated on average from $420,000 to $720,000 — even as the organization outspent its revenue by millions of dollars. The Justice Department sued Southwest Key Programs in July 2024, alleging that some supervisors and employees had committed 'severe' and 'pervasive' rape and sex abuse against kids between 2015 and 2023. The civil suit was dropped by the DOJ in March 2025, the same month that Trump's HHS cut off federal funding for the organization. 5 Green led the GOP charge in the House to impeach former Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. AP Southwest Key 'strongly denied the claims relating to child sexual abuse in our shelters,' a rep previously said. The group did not respond to a Post request for comment Tuesday. Of the more than 550,000 migrant kids who entered the country between February 2021 and January 2025, at least 291,000 were released from federal custody to domestic sponsors — thousands of whom have since been flagged as sex abusers or gang members — and 32,000 went missing entirely, according to an August 2024 report from DHS's inspector general. On average, 2.4 million immigrants entered the US every year between 2021 and 2024, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Roughly 60% crossed the border illegally, a Goldman Sachs analysis found. DHS subagencies such as ICE and the Federal Emergency Management Agency were tapped to 'coordinate with nonprofit organizations that provide services such as food, shelter, and transportation' for those non-citizens who were released, according to a Government Accountability Office report in April 2023. 5 President Trump pulled taxpayer funding for many immigration NGOs after returning to the White House. AP A March 2023 DHS Office of Inspector General audit revealed that 'more than half' of FEMA funding that went to NGOs couldn't be accounted for, Green notes in his letter. The GOP leader has previously called out $81 million in possibly 'illegal' funds that helped cover migrant stays in luxury New York City hotels. Conservative immigration groups have previously estimated that the influx of migrants cost New York City residents as much as $10 billion and bilked US taxpayers up to $150 billion in 2023, the year when illegal border crossings reached their highest level in recorded history. Green led the GOP charge in the House to impeach former Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas for allegedly failing to comply with federal immigration law and lying to Congress that the border was 'secure.' The Republican missive requests the total dollar amount of federal grants, contracts or payments received by the NGOs between Jan. 19, 2021, and Jan. 20, 2025. It also demands to know whether any organization sued the feds and what services it provided to migrants. Influential left-leaning groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union, Amnesty International and the Southern Poverty Law Center have all been asked to respond to the queries.

Trump, Newsom each play to base on immigration. It's risky, experts say.
Trump, Newsom each play to base on immigration. It's risky, experts say.

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Trump, Newsom each play to base on immigration. It's risky, experts say.

Trump, Newsom each play to base on immigration. It's risky, experts say. Trump found the opportunity to blast potential rival Newsom as 'grossly incompetent' but Newsom has compared president's use of the military to a 'dictator.' Show Caption Hide Caption Active-duty marines deployed for Los Angeles anti-ICE protests President Donald Trump is sending in active-duty Marines to assist law enforcement with immigration protests in Los Angeles, California. Trump benefits from the immigration showdown through the show of force and Newsom by shoring up support among progressive Democrats, according to political scientist John Pitney Jr. If the protests drag on, Trump and Newsom could each look ineffective, experts say. WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump and California Gov. Gavin Newsom have each approached the fiery confrontation over immigration enforcement in Los Angeles to advocate for their respective political bases. Political experts warn there are risks for both. Trump has called Newsom 'grossly incompetent' and said the city would be burning from protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement without his deployment of 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines. Newsom has called the military deployment the 'acts of a dictator" and filed a lawsuit to block the troop deployment. The 57-year old Democratic governor dared Trump and border czar Tom Homan to arrest him, as they suggested they could. 'In a way, it benefits both Trump and Newsom. Trump's core supporters love dramatic displays of force, and they hate California,' John Pitney Jr., a politics professor at Claremont McKenna College, told USA TODAY. 'Progressive Democrats hate Trump. They've been leery of Newsom's outreach to conservatives, and his recent statements shore up support on his left.' But there are also political threats to both men if the protests drag on, which could make each look ineffective. The additional risk to Newsom's presidential aspirations in 2028 is that other Democrats could come away looking more powerful, such as Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer or Maryland Gov. Wes Moore. 'Politically, at least, Newson is in the trickier spot here,' William Howell, a political scientist at the University of Chicago, told USA TODAY. Trump campaign on immigration enforcement and has long criticized California Trump and the GOP have long portrayed California as the epitome of bad governance. They've recently poured the blame on Newsom, who was first elected as governor to the nation's most populous state in 2019 and now is in his second term. California's high taxes, homeless problem and other issues have provided the GOP with political fodder for years. 'Donald Trump wants to portray California as the epitome of an America gone wrong,' said Sonoma State University political science professor David McCuan. The clash between protesters who burned cars, threw rocks and shot fireworks at authorities plays into the GOP's portrayal of California as chaotic. The situation revolves around an issue – undocumented immigration – where Trump believes he has a mandate from voters for mass deportations and strong border security. 'Illegal immigration was on top of voters' minds across the country in 2024,' said Mark Bednar, a former senior House GOP leadership aide. 'And it should shock no one that President Trump is working around the clock to address it.' Newsome accuses Trump of political overreach Newsom has condemned the violence, but the pressure from the GOP shows the difficult situation he's in trying to criticize Trump's actions as overreach while also maintaining order in his state. 'Newsom, meanwhile, has clear incentives to stand up to Trump and decry his autocratic excesses, which explains his vocal opposition,' said Howell from the University of Chicago. 'But if he harbors national political ambitions, which he plainly does, then Newsom needs to avoid aligning himself with the most extreme members of the Democratic Party.' Matt Lesenyie, a political science professor at California State University Long Beach political, said Newsom is at a 'huge disadvantage' against Trump on this issue. 'A lot of people, not just Newsom, get hurt with Trump because they let him pick the fight,' Lesenyie said. 'I think it's too late for Newsom or (Los Angeles Mayor) Karen Bass… this is going to turn into a war of images.' Surrogates fuel the political fires The California confrontation has spread far beyond the state's boundaries. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, told reporters June 10 that Newsom 'ought to be tarred and feathered' for 'standing in the way of the administration carrying out federal law.' In the Oval Office with Trump, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Californians 'should never elect him into a leadership position ever again.' Trump added: 'The governor's a nice guy but he's grossly incompetent.' Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pennsylvania, said in a social media post June 9 he stands for 'free speech, peaceful demonstrations and immigration – but this is not that.' 'This is anarchy and true chaos,' he said. 'My party loses the moral high ground when we refuse to condemn setting cars on fire, destroying buildings, and assaulting law enforcement." But other fellow Democrats have rallied to Newsom's defense. Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware, the top Democrat on the Senate subcommittee responsible for the Pentagon's budget, said "warfighters are not political tools meant to patrol the streets of our own cities or to suppress the political views of their fellow Americans." 'I trust local law enforcement, Mayor Bass, and Governor Newsom when they say that violence won't be tolerated and that they are able to handle these protests without the military," Coons said. "What President Trump is doing is not only unneeded. It has made the situation much worse." Those competing visions on how to handle the protests were on full display during a June 10 House hearing featuring Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who faced a question from Rep. Pete Aguilar, D-California, seeking justification for using the military for civilian law enforcement. 'Why are you sending warfighters to cities to interact with civilians?' Aguilar asked. Hegseth replied that Trump "believes in law and order.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store