Judge officially clears Joshua Riibe in Pitt student Sudiksha Konanki's spring break DR disappearance
On Friday, Judge Edwin Rijo issued the full written sentence detailing the legal reasoning behind his decision to grant the habeas corpus motion filed on behalf of 22-year-old Joshua Steven Ribe, officially concluding the case against him.
The detailed judgment does not constitute a new decision, the statement read, as the original ruling, announced at the conclusion of the hearing on March 17, was immediately valid and enforceable.
A Dominican Republic judge ruled in favor of Riibe's writ of habeas corpus, giving him the ability to move freely within the country until his March 28 hearing.
Riibe had been holed up in the Riu Republica under strict police monitoring for 11 days before a judge ruled the situation violated Dominican law. His restrictions also included having his cellphone and passport confiscated.
Riibe's attorneys successfully argued in court that, as a witness, not a suspect, police control over his movements over an 11-day span was unlawful.
"On March 18th, following the conclusion of the habeas corpus hearing that ordered the release of our client, Joshua Riib, the Prosecutor's Office of La Altagracia informed him of their readiness to return his passport," Riibe's attorneys said. "While Joshua appreciated this decision, he chose, for privacy reasons, to apply for a new passport at the U.S. Consulate, which was promptly issued.
Riibe is believed to be one of the last people who saw Konanki, 20, before she vanished in the early morning hours of March 6 from the beach behind their resort, the Riu Republica in Punta Cana.
Surveillance video shows he and Konanki went to the beach with a group around 4:15 a.m., the morning she vanished. Most of them were seen leaving around 6 a.m. Riibe and Konanki remained on the beach. Riibe came back by himself hours later, and Konanki's whereabouts remain unknown nearly two weeks later.
According to a leaked transcript of an interview with police, Riibe told investigators he and Konanki were both pulled away from the shore by a strong current, and they struggled to make it back. He last saw her walking in knee-deep water before he vomited and fell asleep on a beach chair.
Her parents, in a letter to Dominican authorities, asked for her to be declared dead on Monday, March 17, citing the lack of evidence of foul play and Riibe's continued cooperation with investigators.
"Our firm remains committed to upholding due process and the constitutional guarantees established under Article 69 of our Constitution," a representative from Guzmán Ariza shared in a press release. "This ruling reinforces these fundamental principles and strengthens confidence in the justice system of the Dominican Republic."
"This favorable outcome was achieved through the dedication and tireless efforts of our legal team. Guzmán Ariza remains steadfast in its commitment to defending the rule of law, ensuring nationals and foreign citizens alike can trust in the protection of their fundamental rights in the Dominican Republic."
Stepheny Price is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business. She covers topics including missing persons, homicides, national crime cases, illegal immigration, and more. Story tips and ideas can be sent to stepheny.price@fox.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
5 hours ago
- UPI
Tulsi Gabbard revokes security clearance for 37 intelligence officials
Aug. 19 (UPI) -- National Security Director Tulsi Gabbard has revoked the security clearances for 37 current and former intelligence officials, as directed by President Donald Trump. Gabbard acknowledged that the president directed her to revoke the security clearances in a social media post that she made on Tuesday afternoon. "Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right," Gabbard said. "Those in the intelligence community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the interests of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold," she added. Gabbard's post includes a copy of the department memorandum that was circulated on Monday and lists the 37 officials whose security clearances are revoked. Among those whose security clearances are revoked is Maher Bitar, who worked for Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., when he was the House Intelligence Committee chairman during the first impeachment effort against President Donald Trump in 2019, The Hill reported. The Biden administration's National Security Council spokeswoman Emily Horne and Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research Brett Holmgren also are among those who lost their security clearances. Others with revoked clearances include officials who held senior positions within the State Department, the CIA, the National Security Agency, the Defense Department and the National Security Council, according to Politico. Several formerly advised Biden when he was the vice president under former President Barack Obama, and some also were involved in the investigation into claims that Trump colluded with Russia ahead of the 2016 election. The revocations are effective immediately, and those whose security clearances are revoked also have any related contracts or employment terminated and must surrender their credentials to security officers, Fox News reported. The revocations prompted criticism alleging that the Trump administration did so for political purposes. "Further proof of weaponization and politicization," Mark Zaid, a national security attorney, said in a post on X. He said most of those who lost their security clearances "are dedicated public servants who have worked across multiple presidential administrations." The Trump administration also revoked Zaid's prior security clearance. Many who lost their clearance also had spoken to media regarding decisions made by the Trump administration, according to The Hill.
USA Today
6 hours ago
- USA Today
Tulsi Gabbard revokes security clearances of 37 former intelligence officials
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announced on Aug. 19 that President Donald Trump had directed her office to revoke security clearances from 37 former intelligence officials for 'politicizing and manipulating intelligence.' 'Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right. Those in the Intelligence Community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the interests of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold,' she wrote in an X post that contained a memo her office had sent out. 'In doing so, they undermine our national security, the safety and security of the American people and the foundational principles of our democratic republic.' The former officials who are all accused of 'leaking classified intelligence without authorization,' include Biden administration officials Emily Horne, a spokesperson for the National Security Council, and Dilpreet Sidhu, who served as a deputy chief of staff at the National Security Council. Last month, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence released a report that claimed to demonstrate how the former President Barack Obama and his national security Cabinet had 'manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup' against Trump after he had defeated Hillary Clinton in 2016. Obama's office dismissed the claims as another example of the constant "nonsense and misinformation" that emanates out of the White House. 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes," Obama's office said in a statement on July 22. 'These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio.' Rubio now serves as Trump's secretary of state. On his first day in office, Trump revoked the security clearance of his former national security adviser John Bolton as well as his Secret Service protection.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Judge denies Ralph Menzies' request for another competency evaluation
Ralph Menzies appears during his commutation hearing before the parole board at the Utah State Correctional Facility in Salt Lake City as he petitions to stop his execution by firing squad on Wednesday, Aug. 13, 2025. (Pool photo by Bethany Baker/The Salt Lake Tribune) A judge has denied a request from Utah death row inmate Ralph Menzies to undergo another evaluation to see if he's competent to be executed, clearing a major hurdle for the state to proceed with his firing squad execution. Utah 3rd District Judge Matthew Bates denied the 67-year-old inmate's request on Thursday morning, writing that he is 'unpersuaded' by the claim that Menzies, who has dementia, is mentally unfit to be executed. State and federal law prohibit executing inmates who don't have a 'rational understanding' of why they're being executed, which essentially means they can't grasp the government's reasoning behind pursuing the death penalty. For much of the last year, attorneys have tried to argue that Menzies lacks that understanding. Menzies underwent a competency evaluation about a year ago, where doctors commissioned by the state, and his attorneys, reviewed the inmate's cognitive abilities. In June, Bates ruled that he does have dementia, but was not incompetent. Menzies' attorneys say terminal illness and good behavior are reasons to spare him from firing squad Menzies' attorneys then filed a petition for another review in July, arguing that Menzies' dementia has worsened — that's what Bates denied on Thursday. Menzies, convicted of kidnapping and murdering Maurine Hunsaker in 1988, is scheduled to die on Sept. 5. His attorneys still have a pending appeal with the Utah Supreme Court, with arguments set for next week. The Utah Board of Pardons and Parole is also holding a commutation hearing, where board members could vote to impose a life sentence without the possibility of parole (although that has never happened in Utah). But Bates' ruling on Thursday allows the Utah Department of Corrections to continue moving forward with their plans to execute Menzies. Had they ruled in his favor, it would have likely paused execution proceedings, giving doctors time to conduct their evaluation. Both Menzies' attorney and Matt Hunsaker — Maruine's son — reacted to the news Thursday. Hunsaker said he was 'very pleased' with the ruling. 'I had no doubt that Judge Bates spent a lot of time and a lot of effort,' Hunsaker said. 'I'm happy that this step is over and that we can now focus on getting this commutation (hearing) over as well.' Eric Zuckerman, Menzies' attorney, called the ruling disappointing, telling Utah News Dispatch that it 'may result in the execution of a man who does not understand why he is being executed.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX 'Mr. Menzies has not been evaluated by an independent evaluator for over a year and to proceed with his execution without an assessment of his current cognitive functioning offends the Constitution and will not serve the ends of justice,' Zuckerman said. Bates, in his ruling, cited phone calls from the prison that show Menzies is still able to hold conversations and understand the basics of his case. There is a change in his voice, Bates writes, which 'sounds weaker and more tired.' 'Even so, Menzies is able to speak with a normal speed. He is able to ask questions, track conversations, and laugh at appropriate times. He remembers names of family members, makes plans with family to visit, and even gives a brief update on his court case. Nothing in the current phone conversations demonstrate a substantial change in his cognitive functioning,' the ruling reads. Bates also said there's a lack of evidence showing that he's disoriented, impaired or doesn't have a basic understanding of the concept of crime and punishment. 'He had a sense of time and place. He was not confused about who the examiners were, who he was, or where he was,' Bates wrote. Instead, Bates found the reports and evidence submitted simply show that Menzies is physically struggling, with a memory that isn't as good as it used to be — not enough to be deemed incompetent. 'Forgetfulness, an inability to concentrate, and a paucity of language do not amount to a lack of an ability to reach a rational understanding of the link between crime and punishment. Menzies has not alleged sufficient facts or provided sufficient evidence that raises a significant question of whether Menzies is incapable of understanding that he is being executed because he killed Maureen Hunsaker,' Bates wrote. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE Solve the daily Crossword
