Amazon has killed the wrong ludicrously expensive fantasy show
To WoT's considerable fanbase, the cancellation is a huge injustice (an online petition is, of course, already up and running). But in one sense, Prime's instincts were absolutely correct. It's about time the streamer pulled the plug on a mega-budget fantasy series that blatantly attempts to be the new Game of Thrones and is based on a beloved source material. The only error is that it flushed the wrong franchise away.
The obvious candidate for cancellation is Middle-earth prequel show The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power. Not only because it's terrible – its mishmash of awful wigs and even worse dialogue an insult to JRR Tolkien's meticulous world-building. More than that, the series has become a dead weight around the neck of Amazon – demonstrating the folly billionaires such as company founder Jeff Bezos can wreak with an unlimited budget and the conviction fantasy fans will swallow any tosh so long as it comes with wobbly prosthetic elf ears.
Bezos has been criticised for firing Katy Perry into high orbit on his Blue Origin rocket. But if anything deserves to be blasted into deep space, it's the appalling Rings Of Power – which comes with a mind-bending per-episode budget of between $60 - $100 million (depending on whether you factor in the $250 million Amazon paid at the outset for the right to make merry in Middle-earth).
In the case of Wheel of Time, the sheer amount of story to get through meant there was always a danger it would be killed off early. However, while the threat of cancellation was ever-present, the decision is widely understood to be related to the departure in March of Prime studio head Jennifer Salke. She had presided over a string of disasters, including Rings of Power and dead-on-arrival espionage series Citadel (a $1 billion budget and no viewers). With a track record like that, Prime was believed to have had misgivings about putting her in charge of James Bond after acquiring creative control of 007 from Eon Productions.
Even by the standards of a mega corporation such as Amazon, Wheel of Time was a vast undertaking. In 2019, the company commenced building from scratch a full-scale town on a dedicated site 25 miles outside Prague. It was to serve as a base for a production that, all going well, would run for a decade (all did not go well).
Pike – who played Gandalf-esque wizard Moiraine– had moved the Central Europe with her partner and children and expected to be there for the foreseeable. As co-producer on the show, she went all in on the Wheel of Time universe, even narrating several of the tie-in audiobooks (volume one, The Eye of the World, has a run time of 32 hours).
She was joined by a cast of literally hundreds. There were grand battles involving a mind-boggling 3,500 FX shots in series one alone (1,000 more than in Marvel's Endgame) and a globe-hopping schedule, that took in Morocco, Italy, South Africa and the Canary Islands. In all, nearly 1,000 people are thought to have worked on the production – comparable to a large scale Hollywood movie.
It was much better than Rings of Power too. Moiraine headed a solid cast that also included Peaky Blinders actress Natasha O'Keefe as a vengeful demon. The fight scenes were inventive, spectacularly violent and visually dazzling. Crucially, everything made sense – in contrast to Rings Of Power, which implied an absurd sexual chemistry between elf Queen Galadriel and the wicked Sauron.
Compared to some of Jennifer Salke's more prominent flops, Wheel of Time was by no means a calamity. Reviews for series three were positive; ratings were solid. The sub-par production values and fake-looking costumes that had hobbled season one had been put right, too. But WoT was perceived as one of Salke's projects and news that it has been cast into the void is not surprising.
The oliphaunt in the room is that fantasy is no longer a voguish genre. Amazon had acquired the rights to Wheel of Time after Jeff Bezos commanded underlings to present him with a project that had the potential to become the new Game of Thrones (the studio made its bid for Lord of the Rings around the same time). Going on for a decade later, Succession and The White Lotus have put eat-the-rich style social satire at the top of the Hollywood want list (see Julianne Moore's new Netflix project, Sirens). Long-haired weirdos running around in capes babbling about the Dark One simply doesn't cut it – especially not when each episode costs the best part of $20 million.
Where does that leave Rings of Power? The show has been consistently dire, featuring cheap-looking sets, cheesy dialogue and – for reasons best known to the producers – a tribe of hobbit ancestors who sounded like 'thick Irish builders' from a 1970s sitcom. Horrific on every level, its trajectory has been the opposite of that of Wheel of Time, which slowly built a loyal audience (though viewership admittedly fell off from season one to two). In the case of Rings of Power, just one-third of viewers finished the first series, while audiences fell by half in year two.
Why not cancel? The depressing answer is, as part of the rights deal, Prime Video is committed to making five seasons. Which means three more years of TV torture – for them and us. In a grim snapshot of television in 2025, a well-made (and much cheaper) show such as Wheel of Time is pitched into oblivion while the atrocious RoP gets to clop off into the sunset, scorned by practically everyone except the great unblinking eye of Jeff Bezos. It is a bleak end to a cautionary tale. One that, in years to come, is likely to be seen as a warning against Hollywood hubris and the dangers of throwing too much money at a billionaire's pipe dream.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
7 minutes ago
- Reuters
What US stagflation risks mean for world markets
LONDON, Aug 18 (Reuters) - The spectre of U.S. stagflation is stalking global markets, causing some investors to position portfolios to dodge the potential damage that tariffs could wreak on growth and inflation in the world's dominant economy. Some 70% of global investors surveyed by BofA Global Research in early August said they expect stagflation - the combination of below trend growth and above trend inflation - in the next 12 months. Recent data showing U.S. labour market weakness, a sharp rise in U.S. core inflation and an unexpected surge in producer prices justifies this concern. But stocks around the world, including in the United States, remain near record highs and bond markets are calm, suggesting little panic even as U.S. stagflation risks move increasingly onto the radar. "Stagflation is in the mind of the market, but not the price," said Carmignac fixed income manager Marie-Anne Allier. Here's a rundown of how U.S. stagflation risks could play out across global markets. Persistent inflation, or the fear of it, can pummel longer-dated bonds by eroding the real value of fixed interest payments over time. Paul Eitelman of Russell Investments, which helps institutions manage more than $1 trillion of assets, said pension funds and insurers have become increasingly nervous about inflation hitting their bond portfolios. "If we had a another very weak employment report, that would significantly ramp up (U.S. stagflation) concerns," he added. Nor would non-U.S. bonds offer much protection. "Interest rates and the long end of the bond curve are highly correlated between the G7 economies," said Mayank Markanday, portfolio manager at Foresight Group. "If you see a big selloff in the long end of the U.S. curve we are likely to see impact on some of the others." There has already been a selloff in long-dated bonds across major markets. While 2-year yields are lower in the U.S., Germany and Britain this year, 30-year yields are higher. If sticky inflation stops the Federal Reserve from cutting rates this year, short-dated bonds would suffer too. Fidelity International multi-asset manager Caroline Shaw said the group expected U.S. growth to slow and stagflation was one of their two core scenarios. She remains positive on U.S. big tech stocks but in mid-July bought derivatives called put options that would profit should the more cyclical Russell 2000 small cap index fall. (.RUT), opens new tab As with bonds, stocks globally are likely to suffer, even if stagflation is confined to the U.S. Since 1990, world stocks (.MIWD00000PUS), opens new tab have fallen by an average of 15% at times when U.S. manufacturing activity data showed both a contraction and higher than average prices, according to State Street head of macro strategy Michael Metcalfe. But stocks keep surging for now, which Metcalfe says suggests investors think "the disruption to the global trading system isn't going to disrupt big tech earnings." Markets are ignoring bad news and focusing on the good, said Man Group chief market strategist Kristina Hooper. "It's like parenting, you only want to see the best in your children, and we're at a stage where it's possible for markets to do that," she said. Nabil Milali, multi-asset and overlay portfolio manager at Edmond de Rothschild Asset Management, is another investor who says data shows the U.S. economy is heading for stagflation. He anticipated further weakness in the dollar against the euro . Stagflation presents twin risks for the greenback, said Milali, because weak growth can devalue a currency and persistent inflation erodes its purchasing power abroad. The euro is up over 12% against the dollar so far this year. Other currencies like the Japanese yen and Britain's pound have also strengthened. Here's where it gets harder, but stagflation could provide another reason to keep buying gold, already the go-to asset class for investors worried about a variety of risks, said Man Group's Hooper. Other assets that offer protection against inflation could be attractive, such as short-dated inflation linked bonds, said Foresight Group's Markanday. Professional investors are turning to complex derivatives products like inflation swaps, which rise in value when price indices exceed a certain level, Russell's Eitelman said. The U.S. two-year inflation linked swap is near its highest in over two years.
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Republican merch line scrapped after DIY giant complains
The Republican Party of Florida has pulled a line of "Deport Depot" merchandise from its online store after Home Depot objected to the unauthorized use of its brand. The merchandise, which included hats, T-shirts, and mugs, mimicked Home Depot's logo and was launched following Governor Ron DeSantis 's announcement of a new immigrant detention centre. Home Depot said it does not allow any organization to use its logo for commercial purposes. This incident follows a previous merchandise line from the Florida GOP, "Alligator Alcatraz," which also sought to fundraise from the state's immigration policies. DeSantis announced plans to convert a disused state prison into the "Deportation Depot," an immigration detention center, after a federal court order halted new construction at the "Alligator Alcatraz" site due to environmental concerns.
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
The stakes are high as Zelenskyy and European leaders head to Washington
U.S. President Donald Trump is set to host Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders at the White House on Monday to discuss how to end Russia 's three-year war in Ukraine. Months of U.S.-led diplomatic efforts to stop the fighting haven't made headway, but the stakes have risen since Trump met with with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday. After that summit, Trump abandoned the requirement of reaching a ceasefire in order to hold further talks and aligned with Putin's position that negotiations should focus on a long-term settlement instead. The presence of several European leaders at the talks in Washington shows how central the conflict — and any settlement — is to wider security questions on the continent. They are looking to safeguard Ukraine and Europe more broadly from any further aggression from Moscow — but also are providing a show of support for Zelenskyy after his last visit to the White House led to an angry confrontation. The American and Ukrainian leaders are scheduled to first meet privately, without the Europeans. Here's what to know about the Washington meeting. The talks could be a pivotal moment in the war After meeting Putin in Alaska, Trump is making a big push for a breakthrough. A lot of issues need to be resolved, however, and the two sides have previously established red lines that are incompatible, including questions of whether Ukraine will cede any land to Russia, the future of Ukraine's army and whether the country will have any guarantee against further Russian aggression. In a post on social media Sunday night, Trump appeared to shift the burden for ending the war to Zelenskyy, whose country was invaded in February 2022. 'President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight,' he wrote. A comprehensive peace deal could still be a long way off. Putin wants Donbas As a condition for peace, the Russian leader wants Kyiv to give up Donbas, the industrial region in eastern Ukraine that has seen some of the most intense fighting but that Russian forces have failed to capture completely. In his Sunday night post, Trump wrote that Zelenskyy should also accept Russia's illegal 2014 annexation of Ukraine's Crimea region. As part of a deal, Putin has said the United States and its European allies can provide Ukraine with a security guarantee resembling NATO's collective defense pledge, according to a senior U.S. official. Trump envoy Steve Witkoff called that Russian concession 'game-changing' though he offered few details on how it would work. Ukraine has long pressed for some kind of guarantee that would prevent Russia from invading again. Ukraine won't surrender land to Russia Zelenskyy has rejected Putin's demand that Ukraine surrender the Donbas region, made up of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, since the Ukrainian Constitution forbids giving up territory or trading land. That also means he can't cede Crimea either. Instead, freezing the front line — which snakes roughly 1,000 kilometers (620 miles) from northeastern to southeastern Ukraine — seems to be the most the Ukrainian people might accept. Russia currently holds about 20% of Ukrainian territory. Europe's security is also at stake in the talks European leaders see Ukraine's fight as a bulwark against any Kremlin ambitions to threaten other countries in eastern Europe and beyond. French President Emmanuel Macron described Ukraine as an 'outpost of our collective defense if Russia wanted to advance again.' 'If we are weak with Russia today, we'll be preparing the conflicts of tomorrow and they will impact the Ukrainians and — make no mistake — they can impact us, too.' Macron said Sunday. The European political heavyweights expected in Washington are Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte. Civilians are killed as the fighting continues Ukraine has in recent months been losing more territory against Russia's bigger army, and Moscow's forces breached Ukrainian lines in a series of minor infiltrations in the Donetsk region ahead of the Alaska summit. But there is no sign of a looming, major Russian breakthrough on the front line. Both sides have also kept up their daily long-range strikes behind the front line. A Russian drone strike on Kharkiv, Ukraine's second-largest city, killed six people late Sunday, including an 18-month-old and a 16-year-old, according to regional head Oleh Syniehubov. The attack on the northeastern city injured 20 others, including six children, he said. Russia's Defense Ministry on Monday reported intercepting 23 Ukrainian drones over Russian regions and the annexed Crimean peninsula overnight. ___
