
Judge dismisses some charges against blogger known as ‘Turtleboy'
Doolin also dismissed charges that Kearney had a police dispatcher run the plates of a Read witness when her vehicle was parked outside Proctor's home.
Advertisement
Kearney still faces more than a dozen counts related to his alleged harassment of witnesses in the Read case. A trial date hasn't been set.
Read, 45, is
Her lawyers contend that she was framed and that O'Keefe entered the house, owned at the time by a fellow Boston police officer, where he was fatally beaten and possibly mauled by a German Shepherd before his body was planted on the front lawn.
Outside the confines of the trial, no one has done more to advance that theory in the public arena than Kearney, who has built a large following and helped draw national attention to the case.
Advertisement
Some of the charges that remain pending against Kearney stem from a 'Rolling Road Rally' he held with dozens of supporters in July 2023, Doolin wrote.
The group went from house to house of several witnesses in the Read case that day, with Kearney allegedly using a bullhorn to accuse them of involvement in O'Keefe's murder.
Because four of the alleged victims were home when the raucous procession stopped outside, and 'therefore subject to Kearney's conduct and speech, the court concludes that the grand jury heard sufficient evidence' to indict him on charges of unlawful picketing to influence a witness in those instances, Doolin wrote.
But since Proctor wasn't home when the rally stopped outside his residence, Doolin said, 'the court concludes that the grand jury did not hear sufficient evidence to indict Kearney as pertaining to him.'
Doolin also tossed witness intimidation counts related to Bukhenik and Proctor, the latter of which prosecutors brought after Kearney, in one of his web videos, called Proctor's work phone, repeated the number on air, and left an 'ominous voicemail,' according to the ruling.
Proctor was later inundated with messages and calls, forcing him to change his number, records show.
The accusation that Kearney intimidated Bukhenik was brought after he allegedly 'hurled insults and epithets' at the trooper as he entered Norfolk Superior Court in September 2023, according to Doolin.
'While Kearney's conduct of sharing Proctor's phone number and the content of his voicemail messages are distasteful, and his statements to Bukhenik are insulting, it is not clear that his conduct in either regard was intended to impede, obstruct, delay, prevent, or interfere with the Read case,' Doolin wrote.
Advertisement
He also dismissed three conspiracy counts related to the September 2023 plate-running incident, when Kearney allegedly asked an Avon police dispatcher to run the plates of witness Jennifer McCabe's vehicle when it was parked outside Proctor's home, as well as vehicles belonging to Proctor and his wife. Doolin wrote that Proctor was working at the time and McCabe had gone to the residence to see his spouse.
Doolin said prosecutors 'did not present sufficient evidence to support the notion that Kearney requested [the dispatcher] run the license plates for the purpose of intimidating' McCabe and the Proctors.
A trial date hasn't been set for the intimidation counts that remain pending against Kearney.
'In reading the ruling in my motion to dismiss (in which 6 charges were dropped against me), Judge Doolin refers to Michael Proctor as the 'lead investigator in the Read case,'' Kearney said Wednesday via X. '[Bukhenik] spent 3 days [on the stand in Read's trial] refusing to admit this.'
In reading the ruling in my motion to dismiss (in which 6 charges were dropped against me), Judge Doolin refers to Michael Proctor as the "lead investigator in the Read case." Bukkake spent 3 days refusing to admit this.
— Aidan Kearney (@DoctorTurtleboy)
Travis Andersen can be reached at

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Wesley Chapel family says dog survived alligator attack in their backyard
TAMPA, Fla. (WFLA) — A family in Wesley Chapel is traumatized after their rescue dog was attacked by an alligator in their backyard. A video shows Zeus, a German Shepherd, standing on a leash with a gator lurking just beyond the fence, a chilling moment the family now views as a warning. 'We have a doggy door, and Zeus will go in and out of it whenever he wants,' said Susan Alkhatib. 'We have it covered right now because of what happened.' 4 dolphins from Florida park involved in criminal investigation moved to Clearwater Marine Aquarium Earlier this week, Zeus stepped outside like any other night, only this time, an alligator was waiting. 'All of a sudden, I couldn't hear him anymore,' one family member recalled. 'My dad came in frantic. I'd never seen him like that. He said, 'The alligator just took Zeus.'' Alkhatib and her family ran outside with flashlights and caught a glimpse of Zeus struggling in the pond with the gator still latched onto him. 'The alligator had just let go of Zeus,' Alkhatib said. 'We started yelling at him to come toward us. When he got closer, he got tired. So we had to kind of go into the pond a little bit to get him.' While News Channel 8 was interviewing the family, a gator emerged from the water again before slipping back in. 'I have a 7-year-old sister,' said one family member. 'And I just think, if she was at the fence, would he have done the same thing to her?' Zeus miraculously survived the attack. He suffered a fractured and displaced jaw, along with multiple puncture wounds around his neck. 'The vet said it looked like his whole head was in the gator's mouth,' said Alkhatib. 'Even he said, 'I don't know how he survived.'' 'I honestly can't believe he is alive,' Alkhatib said. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has sent out trappers, but so far, they have not been able to capture the gator. Zeus is now recovering from several surgeries. The family has started a GoFundMe to help pay for his veterinary bills. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Boston Globe
3 days ago
- Boston Globe
Testimony resumes after off day in Karen Read retrial. Follow live updates.
Testimony resumes Friday — 8:33 a.m. .cls-1{clip-path:url(#clippath);}.cls-2,.cls-3{fill:none;}.cls-2,.cls-3,.cls-4{stroke-width:0px;}.cls-5{clip-path:url(#clippath-1);}.cls-3{clip-rule:evenodd;} Link copied By Travis Andersen, Globe Staff Testimony resumes Friday in Karen Read's sensational murder retrial in Norfolk Superior Court. Read, 45, has pleaded not guilty to second degree murder and two other counts for allegedly backing her SUV in a drunken rage into her boyfriend, Boston police Officer John O'Keefe, early on Jan. 29, 2022, after dropping him off outside a Fairview Road home in Canton following a night of bar hopping. Advertisement Her lawyers say she was framed and that O'Keefe entered the home, owned at the time by a fellow Boston cop, where he was fatally beaten and possibly mauled by a German Shepherd before his body was planted on the lawn. Read's first trial ended in a hung jury in July and she remains free on bail. The defense is currently presenting its case, and among their witnesses who've yet to testify are analysts from the Philadelphia crash reconstruction firm ARCCA, who said in the first trial that O'Keefe's injuries weren't consistent with a vehicle strike. A government expert testified at the retrial that his arm wounds were consistent with getting momentarily caught in a taillight during a sideswipe. Advertisement


Boston Globe
4 days ago
- Boston Globe
What to know about Chloe, the dog at the center of the Karen Read trial this week
Read's lawyers say she was framed and that O'Keefe entered the home, owned at the time by a fellow Boston police officer, where they say he was fatally beaten and possibly attacked by the family's dog, a German Shepherd then named Chloe. Advertisement The defense theory about the dog arose from a piece of evidence in the case: a series of marks on O'Keefe's arm. Read's attorneys argued during the first trial the marks came from dog bites and scratches. Prosecutors, meanwhile, called on witnesses who said the marks were caused by the car that allegedly hit O'Keefe. That trial ended last year with a hung jury. A photograph of John O'Keefe's right arm is shown during the murder retrial of Karen Read in Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham on June 2. Pat Greenhouse/Globe Staff This week, the seventh week of Read's second trial, jurors again heard the dog attack theory. The defense called a retired emergency room physician in California who said she has treated numerous animal bites and was 'certain' the abrasions on O'Keefe's arm were from a dog attack. During cross examination, the prosecution questioned the physician's expertise with dog bites and also called an expert witness who disagreed with the physician's assessment. Advertisement Here's what we know about the dog, now named Cora. Where did Chloe live at the time of O'Keefe's death? Chloe is a 70-pound German Shepherd mix that, at the time of O'Keefe's death, was owned by Brian and Nicole Albert, who lived at 34 Fairview Road in Canton, where Read dropped O'Keefe off after midnight on Jan. 29, 2022. The dog has since been rehomed to Vermont and is now named Cora, according to witness testimony. During the first Read trial, the dog. Albert said that Chloe 'was fine with strangers' but had attacked other dogs in the past. In April, What have expert witnesses said about the scratches on O'Keefe's arm? The defense has relied heavily on the testimony of a veteran emergency room physician from Los Angeles, Dr. Marie Russell, who has testified in both trials that Russell said during the first trial that the abrasions appeared to come from dog bites, but prosecutors have said her testimony 'cannot be reliably applied to the facts' and questioned her Advertisement Judge Beverly J. Cannone ultimately Dr. Judson Welcher, an accident reconstruction expert, speaks on the witness stand during the Karen Read retrial at Norfolk Superior Court, Wednesday, May 28, 2025, in Dedham. Greg Derr/Associated Press But expert witnesses brought in by the prosecution have disagreed with that conclusion. Last week, During Welcher's testimony, Read attorney Robert Alessi him if O'Keefe's right arm would show 'vertical injuries' if the arm was 'flexed' in the manner it was in Welcher's test. 'Absolutely not,' Welcher said, adding that a 6,000-pound vehicle 'pushes me out of the way' to 'drag and create a horizontal laceration' across the arm. 'It's going to sweep across the arm, which is what causes the horizontal laceration,' Welcher said. O'Keefe was also allegedly carrying a cocktail glass when he left the bar en route to the afterparty, and a broken glass was found at the scene, according to testimony. Another prosecution expert, Dr. James Crosby, a retired Florida police officer who runs Canine Aggression Consulting LLC, is on the witness list but had not been called to the stand as of Wednesday. Prosecutors have said Crosby took measurements of Chloe's teeth to rule out a canine attack and would tell jurors that he believes the wounds came from a sharp or 'semi-sharp' object, but not a dog bite. Advertisement The defense Judge Beverly Cannone ruled in April that Crosby could not testify that his analysis excludes Chloe as the source of O'Keefe's wounds, but he 'is not precluded from testifying as to the anatomy of a canine mouth or of Chloe in particular including the measurements of her mouth.' Was any dog DNA detected on O'Keefe? Prosecutors have said some of O'Keefe's clothes were swabbed for DNA, including holes in the arm of his sweatshirt where the wounds appeared, and canine DNA was not detected. During the first trial, California veterinary forensic specialist Teri Kun testified that prosecutors sent her lab swabs taken from O'Keefe's shirt to test for possible dog DNA. She said results were negative for 'canine DNA,' though 'for both the swabs we did see pig,' which she indicated could have come from food such as cooked pork or bacon. Kun has not been called an expert to testify in the second trial, but during Tuesday's session special prosecutor Hank Brennan raised the DNA issue when he was questioning Russell, the physician from California. Brennan's questioning led Read's attorneys to Cannone denied the motion. Advertisement Nick Stoico can be reached at