What's next as Trump vents fury at Vladimir Putin: From the Politics Desk
Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, an evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail.
In today's edition, Elon Musk and Donald Trump bid farewell from the Oval Office on live TV. Meanwhile, Kristen Welker digs into Trump's latest social media salvos at Vladimir Putin and what they could mean for the Russia-Ukraine war. And senior Supreme Court reporter Lawrence Hurley answers a reader question about a notable provision tucked into the House budget bill that passed recently.
Sign up to receive this newsletter in your inbox every weekday here.
— Scott Bland
Elon Musk stood next to President Donald Trump in the Oval Office on Friday, but the physical proximity belied a growing philosophical divide between two of the world's most powerful men, resulting in the tech mogul's abrupt announcement that he is departing Washington — without having achieved his goal of decimating the federal government.
'He came, he saw, he folded,' Steve Bannon, a senior White House adviser during Trump's first term who is influential with the working-class wing of Trump's MAGA base, said in a text exchange with NBC News.
Musk, who stood with his arms folded across his chest as he and Trump took questions, sported a bruise near his right eye — an unmistakable metaphor for his tumultuous government service — that he said was incurred while playing with his 5-year-old son X.
Trump took a more charitable view of Musk's tenure during a sprawling news conference in which he also declined to rule out pardoning Sean 'Diddy' Combs, who is standing trial on charges of sex trafficking and other alleged crimes; said he dislikes 'the concept' of former first lady Jill Biden being forced to testify before Congress about her husband's mental fitness; and predicted again that Iran is on the cusp of making a deal that would suspend its pursuit of nuclear weapons.
'He had to go through the slings and the arrows, which is a shame because he's an incredible patriot,' Trump said of Musk.
Trump and Musk both contended that DOGE will continue to wring out savings by rooting out waste and fraud without Musk as its face.
'This is not the end of DOGE, but really the beginning,' Musk said, vowing to reach the trillion-dollar mark in cuts by the middle of next year. At the same time he spoke of cutting government spending, Musk lauded Trump's remodeling of the Oval Office.
'I love the gold on the ceiling,' he said.
Musk has argued that inertia throttled his efforts to reduce government spending — a conclusion that raises questions about whether he was naive about the challenge of the mission he undertook.
'The federal bureaucracy situation is much worse than I realized,' he told The Washington Post this week. 'I thought there were problems, but it sure is an uphill battle trying to improve things in D.C., to say the least.'
Read more →
President Donald Trump has ramped up the rhetoric attacking Russian President Vladimir Putin, but so far there's no teeth behind it.
After months of cutting Putin slack on the world stage and clashing with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Trump has undergone a stark rhetorical shift in recent days.
He's taken to social media to blast Putin for having gone 'absolutely crazy' and for 'needlessly killing a lot of people' including Ukrainian citizens 'for no reason whatsoever.' He has warned that 'what Vladimir Putin doesn't realize is that if it weren't for me, lots of really bad things would have already happened to Russia, and I mean REALLY BAD. He's playing with fire!'
Trump appears to now be warming to the belief many Western leaders have held for years — that Putin isn't seriously pushing for peace, outside of total Russian victory. In recent weeks, we've seen some of the biggest bombardments of the entire war, including a massive drone attack in Kyiv that came in the shadow of a prisoner exchange between Russia and Ukraine.
None of this means Trump is buddy-buddy with Zelenskyy now, and he criticized the Ukrainian as 'stubborn' during Friday remarks in the Oval Office, even as he underscored his disappointment with Putin.
Meanwhile, the issue of sanctioning Russia and sending aid to Ukraine obviously splits the GOP, and it doesn't necessarily sit well with the 'America First' wing of the GOP that Trump commands. But if Trump wants to act, as former Vice President Mike Pence told me he recommended during our conversation earlier this month, he has arrows in his quiver.
Earlier this week on 'Meet the Press Now,' former U.S. ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul told us that the only way to convince Putin to come to the negotiating table is to convince him he can't advance on the battlefield. While one might think the West is tapped out when it comes to sanctions, McFaul said there's a lot more on the table, including seizing more assets or banning Russia's 'shadow fleet' that ships oil from docking at Western ports.
And just a few days ago, Iowa GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley, an elder statesman in the Senate, called on Trump to be as 'decisive' in new sanctions against Russia as he's been in his push against Harvard University.
So if Putin has run out of leash with Trump, then what's the president waiting for?
Join us Sunday when we talk about this and a flurry of other important domestic and international issues with House Speaker Mike Johnson and Georgia Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock.
Thanks to everyone who emailed us! This week's reader question is on an under-the-radar provision in Republicans' 'big, beautiful bill.'
'I heard that the bill contains language that takes away a judge's authority to hold someone in contempt when they don't comply with the court's orders. Is that true? I've seen a lot about the financial implications but nothing on this.'
To answer this, we turned to senior Supreme Court reporter Lawrence Hurley. Here's his response:
The House bill does indeed include a provision that would limit the ability of federal judges to hold people in contempt for violating court orders. (Read it here.)
The Republican-backed measure comes amid considerable pushback on the right against a number of judges who have not only blocked Trump administration policies but have also questioned whether the administration is complying with rulings and at least considered contempt proceedings.
The provision in question would seek to limit the ability of judges to pursue contempt findings by withholding federal funds that could be used to enforce such a ruling unless the plaintiff posted a bond when seeking a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction.
But there is no guarantee the Senate will include the language in its version of the bill, in part because it may fall foul of rules intended to ensure budget bill provisions have a direct link to federal revenues.
👩⚖️ A temporary win on temporary status: The Supreme Court said it would continue to let the administration revoke the temporary legal status of more than 500,000 immigrants from four countries as litigation continues. Read more →
🦷 Speaking of having teeth: A new study warns that a 50-state ban on fluoride in water could lead to 1 in every 3 children in America developing cavities in the next five years. Read more →
📉 A roller coaster: Trump's tweet accusing China of flouting a deal on tariffs sent stocks sliding amid the uncertainty related to the trade war between the two countries. Read more →
☔ The fate of FEMA: While the Department of Homeland Security is publicly saying it will get rid of FEMA, it's quietly moving to keep some key pieces in place ahead of hurricane season. Read more →
🚙 Getting out of dodge: A growing number of lawmakers are looking to ditch Washington for the governor's mansions, leaving a job without a term limit for a chance to move back home. Read more →
➡️ Inflation rate: Inflation didn't change much in April, according to new data released by the Commerce Department. Read more →
📱 Poke: The Trump administration wants more social media vetting of Harvard's visa applicants. Read more →
◼️ Bernie Kerik has died: The former New York City police commissioner who later spent three years in jail on tax and false statement charges before being pardoned has died at the age of 69. Read more →
That's all From the Politics Desk for now. Today's newsletter was compiled by Scott Bland and Ben Kamisar.
If you have feedback — likes or dislikes — email us at politicsnewsletter@nbcuni.com
And if you're a fan, please share with everyone and anyone. They can sign up here.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
14 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Aides Insist That Tariffs Will Remain, Even After Court Ruling
President Trump's top economic advisers stressed on Sunday that they would not be deterred by a recent court decision that declared many of the administration's tariffs to be illegal, as they pointed out a variety of additional authorities that the White House could invoke as it looks to pressure China and others into negotiations. They also signaled that Mr. Trump had no plans to extend an original 90-day pause on some of his steepest tariff rates, raising the odds that those duties — the mere announcement of which had roiled markets — could take effect as planned in July. 'Rest assured, tariffs are not going away,' Howard Lutnick, the commerce secretary, said during an appearance on 'Fox News Sunday.' Asked about the future of the president's so-called reciprocal tariffs, first announced and quickly suspended in April, Mr. Lutnick added, 'I don't see today that an extension is coming.' The president's tariff strategy entered uncharted political and legal territory last week after a federal trade court ruled that Mr. Trump had misused an emergency economic powers law in trying to wage a global trade war. The decision would have put a quick halt to those duties, which form the centerpiece of the president's strategy of pressuring other countries into trade talks. But an appeals court soon granted the government a brief administrative pause to sort out arguments in the case, which is expected to reach the Supreme Court. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sound Off: June 1, 2025
Sun Herald readers weigh in on local and national topics. Perhaps someone could develop a device that when a traffic light changed from red to green a signal was sent to the cars in front of the light. That signal would cause a loud ding to sound on the car's speakers alerting those looking at their phones that it was time to move. I'm not sure I've ever laughed harder than I did when I read about how people are making money on Wall Street basing their buys on the idea that Trump Always Chickens Out (TACO). With the Chrisley pardons, President Trump proved that he has zero integrity. The people who were defrauded of millions will never get their money back. If it's possible to have negative integrity, Trump is the charter member of the group. If there's one thing we should have learned by now, it's that Democrats will do anything to win an election. Considering the person in charge of the scheme admitted to it in print and on camera, I'm having trouble figuring out how anyone could say there isn't election fraud in Gulfport. Candidates have always held events where their 'patrons' donate and pledge their support. Is that voter fraud? The GOP in Gulfport is making accusations of voter fraud already. President Trump used that to push the lie that he won the 2020 election. Now he is in office selling everything that is not nailed down. Republicans must be really scared of the Black woman winning the mayors race in Gulfport. Wasn't Elon Musk trying to buy votes in Wisconsin? When Democrats use the Republican play book, they really get upset.. I'm old enough to remember when Elon Musk traveled the country handing out checks to people. I'm trying to figure out why that would be OK, but free meals aren't. I trust that the good people of Gulfport are smart enough to not vote for Hugh Keating, who, obviously, doesn't have enough merits to run on his own. Stephen A Smith said it best: 'How can anyone trust the lying media, Trump was right, they can't be trusted about anything!'Our country was manipulated by them. Why can't Canal Road in Gulfport be paved to 28th Street? Send your Sound Offs to soundoff@
Miami Herald
19 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Your Car Loan Just Got Cheaper as New Bill Allows Tax Write-offs on Interest
The U.S. House of Representatives has passed President Trump's sweeping tax bill, nicknamed the "Big Beautiful Bill," which includes an above-the-line deduction of up to $10,000 in car loan interest. In other words, taxpayers who itemize deductions or claim the standard deduction wouldn't pay tax on auto loan interest up to $10,000. However, your income and the vehicle type you purchase determine your eligibility. The deduction would be phased out by $200 for every $1,000 of modified adjusted gross income above $100,000 for single filers and $200,000 for joint filers, according to the Tax Foundation. Single filers earning above $149,000 and joint filers making over $249,000 wouldn't qualify for an auto loan interest write-off. Qualifying individuals or joint filers could receive the deduction for auto loans taken out in 2025 through 2028 each year until the temporary write-off expires, the Detroit Free Press reports. Additionally, the deduction only applies to cars with their final assembly in the United States. Qualifying vehicle types include SUVs, cars, trucks, vans, motorcycles, all-terrain models, and RVs. If the proposed legislation passes through the Senate and becomes law, drivers can expect to receive the highest deduction during a loan's first year since most monthly payments cover interest rather than principal. The average new car loan for May carries a 4.77% average interest rate for those with a FICO credit score ranging from 781 to 850, according to Bankrate. A credit score between 661 and 780 incurs a 6.40% rate, and the next-lowest tier, 601 to 660, jumps to 9.59%. Credit scores between 501 and 600 carry a 13.08% average interest rate on a new car loan, while 300 to 500 ratings incur a 15.75% rate. If the average driver pays $2,000 on auto loan interest in a year, they'd save $400 on their taxes. Leases, commercial vehicles, and salvage titles would not qualify for auto loan interest deductions. Whether the bill includes interest deductions for used vehicles or only new ones is unclear. While all Americans would welcome auto loan interest write-offs, Trump's bill also proposes that hybrid owners pay $100 more yearly to register their car, and electric vehicle (EV) owners pay a $250 annual registration fee. The fees are projected to generate around $40 billion over the next decade for the Highway Trust Fund (HTF), which pays for various transportation infrastructure projects. While many Americans would welcome auto loan interest tax write-offs, a deduction that hasn't been available since Ronald Reagan's presidency, the proposed legislation's impact appears relatively minimal. "I don't know of many people who would decide that they can buy a car because they're going to cut their taxes by $400. So, we don't think it's as exciting a proposition for driving more vehicle sales," Cox Automotive chief economist Jonathan Smoke said, according to Bankrate. Additionally, the expected sharp rise in already-high vehicle prices due to Trump's auto import tariffs would further offset any savings. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
