logo
Swedish MPs back financing for new nuclear reactors

Swedish MPs back financing for new nuclear reactors

The Advertiser21-05-2025

Sweden's parliament has passed a bill to finance a new generation of nuclear reactors the government says are key to energy security and achieving net zero emissions by 2045.
The government plans four large-scale reactors - with installed capacity of about 5000 megawatts - or the equivalent in small modular reactors (SMRs).
Half of that should be on-stream by 2035, according to the government.
"It's a question guaranteeing Swedish jobs, for dealing with climate change and it's a question of Sweden's security," Financial Markets Minster Niklas Wykman said during a debate in parliament on Wednesday.
Electricity demand is expected to double to about 300 terrawatt hours over the next two decades and the government says without nuclear power, key new industries like green steel, bio-fuels and large-scale hydrogen production will go elsewhere.
The government says it supports all fossil-free energy production,but that only nuclear can supply reliable and predictable power.
A white paper published in August last year, which proposed a similar model, said the state could need to lend nuclear developers between 300-600 billion crowns ($A48-$A96 billion).
Price guarantees would stay in place for 40 years.
Critics say nuclear power will be too expensive and too slow to build and would squeeze out cheaper wind and solar which are the only way to meet increased demand in the short term.
"It is an item of religious faith for this government to build nuclear power whatever the price," Birger Lahti of the opposition Left Party said.
Sweden's parliament has passed a bill to finance a new generation of nuclear reactors the government says are key to energy security and achieving net zero emissions by 2045.
The government plans four large-scale reactors - with installed capacity of about 5000 megawatts - or the equivalent in small modular reactors (SMRs).
Half of that should be on-stream by 2035, according to the government.
"It's a question guaranteeing Swedish jobs, for dealing with climate change and it's a question of Sweden's security," Financial Markets Minster Niklas Wykman said during a debate in parliament on Wednesday.
Electricity demand is expected to double to about 300 terrawatt hours over the next two decades and the government says without nuclear power, key new industries like green steel, bio-fuels and large-scale hydrogen production will go elsewhere.
The government says it supports all fossil-free energy production,but that only nuclear can supply reliable and predictable power.
A white paper published in August last year, which proposed a similar model, said the state could need to lend nuclear developers between 300-600 billion crowns ($A48-$A96 billion).
Price guarantees would stay in place for 40 years.
Critics say nuclear power will be too expensive and too slow to build and would squeeze out cheaper wind and solar which are the only way to meet increased demand in the short term.
"It is an item of religious faith for this government to build nuclear power whatever the price," Birger Lahti of the opposition Left Party said.
Sweden's parliament has passed a bill to finance a new generation of nuclear reactors the government says are key to energy security and achieving net zero emissions by 2045.
The government plans four large-scale reactors - with installed capacity of about 5000 megawatts - or the equivalent in small modular reactors (SMRs).
Half of that should be on-stream by 2035, according to the government.
"It's a question guaranteeing Swedish jobs, for dealing with climate change and it's a question of Sweden's security," Financial Markets Minster Niklas Wykman said during a debate in parliament on Wednesday.
Electricity demand is expected to double to about 300 terrawatt hours over the next two decades and the government says without nuclear power, key new industries like green steel, bio-fuels and large-scale hydrogen production will go elsewhere.
The government says it supports all fossil-free energy production,but that only nuclear can supply reliable and predictable power.
A white paper published in August last year, which proposed a similar model, said the state could need to lend nuclear developers between 300-600 billion crowns ($A48-$A96 billion).
Price guarantees would stay in place for 40 years.
Critics say nuclear power will be too expensive and too slow to build and would squeeze out cheaper wind and solar which are the only way to meet increased demand in the short term.
"It is an item of religious faith for this government to build nuclear power whatever the price," Birger Lahti of the opposition Left Party said.
Sweden's parliament has passed a bill to finance a new generation of nuclear reactors the government says are key to energy security and achieving net zero emissions by 2045.
The government plans four large-scale reactors - with installed capacity of about 5000 megawatts - or the equivalent in small modular reactors (SMRs).
Half of that should be on-stream by 2035, according to the government.
"It's a question guaranteeing Swedish jobs, for dealing with climate change and it's a question of Sweden's security," Financial Markets Minster Niklas Wykman said during a debate in parliament on Wednesday.
Electricity demand is expected to double to about 300 terrawatt hours over the next two decades and the government says without nuclear power, key new industries like green steel, bio-fuels and large-scale hydrogen production will go elsewhere.
The government says it supports all fossil-free energy production,but that only nuclear can supply reliable and predictable power.
A white paper published in August last year, which proposed a similar model, said the state could need to lend nuclear developers between 300-600 billion crowns ($A48-$A96 billion).
Price guarantees would stay in place for 40 years.
Critics say nuclear power will be too expensive and too slow to build and would squeeze out cheaper wind and solar which are the only way to meet increased demand in the short term.
"It is an item of religious faith for this government to build nuclear power whatever the price," Birger Lahti of the opposition Left Party said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Break it Down: Aura Energy welcomes Swedish push to lift uranium mining ban
Break it Down: Aura Energy welcomes Swedish push to lift uranium mining ban

Herald Sun

time3 hours ago

  • Herald Sun

Break it Down: Aura Energy welcomes Swedish push to lift uranium mining ban

Don't miss out on the headlines from Stockhead. Followed categories will be added to My News. Stockhead's Break it Down brings you today's leading market news in under 90 seconds. In this episode, host Tylah Tully explains the latest developments in Sweden, where the country is looking at potentially removing a ban on uranium mining. Aura Energy (ASX:AEE) has interest in uranium projects in Sweden, and is working with the coalition to get the ban lifted. Watch the video to find out the latest. While Aura Energy is a Stockhead advertiser, it did not sponsor this content. Originally published as Break it Down: Aura Energy welcomes Swedish push to lift uranium mining ban Stockhead Rumble Resources could join the ASX's new gold producer class of 2025, with several key steps underway to prepare its Western Queen project for near term mining. Stockhead ReNerve has inked a strategic partnership with US-based Berkeley Biologics LLC to develop and commercialise two new complementary tissue-based product ranges.

Why we need our economists to try a lot harder
Why we need our economists to try a lot harder

Sydney Morning Herald

time25-05-2025

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Why we need our economists to try a lot harder

I noticed in The Psychologist magazine one of that profession's old hands advising newbies to 'think outside the box and question everything'. What? With economists, such heretical advice would be unthinkable. In their profession, all the advice is to learn the orthodoxy and never question it. Why? Because it's the revealed truth. The weird thing is, the great project for academic economists since the 1960s has been to make their discipline more scientific. Within their universities, economists get looked down on by the physical scientists, and they hate it. They hate being regarded as one of the soft 'social' sciences, such as psychology, or worse, those lefty lightweight sociologists. So for decades they've been working to make their discipline more 'rigorous'. How? By expressing ideas about how the economy works in equations, not mere words. Trouble is, there's more to science than maths. The hallmark of a scientist is that they're searching for the truth. They have a theory about how something works, but they're beavering away to improve it, get it a bit closer to the truth. So their best guess at the truth is slowly evolving and is significantly different today than what it was 50 years ago. That's a million miles from academic economics. With most economists – practising as well as academic – their view of how the world works is virtually unchanged from one decade to the next. They've already found the truth, so nothing needs changing. The forecasts in the federal budget which are given great attention on budget night are quite unreliable, but nobody does anything about it. What do you call it when you know the unchanging truth? A religion. Economics is a secular religion, but a religion nonetheless. And when you know the truth, all that's left to do is convince the rest of the world of its truth. It's true that a minority of leading academic economists have been working on new ideas about how the economy works. The annual Nobel Prize in 'economic sciences' – which is sponsored by the Swedish central bank – is awarded to academics (not all of them economists) who have important new thoughts on economic questions.

Why we need our economists to try a lot harder
Why we need our economists to try a lot harder

The Age

time25-05-2025

  • The Age

Why we need our economists to try a lot harder

I noticed in The Psychologist magazine one of that profession's old hands advising newbies to 'think outside the box and question everything'. What? With economists, such heretical advice would be unthinkable. In their profession, all the advice is to learn the orthodoxy and never question it. Why? Because it's the revealed truth. The weird thing is, the great project for academic economists since the 1960s has been to make their discipline more scientific. Within their universities, economists get looked down on by the physical scientists, and they hate it. They hate being regarded as one of the soft 'social' sciences, such as psychology, or worse, those lefty lightweight sociologists. So for decades they've been working to make their discipline more 'rigorous'. How? By expressing ideas about how the economy works in equations, not mere words. Trouble is, there's more to science than maths. The hallmark of a scientist is that they're searching for the truth. They have a theory about how something works, but they're beavering away to improve it, get it a bit closer to the truth. So their best guess at the truth is slowly evolving and is significantly different today than what it was 50 years ago. That's a million miles from academic economics. With most economists – practising as well as academic – their view of how the world works is virtually unchanged from one decade to the next. They've already found the truth, so nothing needs changing. The forecasts in the federal budget which are given great attention on budget night are quite unreliable, but nobody does anything about it. What do you call it when you know the unchanging truth? A religion. Economics is a secular religion, but a religion nonetheless. And when you know the truth, all that's left to do is convince the rest of the world of its truth. It's true that a minority of leading academic economists have been working on new ideas about how the economy works. The annual Nobel Prize in 'economic sciences' – which is sponsored by the Swedish central bank – is awarded to academics (not all of them economists) who have important new thoughts on economic questions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store