Pentagon seeks drone-killing technology that's safe for civilians
DIU Director Doug Beck told House lawmakers Thursday his organization is particularly interested in technologies that can take out drone threats in highly populated areas without major impacts on the environment and, critically, civilians.
'It's really about those low-collateral interceptors and getting after those solutions — whether it's through electronic means, kinetic or ballistic means or other forms of bringing those drones down,' Beck told the House Armed Services Tactical Air and Land Forces subcommittee in a hearing.
Replicator's goal is to create a new pathway for the Pentagon to buy and scale high-need capabilities on faster timelines. Replicator 1, which is ongoing, set out to deliver thousands of low-cost drones by August of this year. Last September, then-Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin announced that the next phase of the effort, dubbed Replicator 2, would center on the small UAS challenge.
DIU is leading Replicator 2 and is partnered closely with the Army-led Joint Counter-Uncrewed Aerial Systems Office, JCO, and the Counter Uncrewed Systems Warfighter Senior Integration Group.
Speaking last week at the Apex Conference, DIU's chief of Policy Sunmin Kim said that along with its emphasis on low-collateral defeat systems, Replicator 2 is also focused on identifying more affordable systems that are available either commercially or from traditional defense contractors with mature technology.
'We're interested in low-cost sensing options, so things like passive [radio frequency] radars versus actually using active sensors that we typically do for aircraft,' she said.
Defending against adversarial drones is a significant challenge for the U.S. military and its allies — from attacks in the Red Sea to reports of drone swarms flying over domestic bases.
The Pentagon has launched a number of efforts and organizations over the last few years to address these threats, including the JCO and the Counter Uncrewed Systems Warfighter Senior Integration Group. Last year, the department designated the commanders of U.S. Northern Command and Indo-Pacific Command as 'lead synchronizers' for counter-UAS operations. And in December, DOD completed a classified counter-UAS strategy meant to provide a 'singular' focus on the most urgent challenges.
Military leaders said Thursday that while the Defense Department is making progress identifying technical solutions and working through complex policies and authorizations, it's not moving fast enough.
'We're happy, but we're not satisfied,' Lt. Gen. Eric Austin, deputy commandant of the Marine Corps for capabilities, development and integration, said during the hearing. 'We're fielding equipment that has the ability and the built-in open architecture to adapt and improve from a software and a hardware perspective, but we've got a ways to go to keep up with the threat and exceed that threat.'
Austin highlighted the Marine Air Defense System, or MADIS, which can integrate with the service's command and control systems and detect and take down small uncrewed aircraft. The Marine Corps also plans to field a prototype this fiscal year of a counter-UAS capability specifically designed to protect dismounted Marines.
'This initiative will put man-portable solutions into Marines' hands at the tactical edge,' Austin said. 'We are feverishly working in belief this will be a model for fielding and iterative improvement.'
Maj. Gen. David Stewart, director of the JCO, and Beck both noted that while DOD has made strides toward identifying and developing counter-UAS technologies, it isn't buying and fielding those systems in sufficient quantities.
'I believe and assess the capability is there,' Stewart said. 'We have a bit of a capacity problem across each of the services.'
Beck noted that for the services to fill those capacity gaps, they need more resources, authorities and funding flexibility from Congress.
'We need to be doing much, much more,' he said. 'We must put capability in place now. We must dramatically improve our capacity and speed to update unmanned and counter-unmanned technologies. We must build the muscle to do so at greater and greater scale.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Congress Moves To Save Gutted F/A-XX 6th Generation Naval Fighter Program
The Senate Appropriations Committee has advanced a draft defense spending bill that would reverse the Pentagon's plan to freeze the U.S. Navy's F/A-XX next-generation carrier-based combat jet program. In addition, the legislation includes funding for the U.S. Air Force to continue with the acquisition of E-7 Wedgetail airborne early warning and control aircraft, something the Department of Defense also wants to axe. The version of the 2026 Fiscal Year Defense Appropriations Bill that the Senate Appropriations Committee approved today includes $1.4 billion for F/A-XX and $647 million for E-7. The $1.4 billion figure aligns directly with a call for additional F/A-XX funding that the Navy had reportedly included in its annual Unfunded Priority List (UPL) sent to Congress earlier this month. The UPLs, which all branches of the U.S. armed forces and certain other commands are required to submit each year by law, are intended to outline key funding requests that could not be included in the annual proposed defense budget. However, the current circumstances surrounding F/A-XX are somewhat unusual in that the Navy appears to be in direct conflict with top Pentagon leadership over the fate of the program. The proposed budget for the 2026 Fiscal Year that the Pentagon rolled out in June includes just enough funding to complete initial development work, but not actually procure any of the jets. U.S. military officials have said that this decision was made to avoid competition for resources with the U.S. Air Force's F-47 sixth-generation fighter program amid concerns that the industrial base in the United States cannot handle work on both efforts simultaneously. Since then, in addition to the UPL submission, Navy officials have been outspoken about how important they view the F/A-XX as part of their service's future carrier aviation plans. 'Nothing in the Joint Force projects combat power from the sea as a Carrier Strike Group, which at the heart has a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier (CVN). To maintain this striking power, the CVN must have an air wing that is comprised of the most advanced strike fighters,' Adm. Daryl Caudle, the current nominee to become the next Chief of Naval Operations, wrote in response to a question about F/A-XX ahead of his confirmation hearing last week. 'Therefore, the ability to maintain air superiority against peer competitors will be put at risk if the Navy is unable to field a 6th Generation strike fighter on a relevant timeline. Without a replacement for the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and E/A-18G Growler, the Navy will be forced to retrofit 4th generation aircraft and increase procurement of 5th generation aircraft to attempt to compete with the new 6th generation aircraft that the threat is already flying.' 'The Navy has a validated requirement for carrier-based 6th generation aircraft, and it is critical that we field that capability as quickly as possible to give our warfighters the capabilities they need to win against a myriad of emerging threats,' he added. Even before the Pentagon's budget rollout, there had been growing signs that the F/A-XX program was at best in limbo, in part due to industrial base concerns. Boeing, the prime contractor for the F-47 and a contender for the F/A-XX contract, notably pushed back on that assertion back in June. Northrop Grumman is understood to be the other company in the running for F/A-XX after Lockheed Martin was reportedly eliminated in March. Lockheed Martin is now aggressively pitching a heavily reworked version of the F-35 as the 'Bridging Fighter' at least for the Air Force ahead of the F-47's arrival. A fight has also already been brewing over the E-7 program, but primarily between the Pentagon and Congress, at least in public. Since 2023, the Air Force's plan had been to replace a portion of its aging E-3 Sentry Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) aircraft with Wedgetails. This was also intended to serve as a bridge toward larger ambitions to eventually push a significant part of that mission set to distributed satellite constellations in space. Confirmation of the decision to axe E-7 purchases and acquire additional E-2D Hawkeye airborne early warning and control aircraft, currently flown by the U.S. Navy, to fill the resulting gap first emerged at a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing in June. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, an Alaska Republican, pushed back hard on that idea at the time. 'I have been concerned. We have E-3 capability up north, of course, but we were all counting on the E-7 Wedgetail coming our way. We're kind of limping along up north right now, which is unfortunate. And the budget proposes terminating the program,' she said. 'Again, the E-3 fleet [is] barely operational now, and I understand the intent to shift towards the space-based – you call it the 'air moving target indicators' – but my concern is that you've got a situation where you're not going to be able to use more duct tape to hold things together until you put this system in place. And, so, how we maintain that level of operational readiness and coverage, I'm not sure how you make it.' 'I would file this entire discussion under difficult choices that we have to make,' Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said during an ensuing exchange with Murkowski. 'But you know, the E-7, in particular, is sort of late, more expensive and 'gold plated,' and so filling the gap, and then shifting to space-based ISR [intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance] is a portion of how we think we can do it best, considering all the challenges.' Hegseth had also previously highlighted the E-7 as an example of a capability that is 'not survivable in the modern battlefield' and had said that it would be better 'to fund existing platforms that are there more robustly and make sure they're modernized.' Since it formally kicked off two years ago, the Air Force's Wedgetail program had already been beset by notable delays and cost growth, issues the Pentagon has also said were major factors in the cancellation decision. Other advocates of the E-7 program, including a significant number of retired senior Air Force officials, have since stepped forward. Earlier this month, 19 retired Air Force generals, including six former Air Force chiefs of staff, signed onto an open letter from the Air & Space Forces Association to Congress 'to express our alarm' at the Wedgetail plan. On July 11, the House Armed Services Committee released a draft of the separate annual defense policy bill, or National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), for the 2026 Fiscal Year, which also included $600 million for the 'continuation of rapid prototyping' of the E-7. At that time, the proposed legislation made no changes regarding the F/A-XX plans, but members of the committee subsequently directed the Air Force and the Navy to provide more details on their respective next-generation fighter plans. A separate draft defense spending bill put forward by the House Appropriations Committee also included $972 million for continued work on F/A-XX. The House and Senate will eventually have to align their respective draft NDAAs and defense appropriation bills before a final vote on either can occur. Funding plans for F/A-XX and E-7 could change again in the course of that process. President Donald Trump will also still need to sign the bills into law. If nothing else, the Senate Appropriations Committee has now given F/A-XX an important vote of support in the face of the Pentagon's plans to gut the program. It has also joined the growing chorus of calls to push ahead with the Air Force's E-7 effort. Contact the author: joe@ Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Army Reserve Is Gutting Aviation Units. Thousands of Soldiers Are Being Left in the Lurch.
Thousands of Army Reserve soldiers are being forced to scramble for new assignments after the service abruptly ordered the dismantling of its helicopter units, a sweeping move that has caught commanders off guard and upended aviation operations across the country. The cuts, which are set to eliminate all of the reserve's helicopter units by the end of the summer, are part of Army Chief of Staff Gen. Randy George's broader push to modernize the force by shedding legacy formations and redirecting resources toward emerging technologies such as drones and artificial intelligence. But the transition has left troops questioning both the pace and planning of the changes. spoke with 16 Army Reserve aviators, including commanders and senior noncommissioned officers, who expressed frustration with what they described as a chaotic and poorly communicated rollout. All requested anonymity, citing concerns about retaliation, as they were not authorized to speak publicly. Read Next: Air Force Rebrands Facebook Page to Combat Rumors, Leaked Memos and Reddit Threads "There was no heads-up, no briefing," said one senior noncommissioned officer. "Just an email saying aviation's going away and we need to find somewhere else to go." News began trickling out within the aviation community's inner circle in February when Brig. Gen. Roger Deon, the head of Army Reserve Aviation Command, began meeting with commanders to give them a warning that the Pentagon had its sights on Army Reserve aviation for cuts, multiple senior officers with direct knowledge described. The plan to cut all of the component's aviation didn't materialize until May, and that information took longer to reach the rank and file. "That's whirlwind-fast for government work," one aviator noted, expressing frustrations with the rapid closure of units. Some reserve aviation units are now working to find alternative roles for their pilots and full-time personnel, including potential placements with federal agencies such as U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Opportunities within the National Guard or the active-duty Army are limited and often require relocation, adding another layer of complexity for service members and their families. For junior enlisted soldiers and part-time reservists in support roles such as mechanics, crew chiefs and administrative staff, the road ahead is even more complicated. Transferring into a new unit or occupational specialty can take months of retraining, a process that can be especially burdensome for reservists balancing military obligations with full-time civilian jobs or college coursework. "There was no time to plan," one senior reserve aviator told "This was all put on us to just figure out; there's been no support on this." It's unclear how many soldiers will be affected. Maj. William Allred, an Army Reserve spokesperson, declined to say, noting operational security. However, the number of soldiers in formations is routinely publicized information. "While the soldiers in the Army Reserve Aviation Command will be impacted by the cuts, they will have the opportunity to continue their military service in other units where their skills can be utilized," Allred said in a statement to Army Reserve aviation as a whole includes about 4,600 soldiers, including some fixed-wing aircraft formations, though helicopter units make up the lion's share of the force, with units in California, Washington state, Texas, Kansas, Colorado, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, New Jersey and Kentucky. Changing components isn't easy. Parts of National Guard service may also be less attractive to reservists, some of those soldiers explained. The reserve often compensates troops for travel and hotels during their weekend duty obligations, a perk that is absent in the National Guard -- much to the chagrin of reservists who have been interviewed and are looking to switch components. And Guard service often carries heavier demands. The component is routinely tapped for both overseas deployments and domestic missions, including disaster relief, border security and civil unrest response, duties that can sometimes be a greater burden on part-time soldiers compared to their reserve counterparts. Acquiring federal benefits is also more complicated. The Army Reserve has not yet developed a comprehensive plan for soldiers to exit their contracts, but if they join the National Guard, they may also be required to repay generous enlistment bonuses of up to $20,000. The Army Reserve declined to comment on questions related to bonuses. "We were told if we received a bonus, we'd have to pay it back," one enlisted soldier said. Unlike their active-duty counterparts, reservists can't easily pivot to new units, particularly in large states or places with significant geographical gaps between units. Many people balance civilian jobs and family obligations, making relocation nearly impossible. Others have highly specialized skills -- such as air medical -- that are now disappearing. Some units are scrambling to land spots in the National Guard, with upcoming weekend drills hosting recruiters, but that option comes with limited slots and often requires troops to sign new multi-year contracts. "It's mostly been on our own accord, [to] find a new home, to figure it out," another soldier noted. Meanwhile, lawmakers in both parties are growing increasingly frustrated with the Army's disjointed rollout of major force structure changes, criticizing what they see as a lack of transparency and strategic coherence. While there's broad agreement on Capitol Hill that the service needs to modernize and move beyond a doctrinal framework that's remained largely unchanged for decades, many say the Army has failed to articulate its plans clearly. Several Capitol Hill aides expressed concerns to that there is a perception reforms are being implemented in an ad hoc and overly hasty manner, leaving Congress in the dark. One of the units on the chopping block is the 1st Assault Helicopter Battalion, 158th Aviation Regiment, a Texas-based formation with a record of responding to domestic emergencies, including relief efforts following Hurricane Harvey in 2017. "You've come into my house, where I was born and raised, in this county, and you're taking something away from me, and I want to know why," Rep. Morgan Luttrell, R-Texas, told George and Army Secretary Dan Driscoll during a budget hearing last month. Related: Decades of Troubles for Air Force Maintainers Set to Get Worse with Job Consolidation Solve the daily Crossword
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Quest on why he thinks Trump's tariff deals will never come to fruition
Hours before a midnight deadline, the White House announced its new trade policy, including its baseline tariffs for all countries. The administration said the 'universal' tariff will remain at 10% — the same level implemented on April 2 — for countries the US has a trade surplus with, which is most of them. Nations with which the US has a trade deficit face a 15% floor. CNN's Richard Quest joins Erin Burnett to discuss and explain why he thinks Trump's tariff deals will never come to fruition.
