Petition Urging Indians, Pakistanis to Reject Division and Hate Gets Over 5,500 Signatures
Menu
हिंदी తెలుగు اردو
Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion
Support independent journalism. Donate Now
Top Stories
Petition Urging Indians, Pakistanis to Reject Division and Hate Gets Over 5,500 Signatures
The Wire Staff
5 minutes ago
Signed by people including Jean Dreze and Pervez Hoodbhoy, the petition also opposed weaponising shared resources and bilateral pacts.
Real journalism holds power accountable
Since 2015, The Wire has done just that.
But we can continue only with your support.
Donate now
Representative image. Photo: Artem Podrez/Pexels
New Delhi: A petition that calls for the people of India and Pakistan to reject divisive ideologies and advocating dialogue over hate and revenge has garnered over 5,500 signatures since it was floated three days ago on change.org.
Signed by prominent individuals including filmmaker Anand Patwardhan, Pakistani physicist Pervez Hoodbhoy, Indian economist Jean Dreze and Nepali publisher Kanak Mani Dixit, the petition condemned violent extremism and terrorism as well as 'the targeting of unarmed civilians for any reason including as a means to achieve political ends'.
Noting that 'communal and faith-based politics' being amplified by the media and social media on either side was creating 'the illusion of a consensus for war', it added that this sentiment has 'severely vitiated the political climate in Southasia [sic]'.
'Sustainable peace requires a collective rejection of such divisive ideologies by the people of the region,' said the petition posted by the Southasia Peace Action Network, which went on to urge Indians and Pakistanis to 'hold their governments accountable and resist any speech or action that feeds war hysteria'.
It also opposed attempts to weaponise shared natural resources or bilateral agreements such as under the Indus Waters Treaty or the Simla Agreement.
India and Pakistan engaged in a military stand-off that killed civilians as well as security personnel over the last week. This followed India's conducting missile strikes against 'terrorist infrastructure' in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir and in Pakistan, which New Delhi said was retaliation for the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack.
Both sides agreed to cease fighting on Saturday afternoon.
The change.org petition has been reproduced in full below.
§
The Issue
We, peace activists from India, Pakistan and elsewhere, categorically condemn every form of violent extremism and terrorism.
We particularly condemn the targeting of unarmed civilians, for any reason, including as a means to achieve political ends.
This cycle must end for peace to prevail. Communal and faith-based politics feeding frenzy on both sides, amplified by media and social media, gives the illusion of a consensus for war.
This loud warmongering puts tremendous pressure on governments and armed forces on both sides, as well as inciting the public. It has severely vitiated the political climate in Southasia*, fostering mistrust among citizens.
Sustainable peace requires a collective rejection of such divisive ideologies by the people of the region.
India and Pakistan must behave responsibly. Any war between these two nuclear-armed nations would be disastrous. As history shows, it is ordinary citizens who suffer the most in conflict, especially women, children, minorities, the elderly, and other vulnerable communities forced to prove their patriotism.
We therefore urge the people of India and Pakistan to hold their governments accountable and resist any speech or action that feeds war hysteria.
We strongly oppose any attempts to weaponize shared natural resources or historic bilateral agreements. Suspending longstanding agreements like the Indus Water Treaty (1960) or like the Shimla Accord (1972) would erode the basic framework of legality and civility in bilateral relations.
We call on all those who believe that peace, not war, is the way forward, to speak out against the politics of hate, violence, and vengeance, and to stand up for dialogue, cooperation, and a shared future of peace and co-existence.
* Why Southasia as one word? Because history, geography and shared struggles say so.
Initial signatories:
Dr. A.H. Nayyar, physicist, Lahore
Beena Sarwar, Journalist, filmmaker, Boston / Karachi
Dr. Pervez Hoodbhoy, Physicist, Islamabad
Saeeda Diep, activist, Lahore
Tahira Abdullah, activist, Islamabad
Sheema Kermani, Cultural activist, Karachi
Dr. Riaz Sheikh, Historian, Karachi
M. Tahseen, Activist, Lahore
Anand Patwardhan, Filmmaker, Mumbai
Lalita Ramdas, educationist, Hyderabad, Telangana
Dr. Sandeep Pandey, activist, Lucknow
Feroze Mithiborwala, Writer, Social Activist, Mumbai, India
Anuradha Bhasin, journalist, Jammu
Kanak Mani Dixit, Journalist, Kathmandu
Arundhati Dhuru, Activist, Lucknow
Khawar Mumtaz, Activist, Lahore
Laxmi Murthy, Journalist, Bangalore
Dr. Syeda Hameed, activist, Delhi
Asad Faruqi, Artist/Filmmaker, Karachi / Brooklyn, NY
Badre Alam, Social and political activist, Siddharth Nagar, Lucknow,Uttar Pradesh
Dilip D'Souza, writer, Bombay
Pragyan Srivastava, Journalist, Boston/Delhi
Ram Puniyani, Peace worker, Mumbai
Sameera Khan, Journalist/Researcher, Mumbai
Col. Pavan Nair, Indian citizen, Pune
Siraj Khan, Board Chair, Society for Youth Boston
Marvi Sirmed, journalist/peace activist (Pakistani-Washington, D.C.)
Vinod Mubayi, Co-editor Insaf Bulletin, New York
Vishal Sharma, Researcher/Peace Activist, Coventry
Dolores Chew, College professor, Montreal
Dr. Jatinder Maan, Punjab
Dr. A. Giridhar Rao, World Esperanto Association
Prabir, Doctor, West Bengal
Sandhya Gokhale, feminist activist, Mumbai
Ms. Sharmeela de Vas, Mumbai
Sneha Jayaraj, Attorney, New York City / Kerala
Sushovan Dhar, Activist, Kolkata
Suraj Budathoki, New Hampshire State Representative, Manchester NH
Shahzad Irshad, Author, Oxford/Manchester
Verdah Kazi, Psychotherapist, Brooklyn/Karachi
Varsha, teacher, civic society activist, bengaluru
Himanshu Gupta, Child protection Social Worker, Ferozepur
Guddi S L, Social Political Activist, Mumbai
Satya Talwar, Retired professor, Delhi
Rajashri Dasgupta, Independent Journalist, Kolkata
Bobby Abraham, Creator, Kerala
Sushil Khanna, Professor (Retd) IIM Calcutta, Kolkata
Rajesh Ramakrishnan, Independent researcher and activist, Chennai
Purnesh Joshi, Software Engineer, Mumbai/Pune
Majid nasrullah, Musician, Bangalore
SandhyaRoy, Journalist, India
Vishal, Engineer, Mumbai
Samita Kaur, Environmentalist, Punjab
Harsh Kapoor, Editor, Mainstream, Montpellier
Susan, Retired, Bangalore
Jyothi, Art facilitator, Chennai
Nityanand Jayaraman, journalist/social activist, Chennai
Sandhya Srinivasan, Journalist / researcher, Mumbai
Sagari Ramdas, Veterinary Scientist, Hyderabad, India
Dr Ashok Kumar Somal, Retired IFS officer, Kangra HP
SUNIL MICHAEL CALEB, Professor, KOLKATA
Ms Foqia Sadiq Khan, Social Scientist, Islamabad
Navin, Independent, Hyderabad
V.Priya, Community facilitator, Tirupathi
Rajeev Raj R, Independent Film maker, New Delhi
Prajit Basu, Hyderabad
Ansloyd Gomes, Artist, Goa/London
Siddhartha Mitra, Programmer NYC
Aditya P, Designer, Pune
Abhayraj Naik, Educator and Researcher, Bengaluru / Sri City
John D'Souza, Consultant, Mumbai
Ajin K Thomas, Schoolteacher, Chennai
Ishan A., Ecologist, Goa
John Dayal, Writer, Delhi
Sadeqa Siddiqui, Activist, Montreal .
Swathi, PhD scholar, Bengaluru
SUMAN BASU, Teacher, Kolkata
Pooja Nirala, Labour Rights Activist, Guwahati
Stella James, Researcher, Bengaluru
Apoorva Kulkarni, Scientist/ Artist, Mumbai/ Oxford
Niya Tapo, Indigenous Climate researcher, Arunachal Pradesh, Roing
Manish Kumar, Student, Araria
Mohammed Ahmed Khan, Social activist, Lucknow
Sehjo singh, Climate Convener, Delhi/Udaipur
Philip Pinto, Brother, Chandigarh
Pradeep Ghosh, Social Worker, Bhopal
Bhagwan Awaghade, Core member Rashtriya Dharmnirpekshta Aandolan and Ambedkarite propagating constitutional human values, Satara
Ela Gandhi, Retired Social worker/ political activist, Durban South Africa
Shubhranshu Choudhary, Journalist, Delhi
Geeta Seshu, Journalist, Mumbai
Mubashira Patel, Student, Intern, Mumbai
Amjad M Syed, Director sales and operations, Bangalore
Shweta Damle, Peace Activist, Mumbai
Tripta Batra, Creative Educator; Writer, Delhi NCR
Soumya Dutta, Educator – Researcher – Knowledge activist
Delhi NCR
Madhavi Swamy-Peters, Rural livelihoods, Kashmir/ Ladakh/ Bangalore
Rahul Banerjee, Social Activist, Indore
Ravinder Pal Singh, Academic Activist, Gurugram
harshad tayade, Student of International Relations, Mumbai
Ammu Abraham, Activist, on women's rights and civil liberties,
Mumbai
Smita Ramanathan, Freelancer, Thrissur
GOVARDHAN RAO PANCHINENI, Businessman, Hyderabad
Nityanand Jayaraman, Journalist/social activist, Chennai
Amna Yameen, Researcher/Activist, Islamabad and Hamilton (NZ)
Abhishek Taneja, Sustainability Promoter, Solan
Nishtha Jain, Filmmaker, Mumbai
Guru, Concerned Citizen, Bengaluru
Krithika, Psychologist / Activist, Bangalore
Jugal Hatila, कृषि, Nokha ( bikaner)
Komal, Activist, Maharashtra
Sangeetha, self employed, Mysore
Mohammad Imran, Retired, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA
Rutuja, I/O psychologist, Pune
Saravanan V., Ph.D. Student, New Delhi
Rukmini Iyer, Peacebuilder, Mumbai, India
Nasreen Rehman, peace activist/historian, Cambridge UK'
Ashka Naik, Researcher/Activist, Boston/India
And others.
Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
Related News
Ceasefire: Political Reactions in India Strike Note of Caution, Mood More Jubilant in Pakistan
In Calls to Jaishankar and Shehbaz Sharif, US Secretary of State Urges 'Immediate De-Escalation'
India Says Pakistan Used 300-400 Drones at 36 Locations, Perhaps to 'Test Air Defence Systems'
Pakistan's Claim That India Would Attack Its Own Cities a 'Deranged Fantasy': FS
Nepal's Civil Society Appeals for Restraint as India-Pakistan Tensions Escalate
World Capitals Urge Calm In Wave of Diplomatic Activity After India's Missile Strikes on Pakistan
Guns Have Fallen Silent but India's Pakistan Dilemma Remains Unsorted
UN Security Council Holds Informal Talks on India-Pakistan Tensions, No Statement Issued
After Drone Incursions, Shelling, Calm Prevails in J&K As No Fresh Incident Reported Amid Ceasefire
About Us
Contact Us
Support Us
© Copyright. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
19 minutes ago
- News18
Honey Trap, Diplomatic Deception: Anti-Espionage Probe After Pahalgam Reveals Deep Infiltration
Last Updated: Officials said Pakistani diplomats used official cover to recruit not only government insiders but also emotionally vulnerable individuals and aspirational social media influencers In the aftermath of the April 22 Pahalgam attack, central intelligence agencies convened a high-level meeting and directed their state units to narrow down suspects from a list of nearly 1,500 individuals compiled through inter-agency intelligence sharing. Government employees and security personnel came under intense scrutiny, leading to the identification of around 30 individuals allegedly involved in an espionage network. This intelligence was subsequently shared with local police and other enforcement agencies for corroboration and further action. According to sources, the central agencies prepared a report of every individual, and a team matched them for further analysis to understand the trend. Officials discovered that many of these individuals had accessed sensitive areas and collected classified information. Sources also said an umbrella report revealed that the espionage activities were being orchestrated with direct support from individuals operating under diplomatic cover in India. 'A common pattern emerged that officers from Pakistan's ISI and other intelligence agencies exploited vulnerable individuals, many of whom were lured with small amounts of money," a senior official involved in the probe told News18. 'Several suspects were found communicating with a set of women identified as a Pakistani intelligence operative who had honey-trapped them." Most of them were in touch with different Pakistani officials for the last 4-5 months. The operation also exposed a shift in espionage tactics. Officials noted a modern, asymmetric strategy where Pakistani diplomats used official cover to recruit not only government insiders but also emotionally vulnerable individuals, aspirational social media influencers, and students, the official said. The agencies further observed that a significant number of those targeted were North Indians familiar with the terrain, making them valuable assets for intelligence gathering. Officials who were trapped were living in the area of which information was required by Pakistani agency. The operation remains ongoing, and more arrests are expected in the coming days based on actionable intelligence provided by central agencies to local authorities. What Analysis Found This was the most common tactic used to lure and compromise targets. Victims were contacted via Facebook, Instagram, or WhatsApp, often by ISI operatives posing as Indian women. Once rapport was built, intelligence was slowly extracted under emotional/romantic pretences. Civilian Targets With Access to Sensitive Info Arrests weren't limited to military insiders—many were students, YouTubers, labourers, or low-level contractors. Ravindra Verma (junior engineer), Jyoti Malhotra (YouTuber), and Devendra Dhillon (student) had limited but useful access (photos, base locations, movement patterns) and were likely seen as easier to manipulate. Heavy Use of Encrypted or Obscure Communication Tools Apps like WhatsApp, Telegram, and custom-designed apps were used to transmit intelligence. Some accused even received instructions through voice notes or delay-upload tools. Clustered Geography Majority of arrests came from Haryana, Punjab, Rajasthan, and Uttar Pradesh. A few isolated cases occurred in Maharashtra, but no confirmed arrests in Southern or North-eastern states so far. ISI networks appear densely active in the northern Indian belt, where familiarity with terrain and access to sensitive installations is higher. Arrested so far 1. Ravindra Muralidhar Verma Details of Allegations: A 27-year-old defence contractor from Thane, Maharashtra, who leaked sensitive naval information (including sketches and audio notes about 14 Indian warships and submarines) to a Pakistan-based handler over WhatsApp. He was honey-trapped through a fake Facebook account, arrested by Maharashtra ATS and booked under the Official Secrets Act. 2. Jyoti Malhotra Details of Allegations: A travel YouTuber from Karnal, Haryana, accused of sending videos and photos of sensitive border areas to Pakistani handlers via encrypted apps. She was in contact with a Pakistan High Commission official and made multiple trips to Pakistan. Arrested and remanded under the Official Secrets Act and conspiracy laws. 3. Jasbir Singh (alias 'Jaan Mahal") Details of Allegations: A YouTuber from Tarn Taran, Punjab, arrested for allegedly promoting pro-Pakistan content, maintaining contact with over 150 Pakistani individuals, and receiving money through suspicious transactions. He reportedly helped others access Pakistan Day events in Delhi. 4. Shakur Khan Details of Allegations: A government official from Jaisalmer, Rajasthan, who made multiple visits to Pakistan. He was arrested for sending sensitive border-related information via WhatsApp to ISI handlers. Remanded under the Official Secrets Act. 5. Devendra Singh Dhillon Details of Allegations: A 25-year-old student from Rohtak, Haryana, accused of sharing photos and details of military installations after visiting Pakistan via the Kartarpur Corridor. He was allegedly recruited by ISI handlers and communicated through Telegram. 6. Mohammad Murtaza Ali Details of Allegations: A man from Jalandhar, Punjab, accused of developing and using a mobile app to transmit confidential Indian defence information to Pakistan. He was arrested with multiple mobile phones and SIM cards used for the operation. 7. Mohammad Tareef (or Tarif) Details of Allegations: A civilian from Tauru, Mewat (Haryana), arrested for sharing visuals of Indian military deployments and IAF bases with handlers linked to Pakistan's High Commission. He was part of a wider ring busted during a major intelligence crackdown. 8. Armaan Details of Allegations: A 26-year-old man from Nuh, Haryana, arrested for sending photos and videos from army expos and defence locations to handlers in the Pakistan High Commission. He was part of the same network as Mohammad Tareef. 9. Amritsar Labourers Details of Allegations: Several daily-wage labourers from Punjab were arrested for leaking basic military infrastructure and deployment details. They reportedly communicated with a jailed intermediary who passed on information to Pakistani handlers. 10. Shahzad Details of Allegations: A businessman from Moradabad/Rampur, Uttar Pradesh, accused of running a smuggling operation that doubled as an espionage network for Pakistan's ISI. He was arrested under the National Security Act and Official Secrets Act. top videos View all 11. Aasif Baloch & Zaffar (Pakistan High Commission officials) Details of Allegations: Not Indian nationals but were directly involved in managing the Indian spy network. Named in FIRs and intelligence reports. Declared persona non grata and expelled from India. About the Author Ankur Sharma With over 15 years of journalistic experience, Ankur Sharma, Associate Editor, specializes in internal security and is tasked with providing comprehensive coverage from the Ministry of Home Affairs, More Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : espionage haryana honey trap jyoti malhotra Pahalgam attack pakistan punjab Spying Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 10, 2025, 09:43 IST News india Honey Trap, Diplomatic Deception: Anti-Espionage Probe After Pahalgam Reveals Deep Infiltration
Scroll.in
30 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Bombay HC overturns rustication of Pune student arrested over post about Operation Sindoor
The Bombay High Court on Monday overturned the decision of an engineering college in Pune to rusticate a 19-year-old student who was arrested in May over an allegedly objectionable social media post about Operation Sindoor, Bar and Bench reported. A bench of Justices MS Karnik and NR Borkar set aside the decision after finding that the student had not been heard before the rustication order was passed. The court, however, granted the college liberty to pass a fresh order after hearing the student, the legal news outlet reported. The 19-year-old is a second-year information technology student at Sinhgad Academy of Engineering, a private college affiliated to Savitribai Phule Pune University. On May 7, she had allegedly reposted material on Instagram from an account that criticised the Indian government. The post was related to military tensions between India and Pakistan after Operation Sindoor. After receiving threats online, she had deleted the post and apologised. However, following protests against her post, she was arrested on May 9. She was rusticated by the college on the same day. On May 27, a division bench of Justices Gauri Godse and Somasekhar Sundaresan criticised the 19-year-old's college for rusticating her for the social media post, saying that educational institutes need to help students rather than turn them into criminals. The High Court had also criticised the Maharashtra government for arresting the student. It had directed the student's counsel to file a bail petition, adding that it would be granted immediately. She was granted bail on May 27. The bench had also directed that the student not be summoned by the police during her exams and barred her from leaving Maharashtra without permission. It had added that she had missed her May 24 and May 27 papers while in custody, and allowed her to approach university authorities regarding those exams. The police had been instructed to provide her security during the exam and the college was given the option to arrange separate seating if needed.
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Apple's India plans have two new threats: Trump and China's Xi
Apple Inc. and its main manufacturing contractor Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. are still betting on India. When Hon Hai — better known as Foxconn — revealed through an exchange filing last week that it was putting another $1.5 billion into its operations there, it will have calmed a few nerves in New Delhi. Worries about the future of Apple in the country had been set off by President Donald Trump , who said last month that he had told the company's Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook that 'I don't want you building in India.' This seemed to contradict hopes, shared by both Cupertino and New Delhi, that most iPhones for the US market would come from India by the end of 2026. But on the ground, Apple's turn to the South Asian nation seems well-entrenched. Reports have emerged of a new Foxconn campus meant to house 30,000 employees — the largest such effort in India's recent history — and that another contract manufacturer, Tata Electronics , is now assembling the iPhone 16 in its South Indian plant. Yet CEOs and politicians may have begun to realize that the difficulties involved in shifting — or duplicating — an entire manufacturing ecosystem extend beyond placating Trump. This is a complex environment, and there are severe obstacles to moving it out of China. US politics is only one, though perhaps the loudest. Admittedly, Apple has had a lot of success in India already. That's why even Trump's talking about it. In just the last year, the value of its products manufactured there has jumped 60%, to $22 billion. Over $17 billion is exported; thanks to Apple, India's $38 billion of electronics exports now earn more than even its world-famous pharmaceutical sector. No other investment has produced anything near this scale of return. In fact, it may be the only success of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's pivot to industrial policy in the middle of his decade in power. This rare win happened because Apple and its suppliers were committed to moving production into India, and because both federal and state governments rewrote regulations and permissions to help them make the move. Politicians kept up this support, even when there might be a price to pay. After a border clash between China and India in 2020 that killed 20 of its soldiers, Indian officials restricted investment from Beijing. Those restrictions have slowly softened since then, primarily to ensure that Apple's contractors didn't get caught up in red tape. That experience should have served as a reminder to New Delhi that attracting an entire ecosystem needs three sets of players to cooperate: the companies, the destination market for their products, and the source geography. Apple and Foxconn might be on board; Trump and his tariffs might be managed — but what of China? A recent book by the former Financial Times journalist Patrick McGee argues that Apple in China, and Foxconn in particular, grew because American investors and engineers helped. That's no surprise. Any industrial power trains its competitors and successors. That's what Great Britain did for America centuries ago. The financiers, engineers and suppliers that make up an existing manufacturing ecosystem need to be willing and able to cooperate in creating a new one. They are generally well rewarded for it. Apple's contract manufacturers and component suppliers, large and small, in China might be willing to set up shop in India — after all, profits are profits wherever they are earned. Some of their engineers might be happy to move to supervise new shop floors. But, it turns out, Beijing might not permit that to happen. Many crucial, experienced employees have found themselves forbidden to travel to India and Southeast Asia. Apple and New Delhi have both tried to woo Trump, and make him accept the possibility that iPhones destined for the US will be made in India. But it appears that they may need to woo President Xi Jinping as well. Objectively, India's Apple-led mobile phone ecosystem is nowhere near challenging China's manufacturing dominance. China is, after all, the indispensable country not just for Apple, but for multiple companies struggling to shift production to India, Vietnam and elsewhere. But Beijing now appears to view Apple's India project as a risk — dangerous enough that a few barriers should be erected in its path. Trump, Apple, New Delhi, and Beijing appear agreed on Indian manufacturing's potential over the next few years, whatever the rest of us might think.
