Guatemalan woman who lives and works on Vermont dairy farm gets immigration reprieve — for now
'Sí se puede,' Bernardo said. 'And united we stand strong.'
According to her attorney, Brett Stokes, ICE agents told her Monday that she was free for now, but that she must return again in 90 days.
Advertisement
For more than a decade, Bernardo and her partner have lived and worked on an Orleans County dairy farm, milking cows and raising a growing family. They have five children of their own and take care of two of Bernardo's orphaned half-sisters — all between the ages of 5 and 18.
Bernardo entered the country without permission in 2014 and was immediately apprehended, according to Stokes. She has had to check in with ICE officials ever since, but those appointments have grown more frequent — and more fraught — since President Donald Trump took office vowing to deport a record number of undocumented people.
Bernardo's case has drawn significant attention in Vermont over the years, with dozens of state lawmakers
Advertisement
'I consider them more than just employees,' he told the Globe. 'They're part of the family.'
Morin and his partner, Lynn Beede, drove Bernardo and two of her children to Monday's meeting. After she addressed the crowd of supporters, Morin said he was filled with 'relief and happiness.'
'I'm glad for her family and for everybody,' he said. 'The outcome was good today, but it's not over yet.'
Bernardo was not the only Vermonter facing a nerve-wracking check-in Monday morning.
Steven Tendo, a pastor and community organizer who fled his native Uganda in 2018, entered the building alongside Bernardo for a similar appointment with ICE officials. He was also released and told to return in 90 days.
Tendo, 40, has said that he faced political persecution and torture in Uganda after a charitable organization he founded tangled with the Ugandan government over its civic education efforts,
In 2019, a federal immigration judge denied Tendo's application for asylum, citing inconsistencies around aspects of his story. After spending more than two years in a federal immigration detention center in Texas, he relocated to Vermont, where he lives in Colchester. He now works as a licensed nursing assistant at the University of Vermont Medical Center in Burlington.
Advertisement
Members of a union that represents him and other hospital workers, Support Staff United, were among the protesters who joined Monday's rally for Tendo and Bernardo.
'It's a huge relief to know that you've left your bed not thinking that you're going to go back,' Tendo said after leaving his appointment. 'And all of the sudden someone tells you, 'Oh, you're OK for the next three months. Come back in October.''
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
9 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Trump's Battle With Sanctuary Cities Dealt Major Blow
Donald Trump has been dealt a significant setback in his ongoing battle over sanctuary cities, after a U.S. federal judge threw out the Administration's lawsuit which looked to block legislation in Illinois that limits local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration authorities. The Trump Administration argued that existing so-called 'sanctuary laws' in the state run counter to federal laws because they restrict local officials from sharing information with federal agents, stopping immigration officials from identifying people who 'may be subject to removal.' But those concerns were dismissed by Judge Lindsay C. Jenkins, who said finding sanctuary policies as 'impermissible regulation'would run counter to the Tenth Amendment. 'It would allow the federal government to commandeer States under the guise of intergovernmental immunity—the exact type of direct regulation of states barred by the Tenth Amendment,' said the judge. Jenkins, who was appointed by former President Joe Biden, added: 'Because the Tenth Amendment protects defendants' sanctuary policies, those policies cannot be found to discriminate against or regulate the federal government.' Trump's war with sanctuary cities began on day one in office, with an Executive Order, titled 'Protecting the American People Against Invasion.' In the Executive Order, Trump argues that sanctuary jurisdictions 'seek to interfere with the lawful exercise of Federal law enforcement operations,' and calls on the Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security to withhold federal funding from these cities. In April, Trump then signed an Executive Order asking Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) identify cities and states that don't sufficiently comply with Trump's federal immigration laws within a month. It is a continuation of Trump's first term, during which he also signed an Executive Order that looked to ensure sanctuary jurisdictions did not receive federal funding. At the time, though, multiple cities sued Trump, and the courts subsequently upheld the legality of such provisions. Read More: What Are Sanctuary Cities and Why Is Trump Targeting Them? Though Trump's battle might be lost in Illinois, his Administration continues to fight across the country. The day before the lawsuit in Illinois failed, Thursday, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced new legal action against New York City for its sanctuary laws. Earlier this week, Louisville, Kentucky chose to acquiesce to the administration's immigration policies and cease its designation as a sanctuary city. As human rights organizations argue for the importance of sanctuary and some cities push back against what they view as federal government overreach, the question remains which cities are fighting back against the crackdown. Chicago's and Illinois leadership was very clear in its desire to challenge Trump's immigration policies. Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker celebrated the ruling on X, saying that, 'Illinois just beat the Trump Administration in federal court.' 'This ruling affirms what we have long known: that Chicago's Welcoming City Ordinance is lawful and supports public safety,' Chicago's Mayor Brandon Johnson said in a statement responding to the ruling, saying he was 'pleased' with the decision. 'Chicago cannot be compelled to cooperate with the Trump Administration's reckless and inhumane immigration agenda.' Chicago's status as a sanctuary city is just one iteration of the term—though the long-time Democratic city has been designated as such cities that limit information shared with federal immigration officers. Though there is no specific definition for a sanctuary city, the term refers to jurisdictions with a wide range of laws in place to limit their cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. For Chicago in particular, their 'Welcoming City Ordinance,' argues that 'partnering with [Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE)] would go against our mission to make Chicago the most immigrant friendly city in the country and turn ours into a community of fear for immigrants.' The Trump Administration, though, also has ongoing suits against not just New York City but also Los Angeles, Denver, Rochester, and four cities in New Jersey. Tom Homan, President Trump's 'border czar,' also has laid out the administration's plans to continue combat sanctuary cities. Read More: Sanctuary Cities Are Not New 'Sanctuary cities are sanctuaries for criminals—hard stop,' Homan said. 'And President Trump made a commitment a couple weeks ago that we're going to prioritize sanctuary cities.' Simultaneously, certain cities designated 'sanctuary cities' have been less strong in their pushback against the federal Government. Louisville's Department of Corrections will now notify the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) at least 48 hours before an inmate with an immigration detainer is scheduled to be released from custody. The city's mayor, Craig Greenberg cited 'a terrifying increase in raids by ICE, including mass raids' on cities designated as sanctuary cities—claiming that by taking Louisville off the designated sanctuary city list, he prevents risking ' the safety of our broader immigrant community.' While New York City has remained the country's largest sanctuary city, its status as such and Mayor Eric Adams' desire to push back against the federal government has come into question. Even before the latest lawsuit issued by the Trump government, Adams' Administration had been embroiled in a battle with the New York City Council and court system to allow ICE agents into Rikers Island. Though he has said he will 'without a doubt' keep the city's sanctuary status. Adams has called for changes to the city's sanctuary laws after the Justice Department suit, saying that they 'go too far' in some places. 'I think we need to tweak the current laws to allow us to coordinate with the federal government when it comes down to removing those dangerous people from our streets," Adams told CBS New York. Back in February, Adams' cooperation with the federal government came under questioning after the Justice Department ordered federal prosecutors to drop corruption charges against the Mayor, stating that the case was interfering with the Democratic mayor's ability to follow through with the President's agenda to crack down on illegal immigration. The move pushed Gov. Kathy Hochul to consider removing Adams from office.
Forbes
40 minutes ago
- Forbes
Trump's H‑1B Fix Could Be Improved: Here's What The U.S. Really Needs
There is discussion about cancelling the H1-B visa program or repairing it. President Trump has ... More proposed new changes. The U.S. H-1B visa program, once a gold standard for attracting global talent, is now under severe strain. But Trump's H1-B visa fix is not enough, more than what has been proposed by the Trump administration is needed. America deserves better and it can be done. Historical Background To The U.S. H1-B Program. The Immigration Act formally established the H-1B visa for workers in specialty occupations that require individuals with theoretical or technical expertise, typically in fields such as IT, engineering, mathematics, and medicine. Initially capped at 65,000 visas per year, the program underwent expansion during the 1990s tech boom. In 1998 and again in 2000, Congress temporarily increased the cap—first to 115,000 and then to 195,000—in response to lobbying by the tech industry. Unfortunately, these elevated caps were allowed to expire, returning to 65,000 plus 20,000 for U.S. master's degree holders by 2004. Over the past two decades, reforms have aimed at curbing abuse, ensuring fair wages, and increasing scrutiny of outsourcing firms. The American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act (2000) introduced portability of H‑1B status and eased green card processing backlogs. Under the first Trump administration, the 2017 'Buy American, Hire American' executive order led to stricter adjudications, a surge in Request for Evidence (RFEs), and a rescission of deference to prior approvals. In 2020, the Department of Homeland Security and Department of Labor introduced wage-based prioritization and significantly raised prevailing wage levels (though these were partially struck down in court). Most recently, the Biden administration proposed modernizing the program to enhance integrity and transparency, while also reaffirming the role of workers in allowing U.S. employers to hire foreign workers temporarily to improve U.S. competitiveness. The program remains the workhorse of the U.S. immigration system. Central to debates on importing skilled immigration, is balancing the economic importance of H-1B demand with concerns over labour market fairness for American workers. However, the H1-B program has largely devolved into a lottery-dependent system that often rewards luck over merit and has become susceptible to manipulation by outsourcing firms. President Donald Trump takes a question from a member of the media. He is in the midst of changing ... More the H1-B work visa program. (Photo by) Fixing The H1B Visa Program President Trump's Way Now, President Trump's 2025 proposal aims to overhaul the system by replacing the random draw with a wage-weighted selection process. The goal is to transform H-1B into an elite pathway for high-wage, high-skill professionals, especially in fields such as STEM, technology, and healthcare. Under this plan, foreign workers would only be admitted to supplement—not displace—the U.S. workforce, addressing concerns about wage suppression and job loss. While aligned with Trump's broader merit-based immigration vision, critics warn that this approach may marginalize lower-wage applicants and disadvantage smaller firms and startups. But is this a real fix? Or could something more creative be considered? What Other Countries Are Doing Several countries have developed or reformed H-1B-style immigration programs to attract high-skilled foreign talent, particularly in STEM fields, amid global competition for innovation and workforce growth. The United Kingdom has introduced the Skilled Worker visa and a Global Talent visa, prioritizing applicants with job offers in shortage occupations or exceptional achievement in fields like AI and engineering. Australia's Temporary Skill Shortage (TSS) visa functions similarly, with a focus on employer sponsorship and labor market testing. Germany's Blue Card system, aligned with the EU framework, facilitates residency for highly qualified workers meeting salary thresholds and educational criteria. Even Japan and South Korea, historically cautious about immigration, are loosening requirements for skilled professionals, while Singapore recently launched the Overseas Networks And Expertise Pass to lure top executives, entrepreneurs, and researchers. Across the board, these nations are balancing economic needs with domestic labour concerns by linking work visas to salary levels, labour shortages, and long-term integration strategies. Ontario Premier Doug Ford is proposing to introduce provincial work permits in Canada. (Steve ... More Russell/Toronto Star via Getty Image) The Canadian Approach to Work Permits: An Example Canada's foreign worker visa system operates primarily through two complementary streams: the Temporary Foreign Worker Program (TFWP) and the International Mobility Program (IMP). The TFWP enables Canadian employers to hire foreign nationals to address labour shortages, to demonstrate the need for a foreign worker, and to ensure that no Canadian will be displaced. In contrast, the IMP facilitates work permits without an LMIA for reasons that serve Canada's broader economic, cultural, or diplomatic interests, such as intra-company transfers, post-graduate work permits, or reciprocal agreements like USMCA (formerly NAFTA). Both streams can lead to permanent residency through pathways like the Express Entry system or Provincial Nominee Programs. Canada prioritizes worker rights by mandating employer compliance with wage standards, working conditions, and access to provincial employment protections, while also offering open work permits in certain humanitarian and spousal sponsorship cases. Canada also offers streamlined employer-sponsored pathways such as the Global Talent Stream, which provides expedited work permits for tech professionals in as little as two weeks. However, recently, Canadian leaders have proposed taking even a more pragmatic approach. Under Section 95 of its Constitution, provinces like Ontario are utilizing their authority to address local labour shortages directly. In 2024, Premier Doug Ford announced a plan for Ontario to issue 100,000 work permits over ten years, targeting high-demand sectors such as healthcare. Canada's Provincial Nominee Program, which already accounts for over 40% of economic immigrants, bypasses lotteries and instead uses a transparent, merit-based points system considering education, age, experience, and language ability. Express Entry, the digital intake portal, allows provinces and employers to select candidates swiftly. Crucially, spouses and dependents receive immediate work permits, supporting household stability and integration. U.S. Constitutional Impediments to H1B Visa Reform? The U.S. should take note. Though immigration is a federal domain under the Constitution, Congress has historically delegated immigration authority in specific contexts, including special visa rules for Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands. There's a clear legal pathway to authorize states to sponsor skilled foreign workers under a federally approved framework. A pilot State-Based Visa Program could allow states like California, Texas, or Florida to recruit for sector-specific shortages using real-time labour data. State departments of labour, working with vetted employers, could certify needs and issue permits valid within their jurisdictions, avoiding the randomness and inflexibility of the current H-1B system. Why It Matters Now President Trump's H1-B visa fix could be improved with something smarter, faster, and fairer. The H-1B program's economic impact is undeniable: skilled immigrants contribute billions to the U.S. economy and are disproportionately represented in AI, STEM, and tech leadership. Tech giants like Google, Microsoft, and Apple were built in part on H-1B talent. But with every failed reform effort, America risks losing its competitive edge. Meanwhile, countries such as Canada, Australia, and the U.K. are establishing streamlined pathways for skilled workers. It's time to fix that.
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Trump slams Europe over immigration, says ‘horrible invasion' is killing the continent
President Donald Trump arrived in Scotland on Friday and wasted little time lashing out at European leaders over mass immigration, warning that the crisis is "killing" the continent and calling it a "horrible invasion." Trump fulfilled a key campaign promise by effectively closing the southern border with Mexico while Europe and the U.K., in particular, are still struggling to get to grips with the crisis as dozens of boats packed with illegal migrants continue to pour into the country every day from France. "On immigration, you better get your act together or you're not going to have Europe anymore," Trump said to reporters after landing at Prestwick airport on Friday evening. "You got to get your act together and last month we had nobody entering our country. Nobody. Shut it down. And we took out a lot of bad people that got there with Biden." Biden repeatedly had single days when apprehensions ranged from 8,000 to 10,000 migrants, with his highest single month being December 2023, when 249,785 Border Patrol apprehensions were recorded. "Biden was a total stiff. And what he allowed to happen," Trump continued, chiding his predecessor. "But you're allowing it to happen to your countries and you got to stop this horrible invasion that's happening to Europe." "Many countries in Europe, some people, some leaders have not let it happen. And they're not getting the proper credit. They should. I could name them to you right now, but I'm not going to embarrass the other ones. But stop this. Immigration is killing Europe." The U.K. saw a major surge in 2022 and 2023 when small boat crossings reached over 44,000 per year, according to government figures. Nearly 22,500 people have arrived in the U.K. so far this year after crossing the English Channel, up 57% on the same point last year. Net migration to the UK was 431,000 last year, down almost 50% from 2023. Hungary and Poland are two of the most prominent European countries to take hardline stances against immigration, particularly irregular migration and asylum seekers. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán is a Trump ally. Trump is in the U.K. for a five-day trip where he will check in with his golf resorts in Turnberry and Aberdeen, as well as with British Prime Minister Kier Starmer and head of the Scottish government, First Minister John Swinney. The president is expected to discuss the latest U.S.-U.K. trade agreement, a deal dubbed the "Economic Prosperity Deal" last month, which agreed to slash tariffs. The U.K. is one of the few countries with which the U.S. has advanced its trade agreements under relatively amicable terms. "I like your prime minister. He's slightly more liberal than I am, as you've probably heard. But he's a good man, he got a trade deal done," Trump told reporters. "And they've been working on this deal for 12 years. He got it done. It's a good deal. It's a good deal for the U.K." Trump added that he would be meeting Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission about securing a trade deal with Europe. "We're meeting with the European Union. And that would be actually the biggest deal of them all if we make it," Trump said.
