Businesses ‘locked' out of key to success unless Minnesota lawmakers act
A 2023 state law banned lead in a lot of products including toys, jewelry, cosmetics, and keys. It took effect in Jan. 2024, but the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency isn't enforcing it until this coming July.
Key makers and retailers say there aren't viable alternatives at this point. MPCA says some companies have alternatives, but they're recommending the legislature delay enforcement for three years.
Bills eliminating the ban on keys are making their way to conference committees for votes, so stakeholders are rallying for change.
ST. PAUL, Minn. (FOX 9) - The keys in your pocket are already illegal to replace in Minnesota.
Enforcement coming soon
The state isn't really enforcing a new law yet, but it will start as of July, and a lot of small businesses are hoping to unlock a change before lawmakers go home.
A 2023 law banned the sale of lead in products like jewelry, toys and cosmetics.The ban included keys, but the people who make keys say there's no way to do it without a little lead.
"Approximately 75% of all products that we stock have become prohibited for sale," said Rob Justen of Doyle Security Products.
Lead is the key to staying in business for Justen's business.
But a Minnesota law could lock them out soon.
"It really does make it illegal to sell or replace the very keys that Minnesotans use every day, your house keys, your car keys, your apartment key, your boat key," said Bruce Nustad of the Minnesota Retailers Association.
Urgency arriving
The law banning new lead keys took effect in January 2024, but the sense of urgency is new for retailers and security companies.
"[The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency] has been gracious in its enforcement," Nustad said. "The issue of sort of pending doom hasn't risen until just now."
A bipartisan group of lawmakers is trying to take keys out of the ban and their changes are bolted to bills still moving in the legislature's final week.
Compromising on keys
Key makers say there's no viable alternative to make functioning keys, but they're open to lead limits like California implemented back in 2001.
"Going back to the California standard would legalize every key that's in your pocket today," Justen said.
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency is saying some companies are already using alternatives, but they're also recommending a three-year delay in enforcement to give these businesses a chance to catch up with new technology.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Republican Rep. Kristin Robbins launches bid for Minnesota governor
The Brief Minnesota state Rep. Kristin Robbins announced she is running for governor in the upcoming election. Robbins is joining a growing field of republican candidates in the bid for governor. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz has not yet announced if he is seeking reelection. MAPLE GROVE, Minn. (FOX 9) - Minnesota state Rep. Kristin Robbins announced Wednesday she is running for Minnesota governor in 2026. Running for Minnesota governor What they're saying Robbins (R-Maple Grove) has represented District 37A in the Minnesota House of Representatives since winning the seat in 2018. She chairs the Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Committee, is vice chair of the Ways and Means Committee, and is a member of the Taxes and Higher Education Committees. In her campaign announcement, Robbins said she would focus on "stopping fraud and restoring fiscal responsibility" and criticized Gov. Tim Walz for what she calls his "complete mismanagement" of the state. "Families are working harder than ever while Tim Walz makes life more difficult," a statement on social media reads. "I'm running to fight fraud, cut taxes, support our police, strengthen schools, and bring back common-sense leadership." Dig deeper Robbins is joining a growing field of GOP candidates in the race for governor. Other candidates include former state Senator Scott Jensen, former MMA fighter Brad Kohler, retired U.S. Army veteran Kendall Qualls, and Phillip Parrish. Gov. Walz has not yet said whether he plans to run for reelection. The Source This story uses information from a campaign announcement, social media and previous FOX 9 reporting.
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Not just electricity — water supplies will be taxed by data centers
Construction continues on the sprawling Rosemount Data Center on land bought by Meta near Dakota County Technical College, shown Thursday, May 29, 2025. (Photo by Nicole Neri/Minnesota Reformer) Americans are becoming well acquainted with data centers' use of electricity via their utility bills, but the power-hungry warehouses that fuel our insatiable appetite for memes, movies, pics and posts is thirsty for an even more important resource: water. One large-scale data center can consume as much water as 12,000 households, according to the the Alliance for the Great Lakes. 'We are going to see more water conflicts as the data center sector expands at the same time as we see an expansion of irrigated agriculture into areas that haven't needed it as much,' said Helena Volzer, a water policy manager for Alliance for the Great Lakes, in an interview. A Minnesota Department of Natural Resources order temporarily barring new or expanded irrigation allowances along Little Rock Creek portends broader conflicts over groundwater use across the Great Lakes region, the Alliance said in a report released Wednesday. The DNR's April 2024 order found 'substantial evidence' that agricultural irrigation and other authorized uses harmed the Mississippi River tributary, which runs along the boundary of Benton and Morrison counties in central Minnesota. Elsewhere in the region, proposed mines, factories and data centers threaten to deplete the underground aquifers that supply up to 40% of the Great Lakes' volume — and drinking water reserves for nearly three-quarters of Minnesotans. Climate change, the artificial intelligence race, and pressure to mine and manufacture more on U.S. soil mean 'we are seeing a convergence of increasing water demand from different sources,' said Volzer, who spent a year compiling the report. Data centers with evaporative cooling systems, in particular, can consume vast amounts of water. Though most of Minnesota lies outside the Great Lakes basin, Volzer said the concerns raised in the report apply to other major watersheds, too. Minnesota statute allows the DNR to limit groundwater appropriations in designated groundwater management areas. But it can only take that step after determining that groundwater draws hurt nearby surface waters, as it did last year in the Little Rock Creek case, or when 'there are competing demands among existing and proposed users which exceed the reasonably available waters,' Volzer said in the report. That restricts the DNR to act only in situations where actual or proposed water withdrawals clearly impact people and businesses. In her report, Volzer advised Minnesota lawmakers to expand the state's groundwater protection law to let the DNR intervene when water appropriations are 'likely' to impact surface or groundwater reserves. State legislators passed a series of water protection laws earlier this decade after a Lakeville-based rail company proposed shipping 500 million gallons of Dakota County groundwater each year to the U.S. Southwest, said state Rep. Rick Hansen, DFL-South St. Paul. (The DNR shot down that proposal.) Proactive measures will help states like Minnesota get ahead of a fast-growing IT industry whose environmental impacts remain unclear, Volzer said. In her report, Volzer advised states to fund studies of expected water demand and groundwater resources, while expanding water use reporting requirements. That could give state and local authorities more insight into where large IT facilities could be located without unduly stressing aquifers, she told the Reformer. The ag industry's political sway could complicate further legislation to manage Minnesota's groundwater, Hansen said. 'Big Ag makes water law changes hard because some legislators are susceptible to 'cropaganda,'' he said. Thirsty data centers have already caused political backlash in Georgia, where residents on private wells near Atlanta say a new Meta facility has rendered their water 'undrinkable.' Meta is spending $800 million to build another data center in Rosemount, southeast of the Twin Cities. The city says that facility could draw 100,000 gallons of groundwater per day at peak capacity, or one Olympic swimming pool every six days, the Star Tribune reported in April. Data centers proposed for Chaska and Farmington could use 15 and 24 times more than Meta's Rosemount hub, the Strib reported, though Chaska's water manager assured the paper that the city can handle the added demand. 'We don't have a good sense of the water footprint of a data center right now,' Volzer said. That's due to the fact that data center developers require city officials to sign nondisclosure agreements before moving forward, she said, and because data center designs vary widely and continue to evolve. Newer designs favor closed-loop or waterless liquid cooling systems that are more economical than evaporative water cooling. The catch, Volzer said, is that those systems may require more electricity to run pumps, fans and heat exchangers, increasing demand on nearby thermal power plants fueled by coal, gas or uranium. Those plants themselves need huge amounts of cooling water, setting up a 'shell game' where data centers shift water usage beyond their sphere of influence. (Wind turbines and solar panels use little or no water in their operations.) 'There is a nexus between water and energy. You can't silo them,' Volzer said. Solve the daily Crossword
Chicago Tribune
2 days ago
- Chicago Tribune
Letters: Op-ed about Boundary Waters misleads readers about mining in northeast Minnesota
While a U.S. senator, Russ Feingold was known and respected for his independent thinking; he was willing to weigh and evaluate the facts of tough issues. Unfortunately, his recent opinion piece about mineral development in my region ('Messing with Boundary Waters is bad politics,' Aug. 9) was a regurgitation of outdated thinking that has led our country to an alarming overreliance on adversarial nations with irresponsible practices for production of much-needed critical minerals. He was wrong on the facts — and the politics. I have represented northeast Minnesota in the U.S. House of Representatives for more than six years; this area is home to my constituents and me. We care deeply about ensuring future generations can continue to enjoy the natural beauty of our area. We also know how stringent our environmental standards are, with the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW) already having strict protections in place and a buffer zone surrounding the wilderness where industrial activity is not allowed. It's puzzling that mining opponents continue to hypothesize about whether a new mine will affect the environment when proposed mining projects must meet high standards through an exhaustive yearslong process before earning permits to construct a mine. Further, Minnesota agencies that oversee mining have upheld the stringency of those standards when challenged by mining opponents in court. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources stated in a 2023 order that the regulation that governs mining 'in conjunction with other existing state and federal environmental protection laws, is adequate to protect the BWCAW from potential water, air, and other impacts from nonferrous mining.' I've seen firsthand that companies like Twin Metals Minnesota have for decades made meticulous efforts to not simply comply with our rigorous regulations, but also to go above and beyond by investing in innovative technology for the next generation of mining. Mining in Minnesota is done in an environmentally sound way; it also benefits Minnesotans across the state through education funding and tax revenue, it provides the materials for technologies we all use in our everyday lives, and it helps us move away from relying on mining elsewhere in the world where child labor is used and environmental standards don't exist. Economic growth, less reliance on foreign adversaries for our supply chain needs, enforcement of strict environmental laws and no reliance on child labor? Those sound like good politics to for keeping the threat to Minnesota's Boundary Waters alive for your readers. Those who don't live in Minnesota perhaps are unaware of the problem with keeping groundwater clean. Unlike Illinois, northern Minnesota doesn't have layers of black dirt and deep recesses of clay underneath the land surface. Impurities don't percolate in the the soil as is the case in Illinois. My father-in-law was a utilities manager of a northern Minnesota city. He had a terrible time cleaning up waste water before releasing it downstream. When you flushed your toilet, the results could end up a few hours later in Minneapolis after passing through the sand and rock subsoil. Can you imagine the damage a copper mine could do!It was certainly appropriate for the Tribune Editorial Board to recognize escalating gerrymandering as a threat to democracy ('Gerrymandering now truly is a dangerous threat to American democracy,' Aug. 10). It's not good, and a positive move toward a national bipartisan solution is warranted. While gerrymandering has been going on for a long time, what we need is a solution, an escalation of the scourge and its threats to our democracy. Nevertheless, the editorial board needs to be taken to task for its obvious partisanship. First, let's recognize that parties have engaged in gerrymandering, including after the 2020 census. But the current crisis is caused by an escalation — to break norms and gerrymander mid-decade. And who does the editorial board choose to attack? Not the president, who is responsible for inserting himself into state matters and initiating this escalation. Not the Texas politicians who are doing this now because they can. Instead, the board criticizes a governor's 'fight fire with fire' verbal response to this ugly and dangerous Trumpian escalation, as if the response itself were causing the problem. Get real. Everyone knows what fight 'fire with fire' means. It means that when faced with serious escalation, you might have to respond in kind if there appears to be no better alternative. But the board just doesn't seem to be able to bring itself to criticize the ones truly responsible for initiating the current mess!Regarding the editorial ''God does not gerrymander' (Aug. 12): Why doesn't the Tribune Editorial Board say, 'God does not gerrymander,' to the Democrats, as they have done gerrymandering for decades? Just look at Illinois. It's obvious its odd-shaped districts are made to benefit Democrats. We're sick to death of the cheating, and we're so that the Republicans have finally grown a backbone to help us have our voices been much talk about gerrymandering by both Democrats and Republicans. Illinois is not immune to this political phenomenon. When we look at a map of the 3rd Congressional District, we see a district that stretches across two counties from Elgin to Chicago. There's no reason we should have congressional maps that look like ink has been carelessly spilled. There is a commonsense solution. Most states are divided into relatively square townships for land survey and taxation purposes. We need to combine these square townships into square congressional districts with population numbers as uniform as possible. End the gerrymandering. Give us all an equal and fair month marks the 60th anniversary of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, landmark legislation that secured the right to vote for millions of disenfranchised Americans and laid the foundation for more fair, inclusive and accessible elections across the country. For decades, the Voting Rights Act has guided election authorities such as the Cook County clerk's office in our ongoing mission to protect and expand access to the ballot. But today, the values at the heart of that legislation are under renewed threat. Across the nation, restrictive voting laws, voter roll purges and disinformation campaigns are chipping away at the hard-won progress of the past 60 years. The right to vote is facing mounting challenges, particularly for voters of color, seniors, people with disabilities, and young or first-time voters. In this climate, the role of local election officials has never been more critical, as county and municipal clerk's offices remain on the front lines of democracy. At the Cook County clerk's office, we are committed to leading by example. That means leaning in on our efforts to expand voter education and outreach, particularly in underserved communities. It also means making voting more accessible by increasing early voting locations and reducing language barriers to ensure that every eligible voter can make their voice heard, regardless of where they live or what language they speak. In next year's gubernatorial election, we are also planning a first-of-its-kind early voting initiative at several suburban high schools to engage and empower first-time voters. We also continue to work to protect trust in our elections through tools such as our Trusted Source webpage, which offers clear, accurate information about election integrity and how your vote is protected. And, as your clerk, I am also advocating for legislative reforms in Springfield that will make voting easier and safer for all eligible residents. Democracy doesn't just live in Washington — it lives right here in Cook County in every polling place and with every ballot cast.
