
He's in Love With His Best Friend, but Does His Friend Love Him Back?
'Open, Heaven,' the first novel by the poet and memoirist Sean Hewitt, begins with an epigraph from William Blake's poem 'Milton': 'every Flower/The Pink, the Jessamine, the Wall-flower, the Carnation,/The Jonquil, the mild Lily opes her heavens; every Tree/And Flower & Herb soon fill the air with an innumerable Dance,/Yet all in order sweet & lovely, Men are sick with Love.' It's a fitting start. This is a novel that has, line for line, more descriptions of flowers than any I can remember reading, and that has as its all-consuming preoccupation the delusion and disorder that abject desire can cause.
Most of the novel takes place around 2002, when the narrator, James, is 16. He lives with his family in Thornmere, a village in northern England that seems either quaintly charming or suffocatingly bleak, depending on one's sensibility and affinity for cows. James feels like an 'interloper' there. He's gay and has recently come out. His parents are somewhat supportive, in their mild, perplexed way, though around town the news has been met with chilly silence or disgust.
Then James meets Luke, a 17-year-old who arrives to live with his aunt and uncle for a year. His origins are murky — a mother somewhere in France, a father in prison. He becomes James's obsession, a blank canvas onto which James can project his. unfulfilled desires. Luke is charismatic and cocksure, casually fluent in the arcane codes governing the lives of straight teenage boys. His sexuality remains maddeningly ambiguous, even as he and James become best friends. James slowly falls in love with Luke, and he grows increasingly desperate to know if his feelings are reciprocated. He fears his desire is a betrayal: 'I was hardly a friend to him at all, only an opportunist, trying to get close to him so I could convince him to love me.'
The inchoate pain of asymmetrical love, the twin currents of need and shame that flow beneath the surface of desire — these are familiar topics for Hewitt, whose 2022 memoir, 'All Down Darkness Wide,' was widely praised as a wrenching portrait of a doomed relationship. But where the memoir was piercing and profound, 'Open, Heaven' clings insistently to the superficial. Hewitt has a fondness for lyrical description, particularly of the natural world ('the flowers from afar looked like a pure white froth … a bright sky-blue blanket of forget-me-nots was ruched in the dappled light…'). These passages effectively stir up an aura of misty poignancy, but they are deployed with such frequency and at such cloying length that at times it seems like Hewitt's goal is merely to conjure an exquisite atmosphere, rather than to understand these characters or to imbue their story with any emotional weight.
While the novel is full of beautiful surfaces, it never gives these boys any sense of particularity; we don't know what draws them to each other. This is the problem with unrelenting rapture: It can become generic and impersonal, even solipsistic. 'It was like walking through a folk song that afternoon,' Hewitt writes, 'the blackbirds and the thrushes, the sweetness of the flowers, the boy I loved, and who might even love me, waiting for me between the trees.'
This is sentimental without communicating actual sentiment, airy without ever taking flight. James is enthralled by his fantasy of Luke's hidden depths — 'beneath the blush of his cheeks, I imagined an ocean of thought' — but we get no notion of what those depths might contain, nor even what James might think they contain. 'When [Luke] was alone, inside himself, he was pure, golden,' James concludes. 'He was like a statue of beauty to me, considered and perfectly made.' A statue may be enough to satisfy adolescent curiosity. But it's not enough for a novel.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
2 days ago
- Forbes
Mark Hamill Has The Most Bizarre ‘The Last Jedi' Story Ever
The Last Jedi There's a lot of documentation about how dismissive Harrison Ford is of his time working on Star Wars (often in very funny ways), but have you ever heard Mark Hamill talk about it? It can go some…very weird places. Recently, Hamill talked a lot about his experience on The Last Jedi, specifically, on Bullseye on YouTube. He cleared the air about some issues, saying the rumor that he had some sort of problem with Rian Johnson and his vision for Luke was false. 'Nothing could be further from the truth,' and thatJohnson is 'one of the most gifted directors' he's ever worked with. Good to hear! But things get weird when Mark Hamill describes a story he invented in his own mind about why he thought Luke was so bitter about the Force and being a Jedi, hence the lightsaber toss at the start, his general demeanor toward training Rey and getting involved again in another galactic conflict. Here's the 'head cannon' he made for Luke's motivation: Uhh, what? Okayyy. I mean, not sure what to make of that. Not even sure it really makes sense. You hate the Jedi and the Force because…you stored your lightsaber improperly, and your kid got to it? Also, this happens after he gives up being a Jedi because of love? I mean, it's your headcanon man, but that's pretty weird! The Last Jedi I've seen this story passed around, and some are saying that it's still better than the canon reveal that Luke almost killed his own nephew because he saw him as a powerful force-user turning to the dark side. That plot point may have its issues, but no, I'm not going to say it's worse than the idea of Luke's toddler accidentally being skewered with his lightsaber. Put it in a lockbox, Luke! Safety first! The Last Jedi remains the most controversial piece of Star Wars media ever. I'd argue the recent series The Acolyte got close, but that's a low-profile offering than the new trilogy movie. Sentiment has really turned against that whole trilogy altogether at this point. Well, circling back, you can come up with all the motivations you want as an actor, but this one is a real headscratcher, I gotta say. Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, Bluesky and Instagram. Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.


Geek Tyrant
2 days ago
- Geek Tyrant
Mark Hamill Shares His Super Dark Pitch For Luke Skywalker's Backstory in STAR WARS — GeekTyrant
Mark Hamill recently opened up about an he had for Luke Skywalker's tragic backstory, but it was, perhaps, too dark for a franchise built around hope, redemption, and family-friendly adventure. In an appearance on the Bullseye with Jesse Thorn podcast, Hamill shared a pitch he had for Luke's past, one that never made it to the big screen. While Hamill respects The Last Jedi director Rian Johnson and his storytelling, he didn't quite agree with the choice to make Luke a depressed hermit, hiding away on the isolated planet Ahch-To. Hamill felt that Luke's descent into exile would have been more compelling if it had been fueled by a personal loss so devastating that it shattered his connection to the Jedi. Hamill shared: 'I thought, 'What could make someone give up a devotion to what is basically a religious entity, to give up being a Jedi?' Well, the love of a woman. So [Luke] falls in love with a woman, he gives up being a Jedi, they have a child together. 'At some point, the child, as a toddler, picks up an unattended lightsaber, pushes the button, and is killed instantly. The wife is so full of grief, she kills herself … but [Rian Johnson] didn't have the time to tell a backstory like that, I'm guessing. He just wanted a brief thing to explain it.' Whoa… this backstory is certainly tragic, but it veers into territory that might be hard for some Star Wars fans to swallow. Yes, the franchise has grappled with heavy themes, from the fall of Anakin Skywalker to the death of children like the younglings in Revenge of the Sith , but the added layer of a grieving mother taking her own life after the accidental death of her child feels almost too dark for the franchise. Hamill's proposed backstory would have introduced grief and loss at a level that's borderline unbearable, pushing the limits of what's acceptable within the Star Wars universe. But, Andor pushed hard with these themes, but the franchise wasn't ready for that kind of thing when Lucasfilm was developing The Last Jedi . The Last Jedi tells a different story. Instead of focusing on a personal tragedy involving love and loss, Luke's exile is driven by his shame and guilt over a momentary lapse in judgment regarding his nephew, Ben Solo. When Luke sensed the darkness growing within Ben, he briefly considered ending his life to prevent the galaxy from suffering under the rise of another Sith Lord. But Ben woke up just in time to destroy Luke's Jedi temple, leading to Luke's retreat to Ahch-To. He isn't just abandoning the Jedi Order; he's abandoning the trust of his best friends, Han and Leia, by failing their son. His exile isn't born out of a simple failure; it's a failure with emotional weight. The guilt of having failed his nephew and having watched another Jedi Order collapse weighs heavily on Luke. As much as some fans criticize Luke's actions in The Last Jedi , there's a layer of emotional complexity here that makes sense, even if it feels jarring at first. Some fans were upset by the portrayal of Luke as a broken man who gave up on everything he once believed in, but others saw it as a profound, humanizing arc, a man struggling with faith, guilt, and redemption. Johnson's approach is emotionally resonant, focusing on Luke's growth as a character rather than trying to justify his actions with a darker, more complex backstory. Had Hamill's tragic backstory made it into The Last Jedi , it might have changed the tone of the entire film. The concept of a tragic love story ending in death and despair is undeniably powerful, but it's hard to imagine The Last Jedi taking that plunge into such grim territory without losing some of its balance. While both versions of Luke's backstory exlore deep emotional wounds, Johnson's choice allows for growth and redemption in the end. What do you think about Hamill's pitch?


Tom's Guide
2 days ago
- Tom's Guide
How to watch Biffy Clyro at Glastonbury 2025: live stream Scottish rock trio online for FREE
There's no disputing that Biffy Clyro will bring their electric energy to Glastonbury 2025. The Scottish trio composed of Simon Neil and twin brothers James and Ben Johnston have created some classic hits over the years. You can watch Biffy Clyro at Glastonbury live streams from anywhere with a VPN and for FREE. Biffy Clyro's Glastonbury 2025 set takes place on Friday, June 27.► Start time: 8:15 p.m. BST / 3:15 p.m. ET / 12:15 p.m. PT / 5:15 a.m. AEST (Sat.)• FREE STREAM — BBC iPlayer (U.K.)• Watch anywhere — try NordVPN 100% risk free Biffy Clyro may have formed back in 1995, but it was their 2009 album Only Revolutions that truly propelled the Scottish rock trio into the mainstream. Packed with hits like Many of Horror, Bubbles, and Mountains, the album cemented their place in modern rock and these classic hits will sure to be a feature of Friday's set. Since then, they've delivered a string of major singles — including Black Chandelier — that continues to be a crowd favorite alongside other classics like Machines and God and Satan. With a brand-new album titled Futique set for release this fall, their Glastonbury performance is definitely one of the standouts of the festival — potentially even outshining the follow-up headliners The 1975. Whether you're a die-hard fan or love a sing-along, this is a set you can't miss. Below are all the details you need to watch Biffy Clyro and live stream Glastonbury 2025 for FREE and from anywhere. You can watch Biffy Clyro's Glastonbury set on BBC iPlayer, which is live streaming the five main stages all day: Pyramid, Other, West Holts, Woodsies, and The Park. As well as laptops, the service also has apps for smartphones, tablets and a wide range of streaming devices. Traveling abroad right now? You can use a VPN to watch Biffy Clyro at Glastonbury 2025 as if you were back home. NordVPN is our top pick of the options and we'll show you how to access it below. Away from home at the moment and blocked from watching the Doechii set on your usual subscription? You can still tune into the West Holts Stage headliner and all other Glastonbury coverage live thanks to the wonders of a VPN (Virtual Private Network). The software allows your devices to appear as if they're back in your home country regardless of where in the world you are. So ideal for viewers away on vacation or on business. Our favorite is NordVPN. It's the best on the market: NordVPN deal: FREE $50 / £50 Amazon gift card Boasting lightning fast speeds, great features, streaming power, and class-leading security, NordVPN is our #1 VPN. ✅ FREE Amazon gift card worth up to $50/£50✅ 4 months extra FREE!✅ 76% off usual price Use Nord to unblock BBC iPlayer and watch Glastonbury live online with our exclusive deal. Using a VPN is incredibly simple. 1. Install the VPN of your choice. As we've said, NordVPN is our favorite. 2. Choose the location you wish to connect to in the VPN app. For instance, if you're away from the U.K. but want to view BBC iPlayer as usual, you'd select a U.K. server from the list. 3. Sit back and enjoy the action. Head over to BBC iPlayer and enjoy Biffy Clyro's set! The Glastonbury Festival is only shown in the U.K., so you won't find Biffy Clyro's Glastonbury set in any international listings. There's good news if you're currently on holiday in the U.S., Australia or Canada from the U.K., however. You can download one of the best VPN services and tap into your FREE home coverage of Glastonbury 2025 through BBC iPlayer. We recommend NordVPN. Or if you're content only to listen to Biffy Clyro's set, you can do so via the BBC's 'pop-up radio station' BBC Radio Glastonbury via BBC Sounds on web browsers. Pyramid Stage The Other Stage West Holts Stage Woodsies Park Stage Acoustic Stage Avalon Stage We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example: 1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service). 2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad. We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.