Three Arrows founders fail in appeal for orders to disclose crypto fund dealings to be set aside
[SINGAPORE] The Court of Appeal on Tuesday (Jun 24) dismissed an application by the founders of Three Arrows Capital (3AC) to set aside orders requiring them to disclose their dealings with their now-defunct cryptocurrency fund.
Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon, however, overturned a lower court decision that allowed liquidators to examine its co-founder Zhu Su following the collapse of 3AC in 2022.
In October 2022, 3AC and its two founders, Zhu and Kyle Davies, were ordered by the court to disclose their dealings with the hedge fund – including any relevant books, papers, or records – to liquidators.
However, both Zhu and Davies failed to comply with the disclosure order, prompting the liquidators to file two orders initiating contempt of court proceedings against them. Both men were subsequently sentenced to four months' jail for the offence.
In 2023, Zhu and Davies applied to the court to have all three orders set aside, which was dismissed. They took their appeal against that decision to the Court of Appeal, in a hearing in April.
Separately, following Zhu's arrest on Sep 29, 2023, liquidators sought an examination order from the court, believing that his incarceration will give them an opportunity to obtain more information about the affairs of the cryptocurrency fund.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Following this, the liquidators commenced proceedings against Zhu and Davies in the British Virgin Islands, in which they sought to recover US$66 million which Zhu allegedly owed to the hedge fund.
Zhu then applied for the examination order, as well as further orders for him to provide additional answers and appear for further examination, to be set aside. This application was also dismissed.
'Deliberate decision' to evade liquidators
In his judgement, the Chief Justice ruled that the lower court had correctly dismissed the founders' applications to set aside the disclosure order, as well as the two orders relating to the contempt of court proceedings.
In the April hearing, Zhu and Davies' lawyers were under the impression that they were cooperating with the liquidators' requests for information and did not think that committal orders would be sought against them.
But this is 'no answer at all', said Chief Justice Menon, who noted that the founders were aware of the disclosure order by Jan 5, 2023, but had no explanation as to why they waited 10 months before filing to have the orders set aside. Their applications were also made well after the 14-day deadline prescribed in the Rules of Court 2021.
Furthermore, Zhu and Davies' argument that they thought they had been cooperating with liquidators in good faith 'said nothing about whether the setting-aside applications had been brought within time, or whether there were grounds for extending time', he added.
'We are with the inference the judge drew, which is that (Zhu and Davies) deliberately chose not to take any steps to set aside the disclosure order because they thought they could remain out of reach of its enforcement.
'In such circumstances, we see no good reason why (Zhu and Davies) should be allowed to revisit the question 10 months later of whether the disclosure order should even have been made against them in the first place.'
'A delay of this time is patently unreasonable,' he added. 'Therefore, we hold that (the founders) were out of time to bring the setting-aside applications against the disclosure order.'
The Chief Justice also noted that Zhu and Davies, being the only directors of 3AC, chose to discharge the company's lawyers a few days before the hearing for the disclosure order was to be heard.
'(This) suggested a deliberate decision by (Zhu and Davies) to evade the efforts of the liquidators to gather the necessary information pertaining to the company,' he wrote.
As for the application relating to the examination order, Chief Justice Menon said the order is not an appropriate means for the liquidators to obtain information from the founders. This is given that the liquidators already intended to commence proceedings to sue Zhu and Davies in the British Virgin Islands shortly before making the order.
Since the liquidators had already decided they wanted to sue the founders, they should be subject to the constraints imposed by the rules of civil procedure, he added.
The court set aside the examination order, but made orders to resolve the outstanding issues arising from the lower court's earlier decision to grant it.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
43 minutes ago
- Business Times
FedEx forecasts profits below analysts' target, shares dive 5% after hours
[LOS ANGELES] FedEx signalled caution ahead with a forecast for the current quarter that was short of the target set by analysts, and shares of the delivery giant dived more than 5 per cent after the bell. The Memphis-based company forecast fiscal first-quarter adjusted profit of US$3.40 to US$4 per share. That was below analysts' estimates of US$4.06 per share, according to data compiled by LSEG. FedEx and many other companies have been grappling with deep uncertainty over US trade policies and regional tensions, most recently Israel's attack on Iran. US President Donald Trump's whiplash tariffs on China and pending deals with many other trading partners have forced executives to put business plans on hold until they have more certainty on product costs. 'The global demand environment remains volatile,' CEO Raj Subramaniam said on an earnings webcast. 'Trade policies are evolving and trade patterns are changing.' BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up FedEx is more exposed to China trade than rival United Parcel Service (UPS), whose shares were down less than 1 per cent. Washington slapped 145 per cent tariffs on China in April, freezing trade between the superpowers, before lowering them to 30 per cent in May. FedEx and UPS are considered economic bellwethers because they work with virtually every type of company around the globe and spot business trends before they become widely visible. FedEx declined to give full-year earnings and profit forecasts, overshadowing better-than-expected results for the fiscal fourth quarter that ended May 31, when the firm said cost cuts and improved export volumes pushed operating margins higher. Adjusted profit was US$1.46 billion, or US$6.07 per share, for the fiscal fourth quarter ended May 31, up from adjusted profit of US$1.34 billion, or US$5.41 per share, a year earlier. Revenue was US$22.2 billion, up from US$22.1 billion. Analysts, on average, expected earnings of US$5.81 per share on revenue of US$21.8 billion, according to LSEG. FedEx and UPS have been locked in a long battle for market share, with demand stalled from manufacturers and other industrial customers. Delivery profits have been squeezed as many customers downshifted from fast, pricey air services to slower, lower-cost ground shipments moved by trucks and trains. Both FedEx and UPS used air volume from China-linked bargain sellers such as Temu and Shein to help replace lost business-to-business volume. But after a botched attempt early this year, Trump's administration in May ended duty-free treatment for direct-to-consumer shipments valued at less than US$800 from China, stopping millions of air parcels from Temu, Shein and other retailers. Separately, FedEx said it plans to spin off its trucking business in June of 2026. REUTERS
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
It's not just Labubu dolls. Chinese brands are booming
LABUBU dolls are hard to come by. Even at the giant flagship store of their maker, Pop Mart, in Shanghai, throngs of customers are told they need to wait a week or longer. The grimacing elvish creatures, which come in 'blind boxes' that keep buyers in suspense over which one they might get, sell for as little as US$20. But a rare variety sold for US$150,000 at an auction on Jun 10. It is not just Chinese children trying to get their hands on the dolls; celebrities including David Beckham, a British ex-football player, and Rihanna, an American pop star, have recently gone public with their appreciation. The Labubu craze has sent Pop Mart's shares up by 170 per cent since the start of the year. It is one of a growing cohort of Chinese consumer brands whose popularity is surging. For decades Chinese shoppers tended to look overseas for the latest trends in cosmetics, fashion, hospitality and more. Now they are flocking to local luxury firms, high-end make-up brands and milk tea shops. What is more, many of these brands are gaining a devoted following abroad. Western brands should be worried. It is an odd time for a boom among Chinese consumer products. Sputtering economic growth has caused household spending to weaken. Yet the strain on Chinese shoppers' wallets is one of the factors propelling local brands. As consumers have become more price sensitive, cheap but decent quality home-grown brands have thrived. Many urban Chinese coffee drinkers, for example, have found local chains such as Cotti or Luckin just as good as Starbucks, an American company, but often half as expensive. Laopu Gold, a Chinese maker of luxury jewellery, has found success selling elegant bracelets and earrings that tend to be cheaper than those offered by Tiffany & Co, another American stalwart. Songmont, a local handbag brand, has launched a costly advertising campaign in airports across the country, pitting itself against foreign competitors that are often twice as expensive, or more. Part of Pop Mart's success with Labubu dolls has come from targeting frugal spenders with high-quality, 'emotive' products, says Lina Yan of HSBC. Yet consumer downgrading is only part of the explanation for the buzz around Chinese brands. In many cases, shoppers are paying just as much or more for local equivalents. For instance, the best-selling products at Chagee, a tea chain that went public in New York in April, are tea lattes that sell for 15-20 yuan (S$2.70-3.60), on par with Starbucks' top products in China. The group has marketed itself as a premium brand, not a budget one, notes Han Zhang of Deutsche Bank, another lender. The fastest-growing segment of electric vehicles in China is not the cheapest but those priced at between 200,000 and 400,000 yuan, considered 'entry-level luxury'. Foreign carmakers have long dominated this market segment, but many popular new models in this range are from local rivals such as Nio and Li Auto. Chinese consumers are also now far less enamoured with foreign goods simply because they are foreign. Laopu's rapid rise is proof of that. The firm, which sells intricate gold jewellery with a distinct Chinese flair, has managed to keep its sales per store above 300 million yuan, at least 50 per cent higher than most of its foreign rivals. Its share price is up by more than 2,000 per cent since it listed in Hong Kong about a year ago. It is one of only a small number of home-grown luxury brands in China. The industry has long been dominated by foreign firms. But most of them are now doing poorly in the country. Western luxury brands once filled a gap simply because there were no real local alternatives, says Amber Zhang of BigOne Lab, a research firm. However, 'that doesn't mean Chinese consumers naturally resonate with the design or cultural message of those Western brands'. Rather than trying to appear Western, both Laopu and Chagee have flaunted their Chineseness. It has worked. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Fans argue that, despite its lower prices, Laopu's materials and design are of higher quality than most foreign offerings. This points to another shift in spending habits in China: shoppers are better informed about products today than they used to be, mainly thanks to social media. Many feel that they have been fleeced by foreign companies that were able to sell at inflated prices purely by not being Chinese. Today, young women scour the labels of cosmetics brands to find local products with the same active ingredients as foreign ones but at lower prices, notes an industry analyst. That has helped yet another hit Chinese brand, a cosmetics maker called Mao Geping, which raised US$300 million in an initial public offering in Hong Kong in December. Its share price has soared by about 250 per cent since then. Home-grown cosmetics companies have been trying to steal share from foreign firms such as L'Oreal and Estee Lauder for years, but have struggled to compete at the pricier end of the market. Mao Geping, which is named after its founder, a famous make-up artist, has become the first local company to make it onto the list of the top ten high-end make-up brands in China. Whereas foreign firms tend to focus on the country's largest cities, local brands operate farther afield. Many got their start in smaller inland cities. Chagee opened its first store in the city of Kunming, in the south-western province of Yunnan, in 2017, and most of its shops remain outside rich coastal areas. Mixue, a cold-drink chain, started as a shaved-ice stand in one of China's poorer provinces. The country's most popular fast-food brands have mainly expanded in smaller cities before trying their luck in places such as Beijing and Shanghai. Hoteliers are doing the same. H World, a Chinese hotel chain, will open about half of its new properties in third and fourth-tier cities over the next year, says He Jihong, its chief strategist. Foreign hotel chains are much less active in small cities. This could be one factor keeping H World's hotels fuller than those of foreign rivals. Its occupancy rate was above 80 per cent last year, while the figure for Marriott International, an American chain with a large presence in China, fell below 70 per cent, making the country one of its worst performing regions. The focus on small cities is important because spending there appears healthier than in big cities. Purchases of fast-moving consumer goods, such as packaged food and beauty products, expanded by 5.5 per cent in 2024 in cities with fewer than one million people, whereas they shrank by 4.6 per cent in the biggest cities, according to Bain, a consultancy. Foreign brands in China are scrambling to fend off their new competitors. Lavazza, an Italian coffee chain, has tried selling salted-duck-egg coffee, with limited success. Some Western businesses, including Starbucks and Haagen-Dazs, an ice-cream chain owned by General Mills, an American food giant, are reportedly sounding out local investors for their Chinese operations in an effort to inject new ideas. The competitive threat is not contained to China. Pop Mart now has stores in more than 20 countries, including at least 37 in America. Mixue can be found across South-east Asia. Chagee will have more than 1,300 shops outside China by the end of the year, up from almost none four years ago. And analysts believe that the more foreign recognition these brands get, the more popular they become within China. The social media craze in the West over Labubu dolls is thought to be adding to their local cachet. For decades, retail trends swept into China from abroad. Those days may be ending. ©2025 The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved
Business Times
11 hours ago
- Business Times
Indonesia's sovereign wealth fund Danantara loans US$405 million to flag carrier Garuda
[JAKARTA] Indonesian sovereign wealth fund Danantara will extend a US$405 million loan to Garuda Indonesia to help the distressed flag carrier turn around finances and expand its fleet in the coming years. Garuda chief executive officer Wamildan Tsani Panjaitan said in a briefing on Tuesday (Jun 24) that the shareholder loan would be the first step in a 'comprehensive transformation' of the airline that will include long-term financing based on performance. The move confirms an earlier Bloomberg News report of funding plans. He added that the airline group plans to grow its fleet to 120 aircraft over the next five years. Garuda and its low-cost unit Citilink operated 98 aircraft as at March, down from 103 a year earlier. Garuda will receive about US$111 million of the funding, with the remainder going to Citilink for maintenance of about 15 grounded jets, said Prasetio, the carrier's director of finance and risk management. Danantara chief operating officer Dony Oskaria, speaking at the same briefing, added that global expertise would be brought in to aid Garuda's business plans. State-controlled Garuda booked a net loss in 2024 after two years of profit following a post-pandemic travel boom. In November, the airline appointed Panjaitan as its new leader tasked with fixing its finances and expanding its global network. The Indonesian government transfered its 65 per cent stake in the airline to Danantara earlier this year as part of President Prabowo Subianto's overhaul of the management of state-owned enterprises. BLOOMBERG
