
Readers react to prospect of muzzling all dogs in Tayside and Fife
Dozens reacted after we ran an article on April 25 asking whether all dogs should be muzzled in public across Tayside and Fife.
The story included an interview with Dundee-based adult nursing student Dominika, who asked us not to reveal her surname.
Her Jack Russell, Luna, was attacked by an America Bully in a shared garden, and required £500 of vet treatment.
Dominika believes that if muzzles were made mandatory in public spaces, there would be few dog-related injuries.
The story also shared the views of Michelle – who is still traumatised five years after being attacked and bitten by a pack of three dogs when she was out shopping in Dundee.
She believes all dogs should be muzzled in public and all dog owners should have a licence to own one.
Meanwhile, Catriona Anderson of Strathmartine in Angus revealed she had a muzzle custom-made for her Patterjack after he almost died scavenging a piece of bone.
Out story also shared the views of those who are 100% anti-muzzle, believing the devices to be 'cruel' and restrictive.
However, we also spoke to two Dundee-based dog trainers – Hannah Green of Adventure Tails and Jess Probst.
Both believe there are many reasons to muzzle train – including safety in emergencies, preventing scavenging, at vet or grooming visits, legal requirements, or to aid rehabilitation for behavioural issues.
We put a poll to readers asking if all dogs should be muzzled in public.
The result (at the time of writing) showed 40 votes in favour of muzzling, and 45 against.
Readers also took to The Courier's comments section – and to social media – to express their views.
Mark Robinson said: 'Yes (to muzzles). Or make it compulsory to have training and a licence. The bad owners have entirely spoiled it for the good ones.'
John Thomps agrees. He said: 'Yes they should – would eradicate the issue.
'Dog owners – please stop being so stupid and muzzle your dog at all times. Keep on a leash too and boom – all issues gone.'
Heather Doyle said, quite simply: 'Yes they should be muzzled.'
Kerry-louise Taylor is against muzzling all dogs in general, but said that if a pet pooch is 'aggressive or reactive', then yes it should be muzzled.
Meanwhile, Dorothy Brown said: 'It's dogs off the lead with no recall skills at all that should be muzzled.'
And Jennifer Brand raised a very good point: 'What happens if a muzzled dog is attacked by an un-muzzled one, and can't defend itself?'
'Because we all know there are those who don't think rules or laws apply to them.
So no, absolutely not.'
Moira Edwards worried not everyone would stick to the rules.
'The problem would be that the people whose dogs are potentially problematic would be the ones that don't muzzle their dogs,' she said.
Jenni Cameron was adamant muzzles are not the answer, and said: 'No they should not (be muzzled).
'People need to learn respecting dogs' space, and if you're out passing other dogs, always put your dogs on the lead until you're a comfortable distance away from them.
'Too many folk got lockdown dogs and didn't know how to train them.'
Ashley Wallace agreed. 'Most of our dogs are well trained, loving dogs that wouldn't harm anyone unless hurt,' she said.
'It's the owners that's the problem. Don't punish the dogs.'
Michelle Duncan isn't a fan of muzzles, but believes all dogs should be on a lead. And she reckons those with large dogs need to have training on the breed.
'If you don't pass the training, you don't get a dog,' she said.
'So many nutters get a breed they don't understand or can't control through their own ignorance.'
While against all dogs being muzzled in public, Chris Dannan thinks education and legislation are the answers.
'Legislation needs to be directed at owners, not dogs,' he said.
'Responsible ownership would see the dogs requiring muzzled under control and those that don't under control so as not to cause incidents.
'It's the owner's responsibility to understand dogs are dogs. It is our duty to keep them and others safe.'
Katie Mackinnon always muzzles her dog when she's out, but doesn't believe everyone should have to muzzle.
But she said people need to stop approaching and touching dogs – because of the risk of an unpleasant response.
'If someone comes up and touches me without my consent, I'm gonna bite them,' she said.
'The same applies to a dog. Keep your hands to yourself.'
Another reader, who goes by the name of Keepitreal, said: 'While I understand completely why some would want to see all dogs muzzled in public, I also understand why sensible owners who have very gentle dogs would be against this.
'Dogs do like to play, catch balls, and sniff other dogs, which cannot be done with a muzzle on.'
Vexed added: 'I'd sooner see leads being mandated in public places to prevent unwelcome approaches from dogs.
''He's only coming to say hello', and 'he's friendly', are hollow words when someone is scared of dogs.
'They shouldn't feel worried about going to the park, beach or any other public area.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Rhyl Journal
30 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
On this day: 'Destruction' of Prestatyn hill sculpture
The sculpture, one of two female figures installed in 2017 at the Hillside Gardens shelter, was discovered vandalised by residents on a walking tour. They noted the 'very odd' appearance of the figure, which had been knocked off its platform and had its arms 'chopped off'.The sculpture after being vandalised (Image: Newsquest) The other sculpture remained unharmed, now cutting a 'lonely figure' on the hill, as one resident described. Created by Rossett-based chainsaw artist Simon O'Rourke, the sculptures represent a modern-day walker and one from the 1920s. The 1920s sculpture marks the era the shelter was built, while the modern-day rambler is intended to represent the Offa's Dyke National sculpture after being vandalised (Image: Newsquest) The figures were installed with funding from Denbighshire County Council's Town and Area Plan (TAP) funding, Natural Resources Wales, Prestatyn Town Council, and the Burbo Bank offshore wind farm, with assistance from the local Offa's Dyke Support Group. Mr O'Rourke had spent 'under three days' on each sculpture and installed them himself. At the time, he said the venture had been 'very rewarding'. This story was first reported by Marko Vranic on August 21, 2024.


Press and Journal
8 hours ago
- Press and Journal
Biker faces raft of surgeries for broken hip bones after being 'forced off A87 by driver on wrong side of road'
A motorcyclist has relived the moment he plunged off a Highland road onto rocks to avoid a head-on collision on the A87. Gavin Lawrie was riding near Glen Shiel when he says he was met by a black BMW driving on the wrong side of the road. He had a split second to avoid a crash – with his efforts to evade the car sending him off the road. He has been bedbound since the incident and the ordeal compounds what he describes as a 'hellish' year following the death of his 22-year-old daughter six months ago. Mr Lawrie sustained serious injuries in the accident, suffering several fractures that will require extensive surgery to repair. He told The Press and Journal the car had not stopped – but fortunately there were other road users who came to his aid. The incident took place on the A87, near Glen Shiel, at about 4.30pm on Friday and has been reported to police. Mr Lawrie, from Kingussie, said: 'I had to make a split-second decision. He could hit me head-on, or I could put the throttle down, which is what I did. 'I remember being thrown onto the rocks. 'The car didn't stop, but two bikers did and they called the police and ambulance who arrived quickly.' The retired 58-year-old was taken to Broadford Hospital on Skye, where X-rays revealed two broken bones in his hip. He also has a suspected fracture in his right ankle and is now wearing a moon boot. 'I haven't been able to walk since Friday and I'm currently bedbound,' he said. 'I'm awaiting transfer to Raigmore Hospital, where I'll have a CT scan. They may need to pin my hip socket bone.' Mr Lawrie said if he hadn't been wearing protective clothing and a helmet, he'd been told by paramedics they 'would have been sweeping me off the rocks'. Mr Lawrie has faced many recent struggles, including the loss of his daughter, yet he remains a fighter. He said: 'The main thing is I'm still here. 'I've been through hell and back, but I've come to accept that my daughter's gone. 'My faith is strong, and I believe we will meet again. 'I live to tell the story.' Earlier this summer, police began giving tourists arriving in Scotland wristbands telling them to 'drive on the left' after a series of crashes across the country. The wristbands are the latest tool being used by officers in an attempt to reduce collisions. It has been a particular issue in the Highlands and islands in recent years. Police Scotland and the Scottish Ambulance Service have been contacted for a statement regarding the incident. Sign up for our weekly newsletter, curated by Oban-based reporter Louise Glen, for top local stories and community highlights. here.


The Courier
9 hours ago
- The Courier
Prisoners like Angus killer Tasmin Glass could have fewer freedom bids under parole reform proposals
Prisoners like Angus killer Tasmin Glass could be forced to spend longer periods behind bars in between parole hearings. A consultation on parole reforms has been launched by the Scottish Government, considering transparency and communication issues that plague victims in the current process. The consultation comes in the wake of The Courier's A Voice for Victims campaign which has called for these much-needed reforms. We have worked with the family of Glass' victim Steven Donaldson, Linda McDonald who survived an attack by Dundee murderer Robbie McIntosh, and the family of Barry Smullen who was stabbed to death in Perth. Justice Secretary Angela Constance spoke exclusively to The Courier as the parole consultation was launched, saying she believes the process must have victim wellbeing at its heart. The consultation considers 43 questions, which collectively have the potential for important reforms to improve the lives of victims and increase transparency. Potential areas for change include how long a criminal should have to wait between parole hearings after being denied by the board. Currently, for prisoners like Tasmin Glass it is 12 months, and for prisoners like Robbie McIntosh it is two years. Glass is a long-term prisoner while McIntosh is on an order of life restriction. That could be increased depending on the results of the consultation. Victims and their families have long pointed to this aspect of parole as one of the most traumatising, as they feel like they are constantly being forced to engage with the process. Another question raises the possibility of more people attending parole hearings. It asks if victims should have an automatic right to be there, or if media could watch proceedings. Other options include more detail being given by the parole board around its decisions to release or not release. One long-sought reform that is not in the consultation is the current automatic right for long-term prisoners to be considered for parole halfway through their sentence. The Justice Secretary said that question would need to come through a different part of legislation. The Justice Secretary spoke with The Courier in Dundee on Wednesday afternoon, the day of the launch. She applauded The Courier's campaign to help drive these reforms forward. 'I am determined that the parole system, at its very heart, has to have victims and their families and their interests,' said Ms Constance. She added: 'That's crucial to the deliberations that the parole board has to make that's ultimately about public safety as well as rehabilitation. 'The Courier has been a great advocate for victims and their families and has led a campaign that is driven on improvements. 'So while there are some really important fundamental questions about how we improve that overall openness, transparency, information, (and) treatment of victims. 'There are also issues that are important in terms of process and management. 'There's an appetite for us to be looking at all of that. 'This is an attempt by the government to be open and its built on the engagement that we've had with victims, and the advocacy that victims themselves, and papers like The Courier, and victims support organisations have championed.'