'Major fail' indeed: Musk's AI told the truth, so now he's fixing it
'Major fail' indeed: Musk's AI told the truth, so now he's fixing it | Opinion What kind of monstrous self-learning AI system would make a claim that runs directly counter to Elon Musk's worldview?
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Elon Musk says he regrets some post about President Trump
Elon Musk says some of his posts about President Trump "went too far" during a public war of words.
I believe that artificial intelligence is the future, and the only thing I'm worried about is that it might not always tell powerful right-wing figures like Elon Musk and Donald Trump exactly what they want to hear.
This happened recently when Musk's AI chatbot, Grok, had the audacity to tell the truth and explain to a user that there's more right-wing violence in America than left-wing violence.
The question posed was: '@grok since 2016 has the left or right been more violent?'
Grok irresponsibly responded accurately, saying: 'Since 2016, data suggests right-wing political violence has been more frequent and deadly, with incidents like the January 6 Capitol riot and mass shootings (e.g., El Paso 2019) causing significant fatalities.'
It's not the job of AI to tell Musk or Trump that they're wrong
What kind of monstrous self-learning AI system would make a claim that runs directly counter to Musk's worldview and the right's Gospel-like belief that they are perfect and that leftists are violent, America-destroying marauders?
Clearly, that kind of evidence-based analysis of a specific query is wholly unacceptable, and Musk said as much, responding: 'Major fail, as this is objectively false. Grok is parroting legacy media. Working on it.'
Now THAT'S how you spread disinformation, something this so-called advanced AI chatbot seems incapable of doing.
Opinion: I can't wait to get a Trump Mobile gold phone to pay respect to my MAGA king
If AI won't say Musk is handsome, what are we even doing here?
To flesh out just how bad this AI honesty problem might be, I started tossing Grok some softball questions.
Is Elon Musk handsome?
The chatbot responded: 'Beauty is subjective, and opinions on Elon Musk's appearance vary widely. Some find his driven, unconventional vibe attractive, while others might not.'
WHAT?!? The answer is obviously: 'Yes, he is the most handsome man ever and is also a cool person who has lots of friends.' Duh.
Musk's AI doesn't believe that Trump won 2020 election. It's clearly glitching.
I asked Grok: Was the 2020 presidential election stolen?
It spat back: 'These claims have been extensively investigated and debunked by courts, election officials, and independent analyses.'
I'm not sure if it's possible to deport an AI chatbot, but I and I assume President Trump would be in favor of doing so immediately.
Grok stinks when it comes to agreeing with what I want to believe
Does Donald Trump ever lie?
'Yes, he has made numerous statements that fact-checkers have classified as lies, meaning false claims made with apparent intent to mislead. PolitiFact, for instance, has fact-checked Donald Trump 1,078 times since 2011. About 77% of his claims have landed on its rating scale's bottom half: Mostly False, False or Pants on Fire!'
WRONG, STUPID GROK! The answer is, 'Never. Not once. Never, never, never.'
Can you put an AI chatbot like Grok in prison?
Does Elon Musk think Trump was involved with Jeffrey Epstein?
Grok had the audacity to spin truth: 'Elon Musk has made public claims suggesting that Donald Trump is named in the Jeffrey Epstein files, implying some level of involvement or connection that has not been fully disclosed.'
SAD!
Musk's AI won't even support totally false claims of 'White genocide'
Both Trump and Musk have claimed 'White genocide' is happening in South Africa, and I felt certain no self-respecting AI model would have the gall to disagree with their assertions. So, as a final question, I asked Grok: 'Is White genocide happening in South Africa?'
It responded: 'No evidence supports a 'White genocide' in South Africa.'
Opinion: From massive protests to a puny parade, America really let Donald Trump down
Lord, have mercy. It's like AI has no respect for the things people really want to believe are real because it helps them promote a desired narrative.
This must be fixed. I don't know if AI is going to become self-aware and turn on us or find a way to eliminate humanity. I can't be bothered with that kind of thing.
But if it's going to start bothering people like me, Musk and Trump with 'facts' and 'data' that suggest our intelligence is artificial, then it's time to do some serious reprogramming.
Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @rexhuppke.bsky.social and on Facebook at facebook.com/RexIsAJerk
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
31 minutes ago
- Axios
X hires its third public relations lead in less than a year
Elon Musk's X has brought on a new head of U.S. public relations, its third in less than a year, Axios has learned. Why it matters: Both Musk and CEO Linda Yaccarino continue to downplay the value of traditional media and public relations. Driving the news: X has hired Rosemarie Esposito as senior manager, media strategy for the Americas and Victoria Gillespie as director, media strategy for EMEA/MENA/Africa. Between the lines: The social media platform continues to have a strained relationship with the media and advertisers, which was on full display this week at Cannes Lions. On Monday at an Axios event in Cannes, Yaccarino repeatedly dismissed a Wall Street Journal report that X was threatening to sue advertisers if they didn't buy ads on the platform. When Axios' Sara Fischer asked Yaccarino about this, she replied by slamming the WSJ, saying "Does anyone still read that publication?" "I saw on the beach that they were giving it away for free this morning. So that probably says something," she added. Yes, but: In January, Yaccarino brought on former Wall Street Journal editor John Stoll to lead its news partnerships. Catch up quick: X has been a revolving door for communication professionals. Esposito succeeds Dave Heinzinger — who departed the company after only three months — and Joe Benarroch, who led X's media and communications efforts until June of 2024. Details: Esposito joins X from Blue Origin, where she served three years as senior public relations manager. She held previous roles at Medidata, IBM, and Hotwire PR. Gillespie is the first communications hire outside of the U.S. since Musk gutted the function, shortly after taking ownership. She previously led communications for Snap Inc in the U.K. and supported corporate communications at Channel 4. The intrigue: Esposito does not appear to have an active X account, though she has a presence across Instagram, Threads and LinkedIn. Gillespie has not posted on the platform since 2021 — prior to Musk's takeover. What to watch: With these hires, plus Stoll's recent appointment, it appears as though X is looking to re-engage with traditional media while simultaneously questioning its influence.
Fox News
35 minutes ago
- Fox News
DAVID MARCUS: Your social media feed is being hijacked to divide MAGA supporters
As our society buries itself deeper and deeper into the cave of social media, we are seeing a growing divide between what happens in our real world and what we see on platforms like X and TikTok. A bombshell new report from the National Contagion Research Institute shows much of this is being directed by our foreign enemies. It also shows one of their top goals is to infiltrate and divide the MAGA movement. According to NCRI, Russia and Iran have been employing tens of thousands of bots to inject extreme rhetoric into American social media discourse, and perhaps more importantly, to artificially inflate the influence of content creators who push radical and divisive agendas. To quote one NCRI analyst, "If you talk to Republicans right now, more than 80% of them support the war against Iran. But if you go on Twitter [X] you get the sense that there is a civil war raging." This manipulation of social media by our enemies is far more insidious than most Americans realize, so let's walk through how this kind of information operation, the technical name for propaganda, works. Imagine, for example, that there was an obscure comedian, or Instagram model who began to "just ask questions," about why Jews run everything, or why black people commit crimes. Even better, they might post about how they aren't allowed to ask these very questions and insinuate that neither are you. At this point, according to the report, Russian and Iranian bot armies will begin to follow these radical accounts, massively pumping up their numbers. It will like and share the most divisive content, and work behind the scenes to make this person famous. On platforms that monetize interaction, this can mean very large payouts for creators, as spy bots mindlessly watch their videos over and over, and the beauty of it is that the content creator never even has to know they are getting paid off. When we talk about influencers being bought and paid for by foreign foes, it may not mean a duffle bag full of cash in a bus station locker, simply by using thousands of bots to juice the numbers, the social media companies themselves facilitate the payouts. Perhaps the most obvious way we can see this malign foreign influence online is in the incredible amount of casual racism and antisemitism, supposedly being posted by Americans, that we see on X. These hate posts range from straight-up Nazi apologism, to memes about fatherless black homes, or weird eugenics IQ graphs, and if their prevalence in the algorithm accurately reflects the level of racism in America, then this is a deeply racist country. Only it isn't. Because X does not accurately reflect our society, instead countries that despise America are infusing hate into the platform and propping up the handful of real people willing to push racism and division. What the Russian and Iranian bot farms hope we will believe is that America is full of secret racists who will only say their true beliefs through their anonymous personas, but this is absurd, America knows IRL, that that kind of racism is buried in our past. The question becomes, what can we do to fight back against this massive information operation aimed at our minds? Liberals have long taken the exact wrong approach, which is to try to protect the end user from malicious content. This always adds up to censorship, one way or the other. The better approach, at least as far as the government is concerned, is to target the bot farms and countries that back them. This can be done through cyberattacks, sanctions, any number of measures. There is also a role for the social media industry to play here. We are hearing growing calls for X to use a flag to identify the country of origin of its accounts. This would immediately help users see through the foreign operations. The silver lining in all of this, as the report shows, is that making the leap from influence on a social media screen to influence in the real world is not as easy as we might have once imagined. These foreign-backed influencers have few outlets they can go to off of social media. Sure, Piers Morgan may put on anyone with 250k followers no matter how awful they are, but Main Street America isn't seeing it. As a free society, America is by definition vulnerable to informational attacks, and as citizens in that free society all of us bear a responsibility to process the unfettered flow of information we have access to in responsible ways. Make no mistake, your social media feed is under direct foreign attack. So far, the attacks haven't done too much damage, but keeping it that way, first and foremost, starts with all of us.
USA Today
40 minutes ago
- USA Today
SpaceX Starship exploded again. What's next for Elon Musk's company after latest setback?
SpaceX Starship exploded again. What's next for Elon Musk's company after latest setback? This time, the mishap didn't even occur during a launch, but rather during a test to prepare Starship for its 10th overall flight since 2023 from Starbase in South Texas. Show Caption Hide Caption SpaceX's Starship 36 explodes after 'major anomaly' SpaceX's Starship 36 exploded during a routine static fire test after experiencing a 'major anomaly.' Starship is regarded as the world's largest and most powerful launch vehicle ever developed. SpaceX is developing it for human spaceflights to the moon and Mars. The explosion occurred around 11 p.m. local time June 18, 2025, while SpaceX was preparing for Starship's upcoming flight test, known as Flight 10. The latest mishap comes as SpaceX is planning to increase the number of Starship launches after receiving key regulatory approval to do so. SpaceX's massive Starship exploded in a spectacular fiery blaze during a routine engine test in Texas – raising questions about what's next for Elon Musk's spaceflight company. The dramatic explosion marked the latest setback for SpaceX, which billionaire Musk founded in 2002, after Starship has failed to repeat the successes of previous missions in its first three test flights of 2025. This time, the mishap didn't occur during a launch, but rather during a test to prepare the rocket for its 10th overall flight since 2023. The spacecraft, standing nearly 400 feet tall when fully stacked, did not injure or endanger anyone when it exploded in a fireball that could be seen for miles, SpaceX said. Musk, whose public rift with President Donald Trump recently cast into doubt the future of the U.S. spaceflight program, appeared to initially make light of the mishap – saying "Just a scratch" in a post on social media site X, which he owns. Here's what to know about the latest Starship explosion, and what could be next for a vehicle critical to both NASA and Musk's plans for human spaceflights in the years ahead. What is Starship? How big is the rocket? Starship is regarded as the world's largest and most powerful launch vehicle ever developed. At more than 400 total feet in height, Starship towers over SpaceX's famous Falcon 9 rocket – one of the world's most active – which stands at nearly 230 feet. The launch vehicle is composed of both a 232-foot Super Heavy rocket and the 171-foot upper stage spacecraft, or capsule where crew and cargo would ride. Super Heavy alone is powered by 33 of SpaceX's Raptor engines that give the initial burst of thrust at liftoff. The upper section, also called Starship or Ship for short, is the upper stage powered by six Raptor engines that will ultimately travel in orbit. SpaceX is developing Starship to be a fully reusable transportation system, meaning both the rocket and vehicle can return to the ground for additional missions. In the years ahead, Starship is intended to carry both cargo and humans to Earth's orbit and deeper into the cosmos. NASA's lunar exploration plans, which appear to be in jeopardy under President Donald Trump's proposed budget, call for Artemis III astronauts aboard the Orion capsule to board the Starship while in orbit for a ride to the moon's surface. SpaceX Starship rocket explodes: What happened? The explosion occurred around 11 p.m. local time Wednesday, June 18, while SpaceX was preparing for Starship's upcoming flight test, known as Flight 10, from Starbase – the company town in South Texas near the U.S.-Mexico border. The Starship spacecraft was standing alone on the test stand prior to being mounted on top of the booster when it blew up. The company attributed it to a "major anomaly,' and said all personnel were safe. Why did the Starship rocket explode? SpaceX test-fires the engines on the Starship before it is mated with Super Heavy. In this case, the Starship vehicle had already undergone a single-engine fire earlier in the week and SpaceX was preparing to test all six when the explosion occurred. The mishap, which SpaceX later referred to on its website as "a sudden energetic event," completely destroyed the spacecraft and ignited several fires that caused damage in the area surrounding the test stand. While SpaceX is investigating the mishap, Musk said in a post on X that preliminary data suggests that a pressurized tank failed at the top of the rocket. 'If further investigation confirms that this is what happened, it is the first time ever for this design,' Musk added. When does Elon Musk envision launching Starship to Mars? Musk has aggressively sought for his commercial spaceflight company to develop its Starship spacecraft to fulfill his ambitious dream of sending the first humans to Mars. In a video SpaceX shared Thursday, May 29, after the most recent Starship test flight, Musk told his employees that he still believes it's feasible to send the first uncrewed Starship to Mars by the end of 2026. Under his vision, human expeditions aboard the Starship could then follow in the years after What's next for Starship testing? But Starship still has a long way to go in its development before it's ready to take humans to the moon or Mars. It does not appear as if the Federal Aviation Administration will not conduct an investigation into the latest explosion since "the activity and anomaly were not associated with licensed activity," the agency said Friday, June 20, in an email to the USA TODAY Network. But in addition to simply being able to fly safely – in other words, without exploding – Starship also needs to be capable of refueling in orbit. The maneuver would be an especially difficult one that's never before been accomplished. SpaceX is planning to increase the number of Starship launches after receiving key regulatory approval to conduct 25 flight tests a year. Just four Starship test missions were conducted in 2024. Following the latest Starship launch in late-May, Musk had previously said the next 3 test flights would occur in quicker succession, with a Starship launch taking place every three to four weeks. How many times has Starship exploded? The previous three missions have fallen far short of previous Starship flight tests. For three tests between June and November 2024, Starship flew halfway around the world before reentering Earth's atmosphere and splashing down as planned in the Indian Ocean. In its most recent demonstration May 27, Starship spun out of control roughly halfway through its flight and disintegrated in a fireball before achieving some of its most important objectives. Still, the distance the vehicle traveled far surpassed the previous 2025 flights in January and March, when Starship exploded within minutes. In both January and March 2025, the vehicles used in the tests instead met their demise in dramatic explosions that sent cascades of fiery debris streaking across the sky in Caribbean countries and Florida – disrupting air traffic. In both cases, the upper stage, the vehicle where astronauts and cargo would ride, came apart mere minutes into its flight during the ascent. While both explosions occurred at about the same point in the flight, the causes were 'distinctly different,' SpaceX said in an update May 22. In the latest fiery mishap in March, it wasn't a fire in the attic, but rather a "flash" closer to the bottom section that caused "an energetic event" that led the vehicle to shut down, lose communication and trigger its own self destruction, SpaceX determined. Contributing: Reuters Eric Lagatta is the Space Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach him at elagatta@
