
‘Now my kids have a future': Syrians dare to dream again after years as a pariah state
The transformation of Sharaa over the last 20 years from al-Qaida fighter to the president of Syria, sharing the world's stage with foreign leaders like Trump, is staggering. For Syrians, the pace of change has been whiplash-inducing.
In just six months after the toppling of former president Bashar al-Assad, Syria has gone from a global pariah under some of the world's most intense sanctions regimes to a country of promise. On Tuesday, Trump announced he would end all US sanctions on Syria, a move he said 'gives them a chance at greatness'.
In Syria, a weary country is finally seeing light at the end of the tunnel. Eyes were glued to television screens which replayed video of Sharaa meeting Trump and hands gesticulated fervently as debates over the sanctions ending raged throughout the country.
'You need to wait a bit, there are steps that need to be taken by the experts,' an elderly man cautioned his peer, pausing for breath as they struggled to cycle up the narrow streets of old Damascus. Their slow ascent on rickety-framed bicycles is a common sight in Damascus, where cars and fuel have become increasingly out of reach for much of the country's war-battered, sanctions-laden population.
Trump's sudden announcement exceeded even the most optimistic of Syrians' expectations. The US state department had been engaged in months of diplomacy with the new government, haggling over a set of conditions which would lead towards sanctions relief.
In typical Trump style, conditions were thrown aside in favour of a sudden, bold announcement that 'all sanctions' would stop. The image of Trump shaking hands with Sharaa cemented what seemed inconceivable just days before: Syria was turning a page in its history.
But experts have stressed that removing sanctions is complicated and that it will be a while before ordinary Syrians feel the effects of sanctions relief.
'The immediate impact is a good one. A lot of the regional investors that were eyeing the Syrian economy will be encouraged to move in. But big investors will take a bit more time,' said Sinan Hatahet, the vice-president for investment and social impact at the Syrian Forum.
He estimated that it could take from six months to up to a year for Syrians to feel a difference in their standard of living.
Syria has been under some form of US sanctions since 1979, but it was after the former Syrian president al-Assad started violently suppressing peaceful protests in 2011 that the US created a virtual economic embargo against the country.
Starting with Obama, the US built a multi-layered web of sanctions on Syria through a mixture of executive orders and congressional legislation. Among the harshest of the sanctions was the 2019 Caesar Act, renewed in late December, which imposed sanctions on not only the Syrian government but also anyone who did business with it.
Trump can wave away sanctions imposed via executive order, but would need a congressional vote to repeal the Caesar Act, which is set to expire in 2029. Here, there could be a stumbling block. There are deep reservations about Sharaa – who had a $10m bounty on his head until December – in Washington.
Even among certain members of the Trump administration, particularly those in the evangelical wing, there are concerns over the Islamist government in Damascus.
These fears were only redoubled in late March after an attack by pro-Assad fighters led to a wave of retaliatory killings of nearly 900 civilians, mostly Alawite, on Syria's coast. Rights groups said that pro-government fighters were responsible for many of those civilian deaths.
Nonetheless, the image of Trump standing side by side with Sharaa marked a milestone for the new Syrian government, which viewed a meeting with the US president as a gateway to international legitimacy. The 37-minute meeting was the culmination of months of diplomacy by Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, which have emerged as key pillars of support for the nascent government in Damascus.
The nod from the US also came despite Israel's strong rejection of Sharaa and his government in Damascus. Israel has refused to allow the new Syrian government to deploy its army in south Syria and has conducted hundreds of airstrikes on Syrian territory since the fall of Assad in December. Sharaa, by contrast, has said he does not want conflict with Israel.
'I think Trump was having his doubts about the Israeli policy to put a freeze on Sharaa and keep Syria disunited and weak, which is what the Israelis were pitching to everyone in Washington,' said James Jeffrey, who was the Syria envoy in Trump's first administration.
Jeffrey pointed to a lack of Israeli airstrikes in Syria in the last 10 days as evidence that even within the Israeli establishment concerns were beginning to emerge about Israel's aggressive posture towards Syria.
The apparent easing of hostilities, even if brief, has helped feed a cautious but growing optimism in Syria, as the country's economic and international isolation seemed to be coming to an end after nearly 14 years of war.
'Finally, we are taking a step forward. Now my kids have a future, maybe they will have some chance to succeed,' said Maher Nahas, a 42-year-old jeweller and father of two who lives in Damascus.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump broke off his meetings with Europe's leaders to call his friend in the Kremlin... why?
Donald Trump has signalled that the U.S. would help, a bit, in 'security guarantees' as part of a land for peace deal between Ukraine and Russia. And Kyiv would need it – the land the Kremlin wants is Ukraine's best laid defence. Handing a vast chunk of the Donetsk Oblast province to Russia when Moscow currently controls about 70 per cent – would hand Vladimir Putin some of Ukraine's finest redoubts and most doubty defenders. It would include thousands of miles of pre-prepared trenches, tank traps that snake across the rolling landscape, pre-prepared ambush positions – a modern Maginot Line. Britain's ministry of defence has estimated that it would take Russia '4.4 years' and nearly 2 million casualties to take the four provinces it has claimed. An agreement to freeze the frontline where they are, but for Russia to settle for the land it has taken plus the Donetsk bonus, will probably save them a couple of years fighting. If the battle for Bakhmut is an indication of how hard won Russian advances are then a pause in the killing is a huge result for Putin who has lost 60,000 there. Kramatorsk would be a harder fight. So would nearby Slaviansk. Hundreds of thousands of Russians would die in fights for those fortress cities. Slaviansk was hit by missiles last night, but knowing its residents, they'd fight invading Russians with broomsticks if they have to. But if Trump can get Ukraine to agree to hand over the land – then Putin saves men and arms to reuse another day. Trump broke away from talks with Volodymyr Zelensky, the leaders of Britain, Germany, France, Italy, Finland plus the top representatives of Nato and the EU, to call Putin during their multilateral summit on Monday evening. Trump spent much of this year trying to get a ceasefire agreed in Ukraine. He showed uncharacteristic irritation with Russia's maximalist demands and over Putin's refusal to respect calls to down weapons, even for a breather. Trump threatened economic sanctions, and sanctioned India, the second biggest importer of Russian oil, in an effort to get the Russian leader to comply. Putin, an indicted war criminal, got a trip to Alaska and a summit with the U.S. president where he persuaded Trump that a ceasefire wasn't necessary. He also managed to shift the debate about the future of Ukraine to 'land swaps' and discussions about what bits of its land Ukraine would surrender in return for vague Trumpian commitments to 'security guarantees'. This makes no sense. Ukraine was invaded. Europe 's leaders each made it clear they backed Ukraine, wanted a ceasefire before any further talks, and that they would buy the weapons America has stopped giving to Ukraine. The Financial Times reported that Ukraine had offered Trump a European funded $100bn arms deal as part of a pact. Trump has every incentive to hold Putin's feet to a fire and demand he get out of Ukraine – or burn. The U.S. could join its allies in Ukraine to defend Europe, it could back its legal demands for territorial integrity, its accession to Nato and celebrate that it is a democracy not a dictatorship. It could also make money by selling weapons and exploiting Ukraine's vast mineral deposits. Trump could show the Kremlin that it could lose this war – not offer Putin a war bonus of the best defended territory currently in Ukrainian hands. But as he sat hanging on the telephone in a call to a man he much admires it is clear that he'll do nothing of that kind. He's figuring out how to betray what his country once stood for, for a man who is everything it once stood against. And he probably called that man for help to do it.


Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
Morning Bid: Suits and smiles define new Ukraine talks
A look at the day ahead in European and global markets from Rocky Swift Volodymyr Zelenskiy dressed for success in his latest meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House. Trump complimented Zelenskiy on his black suit in a briefing punctuated with smiles and laughter. It was a much different scene than their chilly meeting in February, when the Ukrainian president's military-style attire in the Oval Office drew ire. Zelenskiy declared it "the best of our meetings," and Trump said the United States would help guarantee Ukraine's security in any deal to end Russia's hostility there. Whether it was the suit or just growing desperation to end a war that has cast a shadow over the region for more than three years, enthusiasm was contagious. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said Trump's meeting with Zelenskiy and other European and NATO partners was very successful. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said his expectations for the gathering were "exceeded." Even Russia joined in, with special envoy for investment and economic cooperation Kirill Dmitriev calling Monday an "important day of diplomacy." On a largely directionless day in Asian markets, European equity futures traded higher. Pan-region Euro Stoxx 50 futures , German DAX futures , and FTSE contracts were all up about 0.2%. While traders keep one eye on geopolitical developments, the other will be focused on the Federal Reserve's August 21-23 Jackson Hole symposium. Chair Jerome Powell is due to speak on the economic outlook and the central bank's policy framework at the annual gathering. Money markets reflect an 83.6% chance of a quarter-point rate cut at the Fed's meeting on September 17, according to CME FedWatch. Fed Governor Michelle Bowman, one of two dissenting voices favouring a rate cut at last month's meeting, is due to speak today. Key developments that could influence markets on Tuesday: - Home Depot Q2 results - U.S. housing starts, building permits for July - Canada consumer price index for July - Debt sales: German 5-year notes, British 10-year gilts - Fed Vice Chair Michelle Bowman to speak at the Wyoming Blockchain Symposium 2025 - 1810 GMT. - Riksbank monetary policy meeting


Sky News
40 minutes ago
- Sky News
Trump is playing both sides - but has taken peace talks a distance not seen since the war began
Talks between Donald Trump, Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders have taken place at the White House, aimed at finding an end to the war in Ukraine. On the agenda were US security guarantees, whether a ceasefire is required, and a potential summit between the Ukrainian president and Vladimir Putin. Here's what three of our correspondents made of it all: For Mr Trump, the challenge to remain seen as the deal-broker is to maintain "forward momentum, through devilish detail," Sky News' US correspondent James Matthews says. The US president called the Washington summit a "very good early step", but that's all it was, Matthews says. Despite cordiality with Mr Zelenskyy and promising talk of a US role in security guarantees for Ukraine and discussions for meetings to come. Matthews says the obstacles remain. "Trump has taken peace discussions to a distance not travelled since the start of the war, but it is a road navigated by a president playing both sides who have changed his mind on key priorities." 1:25 As for Russia, Sky News' Moscow correspondent Ivor Bennett says the aim is to keep Trump on its preferred path towards peace - a deal first, a ceasefire later. "Moscow believes that's the best way of securing all of its goals," Bennett says. But Ukraine and Europe want things the other way round, and Moscow "will be wary that Trump can be easily persuaded by the last person he spoke to". And so, Russia will be "trying to keep themselves heard" and "cast Kyiv as the problem, as they won't agree to a peace deal on the Kremlin's terms". 0:36 Sky News' deputy political editor Sam Coates says, for Sir Keir Starmer, the biggest success of the Washington summit was the US promise of security guarantees for Ukraine. He adds that the "hard work starts now to actually try and figure out what these guarantees amount to". Coates says Starmer said if President Putin breaches a future peace deal, there would have to be consequences, but potentially "insoluble" issues stand in the way. "At what point do those breaches invoke a military response, whether US guarantees would be enough to encourage European involvement in Ukraine, and whether or not you could see the UK and Europe going to war with Russia to protect Ukraine."