Students shouldn't miss out on J-1s over views on 'horrific' world issues, says Tanaiste
Students should not be deprived of a US J-1 visa for expressing a view on 'horrific issues that are happening around the world', the Tanaiste has said.
Last month, the US Embassy in Dublin announced that students applying for J-1 visas will undergo 'comprehensive and thorough vetting' of their social media. The changes also apply for other exchange visitor applicants in the F, M and J non-immigrant classifications.
All applicants are asked to list all their social media profiles, and make their accounts publicly accessible. Failure to do so could lead to a visa being rejected.
The embassy said it will use all available information in its visa screening to identify those who 'are inadmissible' to the US, including those who pose a threat to national security. It said it wanted to ensure those applying for admission into the US 'do not intend to harm Americans and our national interests'.
It added that a US visa 'is a privilege, not a right'. Ireland's national students' union said the new measures represent a significant and disproportionate intrusion into personal lives and digital privacy, and that they raise serious concerns about freedom of expression and online surveillance.
Simon Harris said he had 'a really good conversation' about student visas with Ed Walsh, US ambassador to Ireland, on Monday. Speaking to reporters afterwards, Mr Harris said: 'I think Ambassador Walsh knows the importance of the people-to-people connection between our two countries.
'I was making the point that we live in a country where young people have very, very strong views – as do I, by the way – on a lot of what's going on in the world and they have every right to express those views. And freedom of speech matters and being able to freely express yourself – online, offline, through protest – is an important part of our democracy, and I know President Trump is somebody who I would imagine in his own country would champion free speech.
He added: 'So we very much want our young people to continue to be able to articulate their very strongly held views on horrific issues that are happening around the world but that shouldn't deprive somebody from going on J-1.'
Mr Harris said while immigration policy and visas is a matter for the US, he said he and the ambassador agreed to keep in touch on the matter.
'Ireland and the US have been friends for hundreds of years. It's important we keep those connections going, and I wouldn't like to see anything that causes apprehension for a young person travelling to the United States – and I just made that point to Ambassador Walsh.'
Join our Dublin Live breaking news service on WhatsApp. Click this link to receive your daily dose of Dublin Live content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice .
For all the latest news from Dublin and surrounding areas visit our homepage.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
18 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Countries who refuse US beef are 'on notice' says Trump
US President Donald Trump has said countries who refuse American beef are "on notice", after Australia announced that it would be relaxing import restrictions on the product. Australia said it would loosen biosecurity rules for US beef, something analysts predicted would not significantly increase US shipments because Australia is a major beef producer and exporter whose prices are much lower. "We are going to sell so much to Australia because this is undeniable and irrefutable Proof that US Beef is the Safest and Best in the entire World," Mr Trump said in a post on Truth Social. "The other Countries that refuse our magnificent Beef are ON NOTICE," the post continued. Mr Trump has attempted to renegotiate trade deals with numerous countries he says have taken advantage of the United States – a characterisation many economists dispute. "For decades, Australia imposed unjustified barriers on US beef," US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said in a statement, calling Australia's decision a "major milestone in lowering trade barriers and securing market access for US farmers and ranchers." Australia is not a significant importer of beef but the United States is, and a production slump is forcing it to step up purchases. Last year, Australia shipped almost 400,000 metric tons of beef worth $2.9 billion to the United States, with just 269 tonnes of US product moving the other way. Australian officials say the relaxation of restrictions was not part of any trade negotiations but the result of a years-long assessment of US biosecurity practices. Canberra has restricted US beef imports since 2003 due to concerns about bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), or madcow disease. Since 2019, it has allowed in meat from animals born, raised and slaughtered in the US but few suppliers were able to prove that their cattle had not been in Canada and Mexico. On Wednesday, Australia's agriculture ministry said US cattle traceability and control systems had improved enough that Australia could accept beef from cattle born in Canada or Mexico and slaughtered in the United States. The decision has caused some concern in Australia, where biosecurity is seen as essential to prevent diseases and pests from ravaging the farm sector. "We need to know if (the government) is sacrificing our high biosecurity standards just so Prime Minister Anthony Albanese can obtain a meeting with US President Donald Trump," shadow agriculture minister David Littleproud said in a statement. Australia, which imports more from the US than it exports, faces a 10% across-the-board US tariff, as well 50% tariffs on steel and aluminium. Mr Trump has also threatened to impose a 200% tariff on pharmaceuticals. Asked whether the change would help achieve a trade deal, Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell said: "I'm not too sure." "We haven't done this in order to entice the Americans into a trade agreement," he said. "We think that they should do that anyway."
Irish Independent
20 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Letters: Mass starvation, multiple child amputees, and still, US politicians stay silent
On Tuesday, it reported the UN saying Gaza is 'hell on earth', with doctors fainting from hunger and snipers shooting civilians in Gaza like it is a 'licence to kill'. Jordan's King Abdullah II, speaking at the UN last September, said: 'This Israeli government has killed more children, more journalists, more aid workers and more medical personnel than any other war in recent memory.' He said Israel's assault in Gaza had led to one of the fastest rates of starvation caused by a war. The king added that the largest cohort of child amputees from a war are in Gaza. He said Jordan and countries around the world condemned Hamas's attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, but Israel's response is unprecedented. I hope for the war to end this year and Hamas to return all Israeli hostages. The US is still not strongly pressing Israel's government to end the war in Gaza on women, men, elderly and children weakened from hunger. It has echoes of the US-Vietnam 1964 to 1975 war when Americans went on marches for years to end a war that dragged on until the US left. That war was to stop communist north Vietnam taking over the south. Vietnam was unified after the war. In Vietnam they call it 'The American War'. Few US politicians speak out against the inhumanity of the war in Gaza. The late Tip O'Neill Jr, Speaker of the House in Washington in the 1980s, was fearless in this regard. Mary Sullivan, College Road, Cork It's a sorry state of affairs when political correctness is valued over morality Thanks to modern technology we all see what is happening on a daily basis in Gaza and the West Bank. Politicians are required to make decisions on moral and ethical standards or political correctness. My personal experience while with the United Nations is that politicians in general follow the political correctness route. Michael Moriarty, Rochestown, Cork Gaelic football aristocrats Kerry go again with push for 39th All-Ireland title On Sunday, Kerry will be seeking their 39th All-Ireland title. Despite the dominance of the Dubs in recent times, Kerry are still the aristocrats of Gaelic football. This weekend, Jack O'Connor will be looking for his fifth All-Ireland – quite an achievement. I believe he is about to join Mick O'Dwyer in the Kerry managerial hall of fame. An O'Connor trait I have admired is that he knows how to wield the stick and when to offer the carrot. He has also shown he has the bottle to make the tough calls. Thomas Garvey, Co Mayo They said abortions would be 'rare', but that's not the case if you look at the data Abortion is still a controversial topic in Ireland. A third of the people voted against it in 2018; more supported it only in certain very limited situations. But what has actually happened goes way beyond what was predicted by campaigners who said it would be 'rare'. Last year, well over 10,000 babies were aborted, according to the Government's latest annual report, including 258 babies in Co Wexford. Clearly, not enough is being done to proactively reduce the abortion rate by providing women in the middle of unplanned pregnancies with the supports they need. It's worth emphasising that unborn babies are completely innocent and totally helpless to speak for themselves or defend themselves. Pat Fogarty, Cleariestown, Co Wexford A 'brutal' excuse by newly renamed planning board to keep airport structures An Bord Pleanála is now An Coimisúin Pleanála (ACP) – one of the first provisions of the Planning and Development Act 2024. Unfortunately, the 'change' of title and, indeed, the new act when it is fully commenced will do little to prevent bizarre determinations like that to refuse the demolition of a set of redundant concrete car park ramps in Dublin Airport. In upholding the decision of Fingal County Council, ACP stated that, notwithstanding the fact that the spirals were not a protected structure, they are of technical and architectural merit by virtue of their brutalist design, associated concrete construction and their unique form and shape, which reflect a distinctive feature next to the Terminal 1 building. They were built in 1972 to serve a facility that no longer exists. And yes, of concrete – a basic, commonplace construction material. As acknowledged by ACP, they are not protected structures. Nevertheless, it found a planning rationale to refuse their demolition. I'm not inclined to go overboard with odious hypothetical comparisons, but consider this: If the same view was taken of the 'brutalist' form of the Ballymun towers and Hawkins House, we would doubtless be celebrating the retention of icons of the 1960s. Larry Dunne, Rosslare Harbour, Co Wexford While cringing is a part of life, at least my moments of shame didn't go online Catherine Prasifka is right to suggest 'cringe' is the tax we pay for trying, but she has a rich future of it ahead ('We're terrified of being labelled 'cringe', but I'd rather embrace it than live in fear', Irish Independent, July 24). Middle age brings its own species of horror. I regularly drive along and am blindsided by a memory – something I said in 1994 about Tyrone football or people who consume low-fat yoghurt – and groan aloud. The only consolation is that my sins were spoken, not posted online. Enda Cullen, Tullysaran Road, Armagh Corruption in governance will prosper when good people turn a blind eye Corrupt governments didn't start with one party controlling the media and taking charge of the message or where one party decided what is truth. Corrupt administrations did not start with one party censoring speech and silencing opposition or where we have one party dividing into 'us' and 'them' and where one party calls on their supporters to harass them. In the final analysis, corrupt governments started when good people turned a blind eye and let it happen.
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
US and Israel withdraw from Gaza ceasefire talks, claiming Hamas ‘not acting in good faith'
Talks for a ceasefire in Gaza were dealt a new blow on Thursday after the US and Israel withdrew their negotiating teams. Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu said his ceasefire negotiators will return to Israel from Qatar for further consultations. US envoy Steve Witkoff said in a statement that the US was doing the same. They made the decision after Israel received Hamas's response to mediators' proposal for a 60-day truce. 'While the mediators have made a great effort, Hamas does not appear to be coordinated or acting in good faith,' Mr Witkoff said. 'We will now consider alternative options to bring the hostages home and try to create a more stable environment for the people of Gaza.' It wasn't immediately clear what led to the breakdown in talks, but Israel's Channel 12 reported that Hamas wants the release of 200 prisoners serving life sentences and another 2,000 arrested in Gaza after October 7th 2023, the day the Palestinian militant group triggered the war by attacking southern Israel. Those are higher than the original proposal that won Israel's agreement, Channel 12 reported. The station also said there were issues around a potential Israeli troop pullback and a Hamas demand for US guarantees that the ceasefire will go on beyond 60 days as long as talks continue. Israeli public broadcaster Kan News said Hamas was also insisting that Israel free some people who joined the October 7th attack on Israel. 'We are determined to achieve all the goals of the war,' Netanyahu said in a speech on Thursday. 'We are working to achieve another deal to release our hostages. But if Hamas perceives our willingness to reach a deal as weakness and an opportunity to dictate terms of surrender that would endanger the State of Israel, it is making a big mistake.' The latest disagreement deals a fresh blow to the talks, weeks after President Donald Trump said a deal was close. Amid rising starvation in the Gaza Strip , an Israeli government minister said on Thursday that Israel had no duty to alleviate hunger in the territory and was seeking to expel its population. Far-right politician Amichay Eliyahu, who leads Israel's heritage ministry, said in a radio interview that 'there is no nation that feeds its enemies,' adding that 'the British didn't feed the Nazis, nor did the Americans feed the Japanese, nor do the Russians feed the Ukrainians now'. He concluded that the government was 'rushing toward Gaza being wiped out,' while also 'driving out the population that educated its people on the ideas of 'Mein Kampf'', an anti-Semitic text written by Adolf Hitler. Life in the West Bank Listen | 26:12 The office of Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu declined to comment on whether Mr Eliyahu's remarks had represented the government's position. An Israeli military official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said Mr Eliyahu's comments did not reflect military policy. Mr Eliyahu oversees historical and archaeological sites and institutions in Israel and has no authority over the military. He does not participate in meetings of a small group of ministers who oversee security decisions. His office did not reply to requests for clarification. Mr Eliyahu's comments were swiftly condemned by Israeli opposition politicians, who said the minister did not represent the Israeli mainstream. Polling suggests a majority of Israelis favour reaching a ceasefire to release hostages held by Islamist group Hamas. The interview came amid increasing cases of starvation in Gaza. Israel has blocked all food deliveries to the enclave between early March and late May. While Israel allows some food into Gaza, it has drastically reduced the number of places from which food is distributed, forcing Palestinians to receive food aid from a handful of sites that are hard to access. The UN's Palestinian refugee agency (Unrwa) said that one in five children in Gaza City is malnourished and cases are increasing daily. Unrwa commissioner-general Philippe Lazzarini cited a colleague telling him: 'People in Gaza are neither dead nor alive, they are walking corpses.' More than 100 international aid organisations and human rights groups have also warned of mass starvation and pressed for governments to take action. – New York Times/Reuters/Bloomberg
