India Holds Major Air Drill Near Pakistan Weeks After Giant Dogfight
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
India concluded a massive two-day air combat drill along its southern border with Pakistan, according to multiple Indian news outlets.
Newsweek has reached out to the Indian Defense Ministry and the office of Pakistan's prime minister for comment.
Why It Matters
The exercise took place nearly a month after India launched its military campaign "Operation Sindoor" targeting Pakistan in their biggest confrontation in decades following a deadly attack on a tourist bus in Kashmir that killed 26 people. Pakistan denied Indian accusations of involvement in that attack.
Four days of fighting was marked by an extensive air battle, one of the largest dogfights since World War II, before the two nuclear rivals reached a ceasefire agreement following U.S. diplomatic efforts.
Indian Air Force (IAF) Rafale fighter jet takes off during Ex Desert Knight-21, a bilateral air exercise between IAF and French Air and Space Force (Armée de l'Air et de l'Espace) at Air Force Station...
Indian Air Force (IAF) Rafale fighter jet takes off during Ex Desert Knight-21, a bilateral air exercise between IAF and French Air and Space Force (Armée de l'Air et de l'Espace) at Air Force Station in Jodhpur on January 23, 2021. More
PRAKASH SINGH/AFP/Getty Images
What To Know
The Indian Air Force issued a Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) earlier this week for a large-scale exercise scheduled for June 7 and 8, taking place in Rajasthan's southern sector near the Pakistan border. Aircraft deployed included the Rafale, Mirage 2000, and Sukhoi-30, according to Indian outlets including Firstpost, The Shillong Times, and Mathrubhumi English.
In May, Pakistan said it shot down several Indian planes, including the French-made Rafale and Russian Sukhoi, with Pakistani Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar saying Chinese J-10C jets were used in the operation.
Diplomatic tensions have continued despite a ceasefire agreed under U.S. pressure. India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi accused Pakistan of disrupting infrastructure development in the disputed territory of Jammu and Kashmir following the Pahalgam attack, Reuters reported Friday.
Pakistan accused India of using claims of developmenta in Jammu and Kashmir to mask an unprecedented military presence, arbitrary arrests, and efforts to alter the region's demography in violation of international law, according to The Associated Press of Pakistan.
Growing tensions also surround India's suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty following the Pahalgam attack.
What People Are Saying
India's Defense Minister Rajnath Singh wrote in The Times of India on June 6: "India has made it clear that we have a zero-tolerance policy towards terrorism. Talks and terrorism cannot go hand-in-hand. Any future dialogue with Pakistan will focus solely on terrorism and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Also, if Pakistan is serious, it must hand over UN-designated terrorists like Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar."
Pakistan's Foreign Office spokesperson Shafqat Ali Khan said on June 6, as quoted by the Associated Press of Pakistan: "We are deeply dismayed that the Indian Prime Minister has once again chosen to accuse Pakistan of involvement in the Pahalgam attack, without presenting a single piece of credible evidence."
What Happens Next
Relations between India and Pakistan remain tense and any incident could easily prompt a resumption of hostilities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Ex-Pakistan foreign minister warns full-scale war with India closer than ever after recent skirmishes
WASHINGTON — Pakistan's former foreign minister warned US lawmakers and diplomats last week that the 'threshold' for war between his nation and India is lower than ever following clashes in the disputed region of Kashmir last month. 'We're incredibly grateful for the role that the US government — President Trump, Secretary [of State] Marco Rubio — created throughout this crisis in helping us all achieve this cease-fire,' Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, the current chairman of the Pakistan People's Party, told The Post in a recent interview. 'But our message has been that the cease-fire is a start, but it is only a start, and what we seek is assistance in our pursuit of peace through dialogue and diplomacy.' 4 Ex-foreign minister of Pakistan Bilawal Bhutto Zardari warned US lawmakers and diplomats last week that the 'threshold' of war between his nation and India is closer than ever following skirmishes in the disputed region of Kashmir last month. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement 'We're all a lot less safe as a result of this conflict than we were before,' added Zardari, the son of the late Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. 'The threshold of full-out military conflict between India and Pakistan has been drastically lowered — the lowest it has ever been in our history, as a result of this conflict.' The US-brokered truce between the nuclear-armed nations took effect May 10 after weeks of fighting. India accused Pakistan of sparking the conflict by supporting an April 22 terror attack that left 26 civilians dead in the segment of Kashmir under New Delhi's control. Advertisement 4 India accused Pakistan of sparking the conflict by backing an April 22 terror attack that left 26 civilians dead in the segment of Kashmir under New Delhi's control. AP Most of those killed were Hindus, and Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri pointed the finger at the Kashmir-based terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba for the carnage in the resort town of Pahalgam. The Pakistani delegation that came to Washington expressed a desire to coordinate with India on counter-terrorism — but rejected that Islamabad was involved in any way with the attack. 'The Prime Minister of Pakistan offered an impartial international inquiry because we were confident that Pakistan is not involved in this terrorist incident,' Zardari said. 'The international intelligence community endorses this view.' Advertisement 4 The Pakistani delegation that came to Washington expressed a desire to discuss coordinating with India on counter-terrorism — but rejected that Pakistan was involved in any way with the attack. AP 'As things stand now, if there's a terrorist attack anywhere in India,' he went on, 'it immediately means war, and the law of reciprocation means, therefore, if there's a terrorist attack in Pakistan, we are to also treat it as an act of war.' Zardari also said that India's threat to cut off Pakistan's water was 'an existential matter' that would be considered 'an act of war.' 'If we are to engage in a new dialogue with India, make new promises with one another that could potentially lead to new treaties, then it's very important that they abide by the old treaties like the Indus Water Treaty,' he said. Advertisement 4 'I'm optimistic that the president is passionate about peace and that he will be successful in pushing that message here in the United States,' Zardari said of Trump. 'Pakistan is obviously ready.' AP The delegation from Islamabad met with officials in the State Department and Congress and is headed this week to meet with UK and European diplomats in hopes of brokering a more lasting peace. 'We had a military upper hand when we agreed to the cease-fire. We did so on the stipulation that the cease-fire would be the first step,' Zardari said. 'I'm optimistic that the president is passionate about peace and that he will be successful in pushing that message here in the United States. Pakistan is obviously ready.' Reps for the Indian embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
USA Today
4 hours ago
- USA Today
Viral Newark airport video sparks outrage, US Embassy says visiting not a right
Hear this story AI-assisted summary A person was detained at Newark Airport, prompting the U.S. Embassy in India to reiterate that visiting the U.S. is a privilege, not a right. A witness recorded the incident and shared it on social media, alleging the detainee, possibly an Indian student, was treated harshly. The Consulate General of India in New York is investigating the situation and is in contact with local authorities. The U.S. Embassy in India is reminding travelers that visiting the U.S. is not a right, days after images surfaced of a person being pinned to the ground at New Jersey's Newark Liberty International Airport. 'The United States continues to welcome legitimate travelers to our country. However, there is no right to visit the United States,' the embassy posted across social media platforms on Tuesday. 'We cannot and will not tolerate illegal entry, abuse of visas, or the violation of U.S. law.' While the statement wasn't tied to a particular incident, it comes on the heels of video shared by Kunal Jain, a longtime U.S. resident and self-described Indo-American social entrepreneur who moved back to India last year, according to his profile on X, formerly Twitter. 'I witnessed a young Indian student being deported from Newark Airport last night— handcuffed, crying, treated like a criminal. He came chasing dreams, not causing harm,' Jain posted on X on Sunday, along with videos and photos that have amassed more than 1.7 million views. In interviews with India's NewsX and NDTV, Jain said he was preparing to board a United Airlines flight to New Delhi, when he spotted the person in custody. Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle. 'Initially that boy was sitting on the chair, but then later on what he started doing is he started (hitting) his head to the wall, and that's when I think these authorities realized that he may hurt himself or he may do something crazy,' Jain told NewsX. 'They have pinned him down on the floor and they sit on him, and that's when he started yelling and screaming.' Jain added that authorities wanted to board the person on the plane, but the pilot said, 'No, I cannot allow as of this moment because he's violent and he could be a threat to the existing passengers.' Jain added that he and a doctor offered to speak to the person in Hindi, but were not allowed. He doesn't know what happened next, but he and others on social media have called on the Indian government to step in and bring the person 'home.' On Monday, the Consulate General of India, New York shared on X, 'We have come across social media posts claiming that an Indian national is facing difficulties at Newark Liberty International Airport. We are in touch with local authorities in this regard. The Consulate remains ever committed for the welfare of Indian Nationals.' A State Department official said they've also seen the reports but don't have any additional information and referred USA TODAY to local authorities. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which oversees the airport, referred USA TODAY to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which has not yet replied. While it's unclear if the person in custody was a student, the Trump administration has been cracking down on international students and on entering the U.S. in general. Additionally, President Donald Trump's latest travel ban, which took effect Monday, bans or heavily restricts travel to U.S. by foreign nationals from nearly 20 countries – though India is not one of them. Coming to America? What happens if you're denied entry into the US 'They don't want any foreigners unauthorized illegal foreigners to come into the country and take the advantage of the resources,' Jain told NDTV, calling that a 'great policy.' However, he added that even with foreign students legally allowed in the country, 'They are becoming more and more watchful, and every act is being monitored.' Jain has said he isn't trying to get into politics or legal matters, but wants to see justice and human dignity.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - A trillion dollars annually for the Pentagon: Military spending is out of control
The era of trillion-dollar annual Pentagon budgets is upon us. Members of Congress are likely to increase defense spending by $150 billion through the budget reconciliation process. When added to the Trump administration's fiscal year 2026 Department of Defense base budget proposal, Pentagon spending will total over $1 trillion a year. There are two factors that virtually guarantee that defense spending will never dip below that mark again. The first is political. If a future budget proposal dips below the $1 trillion mark, there will be howls about national security cuts, and few politicians are willing to weather those attacks. The second reason is more practical. The reconciliation boost includes development funding for a slew of new weapons programs — the F-47, Collaborative Combat Aircraft, the B-21 strategic bomber, Sentinel ballistic missiles, underwater drones, hypersonic missiles and more. The services aren't buying these weapons yet, just paying to develop them. As expensive as they are now, they will become vastly more expensive in coming years when they go into production. This is the beginning of a Pentagon spending 'time bomb.' New programs currently entering into development will be vastly more expensive than they initially appear as they transition into the production and sustainment phases in coming years. The American people are now dealing with the explosion of the last Pentagon spending time bomb, the one that started on Sept. 11, 2001. We now pay more on the military than at any time since the end of World War II. Even at the height of the war on terror, with American troops fighting in two separate theaters, the military wasn't spending as much in real terms as it does now. After the Sept. 11 attacks, no one seriously questioned military spending in Washington. Politicians almost universally wanted to appear strong on defense, and so few were willing to do anything to impede military spending proposals. The services took advantage of the moment and launched a series of new acquisition programs, few of which had any relevance to the war on terror. The Future Combat System, the Littoral Combat Ship, the F-35, the Zumwalt-class Destroyer and others were begun in earnest after 9/11. These were all programs that began the last time the national security establishment decided the historical moment justified their profligacy with taxpayer dollars. In 2001, it was the fear of global terrorism. Today, a menacing China serves the same purpose. The national security establishment has seriously lost its way. It continues to spend more and more while delivering a lot of disappointments. All components of the U.S. military are far smaller than they were 50 years ago. The Army is approximately 40 percent the size it was in 1975. The Navy went from 559 ships to 293 today. The Air Force had more than 10,000 aircraft then and a little more than 5,000 today. What the military does receive is delivered years late and typically twice the quoted price. Many weapons systems also don't work too well. The F-35 works less than one-third of the time. The Navy is retiring Littoral Combat Ships decades ahead of schedule because they can't perform the missions the Navy needs. Army leaders cancelled the Future Combat System without producing a single operational vehicle. Today, policymakers are doubling down on the same structure used to create the current mess. While the American people continue to pay for the sins of the previous generation of policymakers, today's military leaders are setting up at least the next two generations for even more disastrous Pentagon spending. Defense spending has increased nearly 50 percent since 2000. The post-9/11 spending time bomb accounts for a significant portion of that increase. In 20 years, the American people could easily be spending $2 to $3 trillion a year to cover the obligations made today. The Trump administration still has a good opportunity to establish a better path forward. The first step is to reevaluate the strategy that underpins military policies. The world has changed over the last decade. China is facing mounting political, economic and demographic challenges. The U.S. no longer has massive forces fighting overseas. Before proposing gigantic new military spending, the administration should first formulate an updated strategy that can guide policy decisions. By doing things backwards, the entire national security establishment gives the appearance of making the defense budget itself the strategy. Dan Grazier is a senior fellow and program director at the Stimson Center. He is a former Marine Corps captain who served tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
