logo
Planning for 2031 census in Scotland under way

Planning for 2031 census in Scotland under way

Independent17-06-2025
National Records of Scotland has recommended that Scotland's next census should take place in 2031 at the same time as the rest of the UK.
As part of the plans it has launched a consultation on topics to include in the census, which will run until autumn 2025.
New topics for the last census in 2022 included UK Armed Forces Veterans and sexual orientation.
National Records of Scotland (NRS) said that it will work closely with other UK statistical bodies on the design and build of the census, as it has done in previous years.
NRS chief executive Alison Byrne said: 'No other survey provides the richness and range of information that the census does, enabling governments and other public bodies to plan the services we all rely on, and telling the story of Scotland's people for generations to come.
'We look forward to hearing from data users across Scotland in the coming months.
'Their responses will help us to understand the best way to meet their needs as we plan for a 2031 Census.'
NRS said that census data is vital for gathering a vast range of information about Scotland's people which local and central government, the NHS and a range of other service providers and data users in the public, private and third sectors need.
More than one billion statistics were published from Scotland's 2022 Census on topics including education, transport, religion, migration and national identity.
Scottish Government ministers have confirmed that they have accepted in principle NRS's recommendation to hold a census in Scotland in 2031, with further detailed plans to follow.
A census has been taken every ten years since 1801 in Scotland, except for 1941, while the 2021 census was delayed until 2022 due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This is when UK could send troops to Ukraine
This is when UK could send troops to Ukraine

The Independent

time24 minutes ago

  • The Independent

This is when UK could send troops to Ukraine

The UK is preparing to deploy troops to Ukraine as a reassurance force if a peace deal is reached with Russia. A meeting of the "coalition of the willing", co-chaired by Sir Keir Starmer, saw over 30 international leaders discuss further sanctions on Russia and security guarantees for Ukraine. Donald Trump has indicated the US is willing to provide security assistance, such as air support, but will not commit ground troops to Ukraine. Volodymyr Zelensky has welcomed the promise of security guarantees as a major step forward, expecting them to be formalised soon. Donald Trump stated he has spoken directly with Vladimir Putin to plan a meeting between the Russian leader and Mr Zelensky, followed by a three-way meeting including Trump. UK preparing to send troops to Ukraine as part of 'reassurance force' if peace deal is struck

Labour's migrant hotels policy is in disarray: Asylum seekers are stunned as Epping Council wins legal battle to move them out
Labour's migrant hotels policy is in disarray: Asylum seekers are stunned as Epping Council wins legal battle to move them out

Daily Mail​

time25 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Labour's migrant hotels policy is in disarray: Asylum seekers are stunned as Epping Council wins legal battle to move them out

Labour 's asylum policy was left in chaos after a judge ordered a controversial migrant hotel to shut. The High Court ruling gives The Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, just 24 days to close after it became the focus of violent protests. Epping Forest District Council's victory could open the floodgates to a series of similar legal actions against other migrant hotels across the country. Ministers scrambled to respond after an 11th-hour Home Office bid to block the action was thrown out. Government lawyers warned the court that granting the injunction on a planning technicality 'runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests'. Intensifying the pressure on Labour, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said he hoped it gave 'inspiration to others across the country'. Some 32,000 migrants are in about 210 hotels, according to the Home Office, and discontent is building. The injunction left Sir Keir Starmer in an even more woeful position after he scrapped the Tory government's Rwanda asylum deal, in which illegal migrants would have been sent on a one-way ticket to East Africa. The Prime Minister's pledge to 'smash the gangs' was already in tatters, with more than 51,000 small-boat migrants having reached Britain since the election. The legal challenge to The Bell was brought by the local council after a small-boat migrant there was accused of sexual offences. Hadush Kebatu, from Ethiopia, was charged last month with sexual assault, harassment and inciting a girl of 14 to engage in sexual activity. Eight days after he arrived in the UK, Kebatu, 41, allegedly tried to kiss a schoolgirl as she ate pizza, and the next day tried to kiss a woman in the town and put his hand on her leg. He then encountered the girl again and tried to kiss her, Colchester Magistrates' Court was told. Kebatu denies the offences and is in custody. Protesters descended on the hotel following news of his arrest and court appearance, leading to violent scuffles between those opposed to the migrant hotel and 'anti-racism' demonstrators. Recent protests against the hotel have mainly been peaceful, with a group of women nicknamed the 'Pink Ladies' leading marches. Mohammed Sharwarq, 32, a Syrian at the 80-bed hotel, has been charged with seven offences, including kissing a man on the neck on July 25. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said the injunction was 'a victory for the mums and dads in Epping who just want their children to be safe'. She added: ' Putting a hotel full of young, male illegal immigrants in the middle of a community like Epping was always going to lead to issues. They need to be moved immediately. 'But Epping is just one of many towns struggling with asylum hotels. 'Labour have no solution, they're not smashing any gangs and small-boat arrivals are at record highs.' Mr Farage said: 'This community stood up bravely, despite being slandered as far-Right, and have won. 'Young, undocumented males who break into the UK illegally should not be free to walk the streets. They must be detained and deported.' Corina Gander, Tory leader of Broxbourne Borough Council in Hertfordshire, said she was considering similar action. She added: 'It's just given us this massive boost and precedent that we can do something now.' The 12 councils in which Reform UK is the largest party are also said to be exploring the prospect. The legal action was the first to succeed in getting a migrant hotel shut down. Epping Forest council was granted a temporary injunction by Mr Justice Eyre at the High Court in London after arguing that The Bell's owners, Somani Hotels, broke planning rules by changing its use to house migrants. The judge said the firm had 'sidestepped public scrutiny and explanation', writing in his judgement: 'Although the defendant's actions were not flagrant or surreptitious they were deliberate. 'The defendant acted in good faith but chose to take its stand on the position that there was no material change of use.' Home Office lawyers who claimed The Bell's closure would breach asylum seekers' 'fundamental human rights' failed to block the legal challenge. A hearing on a permanent injunction will take place later. Speaking at the Royal Courts of Justice after the ruling, Epping Forest council leader Chris Whitbread said: 'This is a decision that's important to Epping Forest, but also important to councils up and down the country, and it shows that the Government cannot ignore planning rules.' Welcoming the 'fantastic news', Sarah White, 40, one of the protest leaders, said: 'We will start protesting with towns up and down the country. This is bigger than Epping, it is impacting the whole country.' Home Office minister Dame Angela Eagle said the Government would consider the ruling, and would close all asylum hotels by the end of this parliament.'

From delaying tactics to age limits and finding your tribe – ten ways to resist giving in to your kid's phone demands
From delaying tactics to age limits and finding your tribe – ten ways to resist giving in to your kid's phone demands

The Sun

time25 minutes ago

  • The Sun

From delaying tactics to age limits and finding your tribe – ten ways to resist giving in to your kid's phone demands

MORE than half of all kids in Britain are addicted to technology – with 91 per cent owning a mobile phone by the age of 11, research reveals. A 2025 Ofcom report found a massive 78 per cent of teens check their devices at least every hour. 5 5 And even when parents try their hardest to control the situation, it is easy to get it wrong, according to clinical psychologist Dr Martha Deiros Collado, whose new book, The Smartphone Solution: When And How To Give Your Child A Phone, is packed with practical advice. In her two decades of experience, Dr Collado has helped thousands of families and appeared on Channel 4's The Great British Phone Switch. She has vowed not to let her own two daughters, aged six and two, have a smartphone until they are at least 15, but admits pester power is already making it a challenge. Dr Collado explained: 'I know the road ahead is going to be tough. 'Our children were born with digital devices all around them — I'm not saying it's easy. 'We're the first generation of parents having to navigate the choppy seas of the internet with very few safety floats to support us. 'We're all going to make mistakes along the way, and that's OK. 'Like many parents, I worry about smartphones' effect on children's development. 'Kids really do need real-life interaction, attention and play. 'And they need to learn to cope if they are bored or frustrated: pulling out a phone out of habit means they don't get this chance. 'In the meantime, we teach them safety from an early age.' Here are Dr Collado's top ten tips for parents on how to resist giving their kids a smartphone. DON'T SAY NO, SAY NOT YET Delaying smartphones can be empowering to you and your child. A ban instantly makes them more desirable, but tell children that smartphones are not out of bounds, they're simply not ready yet to have one with unimpeded access to all the apps and content they offer. 'Not yet' opens up a conversation — we're not ignoring their wishes, but there's still learning to be done. A hard 'no' can feel like rejection, but delaying offers time to develop digital skills which will protect them from engaging in harmful communications online, like learning when it's time to take a break. SMARTPHONES ARE NOT FOR CHILDREN Making kids wait to own a device emphasises that they're not toys. Smartphones shouldn't be considered an object of fun, a status symbol or rite of passage into secondary school. They're a wonderful tool and a dangerous machine. Be present if your children are using their smartphone. Say loud and clear, 'You can take a photo, but I'm trusting you to hold it very carefully. Smartphones are really expensive'. MAKE THE AGE LIMIT CLEAR EARLY ON 5 You needn't wait until your child asks to say, 'You won't be getting a phone until you're at least 13'. Children benefit from knowing that there's an age when you might start to consider it — and guess what happens? Most kids get excited. Because you haven't said no, there's a lot of hope and possibility that youngsters will grab on to. HOLD FIRM Stay strong and wait until their brains and hearts are sufficiently developed and they possess the impulse control and critical-thinking skills to stay safe when they're bombarded with inappropriate content. Your child might not like it, or agree, but it's not your job to justify your decision or convince them that you're right. It's your job to keep them safe, even when it's hard to do so. Dig deep and find the courage to teach them patience and delayed gratification — two life skills that smartphones are really good at stealing away from them. OFFER OTHER DIGITAL EXPERIENCES We can't completely protect our children from the digital world, but find ways to alleviate the downsides of not having a smartphone when their friends get one. This might be allowing them to video call friends via a tablet under your supervision, using an 'un-smart' phone for calls and texts when they're away from home and at certain agreed hours in your home, or letting them enjoy gaming online with their friends on closed digital platforms where you have oversight of what they play, who with and for how long. SET A GOOD EXAMPLE Children learn more by what you do than what you say. How you behave with your phone is crucial in shaping your child's attitudes. If you limit their screen time, but the rules don't apply to you, it sends mixed messages. And it's more likely that you'll end up fighting daily battles about why it's OK for you to have a phone at the dinner table but not them. Get into the habit of telling them what you're doing on your device — this is useful for training yourself to cut back on usage. Also, resist the chance to reach for the phone's camera when you see your kids doing something adorable — join them in their real-life adventures. TELL OTHER ADULTS YOUR RULES You have parental power to say no at the homes of friends who have older children with smartphones. Even though it might be age-appropriate, it's important to teach that they can't play on someone else's smartphone either. This can be tough with friends, and doesn't always work out, but learn to speak up about mobile usage to prevent a situation that you don't feel comfortable with. Say, 'We know your child has one, but if we could keep it out of reach for a couple of hours it would really help us', or 'It's OK if that's what you want to do, but we'd be really grateful if you don't do it in front of her'. FIND YOUR TRIBE Find a parenting circle in which others are delaying phones, too. A few years ago, it might have seemed like you would be alone in this venture. But now, lots of parents have started to wake up to the potential risks of smartphones for children. And momentum is growing. Some parents may fear being rejected by those who are strongly in favour of delaying. Try to be inclusive and compassionate to anyone who wants to consider this idea with you. START CONVERSATION EARLY For toddlers and preschoolers, be a positive role model and set a strong example by ensuring you follow well-defined rules when your child is with you. This might involve putting your phone in a different room or ensuring that if it beeps or buzzes, you don't allow it to interfere in interactions with your child. See your child as the first priority and your smartphone as the last. Use simple language and stay honest, such as, 'When you're older you'll be allowed to use one'. BE READY FOR SCHOOL 5 Set clear expectations when they start school. Say, 'You need to be at least 13 to have the skills and maturity to use them (devices) responsibly and safely'. State your position, get kids involved, listen to their views, opinions and ideas so they feel part of the rules rather than having something 'done' to them. Try offering an alternative, like a brick phone without apps, so they can make and receive calls and messages. Explain that phones distract from schoolwork and the internet has lots of risks that might make them overwhelmed. Say, 'My job as your parent is to keep you safe. Let's keep talking'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store