‘Move with the times': F1 team principals call for Monaco track change
Formula One team principals have called for layout changes to be considered at the Monaco Grand Prix to address the inability of cars to overtake after efforts to enliven the race with mandatory pit stops fell flat on Sunday.
McLaren's Lando Norris took victory in Monte Carlo and was, despite the two pit-stop rule, in control throughout, Indeed only two passes were made on track across all 78 laps and drivers including Red Bull's Max Verstappen, who finished fourth, and Mercedes' George Russell, who was 11th, dismissed the pit-stop rule change as all but pointless.
Advertisement
The Red Bull team principal, Christian Horner, believed the most important change that was required was to alter the layout to create one area where overtaking was at least feasible.
Related: 'We were almost doing Mario Kart': Verstappen and Russell slate Monaco F1 GP pit stops
'The fundamental problem is you cannot overtake here. The cars are so big now that you just don't have a chance to get alongside,' he said. 'It's circuit specific, we've known that, it's been on the calendar for 72 years. Everything has to move with the times ultimately.
'It's an iconic and historic circuit but if you look at how Monaco has changed, how much land they've reclaimed into the sea, I don't think you'd need to do too much. There just needs to be one area where you can have an overtake and everybody knows that coming here the race was pretty much done on Saturday. We've introduced another dynamic with the pit stop which ultimately for the top 10, other than the retirement, nobody really changed position.'
Advertisement
The race was marked by the leading teams matching each other through the pit stops and the absence of a safety car or red flag to bring an element of chance into proceedings. While in the midfield, teams applied teamwork between drivers to create pit window gaps that involved deliberately driving slowly to the infuriation of others who, with an inability to overtake, were left impotent in a train on track. Very few were satisfied with the outcome.
Norris said it had created jeopardy by the risk of mere fortune deciding the result rather than in the form of actual racing. 'There's not been any more overtaking here. I thought that was what was wanted,' he said. 'Now you just give people opportunity by luck, by waiting for a red flag, waiting for a safety car. You aren't getting a more deserved winner in the end of things.'
The race organisers, the Automobile Club de Monaco (ACM), believe that changing the track layout is all but impossible but Norris's team principal, Andrea Stella, suggested it was worth bringing into the equation.
'We should praise the fact that Formula One and the FIA made an attempt to improve racing in Monaco,' he said. 'The main limitation remains the fact that you cannot overtake and this is quite structural as a limitation and I am not sure exactly how this can be modified just simply by imposing a certain number of pit stops.
Advertisement
'I'm not sure there's anything that can be done from a track layout point of view, to be honest I've never thought of this aspect but maybe there's something that we should consider.'
In what might be considered an unusual show of solidarity that may make F1 take notice, the Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff concurred with his rivals. He suggested that imposing a minimum lap time might be feasible to prevent driving unnecessarily slowly and discussing altering the layout with the organisers.
'What we can look at is to create some more specific regulations that there's only a maximum of back-off that you can have,' he said. 'Does it improve the overtaking? I don't think that's feasible. We need to talk also with maybe ACM here. Is there anything we can change on the layout, if you could in a city limited by mountains and the sea.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AJ Dybantsa Makes Surprise Nike Appearance in Jamaica
AJ Dybantsa Makes Surprise Nike Appearance in Jamaica originally appeared on Athlon Sports. AJ Dybantsa has been traveling the globe lately. BYU's top basketball recruit made a trip to the Monaco Grand Prix last week and got the opportunity to be in the pits with Max Verstappen's Red Bull Racing team. But he also made a surprise trip to Kingston, Jamaica to learn about his roots and giveback on behalf of Nike. Advertisement Dybantsa documented his journey in a recent YouTube video. He handed out shoes and basketballs, along with playing a few pickup games. This was all set up by the Bob Marley and Rita Marley Foundations. What made the meet and greet special for Dybantsa was his ties to the Caribbean island. His mom, Chelsea, is from Jamaica and created the no-nonsense structure for her son. For BYU, Dybantsa being able to represent brands on a global scale is an invaluable recruiting tool. One of the first things people noticed was his team gear, which might be foreign to some but will start to become more recognizable and part of his brand. This comes at the right time with the Cougars building up hype toward next season. "Dybantsa has been a celebrated prospect since before he entered high school, and has avoided many of the pitfalls of early stardom by consistently improving his game at each step in the process," 247Sports' Adam Finkelstein said. Advertisement "Still though, he's become accustomed to playing to the camera and can go through spurts when it becomes more of a show than a game. The time is soon coming when the level of competition won't again allow that. He won't be able to worry about cameras, officiating, or other distractions, and will have to make his singular emphasis." Related: AJ Dybantsa admits BYU wasn't top school, blown away by NBA ready program BYU Basketball's upcoming non-conference schedule is nearing completion after this week. They added UConn, Wisconsin, Villanova, along with a multi-team event at Disney World in Orlando. One of the best ways for Dybantsa to introduce himself to the world of college basketball. This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 1, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
A guide to multi-club ownership: How does it work?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Red Bull-related clubs Leeds United (top-left), Salzburg (top-right), Leipzig (bottom-left) and New York (bottom-right). | Credit: Future Multi-club ownership is increasingly common in football, with plenty of big-money owners splashing out to take control of several clubs around the world. Advertisement Take Red Bull, for instance. They have varying stakes in Leeds United, FC Liefering, New York Red Bulls, Paris FC, RB Leipzig, TV Omiya Ardija, Red Bull Bragantino and Red Bull Salzburg. Several English clubs are part of similar models to different degrees, including Manchester City, Chelsea, Manchester United, Crystal Palace, Aston Villa, Arsenal, Nottingham Forest, and… well, loads more, including down in the lower leagues. So what are the rules on multi-club ownership? Can you own two clubs in the same league? Sir Jim Ratcliffe was linked with buying Chelsea before he bought Manchester United – and he certainly couldn't buy the Blues now | Credit: Getty Images Not in England you can't, certainly not at Premier League and EFL level. The EFL Owners and Directors' Test will automatically disqualify directors who hold an 'interest' in more than one club within the EFL, while the Premier League's own rules say that 'no Person may either directly or indirectly be involved in or have any power to determine or influence the management or administration of more than one [Premier League] Club.' Advertisement While that only applies within each league, the FA have an overarching rule with the same wording as the Premier League that applies to the entire English football pyramid. There is some suggestion that one person/company could own a stake of less than 25%, which would not represent significant control of any one club. That's a higher threshold than is set by UEFA; their rules mean a majority owner of one club could have a less than 50 per cent stake in another club playing in the same competition. That's the lowest bar available, though, and it's up to individual countries' FA to decide if they want to be stricter. Can two clubs from the same ownership compete in Europe? Girona's participation in Europe asked questions of UEFA | Credit: Getty Images This increasingly contentious issue came to a head in 2024 after Girona qualified for the Champions League and Nice qualified for the Europa League. Advertisement The issue was the Girona are part of the City Football Group alongside Manchester City, who also qualified for the Champions League. Manchester United meanwhile joined Nice in the Europa League; both clubs are at least part-owned by INEOS, headed by Sir Jim Ratcliffe. UEFA ultimately decided that each pair of clubs could compete in the same continental competition as long as: No one is simultaneously involved, directly or indirectly, in any capacity whatsoever in the management, administration and/or sporting performance of more than one club participating in a UEFA club competition; and No one has control or decisive influence over more than one club participating in a UEFA club competition. Essentially, then, no one person can be involved in the running or decision-making of two or more clubs within a single UEFA competition. City Football Group and INEOS swiftly made sure they were in line with that, and all four clubs were permitted entry to their respective competitions. That's why Nottingham Forest owner Evangelos Marinakis recently officially ceased to be a 'person of significant control' at the club. Advertisement Forest could potentially end up qualifying for either the Champions League or Europa League with Greek side Olympiacos next season. They're also owned by Marinakis, and so he had to officially step away from Forest to ensure they didn't run into any trouble should that occur. On top of that, clubs in that kind of situation have to apply to UEFA to get the all-clear to proceed into competition against one another. For 2024/25, UEFA allowed clubs to transfer the club to an 'independent third party', like a blind trust, which would be appointed to look out for the interests of that club only, without any consideration for the wider ownership group. Do clubs from the same ownership share resources? City are part of a much bigger network | Credit: Getty Images As far as we can tell, there's nothing to stop them from sharing scouting info and things like that as long as they're not in the same European competition as one another. Advertisement UEFA are keen to ensure that clubs remain independent from one another. To that end, they got a commitment from City Football Group and INEOS that they would not transfer players to one another until September 2025, nor would they 'conclude any kind of cooperation, joint technical or commercial agreements between each other' or 'use any joint scouting or player database'. It seems likely that they would ask for a similar commitment from any other clubs who face a similar situation in future. What's to stop clubs from the same ownership transferring players to each other for free? Red Bull players have often moved between clubs | Credit:Three words: 'associated party transactions'. Advertisement In the Premier League, the rules say that any transfers between 'associated parties' (i.e. clubs within the same ownership group) need to be assessed by the Premier League first to see whether they represent 'fair market value'. What that means is a judgement call for the Premier League assessors, but they could put a halt to any proposed transfer that was 'evidently not' at fair market value. We're not sure it would really be in clubs' interests to try and fiddle it that way, anyway. Each league has its own version of the Premier League's Profit & Sustainability Rules that need to be met. In their current form, both clubs would generally be better off just doing trades between themselves at 'fair market value' anyway, for boring accounting reasons that we won't get into here.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Italy resisting calls from Pirelli to tighten curbs on Chinese shareholder, sources say
By Giuseppe Fonte and Giulio Piovaccari ROME (Reuters) -The Italian government is resisting calls from Pirelli's executive vice-chairman Marco Tronchetti Provera to tighten curbs imposed on the tyremaker's Chinese investor, sources said. Chinese state group Sinochem is Pirelli's largest investor with a 37% stake, while Tronchetti Provera's Camfin vehicle holds a 27.3% shareholding. Tronchetti Provera has been the company's top boss for more than three decades. Pirelli itself and Camfin are at odds with Sinochem, claiming that its substantial holding poses a risk to Pirelli's ambitions to expand its business in the United States. Washington is cracking down on Chinese technology in the automotive industry, by banning key software and hardware from Chinese-controlled companies in connected vehicles on U.S. roads. Tronchetti Provera is lobbying the government to take further action to limit the Chinese influence at Pirelli, two sources familiar with the matter said, by strengthening the restrictions that Rome imposed on Sinochem in 2023 through the golden power rules aimed at protecting strategic assets. However, Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's administration has so far rebuffed these calls, the sources added, asking not to be named due to the sensitivity of the matter. Rome's cautious stance partly stems from concerns it would rely excessively on its golden powers, one of the sources said, at a time when Italy faces a legal dispute with UniCredit over the way it uses the tool in vetting banking deals. All parties declined to comment. The government, which has ruled that Pirelli must not be subject to instructions from the Chinese investor, last November launched an investigation to check whether the presence of Sinochem executives on the tyremaker's board was in breach of these curbs. The inquiry is under way and before considering a harder stance on Sinochem, the government will at least check for violations of existing restrictions, the second source said. FAR APART Emanuele Orsini, the head of Italian business lobby Confindustria of which Pirelli is a leading member, called on the government to defend the autonomy of the Italian group. "Part of Pirelli's shareholding, which is now in the hands of the Chinese government, is not approving the balance sheets and is therefore jamming up Pirelli, so I think something has to be done," Orsini said on Wednesday. In previous remarks on Tuesday, Orsini argued Sinochem should cut its stake in Formula One tyre supplier Pirelli to below 25%. Talks over governance adjustments have so far failed, with Camfin and Sinochem remaining far apart. Last month, the Chinese company described a proposal put forward by Pirelli to solve problems as "seriously unfair", while Camfin said that Sinochem's approach could lead to breaking the shareholder pact still in place between the two largest investors. Should the agreement be dropped, Sinochem and Camfin would be in a position to present separate slates at Pirelli's shareholders' meeting (AGM) next year, with one of them potentially taking full control of Pirelli's board. Two separate sources told Reuters that Tronchetti Provera was relying on further government support through golden powers in the event of a final clash with Sinochem at the AGM. Pirelli has been posting good results despite ongoing struggles in the auto industry. Its net profit rose 27% in the first quarter, while revenues were up 4%. Sign in to access your portfolio