Forensic Science Queensland director Linzi Wilson-Wilde suspended after 'contamination issues' identified
The director of Forensic Science Queensland (FSQ) has been immediately suspended by the state's attorney-general after "contamination issues" were identified.
Attorney-General Deb Frecklington said she moved to immediately suspend the director, Linzi Wilson-Wilde, who was appointed in September 2024, pending a show cause notice for removal.
"This action was taken following advice I received today that FSQ was placing a general pause on routine DNA testing after contamination issues were identified," Ms Frecklington said in a statement.
Ms Frecklington's office could not provide any further details on the contamination issues.
It is not known how long Dr Wilson-Wilde has to respond to the notice.
FSQ is an independent statutory authority and forensic service provider, which supports the criminal justice and coronial systems with specialised services in forensic biology and forensic chemistry.
Two commissions of inquiry, in 2022 and 2023, found serious failings over many years at the FSQ lab, including a "fatally flawed" automated testing method that might have seen offenders escaping conviction.
More than 120 recommendations were made during the commissions of inquiry to address "disturbing and troubling" issues which have meant tens of thousands of samples may need retesting.
Dr Wilson-Wilde became director in September 2024 after joining FSQ as interim chief executive in January 2023.
Ms Frecklington said FSQ's pause in operations would be for a preliminary period of seven days followed by a review to determine the next steps.
"The government has been advised FSQ will continue to progress urgent matters in a limited capacity during this time and that this can be done with appropriate controls," she said.
Ms Frecklington said the government was "firmly committed to fixing the long-standing issues at Forensic Science Queensland".
When contacted by the ABC Dr Wilson-Wilde declined to comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
19 minutes ago
- ABC News
Erin Patterson's mushroom murder trial jury soon to put the puzzle pieces together
For seven weeks, jigsaw pieces have been shaken out before the jury in Erin Patterson's triple-murder trial. Dozens of witnesses were called and exhibits ranged from photos allegedly showing death cap mushrooms being dehydrated in the lead-up to the murders, to reams of data extracted from seized electronic devices. The trial of Erin Patterson, who stands accused of using a poisoned meal to murder three relatives, continues. Look back at how Thursday's hearing unfolded in our live blog. To stay up to date with this story, subscribe to ABC News. In the trial's eighth week, the prosecution and defence used those pieces to assemble and present two contrasting pictures to the jury. The prosecution told the jury the pieces clicked into place to reveal Ms Patterson as a murderer, who had deliberately killed three relatives and attempted to murder a fourth. The lunch she had hosted at her regional Victorian home in 2023 was built on a series of deceptions, the prosecution alleged. The lethal one, lead prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC said, was Ms Patterson's lacing of the beef Wellington meals she served to her relatives. "The sinister deception was to use a nourishing meal as the vehicle to deliver a deadly poison," Dr Rogers told the Supreme Court jury. She invited the jury to consider the pieces of evidence around the "deviations" Ms Patterson made to the original beef Wellington recipe. While the method in the mother of two's cookbook called for a log of meat, individual eye fillets were used. Ms Patterson told the court that was because individual eye fillets were the only ones she could find. The prosecutor suggested that was a lie and the truth was far more calculated. "That choice to make individual portions allowed her complete control over the ingredients in each individual parcel," Dr Rogers said. "It is a control … that she exercised with devastating effect. "It allowed her to give the appearance of sharing in the same meal, whilst ensuring that she did not consume a beef Wellington parcel that she had laced with death cap mushrooms." Ms Patterson's decision to dump her food dehydrator (later found to contain death cap mushroom residue) at the tip and then lie to police about it was behaviour the prosecution said could be slotted together to form incriminating conduct. "If there was nothing incriminating about the dehydrator, why hide it?" Dr Rogers rhetorically asked the jury. "There is only one reasonable explanation: she knew it would incriminate her. "She knew that she had dehydrated death cap mushrooms in that appliance and that she had done deliberately done so, and she knew that keeping it was going to be far too risky." The prosecutor told the jury the evidence laid before them did not point to any "particular motive" for the crime, but this was not a requirement of the murder charges. "The question is not why she did this," she said. "The question you have to determine is: has the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused did this deliberately?" While not alleging a particular motive, the prosecution placed more pieces of trial evidence before the jury to fill out its puzzle. Facebook messages with friends showed Ms Patterson's animosity towards her Patterson in-laws and mockery of their deeply held religious beliefs, Dr Rogers said. "She presented one side while expressing contrary beliefs to others." In concluding her address, the prosecutor told the jury the legal bar for proving murder beyond reasonable doubt had been "well and truly met". When all of the evidence was combined, Dr Rogers suggested the jury would be satisfied the accused had deliberately sought out death caps and served them to her relatives with malicious intent. "One piece on its own or by itself might tell you not very much at all about what the picture is," she said. "But as you start putting more and more pieces together and looking at it as a whole, the picture starts to become clear." She said while jurors may feel the alleged murders were "too horrible, too cold and beyond your comprehension", they needed to remain focused on the evidence. "Don't let your emotional reaction dictate your verdict, one way or the other," Dr Rogers said. When Ms Patterson's defence barrister Colin Mandy SC rose to his feet, he told the jury the absence of an alleged motive meant the prosecution's jigsaw was incomplete. "Without a motive, you're left guessing about the most important element of the offence in this trial and that's intention," Mr Mandy said. He walked through some of the tense communications between the accused and her estranged husband Simon Patterson several months before the lunch. But he said the picture they painted was a fairly ordinary one of two separated people managing the joint care of their young children. "There is nothing unusual about it. In fact, quite the opposite," Mr Mandy said. "It would be in some cases unusual if there wasn't that kind of spat or disagreement or frustration. He accused the prosecution of putting before the jury a series of "ridiculous, convoluted propositions" that were not supported by the evidence. He said Ms Patterson's simpler explanation of a dreadful "accident" was a truthful one that had emerged "unscathed" after days of cross-examination. "Her account remained coherent and consistent, day after day after day, even when challenged, rapid fire, from multiple angles, repeatedly," he said. Under that explanation, a Tupperware container in Ms Patterson's Leongatha pantry contained a mix of dried mushrooms from an Asian grocer and ones she had foraged from the Gippsland region. In that mix, Mr Mandy suggested, were the death cap mushrooms later added to the lunch. "The prosecution says she had them deliberately, the defence says she had them accidentally," he said. He told them Ms Patterson's actions after the lunch were the panic of an innocent woman in the aftermath of a ghastly accident. "Erin got into the witness box and told you, she did those things because she panicked when confronted with the terrible possibility, terrible realisation, that her actions had caused the illnesses of people that she loved," he said. In closing, Mr Mandy told jurors the prosecution had tried to "force the evidence to fit their theory in a way that does not apply to jigsaw puzzle pieces". "Stretching interpretations, ignoring alternative explanations because they don't align perfectly with the narrative," he said. "Missing puzzle pieces in a jigsaw puzzle can make the picture incomplete, but missing evidence is much more significant." He reminded the jury that if they did not accept all of Ms Patterson's evidence as truthful, they needed to set it to the side and consider whether the evidence actually existed to prove murder and attempted murder beyond reasonable doubt. After both sides in a trial that has astounded observers around the world had finished their address, the judge indicated the most important part lay ahead. Justice Christopher Beale will begin delivering his final instructions to the jury on Tuesday, which he said would break down the legal principles at stake in the case. After that, it will fall to the jury to begin piecing the puzzle together themselves.
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Mum, 62, reveals how she lost incredible 30kg after her weight hit 119kgs
Welcome to You Got This, weekly fitness series featuring stories and ideas from real women who've experienced it all. A woman has revealed how she lost more than 30kg after years of being in physical and mental pain. Robyn Stronach weight had increase to 119kg and her body was struggling. She was regularly experiencing shortness of breath and her mental health was detoriating. She was also battling with metabolic syndrome, failed gastric sleeve surgery and a strong family history of heart disease. Mrs Stronach, from Queensland, was a borderline diabetic heading towards an early death as her cholesterol rose. 'I would stress eat anything and everything — and not three meals a day,' she told 'It was all day. As sad as it sounds, I was a bottomless pit. I thought I was feeling happy when I ate. Little did I realise it was making me miserable.' At the age of 59, she decided she desperately needed to lower her weight and improve her fitness. She'd always been someone who didn't like mixed gender gyms and felt embarrassed to go. Her daughter insisted she come along to F45 Ormeau with her and her niece, something she said was 'so hard' at her age. 'There were two trainers I will always hold close to my heart. They encouraged me to the point that I tell everyone they saved my life,' she said. 'They always encouraged and supported me, in general they were just my super heroes.' After countless hours in the gym, Ms Stronach lost 31kg and improved her physical and mental health. She did this while working full time in a hospital, being her mum's carer, looking after her husband who has cancer and being a mum and grandmother to nine children. 'My daughter and I get up most mornings at 3.50am to be at the 4.30am class,' she said. 'If I can't make that class due to work or other obligations, I then go later in the day. I try really hard to complete five days a week minimum.' She says her journey is still ongoing and praised her trainers for her results so far. 'I realised through F45 that age is not a limitation,' she said. 'There are some things I just can't do — like box jumps due to a degenerate lower back but I don't let this stop me. I modify my exercises to suit my old injuries and new. I forget my age and go too far,' she said. Mrs Stronach also said she does her best to encourage new members, paying forward the encouragement given to her. 'My goal next year is to do a Hyrox challenge. That is where my son comes in with his energy and encouragement. I have just started running. I want to be a good role model for my grandchildren who can see their grandmother fit and healthy.'
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Witness describes viral moment ‘d***head' trapped in Melbourne bottle shop
The still image of a bungled, broad-daylight shoplifting attempt in Melbourne is like a renaissance painting. I mean, just look at this thing: In the top of frame you have the would-be thief staring hopelessly at an automatic door sensor with a 12-pack of Jack Daniels cans in his hands. To the left, his accomplice is fixated on his phone, calculating exactly how pear-shaped this thing has gone in his peripheral vision. A witness in the centre of the picture, trying to purchase a single stubby after knock-off, watches on in disbelief at what might be the most awkward and pathetic attempt at pilfering ever caught on film. And to the bottom right is the protagonist — the central figure who drives the entire visual narrative with his left index finger holding power over everyone. No notes. It is perfect. The scene, which played out southeast of Melbourne at The Bottle-O store in Wantirna, has resurfaced online in viral videos recently, despite the fact that it is three years old. You can watch the whole painful scene below if you are into second-hand embarrassment and cringing. Three years after the footage first emerged, has tracked down the one and only in-person witness to the incident. The man in the black shirt, shorts and boots — whose solitary beer is an admirable example of moderation — is Darren. He says he stopped by that store almost every night for one beer back in 2022. On August 11 at 5.05pm he was going about his daily business. 'I used to go there every night after work to grab beers,' he said. 'On that night, I put my beer on the counter and two young blokes were standing behind me. 'One of them reached out and grabbed the drinks and tried to make a run for it. The guy behind the counter was that quick with the button. 'I thought to myself, 'You d***head, you're gone'. I sort of chuckled to myself. It was a comedy.' The clerk, who sold the store to new owners in 2024 and could not be tracked down for comment, can be seen in the video with his finger on the automatic door remote long before the bumbling thief makes his move. The video has no audio of the interaction, but Darren says the clerk told the young man 'put that back, put that back'. 'I said, 'Can I get out?' I think he was just telling them off.' Darren spoke to the owner of the Wantirna Mall bottle shop a few days later about the incident and what he told him was a shock. 'He said he gets it every day.' Online, the video has been shared 49,000 times after it was reposted in mid-May. 'The way his friend didn't even look up,' wrote one person. 'The way he had to stand there and simmer in his embarrassment. Gold,' wrote another. reached out to Australian Liquor Marketers, which owns The Bottle-O brand, in an attempt to speak with our moral champion behind the counter about dishing out daily lessons to youths. They did not respond. The Crime Statistics Agency, which curates data about offences carried out in Victoria each year, has some staggering insights. It shows the number of theft offences recorded in Victoria in the year ending March 2025 was 240,210. That's a lot, but it's skyrocketing compared to previous years. The 240,000-odd recorded thefts, which does not take into account theft that was not reported, is the highest ever recorded. It is 60,000 more than in 2024 and 85,000 more than 2023. Thefts in 2022 were 139,485. Would've been a lot higher if old mate from Wantirna Bottle-O wasn't holding down the fort.
