logo
Fact-checking Trump's claims on DOGE spending cuts

Fact-checking Trump's claims on DOGE spending cuts

AFP07-03-2025

"Just listen to some of the appalling waste we have already identified," Trump said during his March 4, 2025 address to a joint session of Congress, as he thanked billionaire Elon Musk for his cost-cutting efforts at the administration's new Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE.
Trump rattled off a list of 19 grants, contracts and other expenditures he said Musk's team had identified and terminated, calling them "scams."
"We found hundreds of billions of dollars of fraud," he concluded.
The president's as the DOGE website has touted what it claims are $105 billion in savings (archived here).
US media has reported that the itemized contract, grant and lease cancellations on the site's so-called "Wall of Receipts" fall short of that total and include errors and double-counted entries.
Some of the expenditures Trump highlighted were real -- federal records show the US did direct $1.5 million toward improving voter confidence in Liberia, for example -- but in other cases, it was unclear what Trump was referencing (archived here).
Trump's descriptions of some contracts and programs, meanwhile, were misleading or missing context. And he offered no evidence that any of the expenditures he singled out were fraudulent.
AFP reached out to the White House for clarification on Trump's claims, but no response was forthcoming.
contracts AFP found to be misrepresented:
'$22 billion from HHS to provide free housing and cars for illegal aliens.'
His number echoes a February blog post from the nonprofit Open the Books about the agency's Office of Refugee Resettlement, or ORR (archived here).
The article said: "ORR has spent over $22.6 BILLION since 2020 on grants to nonprofits providing everything from help accessing Medicaid to help building credit, help with home and auto loans and cash assistance."
AFP could not independently verify that total, and Open the Books did not respond to a request for comment.
But the Open the Books report says the program assisting with housing and car purchases -- the Individual Development Accounts program -- is just one of ORR's initiatives. The program was projected to receive $2 million in 2025, a government website shows (archived here).
The program serves refugees and other eligible persons, not "illegal aliens," according to its website (archived here).
Its aim is to help save toward paying for a business, car, home or higher education. In addition to financial literacy training, the program offers a $1 match for every $1 a participant sets aside. Its website does not say it provides free housing or vehicles.
"We are unaware of any federal program that provides free housing or cars to unauthorized immigrants," Michelle Mittelstadt, director of communications for the Migration Policy Institute, told AFP in a March 7 email.
ORR separately operates hundreds of shelters nationwide for unaccompanied migrant children (archived here).
'$8 million for making mice transgender -- this is real.'
Trump's wording was inaccurate.
As evidence for his claim, the White House issued a press release pointing to six studies they said added up to $8 million in spending (archived here).
The experiments involved mice receiving hormone therapies that can be used in gender-affirming health care. But the purpose of the research was not to turn mice transgender, as the president claimed.
The studies were geared toward approximating the impact of such treatments on humans.
One project the White House cited, for example, used mice to study the impact of testosterone therapy on breast cancer risk and treatment (archived here). Another used them to evaluate whether y of HIV vaccination is changed by receipt of estrogen hormone therapy (archived here).
A third sought to understand hormonal triggers of asthma in all humans, including transgender people (archived here).
'$10 million for male circumcision in Mozambique.'
Trump was correct that a four-year contract started in 2023 with a local organization was funding voluntary medical circumcision in Mozambique, but his summary is missing context (archived here).
Public health officials have identified male circumcision as a critical tool in reducing the transmission of HIV and combatting AIDS epidemics (archived here). According to UNAIDS, Mozambique has the world's third highest number of people living with HIV and second highest number of new infections (archived here).
'$20 million for the Arab 'Sesame Street' in the Middle East. It's a program. $20 million for a program.'
Trump appears to have conflated an Arabic version of the iconic children's TV show "Sesame Street" with a broader educational program by the same name that has received funding from the US Agency for International Development, or USAID (archived here).
Sesame Workshop, the nonprofit behind "Sesame Street," funds the Arabic-language television program aired in the Middle East and North Africa through donations from the MacArthur Foundation and the LEGO Foundation, among others (archived here, here and here).
The $20 million USAID put toward partnering with Sesame Workshop, according to an archived agency webpage, was "to produce Ahlan Simsim Iraq, a program designed to promote inclusion, mutual respect, and understanding across ethnic, religious, and sectarian groups."
The webpage says the program produces "culturally tailored and age-appropriate original educational media content for young children."
A Sesame Workshop spokesperson told AFP in a March 6 email: "The USAID-funded 'Ahlan Simsim Iraq' program supports the creation of local content and
The funding went to provide items including "storybooks, activity books, classroom materials and training and facilitators guides for teachers for use in early childhood development centers to improve children's learning," the spokesperson said.
The Arabic-language TV show "is funded through separate philanthropic funding," the spokesperson said.
'$1.9 billion to recently created decarbonization of homes committee, headed up... by a woman named Stacey Abrams.'
Trump's comments about Abrams, a two-time Democratic gubernatorial candidate from Georgia, were misleading.
The voting rights activist served as senior counsel from 2023 until the end of 2024 at Rewiring America, a nonprofit focused on electrification. The organization was part of a five-group coalition called Power Forward Communities that received a $2 billion grant from the Environmental Protection Agency as part of former president Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act (archived here and here).
The chief executive at Power Forward Communities told Politico in February 2025 that Abrams "has no relationship" with the coalition and "has not received a penny of this EPA grant" (archived here).
Abrams responded on CNN to Trump's suggestion of irregularity in the program (archived here).
"I led a project in southwest Georgia that has lowered the cost of energy for struggling families, and I'm extraordinarily proud of that work," Abrams said. "And because of that work, because of the work of five major organizations around this country who have done more than 250 years of service combined, the Biden administration authorized a grant. I did not work for the entity that received the grant, ultimately. I worked for one of the partner organizations."
'A $3.5 million consulting contract for lavish fish monitoring.'
Trump appears to have misspoken.
The DOGE website lists a contract "larval fish monitoring," which can help assess ecosystem health and water quality. The contract was between the Department of the Interior's Bureau of Reclamation and a research company called Asir LLC.
The federal procurement record posted to the DOGE website places the total value of the contract above $6.6 million (archived here). USAspending.gov data for the same contract says $6.6 million was the "potential award amount," however, and that only $1.1 million had already been paid (archived here).
More of AFP's reporting on US politics misinformation is available here.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel strikes Iran: what we know
Israel strikes Iran: what we know

France 24

timean hour ago

  • France 24

Israel strikes Iran: what we know

Iran immediately responded by launching drones against Israel, and called the Israeli attack "a declaration of war". US President Donald Trump -- although saying his country was not involved -- warned Iran there will be more "death and destruction". International calls for restraint are multiplying, as fears grow the Middle East could be on the threshold of a broader conflict. Here is what we know: What was hit? The attacks started in the early hours of Friday -- a day of rest and prayer in Iran. Israel hit a key underground nuclear site in Natanz several times, Iranian state television said, reporting that most damage was at "surface level". Other key nuclear sites at Fordow and Isfahan were not immediately struck, said the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, citing Iranian authorities. Additional strikes were reported against sites in Iran's northwest. The head of Iran's Revolutionary Guards, Hossein Salami, and the chief of staff of its armed forces, Mohammad Bagheri, were killed, with replacements swiftly named by supreme leader Ali Khamenei. The Revolutionary Guards said that its aerospace commander, Amirali Hajizadeh, was also killed. He was in charge of Iran's ballistic missile forces. Iranian media said several nuclear scientists were killed. Iran said 95 people were wounded. State television said senior Khamenei adviser Ali Shamkhani was hurt in one of the strikes. The Israeli raids will "continue as many days as it takes", Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said. Iran's response? Iran launched some 100 drones in retaliation, according to the Israeli military, which said "most" were intercepted outside Israeli territory. The bigger concern is Iran's sizeable arsenal of ballistic missiles. Khamenei warned Israel faces a "bitter and painful" fate over the attacks. Iran's foreign minister called the Israeli attacks "a declaration of war" and urged UN Security Council action. Iran had previously warned it would hit US military bases in the Middle East if conflict occurred. The United States pulled out non-essential personnel from several sites days ahead of the Israeli attack. Internet restrictions were imposed across Iran, the country's communications ministry said, adding they would be lifted "once normalcy returns". US involvement? Trump said Israel warned him of its raids ahead of time, but insisted the United States was not involved. He warned Iran that the "next planned attacks" will be "even more brutal" and said Tehran should cut a deal to roll back its nuclear programme "before there is nothing left". The US leader has repeatedly said he will not allow Iran to develop nuclear weapons. Tehran has long denied seeking atomic bombs, but had been enriching uranium to a level very close to be able to make them. The United States and Iran had been holding talks on the issue. The next round, scheduled for Sunday in Oman, now looked to be cancelled. Israel, Trump said, has a huge military arsenal thanks to the United States and "they know how to use it". Trump's secretary of state, Marco Rubio, said the United States would protect its forces in the Middle East. "Let me be clear: Iran should not target US interests or personnel," Rubio said. Reactions The attack, and likely Iranian response, is fuelling international alarm. Many capitals were urging restraint, fearing the consequences if the Israel-Iran conflict widened and drew in the United States, and if Middle East oil production and shipments were impacted. Oil prices leapt dramatically on Friday, trading sharply up to around $75 a barrel. The leaders of France, Germany and Britain were to hold a call to discuss the Israeli strikes, Berlin said. Several airlines cancelled flights servicing the region, including Emirates, Qatar Airways, Air France and Lufthansa. Syria closed its airspace. In Tehran, lines of motorists formed at service stations for fuel, residents stocked up on supplies, and protests were held against the Israeli airstrikes. © 2025 AFP

'Unacceptable': Iranians seethe after Israeli onslaught
'Unacceptable': Iranians seethe after Israeli onslaught

France 24

time2 hours ago

  • France 24

'Unacceptable': Iranians seethe after Israeli onslaught

The aerial onslaught killed several of the military's top brass, targeted an array of leading scientists and struck military and nuclear sites across Iran in an unprecedented attack that left many seething with anger. "How much longer are we going to live in fear?" asked Ahmad Moadi, a 62-year-old retiree. "As an Iranian, I believe there must be an overwhelming response, a scathing response." The raids appeared to push the longtime enemies into full-blown conflict following years of fighting a shadow war mostly conducted through proxies. Iran regularly arrests individuals it accuses of spying for Israel amid a flurry of targeted assassinations and acts of sabotage targeting its nuclear programme in recent years. At least six scientists involved in Iran's nuclear programme were killed in Friday's strikes. "They've killed so many university professors and researchers, and now they want to negotiate?" Moadi exclaimed, referring to calls for Iran to go ahead with nuclear talks with Israel's US ally planned for this weekend. As Iran continued to assess the damage, some residents rallied in the streets of Tehran chanting: "Death to Israel, death to America," while waving Iranian flags and portraits of supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. State television said similar demonstrations were held in cities across the country. The Israeli strikes followed repeated threats from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who appeared to finally cap a years-long quest to strike Iran's nuclear programme. "We can't let this bastard continue, or we'll end up like Gaza," Abbas Ahmadi, a 52-year-old Tehran resident, told AFP from behind the wheel of his car. "Iran must destroy him, it must do something." – 'If God wills it' – Friday's attacks came after more than a year of soaring tensions as Israel took on Iran's regional allies Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Huthis in Yemen. Amid the tensions, Israel and Iran exchanged aerial barrages on two separate occasions last year. while stopping short of a full-scale war. But following Friday's attack, all bets were off over what would come next, with Khamenei warning Israel faced a "bitter and painful" fate, while the Iranian military said there would be "no limits" to its response. Apart from scattered protests, Tehran's streets were largely deserted, except for queues at petrol stations, a familiar sight in times of crisis. Air traffic was halted at Tehran's Imam Khomeini International Airport amid disruption across the region. In the upscale district of Nobonyad in north Tehran, rescuers continued to comb through the rubble of two apartment blocks targeted in Israeli strikes. Families with tear-streaked faces gathered nearby. "They want to deprive us of our nuclear capability — that's unacceptable," said Ahmad Razaghi, 56, calmly echoing the official line. For Farnoush Rezaei, a 45-year-old nurse wearing a colourful hijab, Friday's attacks represented a final act by Israel -- a country "on its last breath". Iranian leaders have for decades insisted that Israel will "soon" disappear. "If God wills it, at least a bit of peace will come from this," said Rezaei.

UN summit celebrates ocean protections, but drops fossil fuels
UN summit celebrates ocean protections, but drops fossil fuels

France 24

time2 hours ago

  • France 24

UN summit celebrates ocean protections, but drops fossil fuels

Countries hoping for new financial pledges to assist with combating rising seas and overfishing were also left disappointed at the UN Ocean Conference in France. More than 60 heads of state and government joined thousands of business leaders, scientists and environmental campaigners over five days in the southern city of Nice. The United Nations says the world's oceans are facing an "emergency" and the Nice gathering was just the third -- and the largest yet -- dedicated entirely to the seas. Treaty tide Activists unanimously praised concrete progress toward ratifying a landmark pact to protect marine life in the 60 percent of oceans that lie beyond national waters. "This week's ratifications of the high seas treaty mark a major milestone for ocean action," said Rebecca Hubbard from the High Seas Alliance. Some 19 countries formally ratified the treaty at Nice, taking the overall tally to 50. Sixty nations are needed to enact the treaty. France's special envoy for the oceans, Olivier Poivre d'Arvor, said the numbers would be ready in time for a formal ratification ceremony in September in New York. The treaty should then take effect in January 2026, he added. - Plastic push - The conference sought to rally global action on marine protection as countries prepare to tussle over global rules for deep-sea mining in July and a plastics treaty in August. More than 90 ministers issued a symbolic call in Nice for the hard-fought plastics treaty to contain limits on consumption and production of new plastics, something opposed by oil-producing nations. Elephant in the room The summit rallied a defence of science and rules-based oversight of common resources -- most notably the unknown depths of the oceans -- in a direct rebuke of US President Donald Trump. Trump was not present in Nice and rarely mentioned by name but his spectre loomed large as leaders backed the global multilateralism he has spurned. In particular, leaders condemned Trump's push to fast-track seabed mining, vowing to resist his unilateral efforts to exploit the ocean floor. Seabed row Leaders "made it unmistakably clear: deep-sea mining is one of the biggest threats facing our ocean, and the world is saying no," said Sofia Tsenikli from the Deep Sea Conservation Coalition. French President Emmanuel Macron called it "madness" while Brazil's Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva warned against a "predatory" race for critical minerals. But a global alliance opposed to deep-sea mining, and spearheaded by France, only attracted four new members during the summit, taking the total to 37 nations. Poivre d'Arvor said the alliance would flatly reject any call at a meeting of the International Seabed Authority next month to permit deep-sea exploration. The authority, backed by the UN, has 169 member states. Overfishing Many nations took the opportunity to unveil plans to create vast new marine protected areas and restrict bottom trawling, which was recently captured in grisly detail in a new David Attenborough documentary. Activists had wanted countries to go further, advocating for a total ban on the destructive fishing method that sees heavy nets dragged across the ocean floor. Missing millions Some 8.7 billion euros ($10 billion) was committed over the next five years by philanthropists and private investors for the sustainable development of ocean economies. But pledges were less forthcoming from wealthy governments, with France announcing two million euros for climate adaptation in Pacific Island nations. Flat finish The summit will close later Friday with a joint political statement, negotiated over many months between nations, that critics slammed for omitting any reference to fossil fuels -- the key driver of ocean warming. Laurence Tubiana, CEO at the European Climate Foundation, said Nice showed global cooperation was still possible "but let's not confuse signatures with solutions". "No communique ever cooled a marine heatwave," she said. Former US special climate envoy John Kerry, who was present in Nice, said in a statement that it was impossible to "protect the ocean without confronting the biggest root cause bringing it to the breaking point: the pollution from unabated fossil fuels pumped into the atmosphere".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store