Najib DNAA: Time for the attorney general to act and deliver reform — Dzulkifli Ahmad
The charges, filed in 2019 under then attorney general Tan Sri Tommy Thomas, involved RM27 million under the Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA). Yet, as of 2025, the prosecution has acknowledged that it is still not ready to proceed. This is more than a delay — it is a failure of prosecutorial governance that demands immediate reform.
Why this matters
1. Why charge if the case isn't ready?Prosecutions should only be brought forward when sufficient, admissible evidence is available and the prosecution is trial-ready. Anything less violates due process and undermines public trust in the legal system.
2. What happened under two successive attorneys general?Under the tenure of Tan Sri Idrus Harun and Tan Sri Ahmad Terriruddin Mohd Salleh, the case stalled with no meaningful review or resolution, pointing to a breakdown in internal accountability.
3. Does this violate constitutional rights?Yes. The prolonged delay infringes Article 5(1) — the right to a fair and expeditious trial — and Article 8(1) of the Federal Constitution, which guarantees equality before the law. Selective delays and prolonged inaction are constitutionally indefensible.
4. What does a DNAA mean?A DNAA is neither an acquittal nor a conviction — it suspends proceedings indefinitely, leaving both the accused and the public in legal and moral limbo, without resolution or closure.
Lawyer,Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah speaks to reporters on his client Datuk Seri Najib Razak's DNAA at the Kuala Lumpur High Court Complex on June 20,2025. — Picture by Yusof Mat Isa
What must be done
Under the leadership of Tan Sri Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar, the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) must take bold, decisive steps to restore institutional credibility and uphold the rule of law:
Ensure all future charges are based on sufficient, admissible evidence and are trial-ready from the outset.
Institutionalise internal review mechanisms to monitor and resolve long-pending or high-profile cases.
Drive critical reform: separate the roles of attorney general and public prosecutor to eliminate conflicts of interest and strengthen prosecutorial independence.
A justice system that works — not one that waits
Justice cannot be charged today, delayed for years, and then justified later. For public confidence in the legal system to be sustained, justice must be transparent, efficient and independent. Malaysia cannot afford a justice system where high-profile cases are charged for headlines but never tried in court.
This is not the time for institutional silence. This is the time for action.
Reform must begin with a professional, principled and prepared prosecutorial authority — and the attorney general must lead that charge without fear or favour.
* Tan Sri Dzulkifli Ahmad was a former Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) chief commissioner.
** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Malaysia hopes cross-border e-hailing with Singapore can be implemented, says Loke
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia is open to introducing cross-border e-hailing services with Singapore, but the initiative must be pursued jointly by both countries, said Transport Minister Anthony Loke. "In principle, we hope that cross-border e-hailing can be implemented," he told the Dewan Rakyat today. He was responding to Tebrau member of parliament Jimmy Puah's question on cross-border traffic congestion and e-hailing drivers. Loke said that the government was ready to discuss the matter further with Singapore, but cautioned that it could not be a unilateral decision. "As a matter of principle and policy, we are ready to discuss with Singapore to enhance cross-border connectivity, but this cannot be carried out unilaterally. Both parties must agree before it can be implemented," he added. The minister explained that any proposal to allow cross-border e-hailing required in-depth discussions at the government-to-government level. "We hope to continue these discussions and hope that Singapore will respond positively so that this idea can become a reality," he said. On Aug 3, it was reported by a news portal that cross-border e-hailing services were one of the matters discussed between Johor Menteri Besar Datuk Onn Hafiz Ghazi and Singapore Acting Transport Minister Jeffrey Siow on Aug 1. However, the island state's Land Transport Authority (LTA) clarified that no decision was made on the issue and that it has no plans to fully liberalise Singapore-Malaysia cross-border point-to-point transport via ride-hail services.
Malaysiakini
2 hours ago
- Malaysiakini
Hanipa backs Muda's Zahid re-indictment push, Umno leaders cry foul
Former deputy law minister Hanipa Maidin has thrown his weight behind Muda's campaign to reopen corruption charges against Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, while Umno leaders accuse the party of judicial interference and opportunism. In a statement today, Hanipa said that Muda has 'every right' to launch its re-indictment campaign, citing the legal principle that a prima facie case had already been established against Zahid before he was granted a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) in September 2023.
Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Widows of Elmina crash victims sue aircraft operator for negligence
In August 2023, a business jet with eight people on board crashed off the Guthrie Corridor Expressway in Bandar Elmina, Selangor, killing 10 including former Pelangai assemblyman Johari Harun and two road users. PETALING JAYA : The wife of former Pelangai assemblyman Johari Harun, who died along with two others in a plane crash near Elmina, Selangor, in August 2023, has filed a negligence suit against the operator of the light aircraft. In a statement of claim filed at the Kuala Lumpur High Court last Friday, the plaintiffs named Jet Valet Sdn Bhd and its parent entity, Koperasi Amanah Pelaburan Bhd, as defendants. The plaintiffs are Johari's wife, Maziah Sudin, as well as Tengku Erina Ungku Abdul Malek and Nizatul Akmar Nasir, the spouses of the two other victims, Naim Muaidi and Khairil Azwan Jamaluddin. They are seeking special, general, aggravated and/or exemplary damages, in addition to costs related to their husbands' funerals and bereavement. The business jet with eight people on board crashed off the Guthrie Corridor Expressway in Bandar Elmina on Aug 17, 2023, killing 10 including Johari and two road users. The aircraft, a Beechcraft Premier 1, was flying from Langkawi to Subang airport. It had been cleared to land at 2.48pm, but crashed two minutes later. The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants breached their duty of care and statutory obligations, including by failing to take adequate steps to ensure that the passengers arrived safely at Subang airport. They alleged that the defendants failed to register the plane with the Civil Aviation Authority of Malaysia and did not obtain the required approval for non-scheduled air services or for carrying passengers, as mandated by law. The defendants are also accused of exploiting regulatory grey areas to avoid stringent oversight and necessary approvals. The plaintiffs further alleged that the defendants allowed the pilot to occupy the right seat of the plane, contrary to flight manual requirements, and permitted an unqualified second-in-command to occupy the left seat and perform critical pre-landing checklist duties. The plaintiffs claimed the defendants breached contract by failing to ensure the aircraft's airworthiness and passenger safety, and violated Article 5(1) of the Federal Constitution guaranteeing the right to life. The widows additionally claimed losses related to funeral arrangements for their spouses, including RM5,000 in burial expenses and RM30,000 in bereavement costs for each of the three deceased, as well as loss of dependency to be determined by the court. The statement of claim was filed by Messrs. Tanes, Khoo & Paulraj. In August last year, the Air Accident Investigation Bureau in its final report on the crash found that the primary cause of the plane crash was the inadvertent extension of the lift dump spoilers. It said the action caused a sudden loss of lift, resulting in catastrophic loss of control and the subsequent crash, adding that it believed the co-pilot had committed the fatal error.
